MINI REVIEW
J. Abdom. Wall Surg.
Narrative Review of Open Abdomen Management and Comparison of Different Temporary Abdominal Closure Techniques
- LA
Levent Afsar 1
- PC
Paolo Carlo Capelli 2
- GC
Gessica Carvalho 3
- DG
Deepanjan Ghosh 4
- WO
Wendy Ofosu 5
- CS
Christian Seelandt 6
- ST
Sadhana Trivedi 7
1. solventum, Istanbul, Türkiye
2. solventum italy, milan, Italy
3. solventum brazil, campinaso, Brazil
4. solventum corporation, maplewood, United States
5. solventum united kingdom, Leicestershire, United Kingdom
6. solventum germany, wiesbaden, Germany
7. solventum ireland, dublin, Ireland
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Abstract
Introduction: The management of an abdomen kept open after life-saving intervention for patients with intra-abdominal hypertension or abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) constitutes an inevitable measure. Various temporary abdominal closure (TAC) techniques have been developed to reduce complications, facilitate re-entry for subsequent procedures, and support improved clinical outcomes. The goal is timely, definitive closure, promoting long-term patient health with full re-establishment of abdominal wall integrity. Methods: This review details TAC techniques and synthesizes guidelines from leading medical organizations. It examines key studies on open abdomen management, identifies research gaps, and proposes future research directions. Results: The TAC techniques include skin closure with clips or sutures, mesh closure and dynamic retention sutures, Wittmann Patch, Bogota Bag, Barker Vacuum Pack, and commercial negative pressure therapy (NPT) systems. Leading organizations such as the World Society of the Abdominal Compartment Syndrome and the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma recommend NPT systems due to their superior clinical results. These systems reduce incidences of ACS, promote primary fascial closure, and decrease mortality. Recommendations: Successful management of the open abdomen requires tailored TAC technique selection to meet specific patient needs while considering available resources. Though commercial NPT systems provide better long-term outcomes, traditional methods like the Barker Vacuum Pack remain viable in resource-constrained environments. Future research should prioritize cost-benefit analyses to ensure that high-quality care is aligned with superior clinical outcomes. Conclusion: The document highlights the importance of early diagnosis and closure and emphasizes the need for further studies to optimize surgical techniques and improve costeffectiveness.
Summary
Keywords
Open Abdomen, temporary abdominal closure, fascial closure, enteroatmospheric fistula, Negative Pressure Therapy
Received
25 November 2024
Accepted
26 May 2025
Copyright
© 2025 Afsar, Capelli, Carvalho, Ghosh, Ofosu, Seelandt and Trivedi. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Levent Afsar, leventadnan@gmail.com
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.