ORIGINAL RESEARCH
Adv. Drug Alcohol Res.
Sex differences in reward network activation are linked to problematic substance use among high-risk adolescents
- OK
Olivia Kay Murray
- PM
Paola Mattey Mora
- JA
Joseph Aloi
- SL
Sydney Lovins
- MP
Michael P Smoker
- LA
Leslie A Hulvershorn
Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Indiana University Bloomington, Indianapolis, United States, Indiana, 46202
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Abstract
Background: Adolescents with externalizing (EXT) disorders, such as attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and conduct disorder—characterized by impulsivity and rule-breaking, are at elevated risk for substance use disorders (SUDs), partly due to deficits in risky decision-making. Sex differences in this association are understudied. Neuroimaging research shows females and males with EXT disorders exhibit different brain activation patterns during risky decisions. This study will explore how these sex differences relate to the development of problematic substance use in youth with EXT disorders.Method: A total of 115 (78 males, 37 females) drug-naive adolescents with EXT psychopathology performed the Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART) during magnetic resonance imaging to assess risky decision-making brain activation. Then, participants and their guardians completed questionnaires at six-month intervals to assess problematic substance use. Statistical analyses evaluated sex differences in brain activation—both parametrically modulated and unmodulated—within a priori-selected regions associated with risky decision-making and problematic substance use, using Cox proportional hazards models.Results: Higher modulated brain activation (as explosion probability increased) during the choice phase contrast, Choose Inflate—Choose Win, was associated with a lower hazard of problematic substance use in the right nucleus accumbens (Hazard Ratio (HR) = 0.68, 95% CI [0.49, 0.94], p = 0.01). This association was significant for females, but not for males, with the hazard ratios being significantly different between sexes. In the right nucleus accumbens, higher unmodulated choice phase activation in males was associated with lower hazard of problematic substance use (HR = 0.60, 95% CI [0.37, 0.97], p = 0.03); and in the right subgenual anterior cingulate cortex, higher unmodulated activation in this same contrast in females was associated with a lower hazard of problematic substance use (HR = 0.49, 95% CI [0.24, 0.97], p = 0.03).Conclusions: This study offers insight into sex differences in risky decision-making neural mechanisms and SUD risk among youth with EXT disorders. Our findings suggest typical risk signaling in the reward-processing network (nucleus accumbens and subgenual anterior cingulate cortex) may protect against substance use, particularly in females with EXT disorders. These findings emphasize the need for further sex-specific research and interventions for youth with EXT disorders.
Summary
Keywords
sex differences, adolescent substance use risk, risky decision-making, externalizing psychopathology, functional neuroimaging
Received
06 March 2025
Accepted
06 November 2025
Copyright
© 2025 Murray, Mattey Mora, Aloi, Lovins, Smoker and Hulvershorn. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Leslie A Hulvershorn, lhulvers@iu.edu
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.