Dear Editors
Portal vein (PV) reconstruction remains a critical technical challenge in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT), particularly in the presence of complex anatomical variants such as Type C portal vein anatomy, characterized by multiple portal branches without a dominant trunk [–]. These configurations are associated with size mismatch, spatial separation, and unfavourable inflow geometry, increasing the risk of thrombosis and anastomotic stenosis.
Autologous Y-graft interposition has traditionally been used to reconstruct multiple PV branches and has demonstrated acceptable outcomes [, ]. However, this approach introduces additional anastomoses and may result in geometric distortion, turbulence, and functional narrowing, particularly in complex anatomical settings and Conjoined unification venoplasty (CUV) was subsequently developed to create a single wide conduit by unifying multiple graft PV branches, thereby improving inflow alignment and reducing anastomotic complexity [–]. Despite these advantages, graft-side reconstruction alone may not adequately address recipient PV limitations, especially in cases with a narrow or unfavorable recipient PV.
We report our experience with a bidirectional dual-patch PV reconstruction technique (Figure 1) that simultaneously optimizes graft and recipient PV geometry in LDLT with Type C anatomy. This approach combines graft conjoined unification venoplasty using a rectangular autologous PV patch with recipient PV augmentation using a triangular patch, enabling a wide, tension-free, and size-matched anastomosis without the need for interposition grafts.
FIGURE 1
Between January 2016 and January 2026, 1,385 LDLTs were performed at our center. Type C PV anatomy was identified in 32 donors (2.31%), of whom 25 required PV reconstruction. 16 patients underwent portal vein reconstruction using autologous Y-graft interposition,5 consecutive patients underwent bidirectional dual-patch reconstruction and constitute this series, Direct venoplasty was feasible in 4 cases due to proximity of portal vein branches & rest of the 7 cases where left lateral graft were taken where no reconstruction were needed. Patients with pre-existing PV thrombosis were excluded.
Our technique for bidirectional dual-patch PV reconstruction (Figure 1) is following recipient hepatectomy, an autologous PV segment was harvested from the explanted liver. On the back table, a rectangular patch was used to unify adjacent graft PV branches into a single enlarged orifice. The recipient PV was then augmented with a longitudinal incision and triangular patch venoplasty to increase luminal diameter and accommodate the reconstructed graft PV. End-to-end anastomosis was performed with continuous sutures, ensuring proper alignment and absence of tension. Intraoperative Doppler ultrasonography confirmed adequate portal inflow.
PV reconstruction was successfully completed in all patients without interposition grafts. No early PV thrombosis or clinically significant stenosis occurred. All recipients demonstrated satisfactory graft function, and PV patency was maintained during 6 months follow-up, with physiologic Doppler flow (mean velocity approximately 35Â cm/s).
In contrast, in our limited experience of portal vein reconstruction using autologous Y-graft interposition in 16 cases, size mismatch, conduit buckling, and angulation-related inflow compromise emerged as the principal technical challenges. These complications necessitated surgical re-anastomosis in 3 cases (18.75%) and endovascular stenting in 1 case (6.25%). While Y-graft interposition remains an effective reconstructive strategy, it is technically demanding during bench preparation and portal vein reconstruction. Particularly in patients with chronic portal vein thrombosis, distorted portal venous morphology, and small-caliber main portal veins where Y-graft interposition may be technically challenging. This inherent fixed anatomical configuration may predispose to angulation-related inflow disturbances, potentially resulting in flow impairment and postoperative thrombosis, thereby requiring re-intervention in a subset of patients. These findings are comparable with previously reported series []. Although conjoined unification venoplasty (CUV) improves graft-side configuration, the resulting conduit may exceed the adaptive capacity of the recipient PV and wider common channel. These observations emphasize that successful PV reconstruction depends not only on graft-side unification but also on appropriate recipient PV accommodation. Asan medical center came up with conjoined unification venoplasty (CUV) method in 2014 which is a technical modification of conventional autologous Portal vein Y graft interposition introduced in 2001 [–]. To overcome these issues we came up with bidirectional dual-patch PV reconstruction.
However, the bidirectional dual-patch technique addresses both components of this problem by combining graft unification with controlled recipient PV enlargement we achieved adequate diameter of main PV, this strategy facilitates a harmonized inflow pathway with improved geometric alignment. This is particularly relevant in LDLT, where partial grafts are exposed to increased portal inflow and are sensitive to disturbances in flow dynamics. Maintenance of a laminar, low-resistance inflow is essential to preserve endothelial integrity and support graft function [–].
In this small series, the absence of PV-related complications and sustained patency suggest that this technique is safe and reproducible. Although the number of patients is limited and follow-up duration is relatively short, the consistent hemodynamic performance supports further evaluation of this approach in larger cohorts. We are currently extending this experience through a comparative study evaluating the bidirectional dual-patch technique against Y-graft interposition to further define its relative advantages.
In conclusion, bidirectional dual-patch PV reconstruction represents a practical and physiologically sound option for managing Type C PV anatomy in LDLT. By restoring ideal graft–recipient portal venous geometry while eliminating the need for interposition grafts, this technique minimizes anastomotic complexity and has the potential to reduce flow-related complications. It should be considered a strong alternative to Y-graft interposition, and warrants further validation in larger, comparative studies with long-term follow-up.
Statements
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
Ethics statement
The studies involving humans were approved by Ethics Review Committee, Pir Abdul Qadir Shah Jeelani Institute of Medical Sciences (PAQSJIMS), Gambat, Sindh, Pakistan. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The ethics committee/institutional review board waived the requirement of written informed consent for participation from the participants or the participants’ legal guardians/next of kin because Written informed consent was waived by the Institutional Review Board due to the retrospective nature of the study and the use of anonymized patient data.
Author contributions
SD conceived the study, performed surgeries, collected data, and drafted the manuscript. BA contributed to study design, data interpretation, and manuscript revision. AWD, MA, MU, and SHA contributed to data collection, literature review, manuscript preparation, and critical revision. All authors reviewed and approved the final manuscript.
Funding
The author(s) declared that financial support was not received for this work and/or its publication.
Conflict of interest
The authors(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declared that generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript. Generative AI (ChatGPT, OpenAI) was used to assist with language editing and improving the clarity of the manuscript. All scientific content, study design, data analysis, and conclusions were generated and verified by the authors.
Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontierspartnerships.org/articles/10.3389/ti.2026.16600/full#supplementary-material
References
1.
NakamuraTTanakaKKiuchiTKasaharaMOikeFUedaMet alAnatomical variations and surgical strategies in right lobe living donor liver transplantation: lessons from 120 cases. Transplantation (2002) 73(12):1896–903. 10.1097/00007890-200206270-00008
2.
GulerNDayangacMYaprakOAkyildizMGunayYTaskesenFet alAnatomical variations of donor portal vein in right lobe living donor liver transplantation: the safe use of variant portal veins. Transpl Int (2013) 26(12):1191–7. 10.1111/tri.12190
3.
WlYTlHTyL. Portal vein variation and thrombosis in right lobe living donor liver transplantation. J Surg Med (2019) 8(5):55.
4.
KyodenYTamuraSSugawaraYMatsuiYTogashiJKanekoJet alPortal vein complications after adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation. Transpl Int (2008) 21(12):1136–44. 10.1111/j.1432-2277.2008.00752.x
5.
LeeSGHwangSParkKMKimKHAhnCSLeeYJet alSeventeen adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantations using dual grafts. Transpl Proc (2001) 33(7–8):3461–3. 10.1016/s0041-1345(01)02491-5
6.
LeeHJHwangSAhnCSKimKHMoonDBHaTYet alLong-term outcomes of portal Y-graft interposition for anomalous right portal veins in living donor liver transplantation. Transpl Proc (2012) 44(2):454–6. 10.1016/j.transproceed.2012.01.053
7.
HaTYHwangSMoonDBAhnCSKimKHSongGWet alConjoined unification venoplasty for graft double portal vein branches as a modification of autologous Y-graft interposition. Liver Transpl (2015) 21(5):707–10. 10.1002/lt.24101
8.
YooSYHwangSHaTYSongGWJungDHParkGCet alLong-term results of conjoined unification venoplasty for multiple portal vein branches of the right liver graft in living donor liver transplantations. Korean J Transpl (2019) 33(4):106–11. 10.4285/jkstn.2019.33.4.106
Summary
Keywords
dual-patch venoplasty, living donor liver transplantation, portal inflow optimization, portal vein reconstruction, type C portal vein anatomy
Citation
Shams-Ud-Din, Acharya B, Dogar AW, Arsalan M, Umar M and Abbas SH (2026) Bidirectional portal vein reconstruction for type C anatomy in living donor liver transplant. Transpl. Int. 39:16600. doi: 10.3389/ti.2026.16600
Received
17 March 2026
Revised
06 June 2026
Accepted
08 June 2026
Published
13 July 2026
Volume
39 - 2026
Updates
Copyright
© 2026 Shams-Ud-Din, Acharya, Dogar, Arsalan, Umar and Abbas.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Shams-Ud-Din, shamsbaloch007@gmail.com
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.