Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Pastoralism

Volume 15 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/past.2025.14461

This article is part of the Special IssueThe role of pastoral livestock and products in climate changeView all 6 articles

Impacts of cattle farming practices and associated livestock systems on energy balances and greenhouse gas emissions in the municipality of Paragominas -State of Pará -Amazonia

DARLENA CAROLINE  DA CRUZ CORREADARLENA CAROLINE DA CRUZ CORREA1,2*René  Jean-Marie Poccard-ChapuisRené Jean-Marie Poccard-Chapuis1Vincent  BlanfortVincent Blanfort1Jean-Luc  BochuJean-Luc Bochu3Philippe  LescoatPhilippe Lescoat2
  • 1UMR Systèmes d’élevage Méditerranéens et Tropicaux (CIRAD), Montpellier, France
  • 2UMR1048 Sciences pour l'action et le développement activités, produits, territoires (SADAPT), Paris, Île-de-France, France
  • 3Solagro, Toulouse, France

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and energy use are important parameters in the development of sustainable livestock systems. On-farm management practices can maximise energy efficiency and reduce gas emissions, however, these practices have yet to be identified and characterized. This study evaluated the eco-efficiency of cattle farming, considering a combination of the energy balance and GHG emissions from 33 farms in the Brazilian Amazon (Paragominas - Pará), using a diagnostic tool adapted to the region. The farms represented the diverse production systems operating in the area, distinguished by their activity (dairy, breeder, breeder-fattener and fattener), degree of intensification, and agrarian situation (corresponding to the farm’s geographical location and social and economic inclusion in the municipality). Energy efficiency on beef cattle farms is on average 16.29 GJ/t live weight (min = 1.74 GJ/t, max = 43.01 GJ/t), and on dairy farms 2.74 GJ/1000 L (min = 0.17, max = 6.48), i.e. respectively 46% and 40% lower than the figures reported by studies conducted in metropolitan France. Improved grazing enhances natural resources by optimising the use of forage biomass, which has a positive impact on energy efficiencies. The purchase of young animals and fertilisation account for a high percentage of energy consumption, with fuel constituting the major part of the direct energy consumed. GHG emissions are on average 17.40 teqCO2/t live weight (min= 6.13, max= 40.85), similar to those of metropolitan France (14 teqCO2/t). When emissions from livestock and storage by forests and pastures over 20 years of age are taken into account, farms have a positive carbon balance. The deforestation levels of each farm over the past 20 years have a strong impact on this balance sheet, which can make it negative. This study highlights the effectiveness of the method in identifying systems and practices that could help farms achieve greater sustainability in terms of energy use and GHG emissions.

Keywords: environmental impact, efficiency, livestock production, livestock emissions, ecological intensification

Received: 07 Feb 2025; Accepted: 16 Jun 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 CORREA, Poccard-Chapuis, Blanfort, Bochu and Lescoat. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: DARLENA CAROLINE DA CRUZ CORREA, UMR Systèmes d’élevage Méditerranéens et Tropicaux (CIRAD), Montpellier, France

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.