This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
To keep the transplantation community informed about recently published level 1 evidence in organ transplantation ESOT and the
Incidence of Cytomegalovirus Infection in Seropositive Kidney Transplant Recipients Treated with Everolimus: a randomized, open-labelled, multicentre phase 4 trial.
The aim of this study was to investigate whether everolimus (EVR)-based immunosuppression leads to a decrease in the incidence of cytomegalovirus (CMV) DNAemia and disease.
Participants were randomised to receive either EVR or mycophenolic acid (MPA) combined with basiliximab, cyclosporin and steroids.
186 CMV seropositive renal transplant recipients.
The primary outcomes were CMV treatment, CMV DNAemia, patient death, graft loss and discontinuation of the study at 6 months following transplantation. The secondary outcomes were maximal viral load, the CMV treatment failure, proportion of patients with CMV disease, and the incidence of CMV mutations (UL97 or UL54) associated with a resistance to an anti-CMV therapy.
12 months.
This large, multicentre phase 4 RCT aimed to demonstrate whether everolimus-based immunosuppression is associated with a reduction in CMV viraemia following renal transplantation. Seropositive recipients were randomised to either everolimus or mycophenolic acid, in conjunction with cyclosporin and steroids. CMV prophylaxis was not used. The study used a composite primary endpoint of CMV treatment, graft loss, death and discontinuation, and showed that in intent-to-treat analysis there was a significant reduction in this endpoint with everolimus. This was driven mainly by a reduction in CMV DNAeamia in the everolimus arm. The study was stopped early due to findings from the ATHENA study that CsA and everolimus is associated with increased incidence of acute rejection–a finding that was not replicated in the present study. Nonetheless, as CMV infection rates were higher than anticipated the study has sufficient statistical power to demonstrate differences in outcome. Similar to previous studies, everolimus was poorly tolerated and benefit will be limited to those patients who can tolerate and maintain treatment. It is unclear how the present strategy compares to universal prophylaxis with more standard immunosuppression.
3.
Modified intention-to-treat analysis.
Yes.
ClinicalTrials.gov - NCT02328963.
Industry funded.
Impact of Portable Normothermic Blood-Based Machine Perfusion on Outcomes of Liver Transplant: The OCS Liver PROTECT Randomized Clinical Trial.
The aim of this study was to investigate liver transplant outcomes associated with portable normothermic machine perfusion preservation of livers obtained from deceased donors.
Participants were randomised to either the Organ Care System (OCS) group or ischemic cold storage (ICS) group.
300 recipients receiving donor livers preserved using ICS or the OCS.
The primary effectiveness outcome was the incidence of early allograft dysfunction (EAD). Secondary outcomes were extent of reperfusion syndrome, OCS Liver
1 year.
This is an interesting and well-conducted, multicentre study in liver transplantation using a normothermic preservation machine (OCS). The study was adequately randomised and, understandably, clinicians could not be blinded to the group allocation, the comparator being standard cold storage on ice. However, good steps were taken to re-randomise patients if a first liver was subsequently not suitable for transplant. The donor population for inclusion was selected on the basis of at least one of the following criteria: 40 years of age or older; expected total cross-clamp/cold ischemic time of six or more hours; DCD donors if 55 years or younger; or macrosteatotic livers (≤40%). The primary endpoint was early allograft dysfunction (EAD) using the Olthoff definition. Mean perfusion time on the machine was 117 min, 152/155 preserved in this way were transplanted. However, there was a significantly higher proportion of DCD livers transplanted from the OCS group than the cold storage group (51% versus 26%). There were 298 patients included in the modified intention to treat analysis, which showed a significant decrease in EAD when the OCS machine was used compared to standard cold storage. Short term patient and graft survival was equivalent but ischaemic biliary lesions were significantly reduced with OCS by 6 and 12 months (2.6% versus 9.9%) and recipients experienced fewer incidences of severe reperfusion injury.
3.
Per protocol analysis.
Yes.
ClinicalTrials.gov - NCT02522871.
Industry funded.
This is a well-conducted, multicentre study in liver transplantation using a normothermic preservation machine (The
The study was adequately randomised and, understandably, clinicians could not be blinded to the group allocation. If a liver was found to be not suitable for transplantation, then the recipient was randomised a second time. This, to some extent, mediates any potential bias that might be introduced when clinicians could not be easily blinded to the preservation method.
Mean perfusion time on the machine was 117 min. The total preservation time for machine perfused livers was on average longer than the control group at 455 min compared to 339 min. Approximately 10% of livers randomised to OCS cross over to the other arm and were preserved with cold storage instead due to: accessory vessels, vascular reconstruction, or liver haematoma. However, the results from the intention to treat analysis were very similar to the per protocol analysis regardless, suggesting that there was no systematic bias introduced.
Reassuringly 98% of livers preserved on the machine were successfully transplanted; those not transplanted were not used following assessment on the machine, showing poor lactate clearance or fibrosis on biopsy. There was a significantly higher proportion of DCD livers transplanted from the machine perfusion group than the cold storage group (51% versus 26%).
The analysis showed a significant decrease in early allograft dysfunction (EAD, using the Olthoff definition) when the OCS machine was used. Short term patient and graft survival was equivalent but ischaemic biliary lesions were significantly reduced with OCS by 6 and 12 months (2.6% versus 9.9%).
This study shows the safety of this technology in liver preservation and how it can potentially give greater confidence to transplant livers following DCD or marginal DBD. Despite the greater proportion of DCD livers in the OCS machine group, and the longer overall preservation time, there was a lower incidence of severe reperfusion injury, EAD and ischaemic biliary lesions. This study adds weight to the improved preservation possible with normothermic machines, and the confidence in organ viability when using this platform.
JO'C wrote the clinical impact summary.
The author declares that this clinical impact summary has been written in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.