Abstract
Pruritus is the most burdensome and persistent symptom of atopic dermatitis (AD), often impairing quality of life more profoundly than visible skin inflammation. Emerging evidence indicates that itch in AD is not merely a downstream consequence of inflammation but an active disease driver that reshapes epidermal barrier integrity and neural plasticity. At the center of AD itch lies a dynamic, bidirectional network linking keratinocytes and sensory neurons. Barrier disruption triggers the release of keratinocyte-derived pruritogens and stress signals that directly activate or sensitize cutaneous nerve fibers, amplifying itch transmission. These epithelial–neuronal interactions are further integrated by intracellular signaling pathways that coordinate environmental and neural inputs. This review synthesizes current mechanistic insights across epidermal and neural compartments and proposes a conceptual framework in which AD itch progresses from peripherally driven signaling to centrally amplified and neurally entrenched states.
Introduction
Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory skin disorder in which pruritus is the most distressing symptom. Unlike visible skin lesions that fluctuate with disease activity, itch is experienced continuously by patients and is often recognized as the most predominant disease-related burden [, ].
Chronic itch in AD imposes a substantial disease burden that extends far beyond the skin. Persistent pruritus disrupts sleep architecture, impairs daytime functioning, and profoundly diminishes quality of life in both pediatric and adult patients []. Repetitive scratching, driven by uncontrollable itch, leads to epidermal barrier disruption, secondary inflammation, and neural sensitization, thereby perpetuating the itch–scratch cycle []. Over time, this vicious cycle contributes to disease chronicity, treatment resistance, and psychological comorbidities, highlighting itch not merely as a symptom but as a key determinant of long-term disease trajectory.
Importantly, itch in AD is qualitatively and mechanistically distinct from pruritus associated with other inflammatory or non-inflammatory dermatoses. AD-associated itch is characteristically intense, persistent, and poorly relieved by conventional antihistamines, reflecting the predominance of non-histaminergic mechanisms []. Moreover, pruritus in AD functions as a disease driver rather than a passive consequence of cutaneous inflammation, actively reshaping epidermal structure and neural plasticity. Even non-lesional skin from patients with AD exhibits heightened cowhage-induced itch compared with healthy controls, indicating that altered sensory responsiveness is an intrinsic feature of the disease rather than merely a byproduct of visible inflammation []. This paradigm shift challenges the traditional view of itch as a secondary manifestation and positions it as a central pathogenic process in AD.
At the core of this process lies a complex network of interactions between sensory neurons and keratinocytes. Epithelial-derived mediators and neuronal signals form bidirectional circuits that amplify itch perception while reshaping cutaneous and neural responsiveness. In this review, we summarize current evidence on the mediators and signaling pathways that coordinate epithelial and neuronal responses in AD-associated itch (Figure 1).
FIGURE 1
This review was conducted as a narrative review focusing on recent mechanistic insights into atopic dermatitis-associated pruritus. Relevant publications were primarily identified through PubMed database searches using combinations of keywords related to atopic dermatitis, itch, neuroimmune interactions, epithelial-derived mediators, cytokines, neuropeptides, neurotrophic factors, and JAK-STAT signaling pathways. Both experimental and clinical studies were considered, with emphasis placed on studies contributing to the understanding of neuro-immune-epithelial crosstalk and chronic itch mechanisms.
Epithelial injury and damage-induced pruritogenic pathways
AD is fundamentally a disease of epithelial barrier disruption. Beyond serving as a passive physical shield, epithelium is a source of potent pruritogenic signals. Damage-induced mediators released from stressed keratinocytes act on adjacent sensory nerves and immune cells, establishing a self-amplifying itch–scratch–injury cycle. Injured keratinocytes, resulting from mechanical scratching or barrier dysfunction in AD lesions, release abundant alarmins such as TSLP, IL-33, and IL-25, which play important roles in disease pathogenesis []. These epithelial cytokines not only serve as pivotal initiators of type 2 immune responses but can also act directly on sensory neurons. Among these alarmins, relatively limited data are available regarding the direct role of IL-25 in itch, and its contribution appears to be largely indirect []. Although no direct role of IL-25 in itch induction has been demonstrated in AD, it can potentiate type 2 inflammatory cytokines such as IL-13, indicating a potential indirect contribution to pruritus []. In the following sections, we will focus on TSLP and IL-33, which have been more extensively studied in the context of AD-associated pruritus.
Thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP)
TSLP is a cytokine produced by epithelial cells that signals through a heterodimeric receptor complex consisting of the TSLP receptor and the IL-7 receptor α subunit []. Engagement of this receptor complex potently activates myeloid dendritic cells and promotes type 2–skewed immune responses involving Th2 cells, mast cells, and natural killer T cells [, ]. TSLP further drives the differentiation of naïve T cells into Th2 cells, leading to the production of key type 2 cytokines, including IL-4 and IL-13 [, ]. Serum level of TSLP is significantly elevated in patients with AD and correlated with the disease severity []. Wilson et al. further reported that calcium-dependent ORAI1/NFAT signaling in keratinocytes regulates TSLP release which in turn directly activates transient receptor potential A1 (TRPA1)+ sensory neurons to induce itch, thereby linking epithelial activation to neurogenic responses []. Interestingly, such epithelial–neuronal crosstalk via TSLP is not confined to the skin but also involves airway epithelial cells and sensory neurons, which may serve as a contributing factor to both the initiation and evolution of the atopic march [].
IL-33
IL-33 participates in the inflammatory process of AD and mediates type 2 responses, including the induction of IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13 []. IL-33 also synergizes with IL-4 to mediate IL-31 production [], a key pruritogen in AD []. Moreover, IL-33 enhances histamine-induced itch through mast cell activation, leading to IL-13 release, which in turn acts on sensory neurons to potentiate histamine-dependent pruritic signaling []. In addition to the above indirect effect, IL-33 receptor (ST2) expression has been identified in both human and mouse dorsal root ganglion (DRG) and IL-33 can sensitize DRG neurons to IL-4-, IL-13-mediated signaling [, ], suggesting a potential role in neuro-immune communication. Beyond peripheral neuroimmune interactions, spinal IL-33/ST2 signaling has been reported to contribute to chronic itch via activation of the astrocytic JAK2–STAT3 pathway, which subsequently enhances gastrin-releasing peptide (GRP)/GRP receptor (GRPR) axis in a murine model of inflammatory dermatitis (2,4-dinitrofluorobenzene -induced allergic contact dermatitis) mouse model, suggesting a potential mechanism relevant to chronic itch []. GRP, a key mediator in spinal pruritoceptive signaling [, ], has also been shown to implicate in AD-related pruritus. Serum GRP levels are increased in patients with AD and correlate with both disease severity and itch intensity [, ].
Studies in both AD patients and murine models of AD-like dermatitis (e.g., MC903-induced dermatitis) have demonstrated elevated IL-33 in circulation, which correlates with clinical severity and characteristics of skin lesions [, , ]. Functionally, one study revealed that IL-33 enhances neuronal excitability indirectly through activation of mast cells and basophils, and potentially directly via ST2-expressing sensory neuronal subsets. However, this study did not observe increased circulating IL-33 levels in patients with AD, nor a significant correlation between IL-33 expression and pruritus severity []. In the same study, specific single-nucleotide polymorphisms within the IL33 gene have been associated with increased itch severity, suggesting that genetic predisposition may modulate IL-33–driven pruritic responses []. Another study likewise reported elevated IL-33 levels in patients with AD and in murine models of MC903-induced AD like dermatitis; however, IL-33 receptor signaling restricted to neurons was dispensable for the development of itch in AD-like disease []. Overall, evidence supporting IL-33 in AD-associated itch derives from both human and animal studies; however, most findings remain correlative or model-dependent, and its direct causal role in human AD itch is still not fully established. Taken together, these findings suggest that IL-33 may participate in itch-related neuro-immune signaling at both peripheral and sensory neuronal (DRG) levels. However, its precise contribution to AD-associated itch remains incompletely defined, as current evidence is largely indirect and sometimes conflicting, and whether IL-33 functions as a direct driver of itch in AD requires further clarification.
Type 2–associated pruritogenic signals
IL-4, IL-13
The immune response in AD is characterized by a Th2-dominant profile, resulting in increased production of type 2 cytokines and chemokines and subsequent recruitment of inflammatory cells []. Among these mediators, IL-4 and IL-13 are central drivers of AD pathogenesis. IL-4 signals through both type I and type II receptor complexes, whereas IL-13 signals exclusively through the type II receptor []. Beyond their established immunomodulatory functions, type 2 cytokines directly interact with the sensory nervous system to promote itch. Both IL-4 and IL-13 can directly activate mouse and human sensory neurons, with IL-4 additionally sensitizing neurons to a broad range of pruritogens []. Mechanistically, chronic itch requires neuronal IL-4Rα–JAK1 signaling, as sensory neuron–specific deletion of IL-4Rα or JAK1 markedly reduces pruritus in mice. Importantly, a proof-of-concept clinical study shows that JAK inhibition effectively relieves recalcitrant chronic itch, even in patients unresponsive to conventional immunosuppressants. These findings highlight an evolutionarily conserved paradigm in which type 2 immune pathways function within sensory neurons, identifying neuronal IL-4Rα–JAK1 signaling as a therapeutic target in type 2–driven itch, including AD [].
Recent study using human DRG neurons have provided direct evidence that type 2 cytokines—including IL-4, IL-13, and IL-33—can sensitize sensory neurons to both histaminergic and non-histaminergic pruritogens. Sensitization occurs rapidly, within 2 h of cytokine exposure, and a discrete subset of neurons exhibits immediate extracellular Ca2+–dependent calcium influx in response to IL-4 and IL-13. With prolonged exposure, IL-4 and IL-13 induce a shared, cytokine-specific transcriptional program that is distinct from that elicited by IL-33 or other inflammatory stimuli, indicating broad and sustained neuromodulatory effects []. These findings demonstrate that type 2 cytokines not only shape immune responses but also directly prime human sensory neurons to amplify itch, thereby contributing to neuroinflammation and hypersensitivity in AD.
IL-31
IL-31 is a crucial cytokine implicated in the pathophysiology of AD. Acting through its receptor complex composed of IL-31 receptor A (IL-31RA) and oncostatin M receptor (OSMR), IL-31 plays a dual role in promoting itch and modulating cutaneous inflammation. Although OSMR is shared with the oncostatin M signaling pathway, current evidence primarily supports a role for IL-31—rather than OSM itself—in directly mediating pruritus. IL-31 is produced predominantly by Th2 cells but is also expressed by other immune cells, including basophils and macrophages []. In addition to Th2 cells, recent evidence has identified M2-polarized macrophages as an additional and clinically relevant source of IL-31 in AD. In lesional skin, IL-31+CD68+CD163+ macrophages closely correlate with epidermal TSLP expression, dermal periostin levels, and basophil infiltration, suggesting a coordinated immune network sustaining chronic itch []. In the MC903-induced AD-like mouse model, upregulation of TSLP and periostin has been associated with basophil recruitment and the presence of IL-31–producing macrophages, resulting in augmented scratching behavior. These findings delineate a TSLP–periostin–basophil–macrophage axis that reinforces neuroinflammatory signaling, defined as bidirectional communication between immune mediators and sensory neurons, and IL-31 driven pruritus in AD [].
In line with its pruritogenic role, IL-31RA is expressed both in human and mice DRG. Cutaneous or intrathecal administration of IL-31 induces robust scratching behavior []. At the neuronal level, IL-31RA signaling triggers intracellular Ca2+ release and ERK activation in a restricted population of IL-31RA+/TRPV1+/TRPA1+ sensory neurons, thereby mediating T cell–dependent itch []. Additionally, a recent study has revealed that upon IL-31 stimulation, STAT3 undergoes rapid activation and nuclear translocation in IL-31R+ neurons, followed by propagation of signaling to other pruriceptive neuronal subsets, enhancing itch responses to diverse pruritogens. Notably, STAT3 not only functions downstream of the IL-31R but also transcriptionally regulates IL-31R expression, establishing a feed forward loop that amplifies neuronal sensitivity to IL-31. Moreover, dermatitis-associated pruritus is highly dependent on sensory neuronal STAT3 [], indicating that STAT3 contributes to both IL-31–dependent and IL-31–independent neuroinflammatory itch circuits in AD.
IL-31 also exhibits neuropoietic activity. Both IL-31 transgenic mice and mice receiving exogenous IL-31 display increased cutaneous nerve fiber density. Accordingly, IL-31 promotes axonal elongation and branching selectively in small-diameter sensory neurons through STAT3 phosphorylation []. This provides a mechanistic explanation for neuronal hyperplasia and heightened itch sensitivity in chronic AD.
Beyond peripheral neuronal activation, IL-31 also engages central itch pathways. Pitake et al. demonstrated that IL-31 induces the expression of B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP), encoded by the NPPB gene in sensory neurons, which transmits itch signals through natriuretic peptide receptor A in the spinal cord [], an essential pathway for central itch processing []. Furthermore, IL-31 has been shown to promote neuroinflammation by inducing SNARE-dependent release of brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), encoded by the NPPB gene, from sensory nerves. BNP subsequently enhances cytokine production associated with AD in keratinocytes and dendritic cells through GSK3- and c-Jun–dependent signaling []. Collectively, these findings establish IL-31 as a critical mediator linking peripheral sensory neuron activation, central itch processing, and cutaneous immune amplification through IL-31 induced neuropeptide signaling. IL-31 therefore represents one of the most well-validated cytokines directly linking immune activation to neuronal itch signaling in both experimental and clinical settings.
Among type 2 cytokines, IL-4/IL-13 and IL-31 have the strongest clinical and therapeutic evidence for direct involvement in itch, particularly supported by successful targeting in human studies, whereas other upstream mediators show more indirect neuroimmune effects.
Periostin
Periostin is a downstream mediator of type 2 inflammation, primarily secreted by dermal fibroblasts and has emerged as a conserved pruritogen capable of directly inducing itch across multiple species, including mice, dogs, and non-human primates [, ]. Serum periostin levels are significantly elevated in patients with AD and positively correlate with disease severity []. Periostin is required for the expression of NF-κB–related cytokines (e.g., IL-1B, IL-24, and IL-33) as well as chemokines involved in neutrophil recruitment. In addition, periostin reciprocally induces keratinocyte-derived TSLP, further amplifying type 2 inflammation [, ].
Beyond its indirect pro-pruritic effects via type 2 cytokine induction, periostin directly promotes itch by triggering spontaneous firing of itch-related DRG sensory neurons. In a mouse model of facial AD with scratching (FADS), periostin was shown to activate DRG neurons and induce scratching behavior through engagement of integrin αvβ3 []. Consistently, Mishra et al. demonstrated that periostin binding to integrin αvβ3 directly activates sensory neurons by inducing extracellular calcium influx and disruption of neuronal β3 integrin significantly attenuates scratching behavior. They also showed that periostin-induced itch is mediated by TRPV1 and TRPA1 channels, with BNP serving as a key neuropeptide effector []. Importantly, periostin production in keratinocytes is itself induced by TSLP through the JAK2–STAT3 pathway []. Thereby establishing a feed-forward epithelial–neuronal signaling loop.
Neuro-immune signaling mediators
Bidirectional communication between the nervous and immune systems plays a critical role in the pathogenesis of AD associated pruritus. A growing body of evidence highlights neuro-immune signaling mediators that link sensory nerve activity to cutaneous inflammation, epidermal remodeling, and chronic itch.
NGF
Patients with AD exhibit systemic upregulation of neurogenic mediators, including plasma NGF and other neuropeptides such as vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP), calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), and neuropeptide Y (NPY), with NGF showing the strongest correlation with disease activity []. NGF, a neurotrophin critical for the development, survival, and plasticity of sensory neurons [], is significantly elevated in the stratum corneum of lesional skin from patients with AD compared with healthy controls. Elevated epidermal NGF levels correlate with itch severity, erythema, xerosis, and systemic markers of disease activity, including eosinophil counts and serum lactate dehydrogenase []. In addition, immunohistochemical analyses of early AD lesions demonstrate marked upregulation of NGF and its receptors within both the epidermis and papillary dermis. P75 NGF receptor–positive nerve fibers are significantly increased in number, size, and branching within the dermal papillae []. Ultrastructural analysis reveals increased schwann cell–axon complexes in AD skin, which are associated with plasma NGF levels []. Effective treatment with antihistamines and/or topical corticosteroids leads to a rapid reduction in epidermal NGF, paralleling clinical improvement in pruritus and inflammatory skin changes []. These findings support a central role for NGF in driving neuroimmune interactions and nerve remodeling in AD, potentially contributing to heightened skin nerve sensitivity. Consistent with this concept, blockade of NGF signaling using high-affinity p75 NGF receptor antagonists or anti-NGF antibodies markedly ameliorates dermatitis severity and scratching behavior in the NC/Nga mouse model of AD [, ].
Substance P (SP)
SP is a neuropeptide that exerts its biological effects primarily through activation of the neurokinin-1 (NK1) receptor, which is widely expressed in the central nervous system as well as on various immune cells. Activation of sensory nerve endings by SP induces neurogenic inflammation and is implicated in chronic itch and neural sensitization []. Early studies showed that SP stimulation enhances the production of both IL-4 and interferon-γ in peripheral blood mononuclear cells from patients with AD, indicating its capacity to influence T cell–associated immune responses. [51]. Subsequent work demonstrated that SP increases the release of IL-10 and TNF-α from peripheral blood mononuclear cells, an effect associated with upregulated NK1 receptor expression [52]. Clinically, immunological profiling has revealed elevated plasma SP levels together with increased expression of SP and NK1 receptors on CD8+ T cells in patients with AD [53]. In addition, circulating SP levels are elevated in patients with AD and correlate with disease severity, accompanied by a marked increase in SP-positive nerve fibers in lesional skin [54, 55]. In parallel, SP signaling has been implicated in neuropsychological comorbidities, as depression scores correlate with the number of NK1 receptor–positive dermal cells in both lesional and non-lesional skin, linking tachykinin signaling cutaneous inflammation, chronic itch, and emotional dysregulation [54]. At the molecular level, transcriptomic analyses of itchy AD skin further demonstrate that SP expression positively correlates with patient-reported itch intensity, providing direct evidence for its role in pruritus []. Although a histamine-dependent pathway has been proposed, which was supported by observations of reduced SP levels following antihistamine therapy [56], accumulating evidence indicates that SP can also evoke itch through histamine-independent mechanisms. In a picrylchloride-induced NC/Nga mouse model of AD, NK1 antagonists were able to inhibit scratching behavior [57]; however, mas-related G protein-coupled receptors (MRGPRs) have emerged as key mediators in this context [58]. Specifically, SP has been shown to activate MRGPRX2 on mast cells and MRGPRA1 on sensory neurons, rather than NK1 receptors, to induce non histaminergic itch [59, 60].
Notably, despite substantial evidence supporting pro-pruritic and pro-inflammatory roles of SP, SP has also been reported to exert protective actions in certain experimental settings. Topical administration of SP was able to enhance skin barrier function while reducing the presence of itch-evoking nerve fibers in the epidermis, and alleviated scratching behavior in a 2,4,6-trinitrochlorobenzene (TNCB)–induced AD-like dermatitis model in NC/Nga mice [61]. Additionally, another study demonstrated that SP attenuated inflammation by suppressing systemic immune responses, including reductions in TSLP and TNF-α levels [62]. These findings suggest that SP exerts context-dependent and bidirectional effects in AD pathophysiology, with predominantly pro-pruritic and pro-inflammatory roles supported by clinical and translational evidence, but with potential protective or modulatory effects observed in specific experimental settings.
CGRP
CGRP is a sensory neuropeptide implicated in pruritus. In patients with AD, lesional skin exhibits a marked increase in CGRP-positive nerve-like fibers, accompanied by greater epidermal infiltration of inflammatory cells [63]. In lesional skin, CGRP-positive nerve fiber density correlates with depression and anxiety scores, and CGRP-positive epidermal inflammatory cells show a similar association with depressive symptoms, supporting potential neuroimmune–neuropsychological interactions. Notably, keratinocytes in lesional skin also express CGRP, suggesting that its role extends beyond sensory neurons [63]. Functional studies using innervated skin models reveal that sensory neurons drive keratinocyte proliferation and epidermal thickening in a CGRP-dependent manner, independent of SP [64]. Atopic keratinocytes display increased neurite outgrowth, higher CGRP release, and upregulated CGRP receptor components, making them more responsive to CGRP and resulting in exaggerated epidermal hyperplasia [64]. Collectively, these findings highlight CGRP as a key mediator linking sensory nerve activity to abnormal epidermal remodeling in AD.
Artemin
Artemin, a member of the glial cell line–derived neurotrophic factor family, binds to the GFRα3 receptor [65]. Increased artemin expression has been observed in lesional AD skin, and artemin-expressing fibroblasts accumulate in patients with AD. In addition, SP has been shown to induce artemin expression in fibroblasts [66, 67]. In animal models, intradermal injection of artemin induces peripheral nerve sprouting, thermal hyperalgesia, and scratching behavior in response to warm stimuli, highlighting its role in altering nerve structure and sensitivity [66]. Moreover, emerging evidence links environmental and microbial signals to artemin regulation in AD. The aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR), a key environmental sensor in keratinocytes [68, 69], induces ARTN (artemin) expression upon activation by organic components of air pollutants, which are common aggravating factors in AD [70, 71]. Epidermal AhR activation in patient skin correlates with artemin expression, and experimental models demonstrate that AhR-driven artemin upregulation leads to sensory hyperinnervation and AD-like phenotypes [70, 71]. In parallel, dermatophagoides farinae, one of the major species of HDMs, stimulation via toll like receptor (TLR) 1/2 in keratinocytes induce upregulation of artemin, which promotes neurite outgrowth, neuronal migration, and epidermal hyperinnervation [67]. Collectively, artemin emerges as a key downstream effector linking diverse upstream signals to sensory nerve remodeling and itch in AD.
Neurotrophic mediators such as NGF, CGRP, and artemin primarily derive their evidence from correlative human studies and animal models, with strong support for neuronal remodeling but less direct evidence for causal itch induction in human AD.
JAK–signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT)
The JAK–STAT pathway is a central signaling cascade that mediates cytokine- and growth factor–driven regulation of intracellular gene expression. In this pathway, JAKs function as receptor-associated kinases that transduce extracellular cytokine signals to activate downstream STAT transcription factors [72], To date, four JAK family members (JAK1, JAK2, JAK3, and TYK2) and seven STAT family members (STAT1, STAT2, STAT3, STAT4, STAT5a, STAT5b, and STAT6) have been identified [72]. Increasing evidence indicates that cytokines signaling through the JAK pathway are critically in the pathogenesis of a variety of inflammatory disorders, including AD [73]. One study demonstrated that lesional skin from patients with AD exhibits broad activation of the JAK–STAT pathway across both epidermal and dermal compartments [74]. Increased expression of phosphorylated JAK3 was observed in the epidermis, whereas dermal inflammatory infiltrates showed enhanced activation of phosphorylated JAK1-3. Consistent with this upstream kinase activation, downstream STAT signaling was also upregulated, with increased phosphorylation of STAT2 and STAT3 in AD lesions [74]. Notably, hyperphosphorylation of epidermal JAK1 has been reported in patients with AD [75]. These findings indicate aberrant activation of the JAK–STAT pathway in lesional AD skin.
Using SPADE, a spontaneous mouse model of pruritic dermatitis caused by an epidermal JAK1 gain-of-function mutation, study has further demonstrated that intrinsic activation of JAK1 signaling in keratinocytes is sufficient to drive skin barrier dysfunction, chronic inflammation, and pruritus [75]. In addition, hyperactivation of JAK1 induces pruritic dermatitis through disruption of epidermal barrier integrity and overexpression of serine proteases [75]. Beyond the skin, JAK1 is enriched in pruriceptive neurons and plays a crucial role in the sensation of chronic itch through its function in sensory neurons. Importantly, multiple pruritogenic cytokines—including IL-4, IL-13, and IL-31—signal through JAK-dependent pathways in sensory neurons, highlighting JAK1 as a key convergence point for cytokine-mediated itch signaling. As discussed above, JAK1 is responsible for neuronal IL-4Rα signaling for chronic itch transduction []. Mice with sensory neuron–specific deletion of JAK1 exhibited a marked reduction in scratching behavior during experimentally induced chronic itch, despite persistent skin inflammation. Furthermore, these mice showed abolished neuronal IL-4 responses, providing direct evidence for a neuronal JAK1–dependent mechanism linking type 2 cytokine signaling to itch []. In addition, epithelial-derived cytokines such as TSLP signal through the TSLPR/IL-7Rα receptor complex and activate JAK-STAT pathways, which can directly stimulate pruriceptive neurons and contribute to non-histaminergic itch signaling [76–78]. Beyond type 2 cytokine–mediated itch, JAK inhibitors also exert broad antipruritic effects. Another study demonstrated that oclacitinib (a selective JAK1 inhibitor) and tofacitinib (a pan-JAK inhibitor) suppress scratching induced by diverse pruritogens—including IL-31, TNF-α, histamine, chloroquine, PAR2-activating peptide, and capsaicin—at least in part through direct inhibition of TRPV1 channels, rather than via JAK signaling [79].
In addition to their peripheral actions, JAK1-selective inhibition can directly modulate central neuronal activity. In cultured frontal cortex neurons, electrophysiological studies revealed that neuronal inhibition increases with greater JAK1 selectivity. The selective JAK1 inhibitor upadacitinib produced pronounced effects on neuronal activity, including reduced burst and spike rates, altered burst structure, enhanced firing regularity, and increased network synchronization. In contrast, the pan-JAK inhibitor tofacitinib had minimal effects, whereas JAK1/2 inhibition with baricitinib caused moderate suppression of bursting and firing irregularities [80]. These findings suggest that JAK1-preferential inhibition may directly influence cortical neuronal excitability and network dynamics, supporting a potential neuromodulatory role of JAK signaling beyond immune regulation.
Importantly, JAK–STAT signaling represents the most clinically validated pathway linking immune cytokine signaling to pruritus, as evidenced by robust responses to JAK inhibition in both experimental models and clinical practice.
Discussion
Chronic itch in AD represents a qualitatively distinct state shaped by repeated stimulation, maladaptive neural plasticity, and sustained peripheral signaling. Although itch is initially triggered by epithelial stress, barrier disruption, and persistent activation progressively sensitizes sensory neurons and broadens their responsiveness to both inflammatory and non-inflammatory cues. Over time, itch becomes less tightly coupled to peripheral epithelial cues and more reflective of structural and functional remodeling within itch-processing neurons, leading to altered baseline excitability across peripheral and central circuits.
Recurrent peripheral signaling can further drive central sensitization, blurring the boundary between peripheral- and neuronally-driven mechanisms. This is reflected by the persistence of severe itch even in non-lesional skin, highlighting that altered sensory responsiveness is an intrinsic feature of AD rather than a mere consequence of visible inflammation. Conceptually, AD itch can be understood as a dynamic continuum, progressing from peripherally driven, epithelial-mediated signaling to centrally amplified, neurally entrenched states.
Taken together, this framework emphasizes the importance of integrating epithelial and neuronal compartments to fully capture the evolving biology of chronic itch. To integrate these diverse epithelial, immune, and neuro-immune pathways, Table 1 summarizes the major pruritogenic mediators in AD (Table 1). Future studies should further define how epithelial stress responses, and peripheral neuronal pathways interact to shape central sensitization, and how early intervention that limits repetitive itch–scratch cycles might prevent long-term neuronal remodeling and restore normal itch perception.
TABLE 1
| Mediator | Cellular source | Receptor | Downstream pathway/Mechanism | Type of evidence | Therapeutic relevance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TSLP | Keratinocytes | TSLPR/IL-7Rα | Activates DC→ Th2 polarization; directly activates TRPA1+ sensory neurons via ORAI1/NFAT signaling | Human (↑ serum), mouse models, neuronal studies | Targeted by anti-TSLP (e.g., tezepelumab, investigational in AD) |
| IL-33 | Keratinocytes, epithelial cells | ST2 (IL1RL1) | Induces IL-4, IL-5, IL-13; enhances IL-31 production; sensitizes DRG neurons; activates spinal astrocytic JAK2–STAT3 → GRP/GRPR axis | Human + mouse (conflicting itch correlation in AD), genetic studies | Potential upstream target; indirect pruritogenic role |
| IL-4 | Th2 cells | Type I/II IL-4R (IL-4Rα) | Direct neuronal activation; sensitizes neurons to pruritogens via JAK1 signaling | Human + mouse + neuronal studies | Targeted by dupilumab |
| IL-13 | Th2 cells | Type II IL-4R | Direct neuronal sensitization; overlaps with IL-4 signaling | Human + mouse + neuronal studies | Targeted (tralokinumab, lebrikizumab) |
| IL-31 | Th2 cells, basophils, M2 macrophages | IL-31RA/OSMR | Activates TRPV1+/TRPA1+ neurons; STAT3 activation; induces BNP → central itch signaling; promotes nerve growth | Strong human + mouse + mechanistic studies | Targeted by nemolizumab |
| Periostin | Dermal fibroblasts | Integrin αvβ3 | Direct neuronal activation (Ca2+ influx); TRPV1/TRPA1-dependent; induces TSLP (feed-forward loop) | Animal models + translational studies | Emerging target |
| NGF | Keratinocytes, immune cells | TrkA, p75NTR | Promotes nerve growth, branching, sensitization | Human + mouse | Anti-NGF strategies (experimental) |
| SP | Sensory neurons | NK1R; MRGPRX2 (mast cells), MRGPRA1 (neurons) | Neurogenic inflammation; histamine-dependent and independent itch | Human + mouse | NK1R antagonists (limited efficacy); MRGPR pathway emerging |
| CGRP | Sensory neurons, keratinocytes | CGRP receptor | Promotes keratinocyte proliferation and epidermal hyperplasia | Human + in vitro models | Indirect target |
| Artemin | Fibroblasts, keratinocytes | GFRα3 | Induces nerve sprouting, hyperinnervation; downstream of AhR and TLR signaling | Animal + translational | Emerging environmental link target |
| JAK1 (pathway) | Keratinocytes, neurons | Cytokine receptors (e.g., IL-4R, IL-31R) | Central signaling hub for itch cytokines; neuronal sensitization; TRPV1 modulation | Strong human + mouse + clinical | JAK inhibitors (upadacitinib, abrocitinib) |
Pruritogenic mediators in atopic dermatitis across epithelial and neuro-immune compartments: sources, receptors, and downstream mechanisms.
AhR, aryl hydrocarbon receptor; BNP, B-type natriuretic peptide (encoded by NPPB); CGRP, calcitonin gene-related peptide; DCs, dendritic cells; DRG, dorsal root ganglion.
GFRα3, glial cell line–derived neurotrophic factor family receptor alpha 3; GRP, gastrin-releasing peptide; GRPR, gastrin-releasing peptide receptor; IL, interleukin; IL-4Rα, interleukin-4, receptor alpha; IL-7Rα, interleukin-7, receptor alpha; JAK, janus kinase; MRGPRA1, Mas-related G protein-coupled receptor member A1; MRGPRX2, Mas-related G protein-coupled receptor member X2; NF-κB, nuclear factor kappa B; NGF, nerve growth factor; NK1R, neurokinin-1, receptor; NPPB, natriuretic peptide B gene; OSMR, oncostatin M receptor; p75NTR, p75 neurotrophin receptor; SP, substance P; STAT3, signal transducer and activator of transcription 3.
ST2, suppression of tumorigenicity 2 (IL-33, receptor, IL1RL1); Th2, type 2 helper T cells; TLR, Toll-like receptor; TRPA1, transient receptor potential ankyrin 1; TRPV1, transient receptor potential vanilloid 1; TSLP, thymic stromal lymphopoietin; TSLPR, thymic stromal lymphopoietin receptor; TrkA, tropomyosin receptor kinase A.
Statements
Author contributions
L-SW: conceptualisation (lead), formal analysis (lead), writing – original draft (lead), writing – review and editing (equal). J-HY: conceptualisation (supporting), writing – original draft (supporting), writing – review and editing (equal). Y-TY: investigation (equal), writing – original draft (supporting), writing – review and editing (equal). J-LY: conceptualisation (supporting), formal analysis (supporting), investigation (equal), supervision (equal), writing – original draft (supporting), writing – review and editing (equal). All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Funding
The author(s) declared that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. This work was supported in part by grants of CMRPG8P0151 from Chang Gung Medical Research Program, Taiwan.
Conflict of interest
The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declared that generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.
Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.
References
1.
de Bruin-WellerMGadkariAAuziereSSimpsonELPuigLBarbarotSet alThe patient-reported disease burden in adults with atopic dermatitis: a cross-sectional study in Europe and Canada. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol (2020) 34:1026–36. 10.1111/jdv.16003
2.
MurotaHKoikeYIshiiKCalimlimBMLudwikowskaMToumiMet alEvaluating the burden of pruritus due to atopic dermatitis in Japan by patient-reported outcomes. J Med Econ (2021) 24:1280–9. 10.1080/13696998.2021.2002559
3.
ChamlinSLMattsonCLFriedenIJWilliamsMLManciniAJCellaDet alThe price of pruritus: sleep disturbance and cosleeping in atopic dermatitis. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med (2005) 159:745–50. 10.1001/archpedi.159.8.745
4.
LiuAWZhangYRChenC-SEdwardsTNOzyamanSRamckeTet alScratching promotes allergic inflammation and host defense via neurogenic mast cell activation. Science (2025) 387:eadn9390. 10.1126/science.adn9390
5.
HeAFeldmanSRFleischerAB. An assessment of the use of antihistamines in the management of atopic dermatitis. J Am Acad Dermatol (2018) 79:92–6. 10.1016/j.jaad.2017.12.077
6.
MoonSStasikowska-KanickaOWągrowska-DanilewiczMHawroMMetzMMaurerMet alClinically uninvolved but not healthy—the skin of patients with atopic dermatitis is primed for itch and inflammation. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol (2024) 38:1089–100. 10.1111/jdv.19694
7.
HasegawaTOkaTDemehriS. Alarmin cytokines as central regulators of cutaneous immunity. Front Immunol (2022) 13:876515. 10.3389/fimmu.2022.876515
8.
NakaharaTKido-NakaharaMTsujiGFurueM. Basics and recent advances in the pathophysiology of atopic dermatitis. The J Dermatol (2021) 48:130–9. 10.1111/1346-8138.15664
9.
SalimiMBarlowJLSaundersSPXueLGutowska-OwsiakDWangXet alA role for IL-25 and IL-33–Driven Type-2 innate lymphoid cells in atopic dermatitis. J Exp Med (2013) 210:2939–50. 10.1084/jem.20130351
10.
WangS-HZuoY-G. Thymic stromal lymphopoietin in cutaneous immune-mediated diseases. Front Immunol (2021) 12:698522. 10.3389/fimmu.2021.698522
11.
JariwalaSPAbramsEBensonAFodemanJZhengT. The role of thymic stromal lymphopoietin in the immunopathogenesis of atopic dermatitis. Clin Exp Allergy (2011) 41:1515–20. 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2011.03797.x
12.
ZieglerSFRoanFBellBDStoklasekTAKitajimaMHanH. The biology of thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP). Adv Pharmacol (2013) 66:129–55. 10.1016/B978-0-12-404717-4.00004-4
13.
García-ReyesMMZumaya-PérezLCPastelin-PalaciosRMoreno-EutimioMA. Serum thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP) levels in atopic dermatitis patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Exp Med (2023) 23:4129–39. 10.1007/s10238-023-01147-5
14.
WilsonSRThéLBatiaLMBeattieKKatibahGEMcClainSPet alThe epithelial cell-derived atopic dermatitis cytokine TSLP activates neurons to induce itch. Cell (2013) 155:285–95. 10.1016/j.cell.2013.08.057
15.
SchmitzJOwyangAOldhamESongYMurphyEMcClanahanTKet alIL-33, an Interleukin-1-like cytokine that signals via the IL-1 receptor-related protein ST2 and induces T helper type 2-Associated cytokines. Immunity (2005) 23:479–90. 10.1016/j.immuni.2005.09.015
16.
MaierEWernerDDuschlABohleBHorejs-HoeckJ. Human Th2 but not Th9 cells release IL-31 in a STAT6/NF-κB-Dependent way. J Immunol (2014) 193:645–54. 10.4049/jimmunol.1301836
17.
FeldMGarciaRBuddenkotteJKatayamaSLewisKMuirheadGet alThe Pruritus- and TH2-Associated cytokine IL-31 promotes growth of sensory nerves. J Allergy Clin Immunol (2016) 138:500–8.e24. 10.1016/j.jaci.2016.02.020
18.
TrierAMHeulAVFredmanALeVWangZAuyeungKet alIL-33 potentiates histaminergic itch. J Allergy Clin Immunol (2024) 153:852–9.e3. 10.1016/j.jaci.2023.08.038
19.
TrierAMMackMRFredmanATamariMVer HeulAMZhaoYet alIL-33 signaling in sensory neurons promotes dry skin itch. J Allergy Clin Immunol (2022) 149:1473–80.e6. 10.1016/j.jaci.2021.09.014
20.
MackMRMironYChenFMillerPEZhangAKorotzerAet alType 2 cytokines sensitize human sensory neurons to itch-associated stimuli. Front Mol Neurosci (2023) 16:1258823. 10.3389/fnmol.2023.1258823
21.
DuLHuXYangWYashengHLiuSZhangWet alSpinal IL-33/ST2 signaling mediates chronic itch in mice through the astrocytic JAK2-STAT3 Cascade. Glia (2019) 67:1680–93. 10.1002/glia.23639
22.
SunY-GChenZ-F. A gastrin-releasing peptide receptor mediates the itch sensation in the spinal cord. Nature (2007) 448:700–3. 10.1038/nature06029
23.
PaganiMAlbisettiGWSivakumarNWildnerHSantelloMJohannssenHCet alHow gastrin-releasing peptide opens the spinal gate for itch. Neuron (2019) 103:102–17.e5. 10.1016/j.neuron.2019.04.022
24.
Tirado-SánchezABonifazAPonce-OliveraRSerum gastrin-releasing peptide levels correlate with disease severity and pruritus in patients with atopic dermatitis. Br J Dermatol (2015) 173:298–300. 10.1111/bjd.13622
25.
KagamiSSugayaMSugaHMorimuraSKaiHOhmatsuHet alSerum gastrin-releasing peptide levels correlate with pruritus in patients with atopic dermatitis. J Invest Dermatol (2013) 133:1673–5. 10.1038/jid.2013.38
26.
Tamagawa-MineokaROkuzawaYMasudaKKatohN. Increased serum levels of interleukin 33 in patients with atopic dermatitis. J Am Acad Dermatol (2014) 70:882–8. 10.1016/j.jaad.2014.01.867
27.
JaworekAKSzafraniecKDoniecZJaworekMWojas-PelcAPokorskiM. Pruritus characteristics in severe atopic dermatitis in adult patients. In: PokorskiM, editor. Medical and Biomedical Updates. Cham: Springer International Publishing (2021). p. 71–7.
28.
ZaryczańskaAGleńJZabłotnaMNowickiRTrzeciakM. Serum levels and single nucleotide polymorphisms of the Interleukin-33 gene in atopic dermatitis. PDIA (2022) 39:959–64. 10.5114/ada.2022.113130
29.
NattkemperLATeyHLValdes-RodriguezRLeeHMollanazarNKAlbornozCet alThe genetics of chronic itch: gene expression in the skin of patients with atopic dermatitis and psoriasis with severe itch. J Invest Dermatol (2018) 138:1311–7. 10.1016/j.jid.2017.12.029
30.
JunttilaIS. Tuning the cytokine responses: an update on interleukin (IL)-4 and IL-13 receptor complexes. Front Immunol (2018) 9:888. 10.3389/fimmu.2018.00888
31.
OetjenLKMackMRFengJWhelanTMNiuHGuoCJet alSensory neurons Co-Opt classical immune signaling pathways to mediate chronic itch. Cell (2017) 171:217–28.e13. 10.1016/j.cell.2017.08.006
32.
FurueMYamamuraKKido-NakaharaMNakaharaTFukuiY. Emerging role of Interleukin-31 and Interleukin-31 receptor in pruritus in atopic dermatitis. Allergy (2018) 73:29–36. 10.1111/all.13239
33.
HashimotoTYokozekiHKarasuyamaHSatohT. IL-31–Generating network in atopic dermatitis comprising macrophages, basophils, thymic stromal lymphopoietin, and periostin. J Allergy Clin Immunol (2023) 151:737–46.e6. 10.1016/j.jaci.2022.11.009
34.
CevikbasFWangXAkiyamaTKempkesCSavinkoTAntalAet alA sensory neuron-expressed Interleukin-31 receptor mediates T helper cell-dependent itch: involvement of TRPV1 and TRPA1. J Allergy Clin Immunol (2014) 133:448–60.e7. 10.1016/j.jaci.2013.10.048
35.
TakahashiSOchiaiSJinJTakahashiNToshimaSIshigameHet alSensory neuronal STAT3 is critical for IL-31 receptor expression and inflammatory itch. Cell Rep (2023) 42:113433. 10.1016/j.celrep.2023.113433
36.
PitakeSRalphPDeBrechtJMishraS. Atopic dermatitis linked cytokine Interleukin-31 induced itch mediated via a neuropeptide natriuretic polypeptide B. Acta Derm Venerol (2018) 98:795–6. 10.2340/00015555-2977
37.
NattkemperLAKimBSYapQVHoonMAMishraSKYosipovitchG. Increased systemic levels of centrally acting B-Type natriuretic peptide are associated with chronic itch of different types. J Invest Dermatol (2024) 144:2267–72. 10.1016/j.jid.2024.02.026
38.
MengJMoriyamaMFeldMBuddenkotteJBuhlTSzöllösiAet alNew mechanism underlying IL-31–Induced atopic dermatitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol (2018) 141:1677–89.e8. 10.1016/j.jaci.2017.12.1002
39.
Sonnenberg-RiethmacherEMieheMRiethmacherD. Periostin in allergy and inflammation. Front Immunol (2021) 12:722170. 10.3389/fimmu.2021.722170
40.
MishraSKWheelerJJPitakeSDingHJiangCFukuyamaTet alPeriostin activation of integrin receptors on sensory neurons induces allergic itch. Cell Rep (2020) 31:107472. 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.03.036
41.
KouKOkawaTYamaguchiYOnoJInoueYKohnoMet alPeriostin levels correlate with disease severity and chronicity in patients with atopic dermatitis. Br J Dermatol (2014) 171:283–91. 10.1111/bjd.12943
42.
NunomuraSUtaDKitajimaINanriYMatsudaKEjiriNet alPeriostin activates distinct modules of inflammation and itching downstream of the type 2 inflammation pathway. Cell Rep (2023) 42:111933. 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.111933
43.
ShiraishiHMasuokaMOhtaSSuzukiSArimaKTaniguchiKet alPeriostin contributes to the pathogenesis of atopic dermatitis by inducing TSLP production from keratinocytes. Allergol Int (2012) 61:563–72. 10.2332/allergolint.10-OA-0297
44.
HodeibAEl-SamadZAHanafyHEl-LatiefAAEl-bendaryAAbu-RayaA. Nerve growth factor, neuropeptides and cutaneous nerves in atopic dermatitis. Indian J Dermatol (2010) 55:135–9. 10.4103/0019-5154.62735
45.
Levi-MontalciniRSkaperSDDal TosoRPetrelliLLeonA. Nerve growth factor: from neurotrophin to neurokine. Trends Neurosci (1996) 19:514–20. 10.1016/S0166-2236(96)10058-8
46.
YamaguchiJAiharaMKobayashiYKambaraTIkezawaZ. Quantitative analysis of nerve growth factor (NGF) in the atopic dermatitis and psoriasis horny layer and effect of treatment on NGF in atopic dermatitis. J Dermatol Sci (2009) 53:48–54. 10.1016/j.jdermsci.2008.08.011
47.
DouY-CHagströmerLEmtestamLJohanssonO. Increased nerve growth factor and its receptors in atopic dermatitis: an immunohistochemical study. Arch Dermatol Res (2006) 298:31–7. 10.1007/s00403-006-0657-1
48.
TakanoNSakuraiTOhashiYKurachiM. Effects of high-affinity nerve growth factor receptor inhibitors on symptoms in the NC/Nga mouse atopic dermatitis model. Br J Dermatol (2007) 156:241–6. 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2006.07636.x
49.
TakanoNSakuraiTKurachiM. Effects of anti-nerve growth factor antibody on symptoms in the NC/Nga mouse, an atopic dermatitis model. J Pharmacol Sci (2005) 99:277–86. 10.1254/jphs.fp0050564
50.
StänderSYosipovitchG. Substance P and neurokinin 1 receptor are new targets for the treatment of chronic pruritus. Br J Dermatol (2019) 181:932–8. 10.1111/bjd.18025
51.
KangHByunD-GKimJ-W. Effects of substance P and vasoactive intestinal peptide on interferon-gamma and Interleukin-4 production in severe atopic dermatitis. Ann Allergy Asthma and Immunol (2000) 85:227–32. 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)62471-4
52.
KimKHParkKCChungJHChoiHR. The effect of substance P on peripheral blood mononuclear cells in patients with atopic dermatitis. J Dermatol Sci (2003) 32:115–24. 10.1016/S0923-1811(03)00070-7
53.
ZhangZZhengWXieHChaiRWangJZhangHet alUp-Regulated expression of substance P in CD8+ T cells and NK1R on monocytes of atopic dermatitis. J Transl Med (2017) 15:93. 10.1186/s12967-017-1196-6
54.
LönndahlLRasulALonne-RahmS-BHolstMJohanssonBEl-NourHet alTachykinin upregulation in atopic dermatitis. Immunopharmacology and Immunotoxicology (2019) 41:117–22. 10.1080/08923973.2018.1558235
55.
ToyodaMNakamuraMMakinoTHinoTKagouraMMorohashiM. Nerve growth factor and substance P are useful plasma markers of disease activity in atopic dermatitis. Br J Dermatol (2002) 147:71–9. 10.1046/j.1365-2133.2002.04803.x
56.
HosokawaCTakeuchiSFurueM. Severity scores, itch scores and plasma substance P levels in atopic dermatitis treated with standard topical therapy with oral olopatadine hydrochloride. The J Dermatol (2009) 36:185–90. 10.1111/j.1346-8138.2009.00621.x
57.
OhmuraTHayashiTSatohYKonomiAJungBSatohH. Involvement of substance P in scratching behaviour in an atopic dermatitis model. Eur J Pharmacol (2004) 491:191–4. 10.1016/j.ejphar.2004.03.047
58.
TominagaMTakamoriK. Peripheral itch sensitization in atopic dermatitis. Allergol Int (2022) 71:265–77. 10.1016/j.alit.2022.04.003
59.
HsinLFernandopulleNADingJLumbCVeldhuisNKarasJAet alThe effect of substance P and its common in vivo‐formed metabolites on MRGPRX2 and human mast cell activation. Pharmacol Res Perspect (2022) 10:e00990. 10.1002/prp2.990
60.
AzimiEReddyVBPereiraPJSTalbotSWoolfCJLernerEA. Substance P activates mas-related G protein–coupled receptors to induce itch. J Allergy Clin Immunol (2017) 140:447–53.e3. 10.1016/j.jaci.2016.12.980
61.
ChoiHKimDNamSLimSHwangJ-SParkKSet alSubstance P restores normal skin architecture and reduces epidermal infiltration of sensory nerve fiber in TNCB-induced atopic dermatitis-like lesions in NC/Nga mice. J Dermatol Sci (2018) 89:248–57. 10.1016/j.jdermsci.2017.11.013
62.
ChoiHKimDNamSLimSHwangJ-SParkKSet alManifestation of atopic dermatitis-like skin in TNCB-induced NC/Nga mice is ameliorated by topical treatment of substance P, possibly through blockade of allergic inflammation. Exp Dermatol (2018) 27:396–402. 10.1111/exd.13421
63.
AbdelhadiSNordlindKJohanssonBTheodorssonEHolstMLönndahlL. Expression of calcitonin gene-related peptide in atopic dermatitis and correlation with distress. Immunopharmacology and Immunotoxicology (2024) 46:67–72. 10.1080/08923973.2023.2253988
64.
RoggenkampDKöpnickSStäbFWenckHSchmelzMNeufangG. Epidermal nerve fibers modulate keratinocyte growth via neuropeptide signaling in an innervated skin model. J Invest Dermatol (2013) 133:1620–8. 10.1038/jid.2012.464
65.
BalohRHTanseyMGLampePAFahrnerTJEnomotoHSimburgerKSet alA novel member of the GDNF ligand family, supports peripheral and central neurons and signals through the GFRalpha3-RET receptor complex. Neuron (1998) 21:1291–302. 10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80649-2
66.
MurotaHIzumiMAbd El-LatifMIANishiokaMTeraoMTaniMet alArtemin causes hypersensitivity to warm sensation, mimicking warmth-provoked pruritus in atopic dermatitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol (2012) 130:671–82.e4. 10.1016/j.jaci.2012.05.027
67.
YeoHAhnSSOuSYunSJLimYKohDet alThe EGR1–Artemin axis in keratinocytes enhances the innervation of epidermal sensory neurons during skin inflammation induced by house dust mite extract from Dermatophagoides farinae. J Invest Dermatol (2024) 144:1817–28.e17. 10.1016/j.jid.2024.01.017
68.
WazirAO’TooleEA. Itching for innovation: the role of aryl hydrocarbon receptor agonists as a future therapy for atopic dermatitis. Clin Exp Dermatol (2025) 50:747–54. 10.1093/ced/llae502
69.
HaasKWeighardtHDeenenRKöhrerKClausenBZahnerSet alAryl hydrocarbon receptor in keratinocytes is essential for murine skin barrier integrity. J Invest Dermatol (2016) 136:2260–9. 10.1016/j.jid.2016.06.627
70.
EdamitsuTTaguchiKKobayashiEHOkuyamaRYamamotoM. Aryl hydrocarbon receptor directly regulates artemin gene expression. Mol Cell Biol (2019) 39:e00190–19. 10.1128/MCB.00190-19
71.
HidakaTOgawaEKobayashiEHSuzukiTFunayamaRNagashimaTet alThe aryl hydrocarbon receptor AhR links atopic dermatitis and air pollution via induction of the neurotrophic factor artemin. Nat Immunol (2017) 18:64–73. 10.1038/ni.3614
72.
MurrayPJ. The JAK-STAT signaling pathway: input and output integration. J Immunol (2007) 178:2623–9. 10.4049/jimmunol.178.5.2623
73.
O’SheaJJSchwartzDMVillarinoAVGadinaMMcInnesIBLaurenceA. The JAK-STAT pathway: impact on human disease and therapeutic intervention. Annu Rev Med (2015) 66:311–28. 10.1146/annurev-med-051113-024537
74.
Alves de MedeirosAKSpeeckaertRDesmetEVan GeleMDe SchepperSLambertJ. JAK3 as an emerging target for topical treatment of inflammatory skin diseases. PLoS One (2016) 11:e0164080. 10.1371/journal.pone.0164080
75.
YasudaTFukadaTNishidaKNakayamaMMatsudaMMiuraIet alHyperactivation of JAK1 tyrosine kinase induces stepwise, progressive pruritic dermatitis. J Clin Invest (2016) 216:2064–76. 10.1172/JCI82887
76.
WohlmannASebastianKBorowskiAKrauseSFriedrichK. Signal transduction by the atopy-associated human thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP) receptor depends on janus kinase function. Biol Chem (2010) 391:181–6. 10.1515/BC.2010.023
77.
RochmanYKashyapMRobinsonGWSakamotoKGomez-RodriguezJWagnerK-Uet alThymic stromal lymphopoietin-mediated STAT5 phosphorylation via kinases JAK1 and JAK2 reveals a key difference from IL-7-induced signaling. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (2010) 107:19455–60. 10.1073/pnas.1008271107
78.
Guttman-YasskyEIrvineADBrunnerPMKimBSBoguniewiczMParmentierJet alThe role of janus kinase signaling in the pathology of atopic dermatitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol (2023) 152:1394–404. 10.1016/j.jaci.2023.07.010
79.
FukuyamaTGanchingcoJRMishraSKOlivryTRzagalinskiIVolmerDAet alJanus kinase inhibitors display broad anti-itch properties: a possible link through the TRPV1 receptor. J Allergy Clin Immunol (2017) 140:306–9.e3. 10.1016/j.jaci.2016.12.960
80.
WohlrabJStintzingDSchultzLJügeltKSchroederOH-U. Influence of janus kinase inhibitors on the neuronal activity as a proof-of-concept model for itch. Skin Pharmacol Physiol (2022) 35:94–101. 10.1159/000519669
Summary
Keywords
atopic dermatitis, itch, keratinocytes, pruritis, sensitized
Citation
Wong L-S, Yang J-H, Yen Y-T and Yang J-L (2026) Pruritogenic mediators in atopic dermatitis: mechanisms of neurogenic crosstalk. J. Cutan. Immunol. Allergy 9:16460. doi: 10.3389/jcia.2026.16460
Received
25 February 2026
Revised
11 May 2026
Accepted
21 May 2026
Published
03 June 2026
Volume
9 - 2026
Updates
Copyright
© 2026 Wong, Yang, Yen and Yang.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Jenq-Lin Yang, jyang@cgmh.org.tw
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.