ORIGINAL RESEARCH

J. Cutan. Immunol. Allergy, 14 February 2024

Volume 7 - 2024 | https://doi.org/10.3389/jcia.2024.12476

Disease perception in patients with atopic dermatitis and chronic spontaneous urticaria: a cross-sectional survey in Japan

  • 1. Department of Dermatology, Masuda Red Cross Hospital, Masuda, Shimane, Japan

  • 2. Department of Dermatology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan

  • 3. Sumikawa Dermatology and Allergy Clinic, Sapporo, Japan

  • 4. Department of Dermatology, School of Medicine, Sapporo Medical University, Sapporo, Japan

  • 5. Division of Dermatology, Department of Internal Related, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan

  • 6. Department of Dermatology, Division of Medicine for Function and Morphology of Sensory Organs, Faculty of Medicine, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Osaka, Japan

  • 7. Department of Dermatology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan

  • 8. Department of Hygiene and Preventive Medicine, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, Fukushima, Japan

Article metrics

1,6k

Views

431

Downloads

Abstract

The opinions of patients with allergic skin diseases often determine their attitudes to treatment. However, little is known about the viewpoints of patients and their concerns regarding their conditions. This novel study is the first to compare relationships between the opinions of patients and their concerns regarding the severity of atopic dermatitis or chronic spontaneous urticaria and the presence or absence of biologics. We also compared and clarified the characteristics of these diseases using a questionnaire that was completed by 359 patients treated at university and city hospitals, as well as dermatology clinics. Covariance analysis was performed to compare both diseases with different backgrounds. Patients with adult atopic dermatitis were more likely than those with chronic idiopathic urticaria to believe that treatment must be continued and that the disease will not spontaneously improve. Patients with severe or poorly controlled atopic dermatitis or chronic spontaneous urticaria often had psychosomatic symptoms and also believed that the disease required continued treatment. Social factors related to wait times and medication were not associated with disease severity. Patients receiving treatment had significantly less anxiety associated with biologics than those who did not receive treatment. Patients with atopic dermatitis had higher physical and mental burden than those with chronic spontaneous urticaria. Therefore, effective treatments must be prescribed. Consideration of these disease-specific characteristics regarding the opinions and concerns of patients can improve patient satisfaction and compliance with treatment, which results in favorable outcomes.

Introduction

The views that patients have of an illness is a phenomenon consisting of multiple dimensions that overlap but are independent of each other [1]. Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a skin allergy with a high disease burden that decreases the quality of life of patients. In addition, doctors and patients differently rate treatment goals and satisfaction with treatment [2, 3]. Urticaria is a common skin disorder. It mostly comprises acute and chronic spontaneous types that cause wheals to develop over the course of a day or for ≥6 weeks, respectively [4]. Compliance with treatment of chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is poor when symptoms improve [4], which might be owing to the attitudes of patients [4]. If patients are not eager to treat the disease, they might not be optimistic about or compliant with treatment. In addition, how AD and CSU are perceived by doctors and patients differ. Previous interview viewpoints have shown that patients believe the disease “is like the bad guy in a movie that refuses to die” [5].

This report describes the results of a survey of patients with AD and CSU regarding medication compliance using the Physician Global Assessment (PGA), itch numerical rating scale (NRS), and opinions and concerns that patients have about the disease. The effects of patient-reported outcomes, treatment methods, and other factors on patient perceptions of the disease were analyzed. Insights and concerns regarding each disease were also compared.

Methods

Patients

This study included 359 patients who were diagnosed with AD or CSU according to the respective guidelines for these diseases [6, 7]. All patients were treated at the Department of Dermatology of Shimane University Hospital, Masuda Red-Cross Hospital, Kyushu University Hospital, Sapporo Medical University Hospital, Sumikawa Dermatology and Allergy Clinic, Kobe University Hospital, and Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine University Hospital between May 2020 and February 2022. Patient data were anonymized before analysis.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

The inclusion criteria comprised age ≥15 years, diagnosis of AD or CSU, and ability to respond to the questionnaire. The exclusion criteria comprised age <15 years and unable to respond to the questionnaire.

Questionnaire

Patients completed a questionnaire developed for this study (Table 1) and described their diagnosis and disease severity using the PGA, which provides a composite score on a scale of 0–4. The questionnaire was self-administered and included multiple-choice items regarding age, sex, occupation, annual income, educational level, lifestyle, and disease duration. A section based on the Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) was also included [6, 8]. Mild, moderate, and severe AD was defined by POEM scores of <7, 8–16, and >16, respectively. Symptom control was assessed using the self-administered urticaria control test (UCT) [7, 9]. Patients with CSU who had UCT scores of <12 and ≥12 were, respectively, classified as having poorly and well-controlled disease. Patients described their current medications, willingness to undergo treatment, and satisfaction with the treatment plan using an 11-point scale. Their opinions and concerns regarding their disease were described using a 5-point scale.

TABLE 1

No.Sub no.ItemPossible responses
1a1Disease name1. Atopic dermatitis
2. Chronic spontaneous urticaria
2Severity (Physician Global Assessment)1. Clear or almost clear
2. Mild
3. Moderate
4. Severe
2AgeYears
3SexMale or Female
4Current salaryYen
5How long have you had your current disease?Years
6What is your level of schooling?Graduate school, college, community college, vocational school, high school, middle school cyclosporine oral steroids topical steroids antihistamine topical tacrolimus moisturizer biologics (Xolair, Dupixent) others
7List your current medications (Multiple answers allowed)
81If you have atopic dermatitis, please answer the POEM questionnaireScore
2If you have chronic idiopathic urticaria, please answer the UCT questionnaireScore
91Itch numerical rating scaleScore
Please select one number that best describes your itchiness in the last 24 h
11-point evaluation
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
No itchiness Highest possible itchiness
10What is your viewpoint of your disease?
1Requires continued treatment1 Strongly disagree
2Cannot be healed2 Disagree
3It is like the bad guy in a movie who does not die3 Neither agree nor disagree
4Related to mental state4 Agree
5Difficult disease5 Strongly agree
6Improves naturally
7Improves with treatment
11How much do each of the following things bother you in relation to your illness?
1ItchinessFive-level evaluation
2Pain1 Not at all troublesome
3Multiple symptoms2 Not troublesome
4Willingness to seek treatment3 Neutral
5Not improving4 Troublesome
6Chronic exacerbation/remission cycle5 Very troublesome
7Few patients have the same disease
8Long waiting time required to see a doctor
9Expensive to treat
10Unknown exacerbating factors
11Understanding my symptoms
12Mental illness
13Restriction of daily life due to illness
14Not knowing how long the treatment will last
15Physician fails to indicate treatment goals
16Not knowing the treatment goals
17Concerns regarding my appearance
18Not being able to confide in my doctor
19Not knowing how to apply ointments
20Concerns regarding the use of topical steroids
21Concerns regarding the use of antihistamines (itch relievers)
22Anxiety regarding the use of oral cyclosporine
23Anxiety regarding the use of biologics (Xolair or Dupixent)
24Continuing treatment without forgetting
12How motivated are you to seek treatment for your illness?Scale number 10 is good
11-point evaluation
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Not at all Very motivated
13Do you think your illness will be cured?Scale number 10 is good
11-point evaluation
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
No Yes
14Please provide us with any feedback you may have about this questionnaire (free response)Free response

Questionnaire items.

a

This item was completed by a physician.

Statistical analysis

All data were statistically analyzed using R 4.0.3 software [10]. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. The characteristics of patients with AD and CSU were compared. Continuous variables are presented as means and standard deviations or as medians and interquartile ranges. Categorical variables are presented as numbers and ratios (%).

The basic characteristics of each disease were compared using Mann–Whitney U tests. The responses of the patients to POEM were compared using Kruskal–Wallis tests. The UCT results and differences between biologic treatments were compared using Wilcoxon rank sum tests.

As disease severity significantly impacts the opinions and concerns of patients, we adjusted the data for severity, age, and sex and used analyses of covariance (ANCOVA) for comparisons.

Results

Analysis of patients

This study included 359 patients, of which 202 had AD (113 men and 89 women; mean age: 39.3 ± 13.6 years) and 157 had CSU (51 men and 106 women; mean age: 48.5 ± 17.0 years) (Table 2). The PGA scores were higher in patients with AD than with CSU (p < 0.001, Mann–Whitney U test) and significantly correlated with POEM (p < 0.001, Kruskal–Wallis test) and UCT (p < 0.001, Wilcoxon rank sum test) scores (Tables 2, 3). The motivation to undergo treatment and ratio of patients who believed that the disease would be cured was higher among those with CSU than with AD (p < 0.001 Mann–Whitney U test).

TABLE 2

Atopic dermatitisChronic spontaneous urticaria
Total patients, n (male, female)202 (m 113, f, 89)157 (m, 51, f, 106)
Age (y; means ± SD)39.3 ± 13.648.5 ± 17.0
Median disease duration, y (IQR)26.5 (13–37)4 (1–10)
Median patient-reported outcomes y (IQR)POEM 9 (4–17)UCT 12 (9–16)
PGA*
 0 clear or almost clear11 (6%)52 (33%)
 1: Mild70 (35%)54 (34%)
 2: Moderate67 (33%)29 (19%)
 3: Severe23 (11%)10 (6%)
 No response31 (15%)12 (8%)
Highest education level, n (%)
 Graduate school3 (1.5%)6 (3.8%)
 University84 (41.6%)42 (26.9%)
 Junior college10 (5.1%)15 (9.6%)
 Vocational school18 (8.7%)16 (10.3%)
 High school50 (25.5%)50 (31.4%)
 Junior high school11 (5.1%)8 (5.1%)
 No response26 (13.3%)20 (12.8%)

Patients’ characteristics.

*p < 0.001 (Mann–Whitney U test). IQR, interquartile range; n, number; POEM, Patient-oriented Eczema Measure; SD, standard deviation; UCT, urticaria control test.

TABLE 3

Atopic dermatitisChronic spontaneous urticaria
PGAPOEM ≤ 7POEM 8–16POEM ≥ 17UCT < 12UCT ≥ 12
Clear or almost clear n (%)7 (9.5)*3 (5.1)0 (0.0)*8 (12.1)43 (51.8)
Mild n (%)38 (51.4)*16 (27.1)10 (20.0)*17 (25.8)34 (41.0)
Moderate n (%)14 (18.9)*28 (47.5)*18 (36.0)27 (40.9)2 (2.4)
Severe n (%)4 (5.4)*3 (5.1)*15 (30.0)*8 (12.1)0 (0.0)
No answer n (%)11 (14.9)9 (15.3)7 (14.0)6 (9.1)4 (4.8)

Physician global assessment and patient-reported outcomes.

*

p < 0.001 (Kruskal–Wallis test). p < 0.001 Wilcoxon rank sum test. PGA, physician global assessment; POEM, Patient-oriented Eczema Measure; UCT, urticaria control test.

Opinions and concerns of patients regarding AD and CSU based on their reported outcomes

Patient age, sex, disease duration, income, willingness to undergo treatment, and ratio of those who believed that they would be cured were not related to the POEM scores. The itch NRS was associated with the POEM score (p < 0.001). Significantly more patients with low POEM scores were treated with biologics than in the other groups (p < 0.001). Patients with high POEM scores were more likely to report psychological problems (p = 0.012), difficulty with their disease (p < 0.001), and that continued treatment was necessary (p < 0.001; Table 4). Patients with high POEM scores were significantly more concerned about physical symptoms, such as itching and pain, and psychological symptoms, such as mental distress (p < 0.001). However, social factors, such as long waits for medical treatment, being unable to confide in a doctor, and concerns regarding medications were not related to the POEM scores (Table 5).

TABLE 4

Question NoQuestionADa POEM ≤7 (n = 73) POEM 8–16 (n = 57) POEM ≥17 (n = 47)CSUb UCT <12 (n = 65) UCT ≥12 (n = 83)
10-1Continued treatment required<0.0010.022
10-2Things that go with us without being healed0.2240.386
10-3It’s like the bad guy in a movie who doesn’t die0.2860.010
10-4Related to mental state0.0120.178
10-5Difficult disease<0.0010.574
10-6Things that get better naturally0.0240.783
10-7Just like studying, things get better with effort0.8160.337

Opinions of AD and CSU based on patient-reported outcomes.

a

Kruskal–Wallis test.

b

Wilcoxon rank sum test. AD, atopic dermatitis; CSU, chronic spontaneous urticaria.

TABLE 5

Question NoQuestionADa POEM ≤7 (n = 73) POEM 8–16 (n = 57) POEM ≥17 (n = 47)CSUb UCT <12 (n = 65) UCT ≥12 (n = 83)
11-1Itchiness<0.001<0.001
11-2Pain<0.0010.010
11-3Having various symptoms<0.0010.001
11-4Unwillingness to seek treatment0.048<0.001
11-5Not getting better<0.001<0.001
11-6Repeated exacerbation and remission of symptoms over a long period of time<0.001<0.001
11-7Few patients with the same disease0.0260.337
11-8Long waiting time to see a doctor0.4470.437
11-9Expensive to treat0.1700.388
11-10Unknown exacerbating factors<0.0010.049
11-11Understanding my symptoms<0.0010.009
11-12Mental illness<0.001<0.001
11-13Restriction of daily life due to illness<0.001<0.001
11-14Not knowing how long the treatment will last<0.0010.001
11-15Physician failure to indicate treatment goals0.0490.003
11-16Not knowing what your treatment goals are<0.0010.009
11-17Concerns about appearance<0.001<0.001
11-18Not being able to tell your doctor what you want to say0.0760.079
11-19Not knowing how to apply ointment0.0520.417
11-20Concern about treatment with topical steroids0.2220.932
11-21Concern about treatment with antihistamines (itch relievers)0.8740.152
11-22Anxiety about oral cyclosporine treatment0.7920.553
11-23Anxiety about treatment with biologics (Xolair, Dupixent, etc.)0.3280.646
11-24Continuing treatment (without forgetting)0.0300.422

Results of a significant difference test by patient-reported outcomes for each patient problem.

a

Kruskal–Wallis test.

b

Wilcoxon rank sum test.

Patients with well-controlled CSU were older (p < 0.001), had lower itch NRS scores (p < 0.001), and were more likely to believe that the disease would be cured (p < 0.001) than those with poorly controlled CSU. Sex, disease duration, income, and willingness to undergo treatment were not associated with the UCT scores. The rate of biologic treatment was significantly higher among patients with well-than poorly controlled CSU (p < 0.023). Patients in the latter group more often reported that continued treatment of CSU is necessary and that the disease was “like a movie villain who does not die easily” than those with well-controlled CSU (Table 4). Physical symptoms, such as itching and pain, and psychological symptoms, such as mental distress, were significantly more frequent in the poorly than in the well-controlled group. However, no social factors were associated with the UCT scores (Table 5).

Patients’ opinions and concerns regarding AD and CSU based on the use of biologics

Dupilumab was prescribed to 41 patients with mild AD. Patients who were treated were significantly older (p = 0.005) and had a longer disease duration (p < 0.001) and lower itch NRS scores (p < 0.001) than those who were not treated with this biologic. Opinions of AD did not significantly different between patients treated with biologics and those who were not (Table 6). Patients who were treated with biologics were less likely to report concerns regarding itching (p = 0.02), various symptoms (p = 0.008), symptoms that did not improve (p < 0.001), repeated exacerbation/remission cycles (p = 0.002), mental stress (p = 0.032), discomfort with their appearance (p = 0.006), and anxiety regarding their treatment (p < 0.001). However, the belief that few patients had the same disease and concerns regarding the cost of treatment were significantly more frequent among patients treated with biologics than those who were not (Table 7).

TABLE 6

Question NoQuestionADaCSUa
Dupilumab+ (n = 41)Omalizumab+ (n = 46)
Dupilumab-(n = 142)Omalizumab-(n = 103)
10-1Continued treatment required0.5860.924
10-2Things that go with us without being healed0.5190.665
10-3It is like the bad guy in a movie who does not die0.8880.012
10-4Related to mental state0.3110.061
10-5Difficult disease0.577<0.001
10-6Things that get better naturally0.0520.572
10-7Just like studying, things get better with effort0.4940.569

Patient’s images of AD and CSU with or without biologics.

a

Wilcoxon rank sum test. AD, atopic dermatitis; CSU, chronic spontaneous urticaria.

TABLE 7

Question no.QuestionADaCSUa
Dupilumab+ (n = 41)Omalizumab+ (n = 46)
Dupilumab-(n = 142)Omalizumab (n = 103)
11-1Itchiness0.0200.575
11-2Pain0.0650.477
11-3Having various symptoms0.0080.042
11-4Unwillingness to seek treatment0.8520.235
11-5Not getting better<0.0010.297
11-6Repeated exacerbation and remission of symptoms over a long period of time0.0020.413
11-7Few patients with the same disease0.0110.002
11-8Long waiting time to see a doctor0.0540.097
11-9Expensive to treat<0.001<0.001
11-10Unknown exacerbating factors0.0500.682
11-11Understanding my symptoms0.1980.653
11-12Mental illness0.0320.032
11-13Restriction of daily life due to illness0.4330.132
11-14Not knowing how long the treatment will last0.9110.813
11-15Physician failure to indicate treatment goals0.8230.870
11-16Not knowing what your treatment goals are0.3250.289
11-17Concerns about appearance0.0060.159
11-18Not being able to tell your doctor what you want to say0.2800.295
11-19Not knowing how to apply ointment0.2200.864
11-20Concern about treatment with topical steroids0.6200.609
11-21Concern about treatment with antihistamines (itch relievers)0.9080.909
11-22Anxiety about oral cyclosporine treatment0.2540.469
11-23Anxiety about treatment with biologics (Xolair, Dupixent, etc.)<0.001<0.001
11-24Continuing treatment (without forgetting)0.7310.055

Significant difference tests between patients with and without biologics for each problem.

a

Wilcoxon rank sum test.

Omalizumab was prescribed to 46 patients with CSU. Patients treated with this biologic were significantly older (p < 0.001) than those who were not. Significantly more females with CSU were prescribed omalizumab than no biologic (p = 0.035). The itch NRS score was lower (p = 0.028) among patients treated with omalizumab than among those who were not. In addition, patients treated with omalizumab were more willing to undergo treatment (p < 0.001) and more likely to believe that the disease would be cured (p = 0.001) than those who were not treated with this biologic. Patients who were treated with omalizumab were highly likely to describe CSU as “a movie villain who does not die easily” and express difficulty with the disease (Table 6). Fewer patients treated with omalizumab reported anxiety regarding the use of biologics, although more reported believing that few patients had the same disease and that they had concerns about mental distress and the cost of treatment (Table 7).

Comparison of disease effects on opinions and concerns of patients

The ANCOVA results showed that patients with CSU were significantly more willing to seek medical treatment (p = 0.035) and more likely to believe that their illness would be cured (p = 0.003) than those with AD. More patients with CSU expressed the opinion that their disease could be cured naturally than those with AD (Table 8). Physical symptoms were frequent in patients with AD. Concerns regarding exacerbating factors, ointment application, and anxiety regarding topical steroids were more prevalent among patients with CSU than those with AD (Table 9).

TABLE 8

Question NoQuestionSum of squareDfMean squareFp
10-1Continued treatment required2.7912.7866.7260.010*
10-2Things that go with us without being healed26.50126.45324.155<0.001*
10-3It is like the bad guy in a movie who does not die8.8018.8327.0970.008*
10-4Related to mental state10.90110.90411.736<0.001*
10-5Difficult disease29.66129.66531.831<0.001*
10-6Things that get better naturally15.71115.70820.856<0.001
10-7Just like studying, things get better with effort56.30156.34052.663<0.001*

Images of AD and CSU diseases compared using ANCOVA.

Significantly higher scores in *AD, CSU. ANCOVA, analysis of covariance; AD, atopic dermatitis; CSU, chronic spontaneous urticaria.

TABLE 9

Question no.QuestionSum of squareDfMean squareFp
11-1Itchiness4.0814.0784.2750.040*
11-2Pain33.00133.00024.537<0.001*
11-3Having various symptoms22.00122.01217.965<0.001*
11-4Unwillingness to seek treatment9.6319.63312.439<0.001*
11-5Not getting better0.1010.0550.0450.833
11-6Repeated exacerbation and remission of symptoms over a long period4.2214.2164.1950.041*
11-7Few patients with the same disease0.5610.5640.6060.437
11-8Long waiting time to see a doctor0.3910.3880.3870.534
11-9Expensive to treat3.9013.9413.4410.065
11-10Unknown exacerbating factors4.9614.9595.0990.025
11-11Understanding my symptoms1.2711.2711.4330.232
11-12Mental illness2.612.6092.3560.126
11-13Restriction of daily life due to illness7.717.7086.0190.015*
11-14Not knowing how long the treatment will last0.5010.4500.4290.513
11-15Physician failure to indicate treatment goals1.0511.0511.2620.262
11-16Not knowing what your treatment goals are0.7010.6990.6050.437
11-17Concerns about appearance49.4149.39040.670<0.001*
11-18Not being able to tell your doctor what you want to say1.5511.5542.5400.112
11-19Not knowing how to apply ointment9.2019.2506.5560.011
11-20Concern about treatment with topical steroids10.40110.3654.9460.027
11-21Concern about treatment with antihistamines (itch relievers)14.8114.8308.5960.004*
11-22Anxiety about oral cyclosporine treatment0.5010.4700.1310.718
11-23Anxiety about treatment with biologics (Xolair, Dupixent, etc.)8.5018.4962.3620.125
11-24Continuing treatment (without forgetting)13.10113.09612.526<0.001*

Results of multivariate analysis comparing the difficulties of AD and CSU.

Significantly higher scores in *AD and CSU.

Discussion

Patients’ images of disease are currently being investigated as narrative-based medicine [11]. In addition, since medication compliance increases with treatment satisfaction, images of a disease might also be associated with compliance [12]. The opinions of patients about diseases have been investigated in the fields of psychiatry [1] and diabetes [13]. By contrast, information about such opinions, particularly about allergic diseases, is scant in the field of dermatology. Therefore, our findings contain valuable information. Medication compliance is essential to effectively treat AD and CSU. Increasing patient satisfaction with treatment and their realization of the beneficial effects of drugs improve their compliance [12, 14], as we showed herein. We also found that patients who applied biologics reported fewer symptoms, although the cost of treatment was a concern. These findings suggested that the high cost of biologics forces patients to choose between paying for treatment or experiencing symptoms. In addition, fewer patients described anxiety regarding the application of biologics. The severity of AD and treatment satisfaction correlated in a study that assessed patients using the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication [15]. Reducing disease severity increases patient satisfaction and adherence to treatment regimens, creating a cycle that results in sufficient therapeutic effects.

Psychosocial effects (such as isolation, sociability, stigma, effects of illness on activity, and hopelessness) and noncompliance can be used to identify patients with psoriasis who require additional support to overcome issues with treatment compliance [16]. We did not identify any correlations between the opinions and concerns of patients regarding AD or CSU. Disease severity often correlates with the opinions and concerns of patients, as the present study also found. These findings highlight the importance of relieving symptoms to improve patient opinions of the disease. We evaluated viewpoints and concerns before and after treatment with biologics in a small subset of patients (data not shown). Although the subset was small, the findings suggested that symptomatic relief owing to treatment improved the opinions and reduced the concerns of patients regarding their disease.

That mental illness also correlates with severity is a notable concern (Table 5), and psychosomatic therapy is important in treating allergic diseases. However, not many allergists practice psychosomatic therapy. Allergic diseases associated with psychosomatic disorders are often severe or refractory to treatment with a conventional bio-medical model. A psychosomatic diagnosis and treatment are necessary according to the psycho-socio-eco-medical model of disease understanding [17].

Atopic dermatitis is an inflammatory skin disease that affects over 1 in 10 children in Japan [6]. Although it is believed that AD remits with age, epidemiological studies have found that AD follows a lifelong episodic course when it presents after the age of 12 years [18, 19]. A gradual change in treatment expectations from cure to control is associated with a long-term acceptance of AD and a hope of being cured [5]. By increasing awareness regarding the long-term nature of eczema among adolescents, effective self-care habits can be encouraged [5]. Our patients did not report the belief that AD improves naturally, which might be because adults with AD were included in the study and AD often cannot be cured if it presents in adulthood. By contrast, patients were more likely to report the belief that CSU naturally improves, which corresponded to the median duration of CSU being 4 years.

The viewpoints and concerns of the patients were subjectively evaluated. Therefore, a comparator was included to increase understanding of the significance of our findings. Therefore, we compared the viewpoints and concerns of patients with AD and CSU using a multivariate analysis. More patients with CSU reported that the symptoms naturally improves, as eruptions appear and disappear. Many patients agreed that the image of disease presented in the other questions applied to AD. More patients with AD reported concerns regarding their physical and mental symptoms than those with CSU. Patients with AD reported concerns regarding antihistamines, which lead to less noticeable effects in patients with AD than in those with CSU. In addition, patients with CSU reported concerns regarding topical drugs, which are not recommended in international [9] or Japanese [7] guidelines. These guidelines must be adhered to in clinical practice.

This study is not without limitations. Patients who responded to the questionnaire were seen by dermatologists and allergists at hospitals offering relatively innovative care. This could have affected the range of treatment choices. All our patients were old enough to answer questions, which might have introduced bias. Simple comparisons between AD and CSU were difficult because of differences in mean disease activity, so analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was performed to compare the two diseases.

In conclusion, patients’ opinions and concerns differ based on specific diseases. Patients’ opinions are influenced by disease severity and types of treatment. Patients were concerned about ineffective treatment. Understanding these characteristics can be used to improve patient satisfaction and compliance, ultimately resulting in favorable outcomes.

Statements

Data availability statement

The raw data supporting the conclusion of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Ethics statement

This study was approved by the ethics committees and Deans of the Faculty of Medicine of Shimane University (approval no. 4418), Masuda RedCross Hospital (approval no. 80), Kyushu University (approval no. 2020-327), SUMIKAWA Dermatology and Allergy Clinic (approval no. 20200717), Kobe University (approval no. B200149), Kyoto Prefectural University (approval no. ERB-C-1828-1), and Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine (approval no. 2020-101). This study proceeded according to the Declaration of Helsinki (2013 amendment). All patients provided written, informed consent to participate in this study.

Author contributions

All authors participated in the design, interpretation of the studies and analysis of the data and review of the manuscript; SK, TN, YS, AF and KM conducted the questionnaire, TK analyzed the questionnaire. All authors wrote the manuscript.

Funding

This study was partially supported by Collaborative Research Grants 2020–2022 from the Japanese Society for Cutaneous Immunology and Allergy.

Acknowledgments

We thank the clerk in the Masuda RedCross Hospital for assisting with this study. We also thank Editage (www.editage.com) for English language editing.

Conflict of interest

SK has received an honorarium as a speaker from Ely-Lilly Japan and Abbvie. TN has received an honorarium as a speaker from Sanofi, Maruho, Ely-Lilly Japan and Abbvie. YS has received fees as a speaker from Sanofi, Maruho, Ely-Lilly Japan and Abbvie. AF has received fees as a speaker from Sanofi, Maruho, Ely-Lilly Japan, Abbvie, Torii, Novartis, Taiho, Tanabe-Mitsubishi and fees for funded research/joint research from Taiho. KM has received honoraria as a speaker for Sanofi and grants as an investigator for Eli Lilly Japan.

The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  • 1.

    ClearySDBhattySBroussardBCristofaroSLWanCRComptonMT. Measuring insight through patient self-report: an in-depth analysis of the factor structure of the Birchwood Insight Scale. Psychiatry Res (2014) 216:2638. 10.1016/j.psychres.2014.01.043

  • 2.

    DruckerAMWangARLiWQSevetsonEBlockJKQureshiAA. The burden of atopic dermatitis: summary of a report for the National Eczema Association. J Invest Dermatol (2017) 137:2630. 10.1016/j.jid.2016.07.012

  • 3.

    NakaharaTFujitaHArimaKTaguchiYMotoyamaSFurueM. Perception gap between patients and physicians regarding disease burden and treatment satisfaction in atopic dermatitis: findings from an on-line survey. Jpn J Dermatol (2018) 128:284355. In Japanese.

  • 4.

    KanekoSMasudaKHiragunTInomataNFurueMOnozukaDet alTransient improvement of urticaria induces poor adherence as assessed by Morisky Medication Adherence Scale-8. J Dermatol (2015) 42:107882. 10.1111/1346-8138.12971

  • 5.

    GhioDMullerIGreenwellKRobertsAMcNivenALanganSMet al‘It’s like the bad guy in a movie who just doesn’t die’: a qualitative exploration of young people’s adaptation to eczema and implications for self-care. Br J Dermatol (2020) 182:1128. 10.1111/bjd.18046

  • 6.

    KatohNOhyaYIkedaMEbiharaTKatayamaISaekiHet alClinical practice guidelines for the management of atopic dermatitis 2018. J Dermatol (2019) 46:1053101. 10.1111/1346-8138.15090

  • 7.

    HideM. Japanese guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of urticaria 2018. Arerugi (2018) 67:13948. 10.15036/arerugi.67.1394

  • 8.

    CharmanCRVennAJWilliamsHC. The patient-oriented eczema measure: development and initial validation of a new tool for measuring atopic eczema severity from the patients’ perspective. Arch Dermatol (2004) 140:15139. 10.1001/archderm.140.12.1513

  • 9.

    ZuberbierTAbererWAseroRAbdul LatiffAHBakerDBallmer-WeberBet alThe EAACI/GA2LEN/EDF/WAO guideline for the definition, classification, diagnosis and management of urticaria. Allergy (2018) 73:1393414. 10.1111/all.13397

  • 10.

    R Development Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical 385 computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing (2016).

  • 11.

    FiorettiCMazzoccoKRivaSOliveriSMasieroMPravettoniG. Research studies on patients’ illness experience using the narrative medicine approach: a systematic review. BMJ Open (2016) 6:e011220. 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011220

  • 12.

    FurueMOnozukaDTakeuchiSMurotaHSugayaMMasudaKet alPoor adherence to oral and topical medication in 3096 dermatological patients as assessed by the Morisky Medication Adherence Scale-8. Br J Dermatol (2015) 172:2725. 10.1111/bjd.13377

  • 13.

    RozenfeldYHuntJSPlauschinatCWongKS. Oral antidiabetic medication adherence and glycemic control in managed care. Am J Manag Care (2008) 14:715.

  • 14.

    MurotaHTakeuchiSSugayaMTaniokaMOnozukaDHagiharaAet alCharacterization of socioeconomic status of Japanese patients with atopic dermatitis showing poor medical adherence and reasons for drug discontinuation. J Dermatol Sci (2015) 79:27987. 10.1016/j.jdermsci.2015.05.010

  • 15.

    NakaharaTFujitaHArimaKTaguchiYMotoyamaSFurueM. Treatment satisfaction in atopic dermatitis relates to patient‐reported severity: a cross‐sectional study. Allergy (2019) 74:117981. 10.1111/all.13712

  • 16.

    BewleyABurrageDMErsserSJHansenMWardC. Identifying individual psychosocial and adherence support needs in patients with psoriasis: a multinational two-stage qualitative and quantitative study. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol (2014) 28:76370. 10.1111/jdv.12174

  • 17.

    AgoY. Psychosomatic treatment of allergic disorders. Arerugi (2001) 50:510.

  • 18.

    AbuabaraKYuAMOkhovatJPAllenIELanganSM. The prevalence of atopic dermatitis beyond childhood: a systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Allergy (2018) 73:696704. 10.1111/all.13320

  • 19.

    RoduitCFreiRDepnerMKarvonenAMRenzHBraun-FahrländerCet alPhenotypes of atopic dermatitis depending on the timing of onset and progression in childhood. JAMA Pediatr (2017) 171:65562. 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.0556

Summary

Keywords

patient perspective, atopic dermatitis, chronic spontaneous urticaria, cross-sectional survey, Japan

Citation

Kaneko S, Nakahara T, Sumikawa Y, Fukunaga A, Masuda K and Kakamu T (2024) Disease perception in patients with atopic dermatitis and chronic spontaneous urticaria: a cross-sectional survey in Japan. J. Cutan. Immunol. Allergy 7:12476. doi: 10.3389/jcia.2024.12476

Received

27 November 2023

Accepted

30 January 2024

Published

14 February 2024

Volume

7 - 2024

Updates

Copyright

*Correspondence: Sakae Kaneko,

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article