Dear editors,
Solid organ transplant recipients face a substantially elevated risk of post-transplant malignancies due to lifelong immunosuppression and impaired viral immune surveillance []. While most post-transplant tumors are de novo, donor-derived tumors (DDTs) represent a rare, highly informative biological model arising from engrafted donor-derived cells that behave as tumor-initiating cells (TICs) within the recipient host [, ]. Here, we report a unique case of donor-derived high-grade urothelial carcinoma originating in a two-time kidney transplant recipient with chronic JC polyomavirus (JCPyV) infection, highlighting a complex interplay between chronic viral inflammation, persistent immunosuppression, and donor-cell somatic mutation [, ].
A 59-year-old male with end-stage renal disease initially received a kidney transplant from a deceased male donor (karyotype XY) in 2006. Seven years post-transplantation, he developed JCPyV-associated nephropathy, leading to graft failure. In 2021, he received a second kidney transplant from a deceased female donor (karyotype XX). Despite immunosuppressive adjustment with everolimus, JCPyV replication persisted at high levels in plasma, urine, and cerebrospinal fluid. Two years after the second transplant, the patient presented with macrohematuria. Work-up revealed a high-grade invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder involving the left ureteral orifice, requiring bilateral native and graft nephroureterectomy with radical cystectomy. To elucidate the cellular origin and oncogenic drivers of the lesion, six fresh tissue specimens were collected from native and transplanted structures. Multiplex QF-PCR short tandem repeat (STR) analysis (Elucigene QST*Rplusv2) and in vitro primary tissue culture in Chang medium were conducted. Targeted Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) covering 67 cancer-related genes (Archer VariantPlex Solid Tumor Kit) was performed on both the neoplastic lesion and macroscopically normal tissues (Figure 1).
FIGURE 1
STR profiling revealed that non-neoplastic native tissues (native bladder and native ureters) shared an identical recipient haplotype (XY). In contrast, the left transplanted ureter and the hyperemic bladder carcinoma displayed a distinct XX donor genotype, interspersed with recipient-derived allelic peaks indicative of local cellular chimerism. Primary cells isolated from the hyperemic bladder area and the left transplanted ureter were successfully expanded over five passages in culture, acquiring an immortalized phenotype with a homogeneous XX donor karyotype.
Targeted NGS identified a specific PIK3CA mutation (c.1571G>A, p.Arg524Lys) in both the hyperemic bladder carcinoma and the macroscopically normal left transplanted ureter. No other pathogenic variants were detected across the 67-gene panel. Real-time PCR confirmed JCPyV DNA persistence across all tissue specimens (range: 3.2 × 104 to 1.1 × 105 copies/mL), although viral DNA was absent in the expanded in vitro cellular pellets, excluding direct ongoing viral integration within the cultured neoplastic clone.
The concordant STR profiles obtained from tumor tissue and cultured cells, together with the clonal expansion of XX cells in vitro and the detection of the same PIK3CA mutation in both ureteral and bladder lesions, strongly support a donor-derived origin of the tumor-initiating cells rather than a secondary infiltration or mosaic event. Rather than a late passenger event, this PIK3CA substitution—located within the helical domain of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway—appears to represent an early somatic alteration present in engrafted donor cells [, ]. We hypothesize a model wherein donor-derived TICs harboring the PIK3CA variant migrated from the transplanted ureter to the bladder mucosa.
Importantly, JCPyV likely contributed to tumor development indirectly via a “field effect” mechanism []. Chronic viral infection induced localized, severe chronic cystitis, establishing an inflamed microenvironment. Synergizing with systemic immunosuppression, this permissive inflammatory niche favored the engraftment, survival, and subsequent clonal expansion of donor-derived TICs.
This case is more than a rare oncologic curiosity—it provides a living model of early carcinogenesis. In a scenario where donor and recipient cells are genomically distinguishable, chimerism could enable the tracking of tumor initiation from its earliest steps, allowing the isolation of the first altered cells, those that silently pave the way for clinical cancer long before dysplasia becomes evident.
Current sequencing efforts focus largely on late-stage tumors, where all cancer cells share the same set of “public mutations,” masking the founding event of transformation. Here, we had the rare opportunity to detect that founding event in a context where the neoplastic population emerged from a known origin and timeline, offering an unparalleled view of tumor initiation in vivo.
This case demonstrates that molecular chimerism analysis combined with targeted genomic profiling of non-neoplastic tissues can track the earliest stages of donor-derived oncogenesis in vivo. Extending genomic surveillance beyond traditional clinical timelines may improve cancer risk stratification and early detection in solid organ transplant recipients [,].
Statements
Data availability statement
The datasets presented in this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Ethics statement
Ethical approval was not required for the studies involving humans because this study reports a single retrospective clinical case managed according to standard medical practice, without any experimental intervention or deviation from routine care. All analyses were performed on samples collected for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes, and the manuscript was prepared using fully anonymized patient data in accordance with institutional policies. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study. Written informed consent was obtained from the individual for the publication of any potentially identifiable images or data included in this article.
Author contributions
GI, DD, MG, PB, SL, DF, and AB contributed to data collection and experimental procedures; GC, DD, SL supervised the project and provided critical resources; GI and AB drafted the manuscript; and all authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Funding
The author(s) declared that financial support was not received for this work and/or its publication.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Prof. Carlo Previderè and Julien Giron-Michel for believing in and supporting this project from its inception.
Conflict of interest
The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declared that generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.
Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.
References
1.
EngelsEAPfeifferRMFraumeniJFJrKasiskeBLIsraniAKSnyderJJet alSpectrum of cancer risk among US solid organ transplant recipients. JAMA (2011) 306(17):1891–901. 10.1001/jama.2011.1592
2.
GandhiMJStrongDM. Donor derived malignancy following transplantation: a review. Cell Tissue Bank (2007) 8(4):267–86. 10.1007/s10561-007-9036-1
3.
EccherAGirolamiIMotterJDMarlettaSGambaroGMomoRENet alDonor-transmitted cancer in kidney transplant recipients: a systematic review. J. Nephrol. (2020) 33(6):1329–1344.
4.
KauffmanHMMcBrideMACherikhWSSpainPCMarksWHRozaAM. Transplant tumor registry: donor related malignancies. Transplantation (2002) 74(3):358–62. 10.1097/00007890-200208150-00011
5.
VerineJVarnaMRatajczakPEl-BouchtaouiMLeboeufCPlassaLFet alA Human de novo papillary renal-cell carcinomas in a kidney graft: evidence of recipient origin with adenoma-carcinoma sequence. Am J Transpl (2013) 13(4):984–992. 10.1111/ajt.12163
6.
SamuelsYWangZBardelliASillimanNPtakJSzaboSet alHigh frequency of mutations of the PIK3CA gene in human cancers. Science (2004) 304(5670):554. 10.1126/science.1096502
7.
JankuFWhelerJJWestinSNMoulderSLNaingATsimberidouAMet alPI3K/AKT/mTOR inhibitors in patients with breast and gynecologic malignancies harboring PIK3CA mutations. J Clin Oncol (2012) 30(8):777–82. 10.1200/JCO.2011.36.1196
8.
MertzKDPfaltzMJuntTSchmidMFernandez FiguerasMTPfaltzKet alJC virus large T antigen expression in bladder cancer: a clinicopathologic study of 94 cases. Am J Surg Pathol (2007) 31(6):888–94.
9.
DesaiRCollettDWatsonCJJohnsonPEvansTNeubergerJ. Cancer transmission from organ donors--unavoidable but low risk. Transplantation (2012) 94(12):1200–7. 10.1097/TP.0b013e318272df41
10.
IsonMGNalesnikMA. An update on donor-derived disease transmission in organ transplantation. Am J Transpl (2011) 11(6):1123–30. 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2011.03493.x
Summary
Keywords
chimerism, donor-derived neoplasms, JC virus (polyomavirus JC), kidney transplantation, PIK3CA mutation
Citation
Ietto G, Dalla Gasperina D, Gritti M, Brani P, La Rosa S, Furlan D, Inversini D, Balzano G, Carcano G, Pettinato G and Baj A (2026) A chimeric bladder tumor in a renal transplant recipient: the oncogenic convergence of JC virus and PIK3CA mutation. Transpl. Int. 39:16897. doi: 10.3389/ti.2026.16897
Received
05 May 2026
Revised
11 July 2026
Accepted
06 October 2026
Published
05 November 2026
Volume
39 - 2026
Updates
Copyright
© 2026 Ietto, Dalla Gasperina, Gritti, Brani, La Rosa, Furlan, Inversini, Balzano, Carcano, Pettinato and Baj.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: G. Ietto, giuseppe.ietto@gmail.com, giuseppe.ietto@uninsubria.it
ORCID: G. Ietto, orcid.org/0000-0001-5029-8173
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.