REVIEW

Br. J. Biomed. Sci.

Volume 82 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/bjbs.2025.14362

This article is part of the Special IssueCurrent Reviews in the Biomedical SciencesView all 5 articles

Artificial Intelligence in Biomedical Sciences: A scoping review

Rasha  Abu-El-RuzRasha Abu-El-Ruz1Ali  HasanAli Hasan2Dima  Anwar Rushdi HijaziDima Anwar Rushdi Hijazi3Ovelia  Anan M J MasoudOvelia Anan M J Masoud1Atiyeh  AbdallahAtiyeh Abdallah1Susu  M ZughaierSusu M Zughaier4Maha  Abdulla H I Al-AsmakhMaha Abdulla H I Al-Asmakh1*
  • 1Department of Biomedical Sciences, College of Health Sciences, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar
  • 2Lebanese American University, Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
  • 3Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, College of Arts and Sciences, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar
  • 4College of Medicine, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly playing important roles in healthcare diagnosis, treatment, monitoring, and prevention of diseases. Despite this widespread implementation of AI in biomedical sciences, it has yet to be characterized.Aim: The aim of this scoping review is to explore AI in biomedical sciences. Specific objectives are to synthesize six scopes addressing the characteristics of AI in biomedical sciences and to provide in-depth understanding of its relevance to education.Methods: This scoping review has been developed according to Arksey and O’Malley frameworks. PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases were searched using broad search terms without restrictions. Citations were imported into EndNote for screening and extraction. Data were categorized and synthesized to define six scopes discussing AI in biomedical sciences.Results: A total of 2249 articles were retrieved for screening and extraction, and 192 articles were included in this review. Six scopes were synthesized from the extracted data: Scope (1): AI in biomedical sciences by decade, highlighting the increasing number of publications on AI in biomedical sciences. Scope (2): AI in biomedical sciences by region, showing that publications on AI in biomedical sciences mainly originate from high-income countries, particularly the USA. Scope (3): AI in biomedical sciences by model, identifying machine learning as the most frequently reported model. Scope (4): AI in biomedical sciences by discipline, with microbiology the discipline most commonly associated with AI in biomedical sciences. Scope (5): AI in biomedical sciences education, which was limited to only six studies, indicating a gap in research on the educational application of AI in biomedical sciences. Scope (6): Opportunities and limitations of AI in biomedical sciences, where major reported opportunities include efficiency, accuracy, universal applicability, and real-world application. Limitations include; model complexity, limited applicability, and algorithm robustness.Conclusions: AI has generally been under characterized in the biomedical sciences due to variability in AI models, disciplines, and perspectives of applicability.

Keywords: Biomedical Sciences, Artificial intelligence, Scoping Review, Clinical, NAACLS

Received: 17 Jan 2025; Accepted: 28 May 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Abu-El-Ruz, Hasan, Anwar Rushdi Hijazi, Anan M J Masoud, Abdallah, M Zughaier and Abdulla H I Al-Asmakh. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Maha Abdulla H I Al-Asmakh, Department of Biomedical Sciences, College of Health Sciences, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.