ORIGINAL RESEARCH
J. Abdom. Wall Surg.
A Comparison of Tissue Handling Forces Between a Novel Suturing Device for Standardised Abdominal Wall Closure and Manual Needle-Driver Suturing
- GB
Gabriel Börner 1,2
- EL
Ellen Lööf 3
- PR
Peder Rogmark 3
- ME
Marcus Edelhamre 1,2
1. Helsingborgs Hospital, Helsingborg, Sweden
2. Lunds universitet Institutionen for kliniska vetenskaper Lund, Lund, Sweden
3. Skanes universitetssjukhus Malmo, Malmö, Sweden
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Abstract
Introduction: Suturing is a fundamental component of surgical procedures, wherein training emphasises the significance of gentle tissue handling. The suturing process involves the pressure exerted by the forceps onto the tissue, as well as the medial traction force applied to stabilise the tissue during the needle bite. This study examined the forces involved in tissue handling during suturing, comparing a novel suturing device for standardised abdominal closure with two sizes of curved suture needles (NDS). Methods: A model was developed to measure suturing forces. The study introduction comprised both a written letter and an oral explanation. Participants performed 10x3 needle pull-throughs, using a large needle (36 mm, LN) and a small needle (26 mm, SN). Maximum forceps pressure and maximum medial traction forces were recorded. Additionally, needle pull-through time and the area under the curve (AUC) were calculated for both forceps pressure and medial traction pressure. Results: The study involved 20 specialists, ten scrub nurses, and five surgical trainees. Of these participants, 22 were female, the average glove size was 6.9, and two were left-handed. The use of SutureTOOL resulted in significantly less force exerted with forceps (p<0.001) when compared to NDS, and a shorter needle pull-through time (p<0.001). No differences were observed in maximum traction force; however, the medial traction force AUC was lower for SutureTOOL and SN compared to LN (p=0.025). Conclusion: The study revealed that SutureTOOL required less forceps pressure and exerted either less or comparable traction force to perform needle pull-throughs, compared to traditional methods. We conclude that this innovative suturing technology did not increase the forces measured in the model. However, the impact on abdominal wall related complications requires further study.
Summary
Keywords
Surgeon skill, suture forces, suturing technique, abdominal wall closure, Surgical training
Received
04 August 2025
Accepted
21 November 2025
Copyright
© 2025 Börner, Lööf, Rogmark and Edelhamre. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Gabriel Börner, gabriel.borner@med.lu.se
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.