We read with great interest the recent article by Leonard Knoedler et al., titled “Experimental Swine Models for Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation and Immunosuppression: A Systematic Review and Case Report of a Novel Heterotopic Hemifacial Swine Model”, which provides a thorough overview of the current strategies for VCA studies in swine. We commend the authors for their comprehensive synthesis of recent advancements in this evolving field and their description of a novel heterotopic partial face transplant model in this species. Experimental VCA models for immunological studies must incorporate the essential components of VCA, and the innovative hemifacial model aligns well with that requirement. Of particular interest, the design conveniently includes mucosal tissue. It presents anatomical features that allow for the integration of vascularized bone marrow, an element shown to be relevant in tolerance induction studies through the establishment of mixed hematopoietic chimerism [1]. Furthermore, porcine models are especially valuable: while nonhuman primates remain a cornerstone for certain translational endpoints, their use is constrained by cost, ethical considerations, and regulatory restrictions. They are therefore most critical at the final stage of translational research, typically after compiling strong data from small animal and swine studies. Pigs offer anatomical and physiological similarities to humans, facilitating surgical refinement, preservation protocol optimization, and immunologic studies. Importantly, experimental studies in whole-eye transplantation must be ethically justified by their potential to advance vision restoration, and should adhere to established animal welfare frameworks [2] as well as recent field-specific ethical analyses [3]. At the same time, heterotopic replantation studies, although not directly assessing visual restoration, can provide critical insights into ex vivo preservation strategies and graft viability, which are indispensable steps toward making functional WET a clinical reality, while also informing the design of future orthotopic models that impose a higher experimental burden on the recipient animal.
Among the diverse spectrum of VCAs, a new entity has emerged: whole-eye transplantation (WET). This groundbreaking procedure was first performed by Rodriguez et al. at NYU [4, 5] as part of a face VCA, aiming for morphological restoration in a patient who had sustained a severe facial injury with loss of the left eye. This groundbreaking achievement has renewed hope for patients with ocular blindness by demonstrating the technical feasibility of whole-eye transplantation, albeit without vision restoration to date. It has also underscored the need for extensive preclinical research to optimize key aspects such as graft preservation, nerve coaptation, and immunosuppressive strategies. In parallel, it has stimulated renewed interest in WET research, building on earlier work already undertaken in several animal models, including orthotopic replantation experiments in rodents [6], as well as human anatomical studies [7–9]. The porcine whole eye vascularized composite allotransplant model has been described [10, 11] and presents several distinct anatomical advantages. It includes the eyeball, palpébra, lacrimal gland, and intraorbital content. Notably, the absence of a lateral orbital wall [12] allows for a vascular configuration that is particularly favorable for procurement and experimental manipulation. The facial vein, originating from the frontal vein and forming part of the external jugular vein system, shares a communicating branch with the ophthalmic vein. On the arterial side, the ophthalmic artery maintains a direct communicating branch with the external carotid system, allowing the arterial pedicle of the WET to be dissected from the ophthalmic artery proximally to the external and common carotid arteries in the neck. This feature facilitates ex vivo experiments and transplantation studies, enabling WET procurement solely via the external carotid artery and jugular veins without intracranial dissection (Figure 1). Our group has recently refined and adapted this porcine model for ex vivo machine perfusion studies [13] and confirmed that these anatomical features are consistent across different pig strains, including Yucatan, Yorkshire, and common commercial breeds (unpublished data). Notably, the WET unit can also be combined with other facial components into chimeric composite flaps, including the ear and additional facial subunits.
FIGURE 1

Whole eye transplantation model in the pig.
Non–skin-bearing VCA models, such as uterine [14] and laryngeal [15] transplantation in swine, have also been developed, offering valuable insights into surgical training, preservation strategies, and immunosuppression. However, these models lie beyond the scope of the present discussion. As WET represents an even more complex and sensitive category of VCA that has only recently emerged in clinical practice, it fully fits within the VCA domain. While it holds remarkable translational promise, substantial work remains to address its unique anatomical, immunological, and neurophysiological challenges.
In conclusion, incorporating WET models into future VCA studies will be essential to tackle key hurdles, including immunological compatibility, preservation strategies, and restoration of function. Fostering close collaboration among microsurgeons, transplant immunologists, and neuroscientists will be critical to accelerating the translation of experimental advances into effective clinical protocols for WET, and VCA more broadly.
Statements
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.
Ethics statement
The animal study was approved by Massachusetts General Hospital IACUC. The study was conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements.
Author contributions
HO conceptualized the manuscript, conducted the literature review, and drafted the initial version. YB contributed to manuscript drafting, critical revisions, and literature analysis. CC and AL provided expert input on vascularized composite allotransplantation models, supervised the work, and critically revised the manuscript for important intellectual content. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Funding
The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.
Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.
References
1.
Barth RN Rodriguez ED Mundinger GS Nam AJ Ha JS Hui-Chou H et al Vascularized Bone Marrow-Based Immunosuppression Inhibits Rejection of Vascularized Composite Allografts in Nonhuman Primates. Am J Transpl (2011) 11(7):1407–16. 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2011.03551.x
2.
National Research Council (US). In: Committee for the Update of the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. 8th ed. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (2011). Available online at: https://nap.nationalacademies.org/read/12910/chapter/1 (Accessed September 15, 2025).
3.
Caplan A . Reopening the “Window to the Soul”? The Ethics of Eye Transplantation now and in the Future. Am J Bioeth (2024) 24(5):6–7. 10.1080/15265161.2024.2333218
4.
Nowogrodzki J . World's First Whole-Eye Transplant: The Innovations that Made It Possible. Nature (2024) 633(8030):500–1. 10.1038/d41586-024-02906-4
5.
Lico M Hanley K Shah A Chinta S Ceradini DJ Rodriguez ED . Swallowing Function After Pioneering Partial Face and Whole Eye Transplant: Clinical Insights. Am J Speech Lang Pathol (2025) 34(4):1921–30. 10.1044/2025_AJSLP-24-00364
6.
Li Y Komatsu C He L Miller MR Noori J van der Merwe Y et al Surgical Techniques and Outcome Assessment of a Novel Vascularized Orthotopic Rodent Whole Eye Transplantation Model. PLoS One (2025) 20(5):e0311392. 10.1371/journal.pone.0311392
7.
Siemionow M Bozkurt M Zor F Kulahci Y Uygur S al OC et al A New Composite Eyeball-Periorbital Transplantation Model in Humans: An Anatomical Study in Preparation for Eyeball Transplantation. Plast Reconstr Surg (2018) 141(4):1011–8. 10.1097/PRS.0000000000004250
8.
Brydges HT Onuh OC Chaya BF Tran DL Cassidy MF Dedania VS et al Combined Face and Whole Eye Transplantation: Cadaveric Rehearsals and Feasibility Assessment. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open (2023) 11(11):e5409. 10.1097/GOX.0000000000005409
9.
Davidson EH Wang EW Yu JY Fernandez-Miranda JC Wang DJ Richards N et al Total Human Eye Allotransplantation: Developing Surgical Protocols for Donor and Recipient Procedures. Plast Reconstr Surg (2016) 138(6):1297–308. 10.1097/PRS.0000000000002821
10.
Bravo MG Granoff MD Johnson AR Lee BT . Development of a New Large-Animal Model for Composite Face and Whole-Eye Transplantation: A Novel Application for Anatomical Mapping Using Indocyanine Green and Liquid Latex. Plast Reconstr Surg (2020) 145(1):67e–75e. 10.1097/PRS.0000000000006322
11.
Rousou C Hoogenboom P van Overdam KA Storm G Dorrestijn J Mastrobattista E . A Technical Protocol for an Experimental Ex Vivo Model Using Arterially Perfused Porcine Eyes. Exp Eye Res (2019) 181:171–7. 10.1016/j.exer.2019.02.003
12.
Kyllar M Štembírek J Danek Z Hodan R Stránský J Machoň V et al A Porcine Model: Surgical Anatomy of the Orbit for Maxillofacial Surgery. Lab Anim (2016) 50(2):125–36. 10.1177/0023677215577923
13.
Oubari H Cabanel L Van Dieren L Berkane Y Randolph MA Uygun K et al 32. Preservation of a Whole Eye Transplant by Machine Perfusion: A First Study on a Porcine Model. Transplantation (2025) 109(6S2):20. 10.1097/01.tp.0001123876.23176.a5
14.
Cabanel L Oubari H Dion L Lavoué V Randolph MA Cetrulo CL et al Establishing a Swine Model to Study Uterus Dynamic Preservation and Transplantation. J Vis Exp (2024) 20:214. 10.3791/67357
15.
Henderson D Knoedler L Niederegger T Fenske J Mathieu O Hundeshagen G et al What are the Functional Outcomes of Total Laryngeal Transplantation? A Systematic Review of Preclinical and Clinical Studies. Front Immunol (2025) 16:1631525. 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1631525
Summary
Keywords
vascularized composite allotransplantation, VCA, whole eye transplantation, WET, swine models
Citation
Oubari H, Berkane Y, Cetrulo CL and Lellouch AG (2025) Emerging Entities in Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation: A New Layer to Ongoing Challenges. Transpl. Int. 38:15420. doi: 10.3389/ti.2025.15420
Received
13 August 2025
Accepted
17 September 2025
Published
17 October 2025
Volume
38 - 2025
Updates
Copyright
© 2025 Oubari, Berkane, Cetrulo and Lellouch.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Haizam Oubari, houbari@mgh.harvard.edu; Alexandre G. Lellouch, alexandre.lellouch@cshs.org
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.