Abstract
Although kidney transplantation (KTx) remains the optimal therapy for end-stage kidney disease, long-term graft survival and patient outcomes continue to be limited by cardiometabolic complications and chronic allograft dysfunction. Nutritional management has evolved from supportive care to a core component of post-transplant follow-up. The early post-transplant phase is marked by catabolism, high-dose immunosuppression, and metabolic instability, leading to increased protein requirements but also potential susceptibility to hyperfiltration injury. In the stable post-transplant phase, a moderate protein intake similar to that recommended for chronic kidney disease (CKD) may support graft longevity, although evidence in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) remains limited and inconsistent. Plant-forward dietary models, including Mediterranean and DASH patterns, consistently improve cardiometabolic risk, inflammation, oxidative stress, and dietary acid load, with potential benefits for graft outcomes. Predominantly plant-based diets may further reduce uremic toxin generation and improve mineral metabolism, though careful monitoring for micronutrient deficiencies is required. Low-protein approaches, such as PLADO, remain largely theoretical in transplant populations, while ketogenic or very low-carbohydrate diets raise concerns regarding acid–base balance, renal hemodynamics, and long-term tolerability. Overall, personalised nutritional strategies tailored to graft function, immunosuppression, and metabolic profile are essential to optimise long-term transplant health.
Introduction
Kidney transplantation is the preferred treatment for end-stage kidney disease, offering superior survival and quality of life compared to chronic dialysis, but long-term outcomes are limited by metabolic complications, cardiovascular disease, and chronic allograft dysfunction.
[] Nutrition, once considered ancillary, is now recognized as a pivotal determinant of graft and patient outcomes [–].
In the immediate post-transplant period, high-dose immunosuppression and catabolic stress necessitate adequate protein intake to maintain nitrogen balance and support lean mass. The recommended protein intake during this phase is typically 1.0–1.3 g/kg/day, as supported by recent reviews and observational studies [–6]. However, excessive protein intake may induce glomerular hyperfiltration and accelerate graft injury, so intake above 1.4 g/kg/day is generally not advised for prolonged periods [, ]. During stable phases, moderate protein restriction (0.8–1.0 g/kg/day) may be beneficial for graft longevity, though evidence in transplant recipients is limited and sometimes conflicting [, 7, 8]. For those with chronic allograft dysfunction or reduced eGFR (<25 mL/min), lower protein targets (0.55–0.60 g/kg/day) may be considered [].
Beyond macronutrient targets, dietary patterns such as the Mediterranean and Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) diets are associated with reduced cardiovascular risk and improved graft outcomes, emphasizing plant-based foods, reduced processed meats, and lower sodium intake [, 7, 9, 10]. These patterns may also beneficially modulate the immune system and gut microbiome [, 11].
In summary, nutritional management in kidney transplant recipients should be individualized, with attention to phase-specific protein requirements, overall dietary patterns, and metabolic risk factors, as supported by current evidence [–12].
Methods
This manuscript is a narrative review summarising the current evidence on nutritional strategies for kidney transplant recipients. A non-systematic literature search was performed using the PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus and Google Scholar databases to identify studies published up to January 2026. Search terms included combinations of the following: “kidney transplantation,” “kidney transplant recipients,” “nutrition,” “diet,” “protein intake,” “Mediterranean diet,” “DASH diet,” “plant-based diet,” “vegetarian diet,” “ketogenic diet,” “microbiota,” and “allograft function.” Priority was given to clinical practice guidelines, randomised controlled trials, cohort studies, meta-analyses and high-quality narrative reviews published in English. This review aimed to provide an overview of emerging dietary approaches and nutritional management strategies in kidney transplantation from a clinical perspective, rather than conducting a formal systematic review or meta-analysis.
Pre-transplant and peri-transplant nutritional optimization: prehabilitation and ERAS-based approaches
Nutritional management in kidney transplantation should not only begin after surgery. The pre- and peri-transplant periods are critical for identifying malnutrition, sarcopenia, obesity, frailty, micronutrient deficiencies and metabolic risk factors, which can affect surgical recovery and long-term transplant outcomes [–]. In other surgical populations, multimodal prehabilitation and Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols combining nutritional optimisation, physical exercise, anaemia correction, glycaemic control and patient education have been associated with a shorter hospital stay, fewer postoperative complications, faster functional recovery and improved survival [–8].
However, direct evidence remains limited in kidney transplant candidates. Available studies suggest that poor nutritional status, sarcopenia, frailty and obesity prior to transplantation are associated with delayed graft function, infectious complications, prolonged hospitalisation, cardiovascular events and reduced patient and graft survival [9–14]. Therefore, pre-transplant nutritional education may be clinically relevant, particularly when integrated into multidisciplinary care involving nephrologists, nutritionists, transplant surgeons and rehabilitation specialists [, 15]. Key objectives include optimising protein-energy status, avoiding protein-energy wasting in dialysis patients, managing weight in obese patients, correcting vitamin and mineral deficiencies, restricting sodium for blood pressure control, and counselling on food safety and metabolic risk after transplantation [, 15–17].
Peri-transplant nutrition should aim to minimise catabolism and support wound healing, early mobilisation and recovery [6–8]. Although ERAS pathways are being adopted more widely in solid-organ transplantation, there is still insufficient standardisation of kidney-transplant-specific nutritional protocols [, ]. Currently, recommendations are largely extrapolated from general surgery, chronic kidney disease (CKD), dialysis, and transplant observational studies, rather than from adequately powered randomised trials in kidney transplant recipients [, ].
Future studies should evaluate whether structured pre-transplant nutritional education and multimodal prehabilitation programmes can improve clinically meaningful outcomes. These outcomes include postoperative complications, delayed graft function, length of hospital stay, readmissions, reversal of frailty, sarcopenia, quality of life, graft function trajectory and long-term patient survival [, , 18].
Dietary approaches for kidney transplant recipients
Over the past decade, several dietary patterns have grown in popularity due to their potential to reduce cardiovascular risk, exhibit anti-inflammatory properties, and promote weight loss [13]. Among these, plant-based diets and low-carbohydrate or ketogenic diets have received considerable attention (Supplementary Tables S1, S2).
Plant-based diets
In earlier decades, it was generally assumed that animal-derived proteins contain all the essential amino acids that the human body cannot produce in sufficient quantities (classifying them as proteins of high biological value), and they are more effective at maintaining the body’s protein pool due to their higher content of sulphur-containing amino acids [14, 15]. However, increasing interest in plant-based dietary approaches has challenged this paradigm. Diets composed primarily or exclusively of plant-derived foods are now considered feasible in populations with chronic diseases, including CKD [16]. A recent study demonstrated that the risk of incident CKD in the general population was reduced by 4% for each additional 0.1 g/kg/day of plant protein intake [14, 17]. Within nephrology, plant-based dietary patterns uniquely allow for the implementation of very low protein regimens (0.4 g/kg body weight/day) []. Compared with animal-based diets, plant-based diets provide higher amounts of fiber and alkali, which contribute to the improved correction of CKD-associated metabolic acidosis and the prevention of intestinal dysbiosis [, 14]. It is important to note that plant-based diets and veganism are not synonymous. Rather, plant-based diets represent a spectrum of dietary models in which the majority of protein intake is derived from plant sources. Examples include the Mediterranean diet, the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) diet, and the PLADO diet. Due to their favorable metabolic effects, recent clinical practice guidelines on nutrition in CKD have endorsed plant-based dietary patterns. While both sets of guidelines acknowledge the limited evidence available to recommend one specific protein source, the KDOQI guidelines do not rule out plant-based diets, and the KDIGO guidelines explicitly recommend them [, 14, 18].
Mediterranean diet
The Mediterranean diet is a dietary pattern that is primarily cardioprotective and anti-inflammatory. It originates from the traditional eating habits of people living in coastal regions of the Mediterranean. It is characterised by a high consumption of extra-virgin olive oil, vegetables, legumes and whole grains, as well as a moderate intake of fish and wine. Overall, it involves moderate protein intake of around 0.8 g/kg/day without being specifically designed as a low-protein regimen. [19]. Robust evidence supports its role in reducing the risk of type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality [20].
Adherence to the Mediterranean diet is associated with multiple metabolic and vascular benefits, including reductions in inflammation, oxidative stress, endothelial dysfunction, metabolic acidosis, hyperlipidemia, hyperglycemia and elevated blood pressure [, 9, 10, 21, 22]. In both the general population and kidney transplant recipients (KTRs), higher Mediterranean Diet Scores correlate with improved renal outcomes [, 23]. In a large multi-ethnic cohort of 3,298 individuals followed for 15 years, higher adherence was associated with approximately 50% lower odds of incident eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 [23]. Similarly, among 632 KTRs, adherence to the Mediterranean diet was protective against kidney function decline and graft loss, with stronger effects observed in patients with proteinuria [].
The renoprotective effects of the Mediterranean diet likely arise from the modulation of several interconnected pathways, including oxidative stress, systemic inflammation, endothelial function, dietary acid load, lipid metabolism, protein intake and glycemic control. High consumption of fruits and vegetables increases antioxidant and dietary fiber intake, while a greater proportion of omega-3 fatty acids contributes to reductions in oxidative stress and inflammation [, 24–26]. Low meat intake combined with high fruit and vegetable consumption improves acid–base balance [, 27], and a lower dietary acid load is associated with reduced CKD risk [28].
The largely plant-based protein profile of the Mediterranean diet may also reduce proteinuria. Plant proteins, which have lower bioavailability and acidogenic potential, may induce less glomerular hyperfiltration and intraglomerular pressure than animal proteins, thereby reducing renal hemodynamic stress. Typical protein intake approximates 0.8 g/kg/day, mainly from non-red and non-processed sources [22]. Additionally, plant proteins are associated with a lower endogenous acid load and reduced sulphur and phosphorus amino acid content, potentially limiting tubular injury and hyperfiltration [].
Finally, the diet’s high content of monounsaturated fats and polyphenols, and low saturated fat intake, further contributes to its protective effects [29–32]. In KTRs, improvements in oxidative status, acid–base balance and glomerular hemodynamics have been documented [, 9, 10, 21–23, 29, 33]. Overall, the Mediterranean diet emerges as a valuable strategy to support general health and potentially long-term graft survival in KTRs.
Dietary approaches to stop hypertension (DASH) diet
The Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) diet was originally developed by the US National Institutes of Health to treat or prevent hypertension. The DASH diet primarily targets sodium reduction and blood pressure control by encouraging the consumption of fruits, vegetables and low-fat dairy products, while reducing saturated fat intake and maintaining moderate protein consumption. It does not specifically promote a plant-based diet.
In the United States, the average sodium intake exceeds 3,400 mg per day, surpassing the maximum recommended intake of 2,300 mg per day set out in the 2015–2020 Dietary Guidelines [34]. Excess sodium intake has been linked to hypertension, cardiovascular events and, in experimental models, to the promotion of chronic allograft rejection [34]. Clinical evidence demonstrates that the DASH diet significantly lowers blood pressure, total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels [35]. In an 8-week controlled feeding trial, the DASH diet reduced systolic and diastolic blood pressure by 5.5 mmHg and 3.0 mmHg respectively compared to standard diets [36]. The DASH diet remains one of the most effective dietary strategies for blood pressure control [37].
Hypertension affects 50%–80% of adult KTRs, contributing to shorter graft survival and increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality [38]. Thus, the DASH diet is a particularly relevant intervention for this population. In a prospective cohort study of 632 KTRs, greater adherence to the DASH diet was associated with a lower risk of decline in kidney function (hazard ratio: 0.95; P = 0.008) and reduced all-cause mortality (hazard ratio: 0.95; P = 0.01) [7]. Similar renal and cardiovascular benefits have been observed in other studies [9, 10, 39], which are likely to be mediated through favorable effects on serum lipids, blood pressure, insulin resistance, inflammation, oxidative stress, arterial stiffness and endothelial function. In summary, the DASH diet provides a robust, evidence-based approach to restricting sodium and controlling blood pressure in KTx patients.
Vegetarian and vegan diets
Vegetarian diets, historically adopted for religious, cultural or ethical reasons, are increasingly promoted for health and disease prevention. Evidence suggests that reducing or eliminating meat intake may attenuate kidney disease progression [9, 10, 40]. Vegetarian diets include heterogeneous patterns, from lacto-ovo vegetarian to vegan diets, and do not inherently guarantee nutritional quality, as processed foods may still be consumed [40].
In kidney transplant recipients, protein source and quantity critically influence graft survival. High protein intake, especially from animal sources, induces afferent arteriolar dilation, glomerular hyperfiltration and intraglomerular hypertension, promoting fibrosis and progressive renal injury [40–42]. Protein restriction reduces hyperfiltration and stabilizes kidney function [42]. Data from chronic kidney disease populations show that low-protein diets delay dialysis initiation and slow progression to end-stage kidney disease [43, 44], whereas high-protein and red-meat–based diets are linked to faster kidney function decline and increased microalbuminuria [45, 46].
Plant-based diets improve mineral metabolism and acid–base balance. Plant phosphorus has lower bioavailability, resulting in reduced serum phosphate and FGF23 levels associated with better graft outcomes [9, 40, 47–51]. Plant potassium generally has milder effects due to enhanced fecal excretion and alkalinisation [9, 40, 52, 53]. High fiber intake reduces uremic toxins and inflammation [54–56]. Nutritional risks include vitamin B12 and iron deficiency, requiring monitoring [57]. Overall, well-planned plant-based low-protein diets may support long-term graft preservation [12, 58].
Low protein intake and plant dominant low protein diet (PLADO)
There is growing evidence that protein restriction slows chronic kidney disease progression [, 59–62], although its impact on kidney transplantation outcomes remains uncertain. Dietary protein intake drives urea and nitrogenous waste production, increasing renal excretory burden. Protein restriction activates protective mechanisms, including downregulation of the renin–angiotensin system [, 63, 64], reduced glomerular hemodynamic stress [59, 65, 66], limited renal hypertrophy [63], decreased ammoniagenesis [63] and lower metabolic activity [67]. Conversely, high-protein diets increase metabolic demand, promote renal vasodilatation and exacerbate intraglomerular pressure in transplant kidneys, leading to hyperfiltration and structural injury [42, 59].
Plant-focused low-protein dietary approaches, including the Plant-Dominant Low-Protein Diet (PLADO) and the Plant-Focused Nutrition in Diabetes (PLAFOND), have been proposed for CKD and diabetes management. The Plant-Dominant Low-Protein Diet (PLADO) is a structured, nephroprotective dietary strategy designed to reduce glomerular hyperfiltration and metabolic burden. It involves controlled protein restriction (0.6–0.8 g/kg/day) and a diet consisting predominantly of plant-derived protein sources (generally 50%–75%) [, 68]. The Plant-Focused Nutrition in Diabetes (PLAFOND) model further emphasises high fiber intake, low glycemic index and adequate energy provision [69]. Although these diets may slow CKD progression, evidence supporting benefits or safety in kidney transplant recipients is lacking.
Evidence on protein intake after transplantation is conflicting. Low intake may preserve graft function, whereas higher intake supports nitrogen balance, muscle mass, fatigue and quality of life [, , 6, 70, 71].
Low-carb diets
Metabolic complications are common after kidney transplantation, and dietary strategies have been explored to limit weight gain, hypertension, dyslipidemia and insulin resistance [13]. Immunosuppressive therapies, especially glucocorticoids, promote hyperglycemia and obesity [72–76]. Adequate glycemic control is clinically relevant because it is associated with slower kidney disease progression [77–79].
Ketogenic diets have gained interest for metabolic control, improving satiety, weight reduction and insulin sensitivity, while reducing inflammation [80–82]. A ketogenic diet usually limits carbohydrates to 30–50 g/day, inducing nutritional ketosis through glycogen depletion and ketone body production [83, 84]. Ketone bodies provide energy for several organs, including kidneys, during carbohydrate restriction.
Nutritional ketosis is defined by ketone levels of 0.5–3 mmol/L [85], whereas therapeutic ketosis reaches higher concentrations [86]. Keto-adaptation involves mitochondrial and enzymatic upregulation in oxidative tissues [85, 87]. Importantly, nutritional ketosis differs from diabetic ketoacidosis, as pH and glucose remain normal.
In kidney transplant recipients, evidence on ketogenic diets is limited and controversial. Potential concerns include acid load, hyperkaliemia, protein catabolism and graft injury, although early CKD data suggest preserved pH during nutritional ketosis [85, 88]. Reported adverse effects include fatty liver and insulin resistance [40, 89, 90]. Data in transplant populations are scarce, heterogeneous and insufficient to define safety or graft benefit. Short-term use under specialist supervision appears feasible for obesity, but long-term advantages resemble those of Mediterranean-style diets [91].
High reliance on processed ketogenic products may be inappropriate for transplant recipients. Moreover, long-term adherence is difficult, and carbohydrate quality may be more relevant than quantity [92, 93]. Diets rich in whole, high-fiber carbohydrates show superior cardiovascular and metabolic outcomes compared with ketogenic diets [94]. In the post-transplant setting, high-quality carbohydrates may reduce post-transplant diabetes and obesity risk [95, 96]. Therefore, balanced dietary patterns emphasizing carbohydrate quality may better address metabolic complications after transplantation.
Dietary protein intake: implication for kidney allograft survival and function
There is currently insufficient evidence to determine the optimal quantity or type of dietary protein for KTRs, so formal recommendations cannot yet be established. Nevertheless, certain patient- and transplant-related factors may inform the individualisation of protein intake.
The 2020 KDOQI Clinical Practice Guideline for Nutrition in CKD recommends a low-protein diet of 0.55–0.60 g/kg/day or a very low-protein diet of 0.28–0.43 g/kg/day, supplemented with keto acid or amino acid analogues, for adults without diabetes. For adults with CKD and concomitant diabetes, an intake of 0.6–0.8 g/kg/day of protein is considered appropriate. It is notable that no specific dietary protein intake targets are currently provided for adult kidney transplant recipients [].
The net state of immunosuppression and dietary protein requirements in kidney transplant recipients
The immunosuppressive status of KTRs fluctuates over time. During the immediate post-transplant period and when treating acute rejection, escalating the use of immunosuppressive agents — particularly high-dose corticosteroids — can accelerate protein catabolism and lead to muscle wasting [, 97]. To counteract muscle loss, protein intake should be increased [].
Evidence from two key studies has provided insights into protein needs (Table 1). A prospective cohort study of KTRs after deceased donor kidney transplantation (DDKT) found that patients consuming a low-protein diet had higher protein catabolic rates than those with higher protein intake [6]. Similarly, a randomised controlled trial involving non-diabetic KTRs found that low protein intake was associated with negative nitrogen balance and muscle mass loss, whereas higher protein intake resulted in positive nitrogen balance and muscle gain []. These studies suggest that an intake of at least 1.0–1.3 g/kg/day of protein may help preserve lean mass during the early post-transplant phase.
TABLE 1
| Clinical phase | Immunosuppressive status | Suggested protein intake | Evidence strength |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate post-transplant (0-1 month, high-dose corticosteroids) [11, 12, 17] | Escalated immunosuppression, high-dose steroids | 1.0–1.3 g/kg/day to maintain nitrogen balance and prevent muscle wasting | Higher intake (≥1.4 g/kg/d; mean ∼1.6–1.8) associated with better early eGFR, hemoglobin, lipids and no increase in short-term complications or infections Suggested evidence strength: Low–moderate (retrospective cohorts, observational) |
| Early stable post-transplant (1-6 months, low or stable steroid dose) [13] | Reduced/stable immunosuppression | ≥0.72 g/kg IBW/day to avoid skeletal muscle loss | ≥0.72 g/kg IBW/day predicted to prevent net skeletal muscle loss at 12 months. Several cohorts link higher intake (∼1.0–1.1 g/kg/d) with better fatigue, QoL, and survival proxies Evidence strength: Low–moderate (observational, modeling) |
| Medium -long term post -transplant[13] | Reduced/stable immunosuppression | ≥0.72 g/kg IBW/day to avoid skeletal muscle loss | Reviews suggest 0.8–1.0 g/kg/d for stable KTRs, with cautious trial of 0.6–0.8 g/kg/d low-protein, plant-dominant patterns to mitigate hyperfiltration, if nutritional status is preserved Evidence strength: Low (narrative reviews, conflicting observational data) |
| Chronic allograft dysfunction/rejection [] | Variable; inflammation may be present, corticosteroids often tapered | ≥0.55–0.60 g/kg/day (low protein diet may improve glomerular permselectivity, but intakes <0.55 g/kg/day risk negative nitrogen balance) | Proposed range aims to slow progression while avoiding negative nitrogen balance; largely extrapolated from CKD LPD data and one crossover KTR nitrogen-balance study Evidence strength: Low (CKD RCTs, small transplant studies, extrapolation) |
| Failed allograft (return to dialysis) [15] | Immunosuppression generally minimized or stopped | 1.0–1.2 g/kg/day (aligned with ESKD recommendations) | Aligns with ESKD guidelines and hemodialysis data, where ≥1.0–1.2 g/kg/d is recommended to prevent protein-energy wasting Evidence strength: Moderate (CKD/ESKD trials and guidelines; indirect for failed graft) |
Suggested protein intake in kidney transplant recipients across different clinical phases.
ESKD: end stage kidney disease; IBW:ideal body weight.
When steroid doses are tapered, the need for protein appears to be lower. A cross-sectional study indicated that a minimum intake of 0.72 g/kg/day may be sufficient 1 year after transplantation []. Conversely, in cases of chronic allograft dysfunction, the inflammatory environment may increase protein requirements. Data from a crossover RCT involving 14 KTRs with chronic rejection compared low (0.55 g/kg/day) and high (2.0 g/kg/day) protein diets. The low-protein group showed lower urinary protein and better glomerular permselectivity, though they only achieved a slightly positive nitrogen balance [98].
It is important to note that current nutritional recommendations for kidney transplant recipients are supported by relatively limited transplant-specific evidence and are often based on studies conducted in populations with chronic kidney disease. The unique physiological and metabolic characteristics of kidney transplant recipients, including chronic immunosuppression, altered inflammatory status, post-transplant metabolic complications and the presence of a functioning allograft, may limit the direct applicability of CKD-derived nutritional strategies. Consequently, adequately powered randomised controlled trials conducted specifically in kidney transplant populations are urgently needed to define optimal dietary patterns, protein and energy requirements, and long-term nutritional interventions capable of improving graft survival, cardiometabolic outcomes, sarcopenia and patient quality of life.
Dietary calorie-protein intake across post-transplant periods
In addition to immunosuppression, the post-transplant period itself influences protein requirements. In a 12-year prospective cohort of 43 KTRs, a low-protein intake (0.73 g/kg/day) was associated with stable GFR, whereas higher intake (1.40 g/kg/day) was associated with a significant decline [99].
However, evidence from observational studies remains inconsistent. In a cross-sectional analysis of 204 KTRs, protein intake >1.2 g/kg/day was associated with proteinuria [], while a larger cohort of 625 KTRs showed no association with creatinine clearance [100]. It is important to note that excessively low protein intake may also be detrimental: in cohorts of 604 and 940 KTRs, lower protein intake was associated with an increased risk of graft loss and mortality [8, 101].
Overall, the current evidence base supports a moderate protein intake of 0.8–1.0 g/kg/day for the first three to twelve months after transplant, with the possibility of increasing this to 1.2–1.4 g/kg/day thereafter. Recommendations following graft failure are in line with the guidelines for end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) (0.55–0.6 g/kg/day) (Figure 1) [].
FIGURE 1
Adequate energy intake is a critical component of nutritional management after kidney transplantation and should accompany protein prescriptions to maintain neutral nitrogen balance and prevent muscle catabolism [, , 70]. In the immediate post-transplant period, calorie requirements generally increase due to surgical stress, exposure to corticosteroids, tissue repair and heightened metabolic demand [, 6, 70]. Approximately 30–35 kcal/kg/day is commonly suggested as an energy intake during the early catabolic phase, whereas lower requirements (25–30 kcal/kg/day) may be appropriate during stable long-term follow-up, depending on factors such as age, physical activity, body composition, graft function, and metabolic comorbidities [, 58]. It is important to note that inadequate caloric intake can lead to the breakdown of endogenous proteins and sarcopenia, even when protein intake appears sufficient [, 6, 71]. Conversely, excessive calorie intake can lead to obesity, post-transplant diabetes mellitus, metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular complications. These remain major determinants of long-term graft and patient outcomes [13, 72, 95, 96].
Comparison of international guidelines (ESPEN, KDOQI, KDIGO)
Compared with older, nutrient-restriction paradigms, today’s triad of ESPEN–KDOQI–KDIGO collectively pushes toward: early anabolic support; longer-term weight, blood pressure (BP), and glycemic control; and endorsement of healthy dietary patterns rather than transplant-unique restrictions. Collectively, these guidelines reflect a paradigm shift: from nutrient restriction to holistic, patient-centered dietary strategies (Table 2).
TABLE 2
| Guideline | Kidney transplant recipient (KTR) coverage | Key nutrition recommendations | Limitations |
|---|---|---|---|
| ESPEN (2021; 2024 update) | No specific guidance for stable KTR; transplant nutrition not addressed | Inpatient focus: energy/protein delivery, artificial nutrition routes, refeeding prevention | Gap in outpatient and post-transplant care; limited applicability beyond hospitalization |
| KDOQI (2020) | Explicitly includes patients with functioning kidney transplants | - Routine nutrition screening and assessment (validated tools, body composition) - Individualized protein/energy prescriptions by stage (higher in acute post-transplant, tailored for long-term) - Sodium restriction for BP control - Promotion of dietary patterns based on whole, minimally processed foods | Does not mandate a single protein target for all KTR; evidence for long-term outcomes still limited |
| KDIGO (2009–2022) | Scattered transplant-related recommendations across thematic guidelines | - Lifestyle and CV risk management integrated with immunosuppression - Pre-transplant risk factor optimization (e.g., obesity) - Post-transplant: BP control (standardized measurement, sodium moderation), weight management, PTDM prevention | No standalone nutrition CPG for KTR; lacks detailed macronutrient prescriptions |
comparison of the main features of different nutrition guidelines focusig on KTRs.
KTR: kidney transplant recipients; BP: blood pressure; CV: cardiovascular; PTDM: Post-transplant Diabetes Mellitus; CPG: clinical practice guidelines.
Intestinal microbiota and nutritional regimens in kidney transplant patients
The gut microbiota is increasingly recognized as a key modulator of health and transplant outcomes. After transplantation, KTRs commonly develop dysbiosis, with reduced microbial diversity and depletion of short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs)-producing bacteria such as Faecalibacterium prausnitzii [102]. Immunosuppressive agents directly alter microbial composition and function [103]. This imbalance may impair gut barrier integrity and promote systemic inflammation [104].
Dietary modulation offers an effective strategy. High-fiber diets enhance microbial fermentation and SCFA production, which support epithelial integrity and improve tacrolimus bioavailability [11]. Butyrate specifically promotes regulatory T-cell differentiation [105]. Conversely, patterns high in red meat and refined sugars increase production of harmful metabolites such as trimethylamine N-oxide [106] (Figure 2).
FIGURE 2
Clinical recommendations and future directions
The following recommendations, derived from available and current evidences, provide a roadmap for the longitudinal care of KTRs, emphasizing a multidisciplinary, phase-specific approach.
Macro-structural dietary recommendations
Prioritizing the Mediterranean Framework: For the stable KTR, the Mediterranean diet should be the default recommendation. Its emphasis on extra-virgin olive oil, high fiber, and plant-derived proteins offers a synergistic effect that addresses the leading cause of death in this population: cardiovascular disease.
The DASH Alternative: In patients where hypertension is the primary driver of allograft injury, the DASH diet provides a structured, evidence-based approach to sodium restriction while ensuring nutritional adequacy.
Carbohydrate Quality and Metabolic Syndrome: Given the high incidence of post-transplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM), clinicians should move away from simple carbohydrate restriction. Instead, the focus should be on carbohydrate quality—prioritizing whole grains and low-glycemic-index foods to counteract the metabolic disturbances induced by glucocorticoids and calcineurin inhibitors.
The precision protein prescription
Protein intake must be tailored to the “chronological age” of the transplant and the patient’s metabolic demands.
The Early Catabolic Window (0–3 Months): To counteract surgical stress and steroid-induced muscle wasting, an intake of 1.0–1.3 g/kg/day is recommended.
The Maintenance Phase (3–12 Months): Transition to 0.8–1.0 g/kg/day. Clinicians must be vigilant to ensure intake does not fall below 0.72 g/kg/day to avoid sarcopenia, which is independently associated with poor outcomes.
The Dysfunction Phase (Chronic Allograft Nephropathy): In the setting of declining eGFR, moderate restriction to 0.55–0.60 g/kg/day may be protective, provided the patient is not in a state of chronic inflammation.
Microbiome-targeted interventions
Fiber as an Immunomodulator: Clinicians should encourage high dietary fiber intake (25–30g/day) not just for gastrointestinal health, but as a strategy to produce short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs). SCFAs, specifically butyrate, may support immune tolerance and protect the gut-vascular barrier.
To advance the field of transplant nutrition, future research must prioritize large-scale, transplant-specific randomized controlled trials to evaluate the long-term impact of plant-dominant dietary patterns, such as the PLADO diet, on eGFR slopes and graft longevity. Additionally, rigorous investigations are needed into the safety and efficacy of nutritional ketosis as a targeted intervention for refractory post-transplant obesity, specifically assessing its potential to improve metabolic markers without precipitating metabolic acidosis. There is also a compelling need for precision nutrition strategies that utilize microbial profiling to personalize fiber and protein intake based on the individual’s unique gut environment.
Ultimately, while the technical success of a kidney transplant begins in the operating room, its long-term preservation is sustained in the kitchen; transitioning to personalized, pattern-based nutritional therapy is therefore essential to ensuring that the gift of a transplant lasts a lifetime (Figure 3.).
FIGURE 3
Conclusions: a new paradigm in transplant nephrology
The historical focus of transplant medicine has traditionally centered on the refinement of surgical techniques and the optimization of immunosuppressive regimens to prevent acute rejection. However, as 1-year graft survival rates have plateaued at high levels, the challenge has shifted toward mitigating the chronic drivers of graft loss: cardiovascular disease, metabolic syndrome, and chronic allograft dysfunction.
This review highlights a significant transition in clinical thought: nutritional management is no longer a secondary support mechanism but a primary therapeutic intervention.
Data from literature underscores that focusing on single nutrients (e.g., sodium or protein) in isolation is less effective than adopting comprehensive dietary patterns. The Mediterranean and DASH diets emerge as the most robust frameworks because they address the multi-faceted nature of post-transplant health—simultaneously targeting systemic inflammation, oxidative stress, and endothelial dysfunction.
While the biological rationale for plant-based and low-protein diets is strong—centering on the reduction of glomerular hyperfiltration and acid load—this review identifies a critical “evidence gap.” Much of our current practice relies on the extrapolation of data from non-transplant CKD populations. The unique physiology of the transplant recipient, characterized by pharmacological immunosuppression and a solitary functioning kidney, necessitates a dedicated body of research.
One of the most compelling frontiers identified is the interaction between nutrition and the gut microbiome. The realization that dietary fiber can modulate the immune response and potentially alter the metabolism of drugs like tacrolimus opens a new chapter in personalized transplant medicine. This suggests that the “net state of immunosuppression” is not merely a product of drug dosage, but a complex interplay between pharmacology and the intestinal environment (Figure 2).
The evidence supporting nutritional interventions in kidney transplant recipients is constrained by substantial methodological limitations. Most available studies are observational, retrospective, or conducted in relatively small cohorts, which restricts statistical power, external validity, and causal inference. Dietary intake is typically assessed using self-reported questionnaires, introducing recall and measurement bias. Residual confounding is also considerable, as healthier dietary patterns often cluster with other favourable lifestyle behaviours. In addition, transplant populations are highly heterogeneous with respect to immunosuppressive regimens, graft function, and comorbid conditions. Finally, many nutritional recommendations—particularly regarding plant-based and low-protein diets—are extrapolated from chronic kidney disease cohorts rather than derived from randomized trials in transplant recipients, highlighting the urgent need for adequately powered, transplant-specific studies.
Statements
Author contributions
PM and LC wrote the manuscript; MG, GC, and CA were responsible for project administration; SVt, AR, SVd, MG, GC, and CA reviewed the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Funding
The author(s) declared that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. This study was funded by the Italian Ministry of Health-Current Research IRCCS.
Conflict of interest
SVt served as a consultant at advisory boards for Merk Sharp & Dohme, Astra Zeneca, Boehringer and Ingelheim, and held a sponsored lecture by Dr. Shär. The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
The remaining author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declared that generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript. During the preparation of this paper FigureLabs AI was used to improve figure building.
Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontierspartnerships.org/articles/10.3389/ti.2026.16322/full#supplementary-material
Abbreviations
CKD, Chronic kidney disease; DDKT, Deceased donor kidney transplantation; DASH, Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension; KD, Ketogenic diets; KTRs, kidney transplant recipients; KTx, Kidney transplantation; PLADO, Plant-Dominant Low-Protein Diet; PLAFOND, Plant-Focused Nutrition in Diabetes; SCFA, Short-chain fatty acid; TMAO, Trimethylamine N-oxide.
References
1.
IkizlerTABurrowesJDByham-GrayLDCampbellKLCarreroJJChanWet alKDOQI clinical practice guideline for nutrition in CKD: 2020 update. Am J Kidney Dis (2020) 76(3 Suppl. 1):S1–S107. 10.1053/j.ajkd.2020.05.006
2.
TantisattamoEKalantar-ZadehK. Dietary protein intake and plant-dominant diets to mitigate risk of allograft dysfunction progression in kidney transplant recipients. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens (2024) 33(1):43–52. 10.1097/MNH.0000000000000944
3.
CarreroJJGonzález-OrtizAAvesaniCMBakkerSJLBellizziVChauveauPet alPlant-based diets to manage the risks and complications of chronic kidney disease. Nat Rev Nephrol (2020) 16(9):525–42. 10.1038/s41581-020-0297-2
4.
Gomes-NetoAWOstéMCJSotomayorCGvan den BergEGeleijnseJMBergerSPet alMediterranean style diet and kidney function loss in kidney transplant recipients. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol (2020) 15(2):238–46. 10.2215/CJN.06710619
5.
LauWPNgKPGanapathySSTahPCIsmailRJalalonmuhaliMet alPrevalence rate of proteinuria and metabolic acidosis among kidney transplant recipients in a tertiary teaching hospital and its relationship to dietary intake. Transpl Proc (2022) 54(2):355–61. 10.1016/j.transproceed.2021.12.019
6.
CoganMGSargentJAYarbroughSGVincentiFAmendWJJr. Prevention of prednisone-induced negative nitrogen balance. Effect of dietary modification on urea generation rate in patients on hemodialysis receiving high-dose glucocorticoids. Ann Intern Med (1981) 95(2):158–61. 10.7326/0003-4819-95-2-158
7.
OstéMCJGomes-NetoAWCorpeleijnEGansROBde BorstMHvan den BergEet alDietary approach to stop hypertension (DASH) diet and risk of renal function decline and all-cause mortality in renal transplant recipients. Am J Transpl (2018) 18(10):2523–33. 10.1111/ajt.14707
8.
SaidMYDeetmanPEde VriesAPZelleDMGansROBNavisGet alCausal path analyses of the association of protein intake with risk of mortality and graft failure in renal transplant recipients. Clin Transpl (2015) 29(5):447–57. 10.1111/ctr.12536
9.
KimHCaulfieldLEGarcia-LarsenVSteffenLMGramsMECoreshJet alPlant-based diets and incident CKD and kidney function. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol (2019) 14(5):682–91. 10.2215/CJN.12391018
10.
CleggDJHill GallantKM. Plant-based diets in CKD. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol (2019) 14(1):141–3. 10.2215/CJN.08960718
11.
ChanSHawleyCMPascoeEMCaoCCampbellSBCampbellKLet alPrebiotic supplementation in kidney transplant recipients for preventing infections and gastrointestinal upset: a randomized controlled feasibility study. J Ren Nutr (2022) 32(6):718–25. 10.1053/j.jrn.2022.02.006
12.
JoshiSShahSKalantar-ZadehK. Adequacy of plant-based proteins in chronic kidney disease. J Ren Nutr (2019) 29(2):112–7. 10.1053/j.jrn.2018.06.006
13.
RadićJVučkovićMGelemanovićAKolakEBučan NenadićDBegovićMet alAssociations between advanced glycation end products, body composition and mediterranean diet adherence in kidney transplant recipients. Int J Environ Res Public Health (2022) 19(17):11060. 10.3390/ijerph191711060
14.
TorreggianiMAvesaniCMContzenBCupistiACzaja-StolcSD’AlessandroCet alDos and don'ts in kidney nutrition: practical considerations of a panel of experts on protein restriction and plant-based diets for patients living with chronic kidney disease. Nutrients (2025) 17(12):2002. 10.3390/nu17122002
15.
Clinical practice guidelines for nutrition in chronic renal failure. K/DOQI, national kidney foundation. Am J Kidney Dis. (2000) 35(6):S17–S104. 10.1053/ajkd.2000.v35.aajkd03517
16.
BarsottiGMorelliECupistiAMeolaMDaniLGiovannettiS. A low-nitrogen low-phosphorus vegan diet for patients with chronic renal failure. Nephron (1996) 74(2):390–4. 10.1159/000189341
17.
HeoGYKohHBKimHJKimKWJungCYKimHWet alAssociation of plant protein intake with risk of incident CKD: a UK biobank study. Am J Kidney Dis (2023) 82(6):687–97.e1. 10.1053/j.ajkd.2023.05.007
18.
Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) CKD Work GroupAhmedSBCarreroJJFosterBFrancisAHallRKet alKDIGO 2024 clinical practice guideline for the evaluation and management of chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int (2024) 105(4S):S117–S314. 10.1016/j.kint.2023.10.018
19.
StamlerJ. Toward a modern mediterranean diet for the 21st century. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis (2013) 23(12):1159–62. 10.1016/j.numecd.2013.08.002
20.
SofiFAbbateRGensiniGFCasiniA. Accruing evidence on benefits of adherence to the mediterranean diet on health: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Clin Nutr (2010) 92(5):1189–96. 10.3945/ajcn.2010.29673
21.
BachKEKellyJTPalmerSCKhalesiSStrippoliGFMCampbellKL. Healthy dietary patterns and incidence of CKD: a meta-analysis of cohort studies. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol (2019) 14(10):1441–9. 10.2215/CJN.00530119
22.
ChauveauPAparicioMBellizziVCampbellKHongXJohanssonLet alMediterranean diet as the diet of choice for patients with chronic kidney disease. Nephrol Dial Transpl (2018) 33(5):725–35. 10.1093/ndt/gfx085
23.
KhatriMMoonYPScarmeasNGuYGardenerHCheungKet alThe association between a Mediterranean-style diet and kidney function in the northern manhattan study cohort. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol (2014) 9(11):1868–75. 10.2215/CJN.01080114
24.
FungTTMcCulloughMLNewbyPKMansonJEMeigsJBRifaiNet alDiet-quality scores and plasma concentrations of markers of inflammation and endothelial dysfunction. Am J Clin Nutr (2005) 82(1):163–73. 10.1093/ajcn.82.1.163
25.
SmidowiczARegulaJ. Effect of nutritional status and dietary patterns on human serum C-reactive protein and interleukin-6 concentrations. Adv Nutr (2015) 6(6):738–47. 10.3945/an.115.009415
26.
LinJFungTTHuFBCurhanGC. Association of dietary patterns with albuminuria and kidney function decline in older white women: a subgroup analysis from the nurses' health study. Am J Kidney Dis (2011) 57(2):245–54. 10.1053/j.ajkd.2010.09.027
27.
SienerR. Dietary treatment of metabolic acidosis in chronic kidney disease. Nutrients (2018) 10(4):512. 10.3390/nu10040512
28.
RebholzCMCoreshJGramsMESteffenLMAndersonCAMAppelLJet alDietary acid load and incident chronic kidney disease: results from the ARIC study. Am J Nephrol (2015) 42(6):427–35. 10.1159/000443746
29.
StachowskaEWesołowskaTOlszewskaMSafranowKMilloBDomańskiLet alElements of mediterranean diet improve oxidative status in blood of kidney graft recipients. Br J Nutr (2005) 93(3):345–52. 10.1079/bjn20051374
30.
SchwingshacklLHoffmannG. Mediterranean dietary pattern, inflammation and endothelial function: a systematic review and meta-analysis of intervention trials. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis (2014) 24(9):929–39. 10.1016/j.numecd.2014.03.003
31.
MinelliPMontinariMR. The mediterranean diet and cardioprotection: historical overview and current research. J Multidiscip Healthc (2019) 12:805–15. 10.2147/JMDH.S219875
32.
Martínez-GonzálezMAGeaARuiz-CanelaM. The mediterranean diet and cardiovascular health. Circ Res (2019) 124(5):779–98. 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.118.313348
33.
van WestingACKüpersLKGeleijnseJM. Diet and kidney function: a literature review. Curr Hypertens Rep (2020) 22(2):14. 10.1007/s11906-020-1020-1
34.
SafaKOhoriSBorgesTJUeharaMBatalIShimizuTet alSalt accelerates allograft rejection through Serum- and glucocorticoid-regulated Kinase-1-Dependent inhibition of regulatory T cells. J Am Soc Nephrol (2015) 26(10):2341–7. 10.1681/ASN.2014090914
35.
LariASohouliMHFatahiSCerqueiraHSSantosHOPourrajabBet alThe effects of the dietary approaches to stop hypertension (DASH) diet on metabolic risk factors in patients with chronic disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis (2021) 31(10):2766–78. 10.1016/j.numecd.2021.05.030
36.
AppelLJMooreTJObarzanekEVollmerWMSvetkeyLPSacksFMet alA clinical trial of the effects of dietary patterns on blood pressure. DASH collaborative research group. N Engl J Med (1997) 336(16):1117–24. 10.1056/NEJM199704173361601
37.
SacksFMSvetkeyLPVollmerWMAppelLJBrayGAHarshaDet alEffects on blood pressure of reduced dietary sodium and the dietary approaches to stop hypertension (DASH) diet. DASH-sodium collaborative research group. N Engl J Med (2001) 344(1):3–10. 10.1056/NEJM200101043440101
38.
WeirMRBurgessEDCooperJEFenvesAZGoldsmithDMcKayDet alAssessment and management of hypertension in transplant patients. J Am Soc Nephrol (2015) 26(6):1248–60. 10.1681/ASN.2014080834
39.
GutiérrezOMMuntnerPRizkDVMcClellanWMWarnockDGNewbyPKet alDietary patterns and risk of death and progression to ESRD in individuals with CKD: a cohort study. Am J Kidney Dis (2014) 64(2):204–13. 10.1053/j.ajkd.2014.02.013
40.
CyrinoLGGalpernJMooreLBorgiLRiellaLV. A narrative review of dietary approaches for kidney transplant patients. Kidney Int Rep (2021) 6(7):1764–74. 10.1016/j.ekir.2021.04.009
41.
Kalantar-ZadehKMooreLW. Does kidney longevity mean healthy vegan food and less meat or is any low-protein diet good enough?J Ren Nutr (2019) 29(2):79–81. 10.1053/j.jrn.2019.01.008
42.
Kalantar-ZadehKFouqueD. Nutritional management of chronic kidney disease. N Engl J Med (2017) 377(18):1765–76. 10.1056/NEJMra1700312
43.
BaragettiIDe SimoneIBiazziCBuzziLFerrarioFLuiseMCet alThe low-protein diet for chronic kidney disease: 8 years of clinical experience in a nephrology ward. Clin Kidney J (2019) 13(2):253–60. 10.1093/ckj/sfz141
44.
HahnDHodsonEMFouqueD. Low protein diets for non-diabetic adults with chronic kidney disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2018) 10(10):CD001892. 10.1002/14651858.CD001892.pub4
45.
JheeJHKeeYKParkSKimHParkJTHanSHet alHigh-protein diet with renal hyperfiltration is associated with rapid decline rate of renal function: a community-based prospective cohort study. Nephrol Dial Transpl (2020) 35(1):98–106. 10.1093/ndt/gfz115
46.
LinJHuFBCurhanGC. Associations of diet with albuminuria and kidney function decline. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol (2010) 5(5):836–43. 10.2215/CJN.08001109
47.
JeonHJKimYCParkSKimCTHaJHanDJet alAssociation of serum phosphorus concentration with mortality and graft failure among kidney transplant recipients. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol (2017) 12(4):653–62. 10.2215/CJN.07090716
48.
van LondenMAartsBMDeetmanPEvan der WeijdenJEisengaMFNavisGet alPost-transplant hypophosphatemia and the risk of death-censored graft failure and mortality after kidney transplantation. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol (2017) 12(8):1301–10. 10.2215/CJN.10270916
49.
ConnollyGMCunninghamRMcNameePTYoungISMaxwellAP. Elevated serum phosphate predicts mortality in renal transplant recipients. Transplantation (2009) 87(7):1040–4. 10.1097/TP.0b013e31819cd122
50.
StevensKKMorganIRPatelRKGeddesCCMarkPBJardineAGet alSerum phosphate and outcome at one year after deceased donor renal transplantation. Clin Transpl (2011) 25(2):E199–E204. 10.1111/j.1399-0012.2011.01400.x
51.
MoeSMZidehsaraiMPChambersMAJackmanLARadcliffeJSTrevinoLLet alVegetarian compared with meat dietary protein source and phosphorus homeostasis in chronic kidney disease. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol (2011) 6(2):257–64. 10.2215/CJN.05040610
52.
St-JulesDEGoldfarbDSSevickMA. Nutrient non-equivalence: does restricting high-potassium plant foods help to prevent hyperkalemia in hemodialysis patients?J Ren Nutr (2016) 26(5):282–7. 10.1053/j.jrn.2016.02.005
53.
NooriNKalantar-ZadehKKovesdyCPMuraliSBBrossRNissensonARet alDietary potassium intake and mortality in long-term hemodialysis patients. Am J Kidney Dis (2010) 56(2):338–47. 10.1053/j.ajkd.2010.03.022
54.
BlackAPAnjosJSCardozoLCarmoFLDolengaCJNakaoLSet alDoes low-protein diet influence the uremic toxin serum levels from the gut microbiota in nondialysis chronic kidney disease patients?J Ren Nutr (2018) 28(3):208–14. 10.1053/j.jrn.2017.11.007
55.
CamerottoCCupistiAD'AlessandroCMuzioFGallieniM. Dietary fiber and gut microbiota in renal diets. Nutrients (2019) 11(9):2149. 10.3390/nu11092149
56.
DemirciBGTutalEEminsoyIOKulahESezerS. Dietary fiber intake: its relation with glycation end products and arterial stiffness in end-stage renal disease patients. J Ren Nutr (2019) 29(2):136–42. 10.1053/j.jrn.2018.08.007
57.
ChauveauPCombeCFouqueDAparicioM. Vegetarianism: advantages and drawbacks in patients with chronic kidney diseases. J Ren Nutr (2013) 23(6):399–405. 10.1053/j.jrn.2013.08.004
58.
Nolte FongJVMooreLW. Nutrition trends in kidney transplant recipients: the importance of dietary monitoring and need for evidence-based recommendations. Front Med (Lausanne) (2018) 5:302. 10.3389/fmed.2018.00302
59.
TantisattamoEKalantar-ZadehKMolnarMZ. Nutritional and dietary interventions to prolong renal allograft survival after kidney transplantation. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens (2022) 31(1):6–17. 10.1097/MNH.0000000000000757
60.
RosmanJBter WeePMMeijerSPiers-BechtTPSluiterWJDonkerAJ. Prospective randomised trial of early dietary protein restriction in chronic renal failure. Lancet (1984) 2(8415):1291–6. 10.1016/s0140-6736(84)90818-3
61.
RosenbergMESwansonJEThomasBLHostetterTH. Glomerular and hormonal responses to dietary protein intake in human renal disease. Am J Physiol (1987) 253(6):F1083–F1090. 10.1152/ajprenal.1987.253.6.F1083
62.
IhleBUBeckerGJWhitworthJACharlwoodRAKincaid-SmithPS. The effect of protein restriction on the progression of renal insufficiency. N Engl J Med (1989) 321(26):1773–7. 10.1056/NEJM198912283212601
63.
RosenbergMEChmielewskiDHostetterTH. Effect of dietary protein on rat renin and angiotensinogen gene expression. J Clin Invest (1990) 85(4):1144–9. 10.1172/JCI114546
64.
PallerMSHostetterTH. Dietary protein increases plasma renin and reduces pressor reactivity to angiotensin II. Am J Physiol (1986) 251(1 Pt 2):F34–F39. 10.1152/ajprenal.1986.251.1.F34
65.
HostetterTHOlsonJLRennkeHGVenkatachalamMABrennerBM. Hyperfiltration in remnant nephrons: a potentially adverse response to renal ablation. Am J Physiol (1981) 241(1):F85–F93. 10.1152/ajprenal.1981.241.1.F85
66.
NathKAKrenSMHostetterTH. Dietary protein restriction in established renal injury in the rat. Selective role of glomerular capillary pressure in progressive glomerular dysfunction. J Clin Invest (1986) 78(5):1199–205. 10.1172/JCI112703
67.
NathKACroattAJHostetterTH. Oxygen consumption and oxidant stress in surviving nephrons. Am J Physiol (1990) 258(5 Pt 2):F1354–F1362. 10.1152/ajprenal.1990.258.5.F1354
68.
Kalantar-ZadehKJoshiSSchlueterRCookeJBrown-TortoriciADonnellyMet alPlant-dominant low-protein diet for conservative management of chronic kidney disease. Nutrients (2020) 12(7):1931. 10.3390/nu12071931
69.
Kalantar-ZadehKRheeCMJoshiSBrown-TortoriciAKramerHM. Medical nutrition therapy using plant-focused low-protein meal plans for management of chronic kidney disease in diabetes. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens (2022) 31(1):26–35. 10.1097/MNH.0000000000000761
70.
WhittierFCEvansDHDuttonSRossGLugerANolphKDet alNutrition in renal transplantation. Am J Kidney Dis (1985) 6(6):405–11. 10.1016/s0272-6386(85)80103-7
71.
KosokuAIwaiTIshiharaTKabeiKNishideSMaedaKet alInfluence of protein intake on the changes in skeletal muscle mass after kidney transplantation. Clin Nutr (2022) 41(9):1881–8. 10.1016/j.clnu.2022.07.028
72.
GórskaMKurnatowskaI. Nutrition disturbances and metabolic complications in kidney transplant recipients: etiology, methods of assessment and Prevention-A review. Nutrients (2022) 14(23):4996. 10.3390/nu14234996
73.
SotlerRPoljšakBDahmaneRJukićTPavan JukićDRotimCet alProoxidant activities of antioxidants and their impact on health. Acta Clin Croat (2019) 58(4):726–36. 10.20471/acc.2019.58.04.20
74.
DennisJMWittingPK. Protective role for antioxidants in acute kidney disease. Nutrients (2017) 9(7):718. 10.3390/nu9070718
75.
DunfordECRiddellMC. The metabolic implications of glucocorticoids in a high-fat diet setting and the counter-effects of exercise. Metabolites (2016) 6(4):44. 10.3390/metabo6040044
76.
GeerEBIslamJBuettnerC. Mechanisms of glucocorticoid-induced insulin resistance: focus on adipose tissue function and lipid metabolism. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am (2014) 43(1):75–102. 10.1016/j.ecl.2013.10.005
77.
AthinarayananSJRobertsCGPVangalaCShettyGKMcKenzieALWeimbsTet alThe case for a ketogenic diet in the management of kidney disease. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care (2024) 12(2):e004101. 10.1136/bmjdrc-2024-004101
78.
LeowZZXGuelfiKJDavisEAJonesTWFournierPA. The glycaemic benefits of a very-low-carbohydrate ketogenic diet in adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus May be opposed by increased hypoglycaemia risk and dyslipidaemia. Diabet Med (2018). 10.1111/dme.13663
79.
KrebsJDParrySACresswellPReynoldsANHannaAHaeuslerS. A randomised trial of the feasibility of a low carbohydrate diet vs standard carbohydrate counting in adults with type 1 diabetes taking body weight into account. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr (2016) 25(1):78–84. 10.6133/apjcn.2016.25.1.11
80.
SumithranPPrendergastLADelbridgeEPurcellKShulkesAKriketosAet alKetosis and appetite-mediating nutrients and hormones after weight loss. Eur J Clin Nutr (2013) 67(7):759–64. 10.1038/ejcn.2013.90
81.
VeldhorstMSmeetsASoenenSHochstenbach-WaelenAHurselRDiepvensKet alProtein-induced satiety: effects and mechanisms of different proteins. Physiol Behav (2008) 94(2):300–7. 10.1016/j.physbeh.2008.01.003
82.
HeinemannL. Variability of insulin absorption and insulin action. Diabetes Technol Ther (2002) 4(5):673–82. 10.1089/152091502320798312
83.
D'AlessandroCGianneseDPiccoliGBPanichiVCupistiA. Ketogenic diets in chronic kidney disease patients: a review for skeptics by skeptics. J Nephrol (2025) 38(6):1541–56. 10.1007/s40620-025-02285-7
84.
WilliamsMSTurosE. The chemistry of the ketogenic diet: updates and opportunities in organic synthesis. Int J Mol Sci (2021) 22(10):5230. 10.3390/ijms22105230
85.
GershuniVMYanSLMediciV. Nutritional ketosis for weight management and reversal of metabolic syndrome. Curr Nutr Rep (2018) 7(3):97–106. 10.1007/s13668-018-0235-0
86.
ZhuHBiDZhangYKongCDuJWuXet alKetogenic diet for human diseases: the underlying mechanisms and potential for clinical implementations. Signal Transduct Target Ther (2022) 7(1):11. 10.1038/s41392-021-00831-w
87.
CahillGFJrAokiTTRudermanNB. Ketosis. Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc (1973) 84:184–202.
88.
FukaoTLopaschukGDMitchellGA. Pathways and control of ketone body metabolism: on the fringe of lipid biochemistry. Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids (2004) 70(3):243–51. 10.1016/j.plefa.2003.11.001
89.
EllenbroekJHvan DijckLTönsHARabelinkTJCarlottiFBallieuxBEPBet alLong-term ketogenic diet causes glucose intolerance and reduced β- and α-cell mass but no weight loss in mice. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab (2014) 306(5):E552–E558. 10.1152/ajpendo.00453.2013
90.
SeidelmannSBClaggettBChengSHenglinMShahASteffenLMet alDietary carbohydrate intake and mortality: a prospective cohort study and meta-analysis. Lancet Public Health (2018) 3(9):e419–e428. 10.1016/S2468-2667(18)30135-X
91.
BravataDMSandersLHuangJKrumholzHMOlkinIGardnerCDet alEfficacy and safety of low-carbohydrate diets: a systematic review. JAMA (2003) 289(14):1837–50. 10.1001/jama.289.14.1837
92.
LudwigDSHuFBTappyLBrand-MillerJ. Dietary carbohydrates: role of quality and quantity in chronic disease. BMJ (2018) 361:k2340. 10.1136/bmj.k2340
93.
ReynoldsAMannJCummingsJWinterNMeteETe MorengaL. Carbohydrate quality and human health: a series of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Lancet (2019) 393(10170):434–45. 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31809-9
94.
GiuglianoDMaiorinoMIBellastellaGEspositoK. More sugar? No, thank you! the elusive nature of low carbohydrate diets. Endocrine (2018) 61(3):383–7. 10.1007/s12020-018-1580-x
95.
SharifAMooreRBaboolalK. Influence of lifestyle modification in renal transplant recipients with postprandial hyperglycemia. Transplantation (2008) 85(3):353–8. 10.1097/TP.0b013e3181605ebf
96.
WissingKMPipeleersL. Obesity, metabolic syndrome and diabetes mellitus after renal transplantation: prevention and treatment. Transpl Rev (Orlando) (2014) 28(2):37–46. 10.1016/j.trre.2013.12.004
97.
GruessnerRW. Tacrolimus in pancreas transplantation: a multicenter analysis. Tacrolimus pancreas transplant study group. Clin Transpl (1997) 11(4):299–312.
98.
SalahudeenAKHostetterTHRaatzSKRosenbergME. Effects of dietary protein in patients with chronic renal transplant rejection. Kidney Int (1992) 41(1):183–90. 10.1038/ki.1992.25
99.
BernardiABiasiaFPatiTPivaMD'AngeloABuccianteG. Long-term protein intake control in kidney transplant recipients: effect in kidney graft function and in nutritional status. Am J Kidney Dis (2003) 41(3 Suppl. 1):S146–S152. 10.1053/ajkd.2003.50105
100.
van den BergEEngberinkMFBrinkEJvan BaakMAGansROBNavisGet alDietary protein, blood pressure and renal function in renal transplant recipients. Br J Nutr (2013) 109(8):1463–70. 10.1017/S0007114512003455
101.
DeetmanPESaidMYKromhoutDDullaartRPFKootstra-RosJESandersJSFet alUrinary urea excretion and long-term outcome after renal transplantation. Transplantation (2015) 99(5):1009–15. 10.1097/TP.0000000000000464
102.
LeeJRMuthukumarTDadhaniaDToussaintNCLingLPamerEet alGut microbial community structure and complications after kidney transplantation: a pilot study. Transplantation (2014) 98(7):697–705. 10.1097/TP.0000000000000370
103.
HobbyGPKaradutaODusioGFSinghMZybailovBLArthurJM. Chronic kidney disease and the gut microbiome. Am J Physiol Ren Physiol (2019) 316(6):F1211–F1217. 10.1152/ajprenal.00298.2018
104.
WinichakoonPChaiwarithRChattipakornNChattipakornSC. Impact of gut microbiota on kidney transplantation. Transpl Rev (Orlando) (2022) 36(1):100668. 10.1016/j.trre.2021.100668
105.
MeijersBKDe LoorHBammensBVerbekeKVanrenterghemYEvenepoelP. p-Cresyl sulfate and indoxyl sulfate in hemodialysis patients. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol (2009) 4(12):1932–8. 10.2215/CJN.02940509
106.
CanyellesMBorràsCRotllanNTondoMEscolà-GilJCBlanco-VacaF. Gut microbiota-derived TMAO: a causal factor promoting atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease?Int J Mol Sci (2023) 24(3):1940. 10.3390/ijms24031940
Summary
Keywords
immunosuppression, ketogenic diet, kidney transplantation, mediterranean diet, metabolic complications
Citation
Caldiroli L, Molinari P, Vettoretti S, Regalia A, Verdesca S, Castellano G, Gallieni M and Alfieri C (2026) Nutritional strategies in kidney transplantation: optimising outcomes beyond surgery. Transpl. Int. 39:16322. doi: 10.3389/ti.2026.16322
Received
29 January 2026
Revised
29 May 2026
Accepted
14 September 2026
Published
24 September 2026
Volume
39 - 2026
Updates
Copyright
© 2026 Caldiroli, Molinari, Vettoretti, Regalia, Verdesca, Castellano, Gallieni and Alfieri.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Paolo Molinari, paolo.molinari1@unimi.it
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.