Abstract
Although Mediterranean ecosystems are adapted to fire disturbances, soils are prone to degradation. Therefore, post-fire forest management is a critical step for ecosystem recovery: it can either reduce soil degradation or add a new disturbance. Post-fire management in Mediterranean burnt forests includes interventions with contrasting approaches, including the management of burnt trees, soil protection, or practices devoted to ecosystem restoration via the improvement of components or processes in the affected ecosystem. The consequences of forest management on soils are complex, thereby, in the context of the intensification of fire events and climate change, understanding the response of key soil components in managed ecosystems is critical for prioritizing soil conservation. One interesting component in the early post-fire stages is moss biocrust. The rapid colonization of biocrust-forming mosses in early successional stages post-disturbance stabilizes soils in their most vulnerable period. However, it is completely unknown further implications as active agents in the recovery and resilience of soils, in the transient stage before vascular vegetation regrowth. In combination with the biocrust, the response of soil microbial communities to forest management is crucial for evaluating the soil recovery progress, given their active role in fundamental ecosystem functions. The additive consequences of fires and forest management on biocrust emergence or microbial composition and functionality are usually neglected in the investigation of post-fire systems, although of major relevance to support strategies to preserve soils against functionality loss.
Introduction
Fire is an ecological and evolutionary force in most terrestrial ecosystems on Earth (Pausas and Bond, 2019). As a recurrent process, fire regimens have direct ecological effects on species traits, species interactions and community composition, carbon and nutrient cycling, and ecosystem functions (McLauchlan et al., 2020). The Mediterranean-type climate is an example of a fire-adapted ecosystem thanks to the climatic seasonality, precipitation in the mild winters that enable plant growth which became highly flammable during the dry and hot summers. Thus, several species have developed adaptive strategies to resist, promote, or recover from recurrent fires (Keeley et al., 2011). Land-use change, fire suppression policies, and climate predictions that point to intensification in drought frequency and warmer conditions, have the potential to magnify the wildfire impacts (Pausas, 2004; IPCC, 2018), threatening the resilience of ecosystems (Flannigan et al., 2009).
Intensification in frequency and severity of fire events is expected to result in detrimental effects on soils (Guénon et al., 2013; Pellegrini et al., 2018), through the magnification of the hydrological response, destruction of soil structure, modification of soil organic matter and soil biochemistry, and loss in soil biodiversity (Neary et al., 1999; DeBano, 2000; González-Pérez et al., 2004; Certini et al., 2021; Doerr et al., 2022). Fire effects on soils are coupled with changes aboveground. Rapid vegetation recovery is critical to guarantee soil protection against erosive forces, the main threat to Mediterranean soils after fires (Cerdà and Robichaud, 2009). Nonetheless, above-belowground interactions may suffer alterations under changing fire regimes, e.g., changing soil nutrient pools over time (Caon et al., 2014; Pellegrini et al., 2018; Dove et al., 2020). Understanding how vegetation regenerates is essential for mitigating the escalating fire effects in vulnerable ecosystems (Fernández-García et al., 2019).
Aboveground and belowground soil components are strongly linked; therefore, fire may modify the microbial communities by altering plant-induced changes in the soil environment (Hart et al., 2005; Knelman et al., 2015; Dove et al., 2021). Given the critical ecosystem processes soil microorganisms are involved in, including nutrient cycling, physical stability, carbon sequestration, or support for plant growth (Fultz et al., 2016), modifications in fire regimen could profoundly alter the microbial communities and lead to a great impact on soil functioning (Ferrenberg et al., 2013; Dove and Hart, 2017; Whitman et al., 2019; Sáenz De Miera et al., 2020). Considering the global change projections and new wildfire scenarios, additional work is necessary to better understand the resilience of fire-affected ecosystems exposed to additional disturbances such as human intervention through forest management, of major relevance to support strategies that preserve soils against functionality loss (Pereira et al., 2018; Tomao et al., 2020; Lucas-Borja et al., 2021; Averill et al., 2022).
Biocrust-Forming Mosses: Their Role in Soil Recovery
Biological soil crust, hereafter “biocrust,” is a diverse community of photoautotrophic (e.g., cyanobacteria, algae, lichens, bryophytes) and heterotrophic (e.g., bacteria, fungi, archaea) organisms, living within the first centimeters of the soil surface. Soil particles are aggregated through their presence and activity, and the resultant living crust covers the surface of the ground as a coherent layer (Weber et al., 2022). Around 12% of Earth’s terrestrial surface is covered by biocrust (Rodriguez-Caballero et al., 2018), dominating the plant interspace in many drylands thanks to specific adaptations to survive in unfavorable and often extreme environments (Belnap and Büdel, 2016). While mosses are typically found creating carpets in habitats where water is not a limiting factor (Weber et al., 2022), biocrust-forming mosses developed in drylands are adapted to cope with high insolation, low rainfall, and drought. In the semiarid Mediterranean region, biocrusts are dominated by lichens and bryophytes due to their physiological and morphological characteristics (Maestre et al., 2021; Ladrón De Guevara and Maestre, 2022).
Biocrust-forming mosses are ecosystem engineers: modulate soil properties, alter microbial communities, and intervene in key ecosystem processes such as water infiltration, nutrient cycling, or carbon sequestration (Ferrenberg et al., 2017; Ladrón De Guevara and Maestre, 2022). Above all, biocrusts are recognized as major soil stabilizers in drylands (Belnap and Büdel, 2016). The morphology of mosses (i.e., fine rhizoids and protonema mats) allows strong cohesion of soil particles providing high stability (Seppelt et al., 2016). This high resistance enables effective mitigation of soil erosion, directly, by creating a physical barrier and roughening the surface, and indirectly, by affecting soil properties mainly by increasing the organic matter content (Gao et al., 2020; Zhang et al., 2022). The biocrust effect on soil stability is subordinated to its development stage, which is influenced as well by the extent, intensity, and time since disturbances (Belnap and Büdel, 2016). Due to their implication in distributing surface flows, infiltration and runoff, and regulating soil moisture, biocrust have a major role in controlling local hydrological cycles in drylands (Eldridge et al., 2020). Biocrusts represent islands of fertility for plants and microorganisms through the concentration of essential elements in soils (Ferrenberg et al., 2018), promoting essential biochemical processes. Moss biocrust contributes directly to soil fertility by fixing carbon and nitrogen, increasing the organic matter in soils beneath the crust (Cheng et al., 2021), and contribute indirectly by acting as dust particle trappers (Reynolds et al., 2001). The nutrient status in the soil biocrust facilitates the development of microbial communities, playing fundamental roles in ecosystem multifunctionality and acting as hotspots of soil biodiversity (Delgado-Baquerizo et al., 2016; Maier et al., 2016; Zhang et al., 2022).
Natural recovery rates of biocrust after disturbances are known to be slow, especially after wildfire events, which can involve long-lasting consequences for biocrust community structure and diversity recovery (Johansen, 2001; Root et al., 2017). However, there is not a general consensus on how biocrusts respond to fire disturbances since it highly depends on the biocrust type, the ecosystem, and variables related to the fire, such as severity, frequency, and disturbance history (Zaady et al., 2016; Palmer et al., 2020). Under favorable climate conditions and soil stability, the initial cyanobacteria-dominated succession stages may be omitted to start with biocrust-forming mosses (Weber et al., 2016). This succession pattern is highly observed in fire-affected semiarid or temperate ecosystems (Bowker et al., 2004; Grover et al., 2020; Weber et al., 2022). Fire disturbances provide an opportunity for biocrust to develop, and demine temporarily, in areas that are commonly covered with vascular plants and plant litter. Eventually, biocrust will be diminished in abundance or replaced by vascular plant vegetation with natural recovery succession; however, persistent stressful conditions for vascular plants, e.g., soil compaction provided by heavy machinery in post-fire management, might create conditions that support long-term persistence of biocrust in those environments (Gall et al., 2022a).
Bryophytes are recurrent elements in the post-fire vegetation succession in Mediterranean forests (During, 1979; De las Heras et al., 1994; Esposito et al., 1999; Castoldi et al., 2013; Stinca et al., 2020). After wildfires, ruderal mosses rapidly colonize bare soils in a transient succession stage before vascular plant colonization. This is especially documented after high-intensity fires, in which ecosystems are largely dominated by ruderal mosses during the first 2–3 years after the disturbance (De las Heras et al., 1994; Esposito et al., 1999), revealing the high resilience of mosses to the post-fire environment (Reed et al., 2016; Condon and Pyke, 2018). The reason for their quick response may be related to the wide dispersal of spores, the possible regeneration from dormant propagules in sub-surface soil banks, and rapid protonema and gametophyte growth facilitated by their ability to develop on unstable substrates like charred surfaces and ashes (Esposito et al., 1999; Smith et al., 2014). The colonization stage is characterized by the dominant presence of a few pioneers colonizing species such as Funaria hygrometrica, a specie that shows a very fast protonema development able to survive the desiccation that typically occurs in recently burned soils (During, 1979; De las Heras et al., 1994; Esposito et al., 1999).
Biocrust-forming mosses have received attention recently due to their efficiency in stabilizing the soil surface and controlling soil water erosion after wildfires (Figure 1) (Silva et al., 2019; Gall et al., 2022b), which makes them a promising technique to rehabilitate fire-affected soils (Grover et al., 2020; Muñoz-Rojas et al., 2021). Despite the growing body of knowledge demonstrating their role as ecosystem engineers, pioneer moss biocrusts are often neglected in studies assessing their effect on fire-affected ecosystems. The burgeoning biocrust is a valuable component in post-fire environments beyond soil stabilization. The early colonization of mosses mitigates the harsh conditions on the surface (e.g., desiccation, high temperature, and solar radiation), thereby facilitating microbial growth in biomass and diversity, thus accelerating key biochemical processes from nutrient cycling affected in the wildfire. Therefore, biocrust might play a critical role in the resilience of soil microbial communities affected by wildfires, an influence that persists and accentuates over time with biocrust development (García-Carmona et al., 2020; 2022). However, biocrust are highly vulnerable to physical disturbances and climate change (Rodriguez-Caballero et al., 2018; García-Carmona et al., 2020), thus more studies are needed to understand how biocrust-forming mosses will respond to the intensification of fire events in a scenario of climate change.
FIGURE 1
Patch of moss biocrust emerged after a wildfire stabilizing soils surrounded by bare soils exhibiting erosion symptoms.
The Soil Microbial Response to Fire Disturbances
Soil microbial communities play an essential role in driving a wide variety of ecosystem processes and functions, including nutrient cycling, primary production, litter decomposition, climate regulation, and soil formation (Bardgett and Van Der Putten, 2014; Delgado-Baquerizo et al., 2020). Therefore, microbial diversity act as a precise indicator of soil process alterations and ecosystem recovery after wildfires (Muñoz-Rojas and Bárcenas-Moreno, 2019). Fire disturbances induce complex effects on ecosystem functioning, in which alterations can last months to years depending on the interactive plant and microbial communities’ responses to fires (Kardol and Wardle, 2010; Pérez-Valera et al., 2019). In Mediterranean soils, microbial communities generally show high resilience to wildfires, and ecosystem functioning related to microbial performance recovers relatively quickly (Ferrenberg et al., 2013; Pérez-Valera et al., 2020). However, increasing disturbance pressure on soil microorganisms may hamper the recovery ability of the ecosystem (Villnäs et al., 2013; Mendes et al., 2015). Microbial functionality is linked to the soil post-fire status (Nelson et al., 2022) since the environment strongly filters the abundance and composition of microbial communities (e.g., pH, soil nutrients, climatic variables) (Bahram et al., 2018). The study of microbial communities (i.e., population abundance and taxonomic and functional diversity) and their relationship with soil properties (i.e., indicators of soil health, nutrient cycling, or soil carbon stock) becomes strategic to evaluate the recovery process after fires, monitor the soil biodiversity conservation, and to predict the ecosystem’s resilience to further disturbances (Adkins et al., 2020; Dove et al., 2020; Guerra et al., 2021).
Fire profoundly alters the assembly of microbial communities, which are strongly affected by fire severity (Whitman et al., 2019), and with long-lasting consequences on the community complexity (Treseder et al., 2004; Holden et al., 2016; Cutler et al., 2017; Su et al., 2022). As warned in several meta-analyses, if microbial communities are not resilient to fire within a decade, the predicted increase in fire frequency can hinder the recovery of microbial communities and the important ecosystem processes they regulate (Dooley and Treseder, 2012; Pressler et al., 2019). After wildfires, the taxonomic structure is dominated by some groups as a response to their ecological strategy (Prendergast-Miller et al., 2017; Pérez-Valera et al., 2018). For instance, the identification of responsive taxa to fire disturbances provides valuable information in order to predict the recovery of microbial functionality. In this sense, pyrophilous fungi are interesting indicator taxa after fires, which fruit abundantly due to heat stimulation, lack of competition, and tolerance to post-fire conditions (Reazin et al., 2016; Bruns et al., 2020; Raudabaugh et al., 2020; Fox et al., 2022). Pyrophilous fungi have been recently recognized for aggregating particles and increasing moisture in soils (Filialuna and Cripps, 2021), accelerating the ecosystem recovery process following a fire disturbance.
In drylands, biocrust promote soil microbial diversity (Delgado-Baquerizo et al., 2016; Zhang et al., 2022), being the macro component, either cyanobacteria, lichen, or bryophyte, the main driver of microbiome assembly (Maier et al., 2016; 2018). Moss biocrust is known to harbor a high diversity of bacteria and fungi beneath it, but communities are highly sensitive to disturbances (Xiao and Veste, 2017; Bao et al., 2019; Cheng et al., 2021). Whether new wildfire scenarios coupled with climatic projections may shift the structure of biocrust, switching to early-successional cyanobacteria, is relevant for microbial biodiversity conservation. Those shifts may strongly impact the functioning of recently fire-affected ecosystems through the profound alteration of soil microbial communities and biochemical processes (Maestre et al., 2015; Delgado-Baquerizo et al., 2018; Tucker et al., 2020; Tian et al., 2022). Those questions remain unanswered, but new approaches in the study of soil microbiome are expected to reveal valuable information in this regard.
Post-Fire Management in Mediterranean Forests: Restoring or Adding a New Disturbance
The management of fire-affected areas represents a crucial step for the fate of soils after fires. While Mediterranean ecosystems are resilient to fire events, soils are prone to degradation. Therefore, the management will determine the ecosystem’s capacity to recover from the fire disturbance, combined with factors such as the fire history, ash properties, topography, post-fire weather, and vegetation recuperation (Pereira et al., 2018). Post-fire management planning in a Mediterranean burnt forest includes interventions with contrasting approaches, including the management of burnt trees, soil protection, or practices devoted to ecosystem restoration. The consequences of forest management in soils, especially in soil biology, are particularly complex and conditioned by multiple factors, often overlooked in the decision-making process (Figure 2).
FIGURE 2
Insights from the Discussion: An overview of post-fire management in Mediterranean soils and key roles of biocrust-forming mosses and soil microbial communities.
Salvage logging is the most common post-fire management strategy in Mediterranean coniferous forests. Intensive salvage logging trigger soil degradation processes: soil compaction, delay of vegetation recovery (Wagenbrenner et al., 2016; García-Orenes et al., 2017), disturbance of nutrient cycling (Pereg et al., 2018), alteration in carbon fluxes (Serrano-Ortiz et al., 2011; Hartmann et al., 2014), and disruption in soil biodiversity directly or indirectly, e.g., disturbing the deadwood-dependent species (Thorn et al., 2020), reducing the cover of biocrust-forming mosses (García-Carmona et al., 2020), or altering the soil microbial communities (García-Carmona et al., 2021a). Soils can suffer persistent alterations, ultimately reducing forest productivity and ecosystem functionality (Hartmann et al., 2014; Chen et al., 2015). Nevertheless, the effects on soils are highly dependent on the context, the site characteristics, the soil erodibility, and the way to perform the management (Fernández and Vega, 2016; García-Orenes et al., 2017; Francos et al., 2018). On the other hand, burnt wood is a biological legacy of key relevance in burned forests (Thorn et al., 2018). The burnt wood act as a barrier for sediments against water erosion, constitutes a stock of nutrients that slowly fertilize soil through decomposition, and ameliorates the stress conditions by increasing soil moisture, enabling vegetation and microbial development and sustaining biodiversity and ecosystem services (Baldrian, 2017; Thorn et al., 2018; 2020; García-Carmona et al., 2021a; Juan-Ovejero et al., 2021). However, timber activities in Mediterranean forests are important from a social perspective, being non-interventionism is highly controversial (Castro, 2021). The creation of land diversification via patches of different wood extraction intensities could increase the forest’s resilience to future disturbances (FAO et al., 2020).
Among the emergency stabilization techniques to face the risk of soil erosion, mulching is considered the most cost-effective intervention after wildfires (Robichaud et al., 2013; Girona-García et al., 2021). Straw mulches, the most commonly applied materials, are highly effective (Lucas-Borja et al., 2019), but their application presents some drawbacks like the introduction of non-native species and low wind resistance (Beyers, 2004; Kruse et al., 2004). In contrast, wood-based mulches exhibit great resistance to wind displacement and long longevity due to their decay resistance (Bautista et al., 2009; Jonas et al., 2019). However, vegetation regrowth can be hindered under a thick layer of mulch (Bautista et al., 2009), and thus endangered its crucial role in soil protection and recovery. While preventing soil loss in Mediterranean forests must be the main goal in post-fire planning, more research is needed regarding the potential threat to soil biodiversity conservation of wood-mulching if incorrectly performed. Multiple recommendations or guidelines exist in this aspect (Vallejo et al., 2012; Robichaud et al., 2013; Pereira et al., 2018; Castro, 2021): interventions should be limited to very specific situations, i.e., high risk of erosion, slow vascular plant recovery rate, risk downslope, etc. For instance, wood residues generated in the framework of logging operations are often applied where intensive logging operations may have created the necessity of the mulch application after triggering erosion processes (Castro, 2021). Wood-based mulch in soils is expected to produce positive effects in soils related to microclimatic improvement and nutrient supply, although the biological soil response and functionality recovery are still rather unexplored.
Restoration practices act on components or processes in the affected ecosystem in order to recover its functionality, for example, via the application of organic amendments (Hueso-González et al., 2018; Muñoz-Rojas, 2018). After the strong consumption of organic carbon in high-severity fires, the additional source of organic matter induces a cascade of effects in multiple components of the perturbed ecosystem (Heneghan et al., 2008; Costantini et al., 2016). The amendment selection, in relation to the decomposition rates of the organic materials, depends on the goals of the soil restoration plan in terms of the durability of effects on the soil response (Tejada et al., 2009; González-Ubierna et al., 2012; Larney and Angers, 2012; García-Carmona et al., 2021b). Studying the application effects on soil microbial diversity is highly necessary to identify possible threats to soil biodiversity, related to the introduction of new taxa, in order to correctly address biodiversity protection plans.
Conclusion
In order to support management practices that boost soil biodiversity and preserve ecosystem functionality, threats must be identified to formulate strategies that prioritize soil conservation (Guerra et al., 2021; Averill et al., 2022). In this sense, biocrust and soil microbial communities are highly vulnerable to post-fire physical disturbances, thus land diversification through different management intensities could be strategic for increasing the ecosystem’s resilience. In the context of intensification of fire events and climate change scenarios, the investigation of two key components for soil recovery, i.e., microbial diversity and biocrust-forming mosses, might be key to guiding forest strategies toward accelerating recovery and resilience of semi-arid ecosystems prone to degradation.
Statements
Author Contributions
MG-C conduct the study and wrote the manuscript, JM-S and FG-O lead the funding acquisition. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Funding
This work was supported by the “POSTFIRE_CARE” project of the Spanish Research Agency (AIE) and the European Union through European Funding for Regional Development (FEDER) (Ref.: CGL 2016-75178-C2-1-R), and the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (grant FPI-MINECO BES-2017-081283 supporting MG-C).
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
1
Adkins J. Docherty K. M. Gutknecht J. L. M. Miesel J. R. (2020). How Do Soil Microbial Communities Respond to Fire in the Intermediate Term? Investigating Direct and Indirect Effects Associated with Fire Occurrence and Burn Severity. Sci. Total Environ.745, 140957. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140957
2
Averill C. Anthony M. A. Baldrian P. Finkbeiner F. van den Hoogen J. Kiers T. et al (2022). Defending Earth’s Terrestrial Microbiome. Nat. Microbiol.7, 1717–1725. 10.1038/s41564-022-01228-3
3
Bahram M. Hildebrand F. Forslund S. K. Anderson J. L. Soudzilovskaia N. A. Bodegom P. M. et al (2018). Structure and Function of the Global Topsoil Microbiome. Nature560, 233–237. 10.1038/s41586-018-0386-6
4
Baldrian P. (2017). Forest Microbiome: Diversity, Complexity and Dynamics. FEMS Microbiol. Rev.41, 109–130. 10.1093/FEMSRE/FUW040
5
Bao T. Zhao Y. Yang X. Ren W. Wang S. (2019). Effects of Disturbance on Soil Microbial Abundance in Biological Soil Crusts on the Loess Plateau, China. J. Arid. Environ.163, 59–67. 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2019.01.003
6
Bardgett R. D. Van Der Putten W. H. (2014). Belowground Biodiversity and Ecosystem Functioning. Nature515, 505–511. 10.1038/nature13855
7
Bautista S. Robichaud P. R. Bladé C. (2009). “Post-Fire Mulching,” in Fire Effects on Soils and Restoration Strategies. Editors CerdaA.RobichaudP. R. (CRC Press), 369–388. 10.1201/9781439843338-17
8
Belnap J. Büdel B. (2016). “Biological Soil Crusts as Soil Stabilizers,” in Biological Soil Crusts: An Organizing Principle in Drylands. Editors WeberB.BüdelB.BelnapJ. (Springer), 305–320. 10.1007/978-3-319-30214-0_16
9
Beyers J. L. (2004). Postfire Seeding for Erosion Control: Effectiveness and Impacts on Native Plant Communities. Conserv. Biol.18, 947–956. 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.00523.x
10
Bowker M. A. Belnap J. Rosentreter R. Graham B. (2004). Wildfire-resistant Biological Soil Crusts and Fire-Induced Loss of Soil Stability in Palouse Prairies, USA. Appl. Soil Ecol.26, 41–52. 10.1016/J.APSOIL.2003.10.005
11
Bruns T. D. Chung J. A. Carver A. A. Glassman S. I. (2020). A Simple Pyrocosm for Studying Soil Microbial Response to Fire Reveals a Rapid, Massive Response by Pyronema Species. PLoS One15, e0222691. 10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0222691
12
Caon L. Vallejo V. R. Coen R. J. Geissen V. (2014). Effects of Wildfire on Soil Nutrients in Mediterranean Ecosystems. Earth-Science Rev.139, 47–58. 10.1016/j.earscirev.2014.09.001
13
Castoldi E. Quintana J. R. Mata R. G. Molina J. A. (2013). Early Post-fire Plant Succession in Slash-Pile Prescribed Burns of a Sub-mediterranean Managed Forest. Plant Ecol. Evol.146, 272–278. 10.5091/plecevo.2013.848
14
Castro J. (2021). “Post-Fire Restoration of Mediterranean Pine Forests,” in Pines and Their Mixed Forest Ecosystems in the Mediterranean Basin. Editors Ne’emanG.OsemY. (Cham: Springer), 537–565. 10.1007/978-3-030-63625-8_25
15
Cerdà A. Robichaud P. (2009). Fire Effects on Soils and Restoration Strategies. 10.1201/9781439843338
16
Certini G. Moya D. Lucas-Borja M. E. Mastrolonardo G. (2021). The Impact of Fire on Soil-Dwelling Biota: A Review. For. Ecol. Manage.488, 118989. 10.1016/j.foreco.2021.118989
17
Chen X.-L. Wang D. Chen X. Wang J. Diao J.-J. Zhang J.-Y. et al (2015). Soil Microbial Functional Diversity and Biomass as Affected by Different Thinning Intensities in a Chinese Fir Plantation. Appl. Soil Ecol.92, 35–44. 10.1016/j.apsoil.2015.01.018
18
Cheng C. Gao M. Zhang Y. Long M. Wu Y. Li X. (2021). Effects of Disturbance to Moss Biocrusts on Soil Nutrients, Enzyme Activities, and Microbial Communities in Degraded Karst Landscapes in Southwest China. Soil Biol. biochem.152, 108065. 10.1016/J.SOILBIO.2020.108065
19
Condon L. A. Pyke D. A. (2018). Resiliency of Biological Soil Crusts and Vascular Plants Varies Among Morphogroups with Disturbance Intensity. Plant Soil433, 271–287. 10.1007/s11104-018-3838-8
20
Costantini E. A. C. Branquinho C. Nunes A. Schwilch G. Stavi I. Valdecantos A. et al (2016). Soil Indicators to Assess the Effectiveness of Restoration Strategies in Dryland Ecosystems. Solid earth.7, 397–414. 10.5194/se-7-397-2016
21
Cutler N. A. Arróniz-Crespo M. Street L. E. Jones D. L. Chaput D. L. DeLuca T. H. (2017). Long-term Recovery of Microbial Communities in the Boreal Bryosphere Following Fire Disturbance. Microb. Ecol.73, 75–90. 10.1007/s00248-016-0832-7
22
De las Heras J. Guerra Montes J. Herranz J. M. (1994). Stages of Bryophyte Succession after Fire in Mediterranean Forests (SE Spain). Int. J. Wildl. Fire4, 33–34. 10.1071/wf9940033
23
DeBano L. F. (2000). “Water Repellency in Soils: A Historical Overview,” in Journal of Hydrology (Elsevier Science B.V.), 4–32. 10.1016/S0022-1694(00)00180-3
24
Delgado-Baquerizo M. Maestre F. T. Eldridge D. J. Bowker M. A. Jeffries T. C. Singh B. K. (2018). Biocrust-forming Mosses Mitigate the Impact of Aridity on Soil Microbial Communities in Drylands: Observational Evidence from Three Continents. New Phytol.220, 824–835. 10.1111/nph.15120
25
Delgado-Baquerizo M. Maestre F. T. Reich P. B. Jeffries T. C. Gaitan J. J. Encinar D. et al (2016). Microbial Diversity Drives Multifunctionality in Terrestrial Ecosystems. Nat. Commun.7, 10541–10548. 10.1038/ncomms10541
26
Delgado-Baquerizo M. Reich P. B. Trivedi C. Eldridge D. J. Abades S. Alfaro F. D. et al (2020). Multiple Elements of Soil Biodiversity Drive Ecosystem Functions across Biomes. Nat. Ecol. Evol.4, 210–220. 10.1038/s41559-019-1084-y
27
Doerr S. H. Santín C. Mataix-Solera J. (2022). Fire Effects on Soil. Ref. Modul. Earth Syst. Environ. Sci. 10.1016/B978-0-12-822974-3.00106-3
28
Dooley S. R. Treseder K. K. (2012). The Effect of Fire on Microbial Biomass: a Meta-Analysis of Field Studies. Biogeochemistry109, 49–61. 10.1007/s10533-011-9633-8
29
Dove N. C. Hart S. C. (2017). Fire Reduces Fungal Species Richness and In Situ Mycorrhizal Colonization: A Meta-Analysis. Fire Ecol.13, 37–65. 10.4996/fireecology.130237746
30
Dove N. C. Klingeman D. M. Carrell A. A. Cregger M. A. Schadt C. W. (2021). Fire Alters Plant Microbiome Assembly Patterns: Integrating the Plant and Soil Microbial Response to Disturbance. New Phytol.230, 2433–2446. 10.1111/NPH.17248
31
Dove N. C. Safford H. D. Bohlman G. N. Estes B. L. Hart S. C. (2020). High-severity Wildfire Leads to Multi-Decadal Impacts on Soil Biogeochemistry in Mixed-Conifer Forests. Ecol. Appl.30, e02072. 10.1002/EAP.2072
32
During H. J. (1979). Life Strategies of Bryophytes: A Preliminary Review. Lindbergia2–18.
33
Eldridge D. J. Reed S. Travers S. K. Bowker M. A. Maestre F. T. Ding J. et al (2020). The Pervasive and Multifaceted Influence of Biocrusts on Water in the World's Drylands. Glob. Chang. Biol.26 (10), 6003–6014. 10.1111/gcb.15232
34
Esposito A. Mazzoleni S. Strumia S. (1999). Post‐fire Bryophyte Dynamics in Mediterranean Vegetation. J. Veg. Sci.10, 261–268. 10.2307/3237147
35
Fernández C. Vega J. A. (2016). Effects of Mulching and Post-fire Salvage Logging on Soil Erosion and Vegetative Regrowth in NW Spain. For. Ecol. Manage.375, 46–54. 10.1016/j.foreco.2016.05.024
36
Fernández-García V. Fulé P. Z. Marcos E. Calvo L. (2019). The Role of Fire Frequency and Severity on the Regeneration of Mediterranean Serotinous Pines under Different Environmental Conditions. For. Ecol. Manage.444, 59–68. 10.1016/J.FORECO.2019.04.040
37
Ferrenberg S. Faist A. M. Howell A. Reed S. C. (2018). Biocrusts Enhance Soil Fertility and Bromus Tectorum Growth, and Interact with Warming to Influence Germination. Plant Soil429, 77–90. 10.1007/s11104-017-3525-1
38
Ferrenberg S. O’neill S. P. Knelman J. E. Todd B. Duggan S. Bradley D. et al (2013). Changes in Assembly Processes in Soil Bacterial Communities Following a Wildfire Disturbance. ISME J.7, 1102–1111. 10.1038/ismej.2013.11
39
Ferrenberg S. Tucker C. L. Reed S. C. (2017). Biological Soil Crusts: Diminutive Communities of Potential Global Importance. Front. Ecol. Environ.15, 160–167. 10.1002/FEE.1469
40
Filialuna O. Cripps C. (2021). Evidence that Pyrophilous Fungi Aggregate Soil after Forest Fire. For. Ecol. Manage.498, 119579. 10.1016/J.FORECO.2021.119579
41
Flannigan M. D. Krawchuk M. A. De Groot W. J. Wotton B. M. Gowman L. M. (2009). Implications of Changing Climate for Global Wildland Fire. Int. J. Wildl. Fire18, 483–507. 10.1071/WF08187
42
Fox S. Sikes B. A. Brown S. P. Cripps C. L. Glassman S. I. Hughes K. et al (2022). Fire as a Driver of Fungal Diversity — A Synthesis of Current Knowledge. Mycologia114, 215–241. 10.1080/00275514.2021.2024422
43
Francos M. Pereira P. Alcañiz M. Úbeda X. (2018). Post-Wildfire Management Effects on Short-Term Evolution of Soil Properties (Catalonia, Spain, SW-Europe). Sci. Total Environ.633, 285–292. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.195
44
Fultz L. M. Moore-Kucera J. Dathe J. Davinic M. Perry G. Wester D. et al (2016). Forest Wildfire and Grassland Prescribed Fire Effects on Soil Biogeochemical Processes and Microbial Communities: Two Case Studies in the Semi-arid Southwest. Appl. Soil Ecol.99, 118–128. 10.1016/j.apsoil.2015.10.023
45
Gall C. Nebel M. Quandt D. Scholten T. Seitz S. (2022b). Pioneer Biocrust Communities Prevent Soil Erosion in Temperate Forests after Disturbances. Biogeosciences19, 3225–3245. 10.5194/BG-19-3225-2022
46
Gall C. Ohan J. Glaser K. Karsten U. Schloter M. Scholten T. et al (2022a). Biocrusts: Overlooked Hotspots of Managed Soils in Mesic Environments. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 10.1002/JPLN.202200252
47
Gao L. Sun H. Xu M. Zhao Y. (2020). Biocrusts Resist Runoff Erosion through Direct Physical Protection and Indirect Modification of Soil Properties. J. Soils Sediments20, 133–142. 10.1007/s11368-019-02372-w
48
García-Carmona M. Arcenegui V. García-Orenes F. Mataix-Solera J. (2020). The Role of Mosses in Soil Stability, Fertility and Microbiology Six Years after a Post-fire Salvage Logging Management. J. Environ. Manage.262, 110287. 10.1016/J.JENVMAN.2020.110287
49
García-Carmona M. García-Orenes F. Mataix-Solera J. Roldán A. Pereg L. Caravaca F. (2021a). Salvage Logging Alters Microbial Community Structure and Functioning after a Wildfire in a Mediterranean Forest. Appl. Soil Ecol.168, 104130. 10.1016/J.APSOIL.2021.104130
50
García-Carmona M. Lepinay C. García-Orenes F. Baldrian P. Arcenegui V. Cajthaml T. et al (2022). Moss Biocrust Accelerates the Recovery and Resilience of Soil Microbial Communities in Fire-Affected Semi-arid Mediterranean Soils. Sci. Total Environ.846, 157467. 10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2022.157467
51
García-Carmona M. Marín C. García-Orenes F. Rojas C. (2021b). Contrasting Organic Amendments Induce Different Short-Term Responses in Soil Abiotic and Biotic Properties in a Fire-Affected Native Mediterranean Forest in Chile. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr.21, 2105–2114. 10.1007/s42729-021-00506-z
52
García-Orenes F. Arcenegui V. Chrenková K. Mataix-Solera J. Moltó J. Jara-Navarro A. B. et al (2017). Effects of Salvage Logging on Soil Properties and Vegetation Recovery in a Fire-Affected Mediterranean Forest: a Two Year Monitoring Research. Sci. Total Environ.586, 1057–1065. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.02.090
53
Girona-García A. Vieira D. C. S. Silva J. Fernández C. Robichaud P. R. Keizer J. J. (2021). Effectiveness of Post-fire Soil Erosion Mitigation Treatments: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Earth-Science Rev.217, 103611. 10.1016/J.EARSCIREV.2021.103611
54
González-Pérez J. A. González-Vila F. J. Almendros G. Knicker H. (2004). The Effect of Fire on Soil Organic Matter - A Review. Environ. Int.30, 855–870. 10.1016/j.envint.2004.02.003
55
González-Ubierna S. Jorge-Mardomingo I. Carrero-González B. Teresa de la Cruz M. Ángel Casermeiro M. (2012). Soil Organic Matter Evolution after the Application of High Doses of Organic Amendments in a Mediterranean Calcareous Soil. J. Soils Sediments12, 1257–1268. 10.1007/s11368-012-0516-y
56
Grover H. S. Bowker M. A. Fulé P. Z. (2020). Improved, Scalable Techniques to Cultivate Fire Mosses for Rehabilitation. Restor. Ecol.28, S17. 10.1111/rec.12982
57
Guénon R. Vennetier M. Dupuy N. Roussos S. Pailler A. Gros R. (2013). Trends in Recovery of Mediterranean Soil Chemical Properties and Microbial Activities after Infrequent and Frequent Wildfires. L. Degrad. Dev.24, 115–128. 10.1002/ldr.1109
58
Guerra C. A. Bardgett R. D. Caon L. Crowther T. W. Delgado-Baquerizo M. Montanarella L. et al (2021). Tracking, Targeting, and Conserving Soil Biodiversity: A Monitoring and Indicator System Can Inform Policy. Sci. (80)371, 239–241. 10.1126/science.abd7926
59
Hart S. C. DeLuca T. H. Newman G. S. MacKenzie M. D. Boyle S. I. (2005). Post-Fire Vegetative Dynamics as Drivers of Microbial Community Structure and Function in Forest Soils. For. Ecol. Manage.220, 166–184. 10.1016/j.foreco.2005.08.012
60
Hartmann M. Niklaus P. A. Zimmermann S. Schmutz S. Kremer J. Abarenkov K. et al (2014). Resistance and Resilience of the Forest Soil Microbiome to Logging-Associated Compaction. ISME J.8, 226–244. 10.1038/ismej.2013.141
61
Heneghan L. Miller S. P. Baer S. Callaham M. A. Montgomery J. Pavao-Zuckerman M. et al (2008). Integrating Soil Ecological Knowledge into Restoration Management. Restor. Ecol.16, 608–617. 10.1111/j.1526-100X.2008.00477.x
62
Holden S. R. Rogers B. M. Treseder K. K. Randerson J. T. (2016). Fire Severity Influences the Response of Soil Microbes to a Boreal Forest Fire. Environ. Res. Lett.11, 035004. 10.1088/1748-9326/11/3/035004
63
Hueso-González P. Muñoz-Rojas M. Martínez-Murillo J. F. (2018). The Role of Organic Amendments in Drylands Restoration. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sci. Heal.5, 1–6. 10.1016/j.coesh.2017.12.002
64
IPCC (2018). Global Warming of 1.5° C: An IPCC Special Report on the Impacts of Global Warming of 1.5° C above Pre-industrial Levels and Related Global Greenhouse Gas Emission Pathways, in the Context of Strengthening the Global Response to the Threat of Climate Change, Sustainable Development, and Efforts to Eradicate Poverty. Intergov. Panel Clim. Change.
65
Johansen J. R. (2001). “Impacts of Fire on Biological Soil Crusts,” in Biological Soil Crusts: Structure, Function, and Management. Editors BelnapJ.LangeO. L. (Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer), 385–397. 10.1007/978-3-642-56475-8_28
66
Jonas J. L. Berryman E. Wolk B. Morgan P. Robichaud P. R. (2019). Post-Fire Wood Mulch for Reducing Erosion Potential Increases Tree Seedlings with Few Impacts on Understory Plants and Soil Nitrogen. For. Ecol. Manage.453, 117567. 10.1016/J.FORECO.2019.117567
67
Juan-Ovejero R. Molinas-González C. R. Leverkus A. B. Martín Peinado F. J. Castro J. (2021). Decadal Effect of Post-fire Management Treatments on Soil Carbon and Nutrient Concentrations in a Burnt Mediterranean Forest. For. Ecol. Manage.498, 119570. 10.1016/J.FORECO.2021.119570
68
Kardol P. Wardle D. A. (2010). How Understanding Aboveground–Belowground Linkages Can Assist Restoration Ecology. Trends Ecol. Evol.25, 670–679. 10.1016/J.TREE.2010.09.001
69
Keeley J. Bond W. Bradstock R. Pausas J. (2011). in Fire in Mediterranean Ecosystems: Ecology, Evolution and Management. Editors KeeleyJ.BondW.BradstockR.PausasJ. (New York: Cambridge University Press).
70
Knelman J. E. Graham E. B. Trahan N. A. Schmidt S. K. Nemergut D. R. (2015). Fire Severity Shapes Plant Colonization Effects on Bacterial Community Structure, Microbial Biomass, and Soil Enzyme Activity in Secondary Succession of a Burned Forest. Soil Biol. biochem.90, 161–168. 10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.08.004
71
Kruse R. Bend E. Bierzychudek P. (2004). Native Plant Regeneration and Introduction of Non-natives Following Post-fire Rehabilitation with Straw Mulch and Barley Seeding. For. Ecol. Manage.196, 299–310. 10.1016/J.FORECO.2004.03.022
72
FAO, ITPS, GSBI, SCBD, EC (2020). in State Of Knowledge of Soil Biodiversity - Status, Challenges and Potentialities. Report 202. ScowK.BardgettR. D.PennockD.Vargas-RojasR.SinghB. K.EisenhauerN. Editors (Rome: FAO). 10.4060/CB1928EN
73
Ladrón De Guevara M. Maestre F. T. (2022). Ecology and Responses to Climate Change of Biocrust-Forming Mosses in Drylands. J. Exp. Bot.73, 4380–4395. 10.1093/JXB/ERAC183
74
Larney F. J. Angers D. A. (2012). The Role of Organic Amendments in Soil Reclamation: A Review. Can. J. Soil Sci.92, 19–38. 10.4141/CJSS2010-064
75
Lucas-Borja M. E. Delgado-Baquerizo M. Muñoz-Rojas M. Plaza-Álvarez P. A. Gómez-Sanchez M. E. González-Romero J. et al (2021). Changes in Ecosystem Properties after Post-fire Management Strategies in Wildfire-Affected Mediterranean Forests. J. Appl. Ecol.58, 836–846. 10.1111/1365-2664.13819
76
Lucas-Borja M. E. González-Romero J. Plaza-Álvarez P. A. Sagra J. Gómez M. E. Moya D. et al (2019). The Impact of Straw Mulching and Salvage Logging on Post-fire Runoff and Soil Erosion Generation under Mediterranean Climate Conditions. Sci. Total Environ.654, 441–451. 10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2018.11.161
77
Maestre F. T. Benito B. M. Berdugo M. Concostrina-Zubiri L. Delgado-Baquerizo M. Eldridge D. J. et al (2021). Biogeography of Global Drylands. New Phytol.231, 540–558. 10.1111/NPH.17395
78
Maestre F. T. Delgado-Baquerizo M. Jeffries T. C. Eldridge D. J. Ochoa V. Gozalo B. et al (2015). Increasing Aridity Reduces Soil Microbial Diversity and Abundance in Global Drylands. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.112, 15684–15689. 10.1073/pnas.1516684112
79
Maier S. Muggia L. Kuske C. R. Grube M. (2016). “Bacteria and Non-lichenized Fungi within Biological Soil Crusts,” in Biological Soil Crusts: An Organizing Pricinple in Drylands. Editors WeberB.BüdelB.BelnapJ. (Cham: Springer), 81–100. 10.1007/978-3-319-30214-0_5
80
Maier S. Tamm A. Wu D. Caesar J. Grube M. Weber B. (2018). Photoautotrophic Organisms Control Microbial Abundance, Diversity, and Physiology in Different Types of Biological Soil Crusts. ISME J.12, 1032–1046. 10.1038/s41396-018-0062-8
81
McLauchlan K. K. Higuera P. E. Miesel J. Rogers B. M. Schweitzer J. Shuman J. K. et al (2020). Fire as a Fundamental Ecological Process: Research Advances and Frontiers. J. Ecol.108, 2047–2069. 10.1111/1365-2745.13403
82
Mendes L. W. Tsai S. M. Navarrete A. A. de Hollander M. van Veen J. A. Kuramae E. E. (2015). Soil-borne Microbiome: Linking Diversity to Function. Microb. Ecol.70, 255–265. 10.1007/s00248-014-0559-2
83
Muñoz-Rojas M. Bárcenas-Moreno G. (2019). “Soil Microbiology,” in Fire Effects on Soil Properties. Editors PereiraP.Mataix-SoleraJ.ÚbedaX.ReinG.CerdàA. (CSIRO), 157–175.
84
Muñoz-Rojas M. Machado de Lima N. M. Chamizo S. Bowker M. A. (2021). Restoring Post-fire Ecosystems with Biocrusts: Living, Photosynthetic Soil Surfaces. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sci. Heal.23, 100273. 10.1016/J.COESH.2021.100273
85
Muñoz-Rojas M. (2018). Soil Quality Indicators: Critical Tools in Ecosystem Restoration. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sci. Heal.5, 47–52. 10.1016/j.coesh.2018.04.007
86
Neary D. G. Klopatek C. C. DeBano L. F. Ffolliott P. F. (1999). Fire Effects on Belowground Sustainability: A Review and Synthesis. For. Ecol. Manage.122, 51–71. 10.1016/S0378-1127(99)00032-8
87
Nelson A. R. Narrowe A. B. Rhoades C. C. Fegel T. S. Daly R. A. Roth H. K. et al (2022). Wildfire-dependent Changes in Soil Microbiome Diversity and Function. Nat. Microbiol.7, 1419–1430. 10.1038/s41564-022-01203-y
88
Palmer B. Hernandez R. Lipson D. (2020). The Fate of Biological Soil Crusts after Fire: a Meta-Analysis. Glob. Ecol. Conserv.24, e01380. 10.1016/j.gecco.2020.e01380
89
Pausas J. G. Bond W. J. (2019). Humboldt and the Reinvention of Nature. J. Ecol.107, 1031–1037. 10.1111/1365-2745.13109
90
Pausas J. G. (2004). Changes in Fire and Climate in the Eastern Iberian Peninsula (Mediterranean Basin). Clim. Change63, 337–350. 10.1023/B:CLIM.0000018508.94901.9C
91
Pellegrini A. F. A. Ahlström A. Hobbie S. E. Reich P. B. Nieradzik L. P. Staver A. C. et al (2018). Fire Frequency Drives Decadal Changes in Soil Carbon and Nitrogen and Ecosystem Productivity. Nature553, 194–198. 10.1038/nature24668
92
Pereg L. Mataix-Solera J. McMillan M. García-Orenes F. (2018). The Impact of Post-fire Salvage Logging on Microbial Nitrogen Cyclers in Mediterranean Forest Soil. Sci. Total Environ.619–620, 1079–1087. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.11.147
93
Pereira P. Francos M. Brevik E. C. Ubeda X. Bogunovic I. (2018). Post-Fire Soil Management. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sci. Heal.5, 26–32. 10.1016/j.coesh.2018.04.002
94
Pérez-Valera E. Goberna M. Verdú M. (2019). Fire Modulates Ecosystem Functioning through the Phylogenetic Structure of Soil Bacterial Communities. Soil Biol. biochem.129, 80–89. 10.1016/j.soilbio.2018.11.007
95
Pérez-Valera E. Verdú M. Navarro-Cano J. A. Goberna M. (2018). Resilience to Fire of Phylogenetic Diversity across Biological Domains. Mol. Ecol.27, 2896–2908. 10.1111/mec.14729
96
Pérez-Valera E. Verdú M. Navarro-Cano J. A. Goberna M. (2020). Soil Microbiome Drives the Recovery of Ecosystem Functions after Fire. Soil Biol. biochem.149, 107948. 10.1016/j.soilbio.2020.107948
97
Prendergast-Miller M. T. de Menezes A. B. Macdonald L. M. Toscas P. Bissett A. Baker G. et al (2017). Wildfire Impact: Natural Experiment Reveals Differential Short-Term Changes in Soil Microbial Communities. Soil Biol. biochem.109, 1–13. 10.1016/j.soilbio.2017.01.027
98
Pressler Y. Moore J. C. Cotrufo M. F. (2019). Belowground Community Responses to Fire: Meta-Analysis Reveals Contrasting Responses of Soil Microorganisms and Mesofauna. Oikos128, 309–327. 10.1111/oik.05738
99
Raudabaugh D. B. Matheny P. B. Hughes K. W. Iturriaga T. Sargent M. Miller A. N. (2020). Where Are They Hiding? Testing the Body Snatchers Hypothesis in Pyrophilous Fungi. Fungal Ecol.43, 100870. 10.1016/J.FUNECO.2019.100870
100
Reazin C. Morris S. Smith J. E. Cowan A. D. Jumpponen A. (2016). Fires of Differing Intensities Rapidly Select Distinct Soil Fungal Communities in a Northwest US Ponderosa Pine Forest Ecosystem. For. Ecol. Manage.377, 118–127. 10.1016/J.FORECO.2016.07.002
101
Reed S. C. Maestre F. T. Ochoa-Hueso R. Kuske C. R. Darrouzet-Nardi A. Oliver M. et al (2016). “Biocrusts in the Context of Global Change,” in Biological Soil Crusts: An Organizing Principle in Drylands. Editors WeberB.BüdelB.BelnapJ. (Cham: Springer), 451–476. 10.1007/978-3-319-30214-0_22
102
Reynolds R. Belnap J. Reheis M. Lamothe P. Luiszer F. (2001). Aeolian Dust in Colorado Plateau Soils: Nutrient Inputs and Recent Change in Source. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.98, 7123–7127. 10.1073/pnas.121094298
103
Robichaud P. R. Lewis S. A. Wagenbrenner J. W. Ashmun L. E. Brown R. E. (2013). Post-Fire Mulching for Runoff and Erosion Mitigation: Part I: Effectiveness at Reducing Hillslope Erosion Rates. Catena105, 75–92. 10.1016/J.CATENA.2012.11.015
104
Rodriguez-Caballero E. Belnap J. Büdel B. Crutzen P. J. Andreae M. O. Pöschl U. et al (2018). Dryland Photoautotrophic Soil Surface Communities Endangered by Global Change. Nat. Geosci.11, 185–189. 10.1038/s41561-018-0072-1
105
Root H. T. Brinda J. C. Kyle Dodson E. (2017). Recovery of Biological Soil Crust Richness and Cover 12-16 Years after Wildfires in Idaho, USA. Biogeosciences14, 3957–3969. 10.5194/bg-14-3957-2017
106
Sáenz De Miera L. E. Pinto R. Gutierrez-Gonzalez J. J. Calvo L. Ansola G. (2020). Wildfire Effects on Diversity and Composition in Soil Bacterial Communities. Sci. Total Environ.726, 138636. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138636
107
Seppelt R. D. Downing A. J. Deane-Coe K. K. Zhang Y. Zhang J. (2016). “Bryophytes within Biological Soil Crusts,” in Biological Soil Crusts: An Organizing Principle in Drylands. Editors BettinaW.BüdelB.BelnapJ. (Cham: Springer), 101–120. 10.1007/978-3-319-30214-0_6
108
Serrano-Ortiz P. Marañón-Jiménez S. Reverter B. R. Sánchez-Cañete E. P. Castro J. Zamora R. et al (2011). Post-Fire Salvage Logging Reduces Carbon Sequestration in Mediterranean Coniferous Forest. For. Ecol. Manage.262, 2287–2296. 10.1016/j.foreco.2011.08.023
109
Silva F. C. Vieira D. C. S. van der Spek E. Keizer J. J. (2019). Effect of Moss Crusts on Mitigation of Post-fire Soil Erosion. Ecol. Eng.128, 9–17. 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2018.12.024
110
Smith R. J. Abella S. R. Stark L. R. (2014). Post-Fire Recovery of Desert Bryophyte Communities: Effects of Fires and Propagule Soil Banks. J. Veg. Sci.25, 447–456. 10.1111/jvs.12094
111
Stinca A. Ravo M. Marzaioli R. Marchese G. Cordella A. Rutigliano F. A. et al (2020). Changes in Multi-Level Biodiversity and Soil Features in a Burned Beech Forest in the Southern Italian Coastal Mountain. Forests11, 983. 10.3390/f11090983
112
Su W. Tang C. Lin J. Yu M. Dai Z. Luo Y. et al (2022). Recovery Patterns of Soil Bacterial and Fungal Communities in Chinese Boreal Forests along a Fire Chronosequence. Sci. Total Environ.805, 150372. 10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2021.150372
113
Tejada M. Hernandez M. T. Garcia C. (2009). Soil Restoration Using Composted Plant Residues: Effects on Soil Properties. Soil Tillage Res.102, 109–117. 10.1016/j.still.2008.08.004
114
Thorn S. Bässler C. Brandl R. Burton P. J. Cahall R. Campbell J. L. et al (2018). Impacts of Salvage Logging on Biodiversity: A Meta-Analysis. J. Appl. Ecol.55, 279–289. 10.1111/1365-2664.12945
115
Thorn S. Chao A. Georgiev K. B. Müller J. Bässler C. Campbell J. L. et al (2020). Estimating Retention Benchmarks for Salvage Logging to Protect Biodiversity. Nat. Commun.11, 4762–4768. 10.1038/s41467-020-18612-4
116
Tian C. Pang J. Bu C. Wu S. Bai H. Li Y. et al (2022). The Microbiomes in Lichen and Moss Biocrust Contribute Differently to Carbon and Nitrogen Cycles in Arid Ecosystems. Microb. Ecol.1, 1–12. 10.1007/s00248-022-02077-7
117
Tomao A. Antonio Bonet J. Castaño C. de-Miguel S. (2020). How Does Forest Management Affect Fungal Diversity and Community Composition? Current Knowledge and Future Perspectives for the Conservation of Forest Fungi. For. Ecol. Manage.457, 117678. 10.1016/J.FORECO.2019.117678
118
Treseder K. K. Mack M. C. Cross A. (2004). Relationships Among Fires, Fungi, and Soil Dynamics in Alaskan Boreal Forests. Ecol. Appl.14, 1826–1838. 10.1890/03-5133
119
Tucker C. Antoninka A. Day N. Poff B. Reed S. (2020). Biological Soil Crust Salvage for Dryland Restoration: an Opportunity for Natural Resource Restoration. Restor. Ecol.28, S9–S16. 10.1111/rec.13115
120
Vallejo V. R. Arianoutsou M. Moreira F. (2012). “Fire Ecology and Post-fire Restoration Approaches in Southern European Forest Types,” in Post-Fire Management and Restoration of Southern European Forests. Managing Forest Ecosystems. Editors MoreiraF.ArianoutsouM.CoronaP.De las HerasJ. (Dordrecht: Springer), 93–119. 10.1007/978-94-007-2208-8_5
121
Villnäs A. Norkko J. Hietanen S. Josefson A. B. Lukkari K. Norkko A. (2013). The Role of Recurrent Disturbances for Ecosystem Multifunctionality. Ecology94, 2275–2287. 10.1890/12-1716.1
122
Wagenbrenner J. W. Robichaud P. R. Brown R. E. (2016). Rill Erosion in Burned and Salvage Logged Western Montane Forests: Effects of Logging Equipment Type, Traffic Level, and Slash Treatment. J. Hydrol.541, 889–901. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.07.049
123
Weber B. Belnap J. Büdel B. Antoninka A. J. Barger N. N. Chaudhary V. B. et al (2022). What Is a Biocrust? A Refined, Contemporary Definition for a Broadening Research Community. Biol. Rev.97, 1768–1785. 10.1111/BRV.12862
124
Weber B. Bowker M. Zhang Y. Belnap J. (2016). “Natural Recovery of Biological Soil Crusts after Disturbance,” in Biological Soil Crusts: An Organizing Pricinple in Drylands. Editors WeberB.BüdelB.BelnapJ. (Cham: Springer), 479–498. 10.1007/978-3-319-30214-0_23
125
Whitman T. Whitman E. Woolet J. Flannigan M. D. Thompson D. K. Parisien M. A. (2019). Soil Bacterial and Fungal Response to Wildfires in the Canadian Boreal Forest across a Burn Severity Gradient. Soil Biol. biochem.138, 107571. 10.1016/j.soilbio.2019.107571
126
Xiao B. Veste M. (2017). Moss-Dominated Biocrusts Increase Soil Microbial Abundance and Community Diversity and Improve Soil Fertility in Semi-arid Climates on the Loess Plateau of China. Appl. Soil Ecol.117, 165–177. 10.1016/j.apsoil.2017.05.005
127
Zaady E. Eldridge D. J. Bowker M. A. (2016). “Effects of Local-Scale Disturbance on Biocrusts,” in Biological Soil Crusts: An Organizing Principle in Drylands. Editors WeberB.BüdelB.BelnapJ. (Cham: Springer), 429–449. 10.1007/978-3-319-30214-0_21
128
Zhang J. Xu M. Xu M. X. (2022). Characterising the Diversity and Functionality of the Microbial Community within Biocrusts Associated with Different Vegetation Communities and Soil Habitats. Appl. Soil Ecol.175, 104458. 10.1016/J.APSOIL.2022.104458
Summary
Keywords
biological soil crust, burnt wood, Mediterranean, microbial community, moss
Citation
García-Carmona M, García-Orenes F, Arcenegui V and Mataix-Solera J (2023) The Recovery of Mediterranean Soils After Post-Fire Management: The Role of Biocrusts and Soil Microbial Communities. Span. J. Soil Sci. 13:11388. doi: 10.3389/sjss.2023.11388
Received
22 March 2023
Accepted
02 June 2023
Published
13 June 2023
Volume
13 - 2023
Edited by
Avelino Núñez-Delgado, University of Santiago de Compostela, Spain
Updates
Copyright
© 2023 García-Carmona, García-Orenes, Arcenegui and Mataix-Solera.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Minerva García-Carmona, minerva.garciac@umh.es
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.