ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Transpl. Int.

Reassessing Simultaneous Pancreas-Kidney Vs. Kidney Transplant Alone: A Propensity-Weighted Analysis of Survival and Morbidity

  • 1. Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, United States

  • 2. University of Colorado Hospital, Aurora, United States, Colorado

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Abstract

This study compares outcomes between Simultaneous Pancreas-Kidney Transplantation (SPKT) and Deceased Donor Kidney Transplantation (DDKT) in recipients with diabetes, assessing survival benefits against surgical and immunological risks. We analyzed Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients data (2014-2023) to assess patient and kidney graft survival. Overlap propensity score weighting was applied to adjust for group differences. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate survival outcomes in unadjusted, covariate-adjusted, and weighted analyses. Among 22,545 recipients with diabetes (25% SPKT), those receiving SPKT were younger (41 vs. 52 years), predominantly non-Hispanic white, had type 1 diabetes, lower BMI, shorter dialysis duration, and higher preemptive transplant rates (all p<0.001). Overlap-weighted (ow) analyses showed no significant differences in 5- and 10-year patient (SPKT: 86%, 71%; DDKT: 87%, 74%) and kidney graft survival (SPKT: 80%, 66%; DDKT: 83%, 62%). SPKT recipients with graft survival at 1 year experienced higher one-year treated rejection (owOR: 2.80, 95% CI: 1.75-4.49) and hospital readmissions (owOR: 2.05, 95% CI: 1.62-2.60). However, among recipients with type 1 diabetes and BMI <30, SPKT was associated with lower mortality. After adjustment for selection bias, SPKT did not improve long-term survival compared to DDKT and was associated with greater early morbidity.

Summary

Keywords

Allocation system, SPKT, ddkt, patient survival, allograf survival

Received

20 May 2025

Accepted

09 December 2025

Copyright

© 2025 Budhiraja, Lopez, Arrigain and Schold. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Pooja Budhiraja, budhiraja.pooja@mayo.edu

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Share article