<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3-mathml3.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xml:lang="EN">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Span. J. Soil Sci.</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Spanish Journal of Soil Science</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Span. J. Soil Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">2253-6574</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">16036</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/sjss.2026.16036</article-id>
<article-version article-version-type="Version of Record" vocab="NISO-RP-8-2008"/>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Biomass maturity as a key driver of green manure decomposition and soil nutrient dynamics</article-title>
<alt-title alt-title-type="left-running-head">Kintl et al.</alt-title>
<alt-title alt-title-type="right-running-head">
<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/sjss.2026.16036">10.3389/sjss.2026.16036</ext-link>
</alt-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kintl</surname>
<given-names>Antonin</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn001">
<sup>&#x2020;</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kucerik</surname>
<given-names>Jiri</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn001">
<sup>&#x2020;</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Holatko</surname>
<given-names>Jiri</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">
<sup>3</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn001">
<sup>&#x2020;</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Naveed</surname>
<given-names>Muhammad</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4">
<sup>4</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn001">
<sup>&#x2020;</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Sobotkova</surname>
<given-names>Julie</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn001">
<sup>&#x2020;</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Baltazar</surname>
<given-names>Tivadar</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn001">
<sup>&#x2020;</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Malicek</surname>
<given-names>Ondrej</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn001">
<sup>&#x2020;</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name>
<surname>Mustafa</surname>
<given-names>Adnan</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff5">
<sup>5</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c001">&#x2a;</xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn001">
<sup>&#x2020;</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1450327"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Brtnicky</surname>
<given-names>Martin</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff6">
<sup>6</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn001">
<sup>&#x2020;</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1">
<label>1</label>
<institution>Department of Agrochemistry, Soil Science, Microbiology and Plant Nutrition, Faculty of AgriSciences, Mendel University in Brno</institution>, <city>Brno</city>, <country country="CZ">Czechia</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff2">
<label>2</label>
<institution>Agricultural Research, Ltd.</institution>, <city>Troubsko</city>, <country country="CZ">Czechia</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff3">
<label>3</label>
<institution>Agrovyzkum Rapotin, Ltd.</institution>, <city>Sumperk</city>, <country country="CZ">Czechia</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff4">
<label>4</label>
<institution>Institute of Soil and Environmental Sciences, University of Agriculture Faisalabad</institution>, <city>Faisalabad</city>, <country country="PK">Pakistan</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff5">
<label>5</label>
<institution>Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Applied Botany, South China Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences</institution>, <city>Guangzhou</city>, <country country="CN">China</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff6">
<label>6</label>
<institution>Department of Landscape Ecology, Landscape Research Institute</institution>, <city>Brno</city>, <country country="CZ">Czechia</country>
</aff>
<author-notes>
<corresp id="c001">
<label>&#x2a;</label>Correspondence: Adnan Mustafa, <email xlink:href="mailto:adnanmustafa780@gmail.com">adnanmustafa780@gmail.com</email>
</corresp>
<fn fn-type="other" id="fn001">
<label>&#x2020;</label>
<p>ORCID: Antonin Kintl, <uri xlink:href="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0031-083X">orcid.org/0000-0002-0031-083X</uri>; Jiri Kucerik, <uri xlink:href="https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9083-4866">orcid.org/0000-0001-9083-4866</uri>; Jiri Holatko, <uri xlink:href="https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4156-4673">orcid.org/0000-0003-4156-4673</uri>; Muhammad Naveed, <uri xlink:href="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4166-137X">orcid.org/0000-0002-2759-6049</uri>; Julie Sobotkova, <uri xlink:href="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4166-137X">orcid.org/0000-0002-4166-137X</uri>; Tivadar Baltazar, <uri xlink:href="https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5381-257X">orcid.org/0000-0001-5381-257X</uri>; Ondrej Malicek, <uri xlink:href="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8791-4344">orcid.org/0000-0002-8791-4344</uri>; Adnan Mustafa, <uri xlink:href="https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2741-9672">orcid.org/0000-0003-2741-9672</uri>; Martin Brtnicky, <uri xlink:href="https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5237-722X">orcid.org/0000-0001-5237-722X</uri>
</p>
</fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date publication-format="electronic" date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2026-05-14">
<day>14</day>
<month>05</month>
<year>2026</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date publication-format="electronic" date-type="collection">
<year>2026</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>16</volume>
<elocation-id>16036</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>10</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2025</year>
</date>
<date date-type="rev-recd">
<day>04</day>
<month>04</month>
<year>2026</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>22</day>
<month>04</month>
<year>2026</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#xa9; 2026 Kintl, Kucerik, Holatko, Naveed, Sobotkova, Baltazar, Malicek, Mustafa and Brtnicky.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2026</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Kintl, Kucerik, Holatko, Naveed, Sobotkova, Baltazar, Malicek, Mustafa and Brtnicky</copyright-holder>
<license>
<ali:license_ref start_date="2026-05-14">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ali:license_ref>
<license-p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY)</ext-link>. The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</license-p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>Green manuring plays a vital role in enhancing soil fertility and organic matter dynamics in sustainable cropping systems, yet its effectiveness largely depends on the biochemical quality and maturity of the incorporated biomass. To elucidate the influence of crop type and development stage of buried plant biomass on soil traits, a 17-week pot experiment was conducted using safflower (<italic>Carthamus tinctorius</italic>), radish (<italic>Raphanus sativus</italic>), and white mustard (<italic>Sinapis alba</italic>) plants, harvested at two maturity stages: after 11 weeks (biomass A) and 12.5 weeks (biomass B) of cultivation. Biomass maturity exerted a stronger influence than crop identity on plant composition (fat, NDF, cellulose, hemicellulose), amount of residual plant biomass, and on soil properties (&#x3b2;-glucosidase, urease, pH). The more matured biomass (B) contained higher carbohydrates and fat contents, and despite higher recalcitrance indices, it decomposed more completely, resulting in lower residue retention. Crop-specific responses of soil traits were the most distinct at the early harvest stage: radish biomass A enhanced soil enzyme activities and total N, whereas white mustard, particularly biomass B, promoted soil P, Mg, and K availability alongside elevated N-acetyl-&#x3b2;-D-glucosaminidase activity. Safflower decomposed more slowly, indicating potential for longer-term carbon stabilization but limited immediate fertility gains. Overall, harvest timing emerged as a critical determinant in tailoring green manures for both nutrient cycling efficiency and soil carbon stabilization.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>cover crop</kwd>
<kwd>decomposition</kwd>
<kwd>enzymes</kwd>
<kwd>nutrient acquisition</kwd>
<kwd>nutrients</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<funding-group>
<funding-statement>The author(s) declared that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. The work was supported by the Ministry of Agriculture of the Czech Republic by project QK21010161 and by institutional support MZE-RO1223, MZE-RO1725 and by project VUK-IP-00027073.</funding-statement>
</funding-group>
<counts>
<fig-count count="7"/>
<table-count count="2"/>
<equation-count count="4"/>
<ref-count count="86"/>
<page-count count="15"/>
</counts>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec sec-type="intro" id="s1">
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Green manuring is a widely adopted practice in sustainable and organic agriculture for maintaining soil fertility (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Fr&#xf8;seth et al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Garcia-Franco et al., 2015</xref>), improving soil structure (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">Ma et al., 2024</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Antosh et al., 2022</xref>), and enhancing carbon sequestration (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B71">Singh et al., 2023</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B85">Zhang et al., 2025</xref>). Green manuring particularly through the incorporation of cover crops or catch crops into soil at the green or early flowering stage (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B71">Singh et al., 2023</xref>), is a widely applied practice in organic farming. It delivers both economic benefits (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Antosh et al., 2022</xref>) and ecological services that enhance soil fertility and sustainable production. By incorporating fresh plant biomass into soil, green manures provide easily decomposable organic substrates that stimulate microbial activity, nutrient mineralization, and aggregation processes. Major reported effects hitherto include improved biomass production (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Antosh et al., 2022</xref>), enhancement of soil physical, chemical (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Adetunji et al., 2020</xref>) and biological properties (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">dos Santos Cordeiro et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Feng et al., 2021</xref>), higher soil organic matter (SOM) quality as well as C (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Bogu&#x17e;as et al., 2015</xref>) and N contents (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">Liu et al., 2020</xref>), reduced nutrient leaching (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Cou&#xeb;del et al., 2018a</xref>), and improved nutrient availability (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B73">Su et al., 2022</xref>).</p>
<p>However, the benefits of green manuring depend largely on the biochemical quality and maturity of the biomass at incorporation, which govern its decomposition rate and subsequent effects on nutrient availability and soil organic carbon (SOC) stabilization. For instance, the efficacy of green manuring depends on processes following biomass incorporation through tillage (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Hu et al., 2023</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">Li et al., 2024</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B84">Zhang et al., 2023</xref>). Incorporated biomass residues release nutrients through mineralization and transformation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B84">Zhang et al., 2023</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B70">Sharma et al., 2000</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">Liu et al., 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B80">Xie et al., 2022</xref>), with release dynamics influenced by residue stoichiometry, particularly the C:N ratio (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B67">Ranaivoson et al., 2022</xref>). These processes are accompanied by enhanced enzymatic activity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B81">Xu W. et al., 2023</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B64">Piotrowska-Dlugosz and Wilczewski, 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B82">Xu J. et al., 2023</xref>), which further improves nutrient availability (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B81">Xu W. et al., 2023</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B72">Solangi et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Dong et al., 2021</xref>) and short-term use efficiency (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B61">Muhammad et al., 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B78">Wang et al., 2025</xref>). Consequently, green manuring often leads to higher crop yields (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B84">Zhang et al., 2023</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B70">Sharma et al., 2000</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B80">Xie et al., 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Gautam et al., 2021</xref>).</p>
<p>The decomposition dynamics of green manures are closely linked to their chemical composition, including the proportions of carbohydrates, lignin, cellulose, hemicellulose, and fat (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B70">Sharma et al., 2000</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">Liu et al., 2008</xref>). A key factor shaping these outcomes is the maturity stage of the incorporated biomass (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B69">Sandhu et al., 2022</xref>). Younger residues typically contain easily degradable lipids, proteins, and non-structural carbohydrates (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Feng, 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Jenkinson, 1965</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Gunnarsson et al., 2008</xref>), whereas more mature residues are enriched in cellulose, hemicellulose (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Henriksen and Breland, 1999</xref>), and lignin (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Jensen et al., 2005</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B59">Moore et al., 1999</xref>), conferring stability and recalcitrance (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Hadas et al., 2004</xref>). Therefore, identifying the optimal harvest stage that balances nutrient release and carbon stabilization remains a major challenge in optimizing green manuring systems. Despite the recognized importance of maturation stage at harvesting for biomass quality, most studies on green manures have emphasized species selection or management frequency (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B71">Singh et al., 2023</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Antosh et al., 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B84">Zhang et al., 2023</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B70">Sharma et al., 2000</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">Liu et al., 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B80">Xie et al., 2022</xref>), while the influence of biomass maturity, particularly in short-duration crops remains poorly quantified. A deeper understanding of how subtle differences in crop maturity alter biochemical composition, decomposition patterns, and soil responses is essential to refine green manure management for both short-term fertility improvement and long-term carbon stabilization.</p>
<p>To address this research gap, we conducted a 17-week pot experiment using three green manure crops&#x2014;safflower (<italic>Carthamus tinctorius</italic>), radish (<italic>Raphanus sativus</italic>), and white mustard (<italic>Sinapis alba</italic>), harvested at two maturity stages (11 and 12.5 weeks). The objectives were to (i) evaluate how crop type and maturity stage affect biomass composition and decomposition, (ii) assess their impacts on soil enzyme activities and nutrient availability, and (iii) identify the optimal maturity stage for maximizing both soil fertility and carbon stabilization potential of green manures.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="materials|methods" id="s2">
<title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="s2-1">
<title>The crop biomass acquirement</title>
<p>Incorporated plants were applied as aboveground biomass: radish (<italic>Raphanus sativus</italic> L.), safflower (<italic>Carthamus tinctorius</italic> L.), and white mustard (<italic>Sinapis alba</italic> L.) were harvested from fields near Nov&#xe1; Ves, Brno (49&#xb0;06&#x2032;25.7&#x2033; N, 16&#xb0;18&#x2032;15.3&#x2033; E) after 77&#xa0;days (11&#xa0;weeks; biomass A) or 87&#xa0;days (12.5&#xa0;weeks; biomass B; <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref>). Plants were cut at ground level, oven-dried at 60&#xa0;&#xb0;C to constant weight, analysed (details in the section <italic>Plant and soil analyses</italic>) and stored.</p>
<table-wrap id="T1" position="float">
<label>TABLE 1</label>
<caption>
<p>The cover crops used in the pot trial.</p>
</caption>
<table>
<thead valign="top">
<tr>
<th align="left">&#x23;</th>
<th align="center">acronym</th>
<th align="center">Intercrop species</th>
<th align="center">term of sowing</th>
<th align="center">term of harvest</th>
<th align="center">type</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody valign="top">
<tr>
<td align="left">1</td>
<td align="left">Rad1</td>
<td align="left">Radish (<italic>Raphanus sativus</italic> L.)</td>
<td align="center">16.8. 2021</td>
<td align="center">1.11.2021</td>
<td align="left">A</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">2</td>
<td align="left">SafA</td>
<td align="left">Safflower (<italic>Carthamus tinctorius</italic> L.)</td>
<td align="center">16.8. 2021</td>
<td align="center">1.11.2021</td>
<td align="left">A</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">3</td>
<td align="left">Wmu1</td>
<td align="left">white mustard (<italic>Sinapis alba</italic> L.)</td>
<td align="center">16.8. 2021</td>
<td align="center">1.11.2021</td>
<td align="left">A</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">4</td>
<td align="left">RadB</td>
<td align="left">Radish (<italic>Raphanus sativus</italic> L.)</td>
<td align="center">16.8. 2021</td>
<td align="center">11.11.2021</td>
<td align="left">B</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">5</td>
<td align="left">SafB</td>
<td align="left">Safflower (<italic>Carthamus tinctorius</italic> L.)</td>
<td align="center">16.8. 2021</td>
<td align="center">11.11.2021</td>
<td align="left">B</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">6</td>
<td align="left">Wmu2</td>
<td align="left">white mustard (<italic>Sinapis alba</italic> L.)</td>
<td align="center">16.8. 2021</td>
<td align="center">11.11.2021</td>
<td align="left">B</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-2">
<title>Soil preparation and experimental design</title>
<p>The experiment was conducted at Agricultural Research, Ltd. (Troubsko, Czech Republic; 49&#xb0;17&#x2032;49.8&#x2033; N, 16&#xb0;49&#x2032;13.0&#x2033; E). Arable topsoil (0&#x2013;15&#xa0;cm) was collected from fields managed conventionally in a cereal&#x2013;rapeseed&#x2013;pea rotation. The site is moderately warm and dry (mean annual temperature 9.0&#xa0;&#xb0;C, precipitation 526&#xa0;mm). Geologically, it is underlain by loess/loess loam of the Bohemian Massif. The soil was classified as a Haplic Luvisol (WRB) with silty clay loam texture (USDA). The primery chemical properties were: total C 14.0&#xa0;g&#xb7;kg<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>, total N 1.60&#xa0;g&#xb7;kg<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>, P 0.10&#xa0;g&#xb7;kg<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>, S 0.15&#xa0;g&#xb7;kg<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>, Ca 3.26&#xa0;g&#xb7;kg<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>, Mg 0.24&#xa0;g&#xb7;kg<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>, K 0.23&#xa0;g&#xb7;kg<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>; pH (CaCl<sub>2</sub>) 7.3. Soil was homogenized and sieved (2&#xa0;mm, Retsch GmbH, Germany).</p>
<p>The trial was conducted in rectangular boxes (57 &#xd7; 37&#xa0;cm; 10&#xa0;kg soil each). Two semipermeable polyamide mesh bags (Uhelon 130&#xa0;T, 42&#xa0;nm pore size, SILK and PROGRESS, Czech Republic), each containing 20&#xa0;g of dry biomass (equivalent to 2&#xa0;g&#xb7;kg<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> soil), were placed in each box and covered with 2&#xa0;cm soil layer (<xref ref-type="sec" rid="s11">Supplementary Figure S1</xref>). All treatments (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table 2</xref>) were arranged in triplicate (n &#x3d; 3).</p>
<table-wrap id="T2" position="float">
<label>TABLE 2</label>
<caption>
<p>The experimental variants (their acronyms) according to buried crops and WA treatment.</p>
</caption>
<table>
<thead valign="top">
<tr>
<th align="left">Buried intercrop</th>
<th align="center">Variant</th>
<th align="center">Plant biomass per box</th>
<th align="center">Urea per box</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody valign="top">
<tr>
<td align="left">Control</td>
<td align="left">Cont</td>
<td align="center">-</td>
<td align="center">-</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Radish (<italic>Raphanus sativus</italic> L.)</td>
<td align="left">RadA</td>
<td align="center">20&#xa0;g</td>
<td align="center">6.88&#xa0;g</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Safflower (<italic>Carthamus tinctorius</italic> L.)</td>
<td align="left">SafA</td>
<td align="center">20&#xa0;g</td>
<td align="center">6.88&#xa0;g</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">white mustard (<italic>Sinapis alba</italic> L.)</td>
<td align="left">WmuA</td>
<td align="center">20&#xa0;g</td>
<td align="center">6.88&#xa0;g</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Radish (<italic>Raphanus sativus</italic> L.)</td>
<td align="left">RadB</td>
<td align="center">20&#xa0;g</td>
<td align="center">6.88&#xa0;g</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Safflower (<italic>Carthamus tinctorius</italic> L.)</td>
<td align="left">SafB</td>
<td align="center">20&#xa0;g</td>
<td align="center">6.88&#xa0;g</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">white mustard (<italic>Sinapis alba</italic> L.)</td>
<td align="left">WmuB</td>
<td align="center">20&#xa0;g</td>
<td align="center">6.88&#xa0;g</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<p>The experiment was conducted from 16 February to 16 June 2022 (120 days). Environmental conditions were maintained at 9/16&#xa0;&#xb0;C (night/day), and each box was watered weekly with 1.5&#xa0;L of distilled water to simulate alternating dry and moist periods. Urea was applied at a rate of 3.44&#xa0;g per box on days 15 and 35 after incubation began. This meant than soil was fertilized with urea (46% N, AGRO CS a.s., Czech Republic) at dose of 0.688&#xa0;g N&#xb7;kg<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> (150&#xa0;kg N&#xb7;ha<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>), applied in two splits.</p>
<p>During sampling at the end of the trial, soil was gently removed, mesh bags collected, and soil sampled from the 0&#x2013;2&#xa0;mm layer beneath each bag. Residual biomass (RB; g&#xb7;bag<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>) was oven-dried (65&#xa0;&#xb0;C) and weighed.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-3">
<title>Plant and soil analyses</title>
<sec id="s2-3-1">
<title>Plant biomass</title>
<p>Fibre fractions were determined as acid-detergent fibre (ADF) and neutral-detergent fibre (NDF) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">ANKOM, 2006</xref>), using ANKOM 220 fibre analyser (ANKOM Technology, USA). Acid-detergent lignin (ADL) was measured according to ISO 13906:2008 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">ISO_13906, 2008</xref>). Hemicellulose was calculated as NDF &#x2013; ADF and cellulose as ADF &#x2013; ADL (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B68">Rinne et al., 1997</xref>). Crude protein was determined by the Kjeldahl method using Kjeltec&#x2122; 2300 Analyzer (FOSS, Denmark) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">AOAC, 2023</xref>) and calculated with equation: protein content &#x3d; total N &#xd7; 6.25. Crude fibre was determined by two-step hydrolysis (H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> followed by KOH) with ash correction. Reducing sugars were measured by the Luff&#x2013;Schoorl method (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B65">Pomeranz and Meloan, 1994</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">Marrubini et al., 2017</xref>). Ash was determined according to (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">ISO_6865, 2000</xref>). Fat content was determined gravimetrically using the Soxhlet extraction with petroleum ether (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Garc&#x131;&#x301;a-Ayuso and Luque de Castro, 1999</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-3-2">
<title>Soil</title>
<p>Fresh soil was sieved (2&#xa0;mm; Retsch, Germany) and soil subsamples were processed differently according to which analyses they were used for. Air-dried subsamples were analysed for pH(CaCl<sub>2</sub>) ISO 10390:2005 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">ISO_10390, 2005</xref>), oxidizable carbon (Cox), determined by sulfochromic oxidation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">ISO_14235 (1998)</xref>, and total nitrogen (TN) ISO 13878:1998, measured by dry combustion (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">ISO_13878, 1998</xref>), using a Vario Macro Cube (Elementar Analysensysteme GmbH, Langenselbold, Germany). The Cox_N ratio was calculated from Cox and TN. Soil phosphorus (P), magnesium (Mg) and potassium (K) were quantified in the soil extract, prepared according to the method based on Mehlich III reagent (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B58">Mehlich, 2008</xref>), using the Agilent 7700x ICP-MS featuring the Octopole Reaction System (Agilent Technologies, Japan).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-3-3">
<title>Soil enzyme assays</title>
<p>Sieved soil (&#x3c;2&#xa0;mm) was used fresh or stored at 4&#xa0;&#xb0;C for dehydrogenase activity (DHA) determined by the TTC method (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Doi and Ranamukhaarachchi, 2009</xref>) expressed as &#xb5;g TPF&#xb7;g<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>&#xb7;h<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>. Freeze-dried soil was analysed for &#x3b2;-glucosidase (GLU; C-mineralising), urease (Ure; N-mineralising), N-acetyl-&#x3b2;-D-glucosaminidase (NAG; N-mineralising), phosphatase (Phos; P-mineralising), and arylsulfatase (ARS; S-mineralising) following (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">ISO_20130, 2018</xref>). Activities were measured spectrophotometrically at &#x3bb; &#x3d; 405&#xa0;nm (PNP assays) or 650&#xa0;nm (urease), expressed as nmol PNP&#xb7;g<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>&#xb7;min<sup>-1</sup> (enzymes) or nmol NH<sub>3</sub>&#xb7;g<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>&#xb7;min<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> (urease).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-3-4">
<title>Stoichiometric metrics</title>
<p>Nutrient acquisition ratios were calculated according to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Cui et al. (2022)</xref>, using the equations for C (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="e1">Equation 1</xref>) and N (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="e2">Equation 2</xref>).<disp-formula id="e1">
<mml:math id="m1">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi>
<mml:mtext>&#x2009;acquisition&#x2009;ratio</mml:mtext>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>ln</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")" separators="|">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>DHA</mml:mtext>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
<mml:mtext>GLU</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>&#x2009;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mo>/</mml:mo>
<mml:mo>&#x2061;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>ln</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")" separators="|">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>DHA</mml:mtext>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
<mml:mtext>GLU</mml:mtext>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
<mml:mtext>NAG</mml:mtext>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
<mml:mtext>Ure</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
<label>(1)</label>
</disp-formula>
<disp-formula id="e2">
<mml:math id="m2">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi>
<mml:mtext>&#x2009;acquisition&#x2009;ratio</mml:mtext>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>ln</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")" separators="|">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>NAG</mml:mtext>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
<mml:mtext>Ure</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>&#x2009;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mo>/</mml:mo>
<mml:mo>&#x2061;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>ln</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")" separators="|">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>NAG</mml:mtext>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
<mml:mtext>Ure</mml:mtext>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
<mml:mtext>Phos</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
<label>(2)</label>
</disp-formula>
</p>
<p>Microbial resource limitation was evaluated by vector analysis according to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B60">Moorhead et al. (2016)</xref>, using the <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="e3">Equations 3</xref>, <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="e4">4</xref>:<disp-formula id="e3">
<mml:math id="m3">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>V</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>c</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>o</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>r</mml:mi>
<mml:mtext>&#x2009;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mi>l</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>g</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>h</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:msqrt>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")" separators="|">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>ln</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")" separators="|">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>D</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>H</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>A</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>G</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>L</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>U</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>ln</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")" separators="|">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>P</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>h</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>o</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>s</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:msup>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")" separators="|">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>ln</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")" separators="|">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>D</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>H</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>A</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>G</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>L</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>U</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>ln</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")" separators="|">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>N</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>A</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>G</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>U</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>r</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:msup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msqrt>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
<label>(3)</label>
</disp-formula>
<disp-formula id="e4">
<mml:math id="m4">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>V</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>c</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>o</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>r</mml:mi>
<mml:mtext>&#x2009;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>g</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>l</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
<mml:mtext>&#x2009;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")" separators="|">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>r</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>d</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>A</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>R</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>C</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>T</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>G</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>ln</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")" separators="|">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>D</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>H</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>A</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>G</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>L</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>U</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>ln</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")" separators="|">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>P</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>h</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>o</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>s</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
<mml:mo>;</mml:mo>
<mml:mtext>&#x2009;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>ln</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")" separators="|">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>D</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>H</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>A</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>G</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>L</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>U</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>ln</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")" separators="|">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>N</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>A</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>G</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>U</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>r</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
<label>(4)</label>
</disp-formula>where ARCTG2 denotes the arctangent.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-4">
<title>Statistic analyses</title>
<p>All data (plant biomass and quality traits, soil chemical and biological parameters) were analysed in R v4.3.1 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B66">R_Core_Team, 2023</xref>). Pearson&#x2019;s correlations were used to characterise relationships, interpreted as moderate (0.5&#x2013;0.7), high (0.7&#x2013;0.9), or very high (&#x3e;0.9) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Hinkle et al., 2003</xref>). Figures were created using ggplot2 0.5&#x2013;0.7 &#x3d; moderate, 0.7&#x2013;0.9 &#x3d; high, and &#x3e;0.9 &#x3d; very high correlation. Figures were created using <italic>ggplot2</italic> package (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B79">Wickham, 2016</xref>).</p>
<p>One-way and two-way ANOVA with Type I sums of squares were applied at &#x3b1; &#x3d; 0.05 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B83">Zar, 1984</xref>), using the <italic>FactoMineR</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">L&#xea; et al., 2008</xref>) and <italic>Factoextra</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">Kassambara and Mundt, 2020</xref>) packages. Tukey&#x2019;s HSD (&#x3b1; &#x3d; 0.05) was used for <italic>post hoc</italic> comparisons. Results are presented as standard error of the mean (&#xb1;SEM) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Faraway, 2014</xref>).</p>
<p>Model assumptions were tested at &#x3b1; &#x3d; 0.05. Normality of residuals was evaluated with Kolmogorov&#x2013;Smirnov and Anderson&#x2013;Darling tests (nortest package). Homoscedasticity was assessed by Bartlett&#x2019;s and Fligner&#x2013;Killeen tests. Diagnostic plots included residuals vs. fitted values, Q&#x2013;Q plots, Cook&#x2019;s distance, and leverage plots (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Faraway, 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B63">Pek&#xe1;r and Brabec, 2016</xref>). Distributional shape was further tested using D&#x2019;Agostino&#x2019;s K-squared (skewness) and Anscombe&#x2013;Glynn (kurtosis) tests (moments package (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">Komsta and Novomestky, 2022</xref>).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="results" id="s3">
<title>Results</title>
<sec id="s3-1">
<title>Biodegradation and properties of plant biomass</title>
<p>Chemical and nutritional traits of plant biomass, which determine decomposition rates, varied significantly with both crop species and harvest time (one-way ANOVA; partial eta-squared; <xref ref-type="sec" rid="s11">Supplementary Table S1</xref>; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figures 1A&#x2013;H</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F1" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 1</label>
<caption>
<p>Initial properties of plant biomass <bold>(A&#x2013;H)</bold>. Properties: carbon content (C - chart <bold>(A)</bold>), content of nitrous compounds (NC - chart <bold>(B)</bold>), Ash (chart <bold>(C)</bold>), carbohydrate content (CH - chart <bold>(D)</bold>), fat (chart <bold>(E)</bold>), neutral detergent fiber (NDF - chart <bold>(F)</bold>), acid detergent fiber (ADF - chart <bold>(G)</bold>), acid detergent lignine (ADL - chart <bold>(H)</bold>), crude fiber (CF - chart <bold>(I)</bold>), cellulose content (CEL - chart <bold>(J)</bold>), hemicellulose content (HCEL - chart <bold>(K)</bold>), ADL to NC ratio (ADL_NC - chart <bold>(L)</bold>), residual biomass (RB - chart <bold>(M)</bold>); displayed are means (n &#x3d; 3) &#xb1; standard error of mean (SEM; error bars); lowercase letters express differences among two types of biomass for a single crop (in regard to the date of harvest), uppercase letters express differences among variants (crop type) within each group with simultaneously harvest biomass; results based on Tukey&#x2019;s HSD post-hoc test calculated at a significance level p &#x2264; 0.05. Rad &#x3d; radish; Saf &#x3d; safflower, Wmu &#x3d; white mustard.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="sjss-16-16036-g001.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Grouped bar chart panels labeled A to M display comparative data on biomass composition and fiber content indicators for three sample groups, with color coding for types A and B. Each panel presents mean values with error bars for variables like carbon, nitrogen, ash, carbohydrate, fat, NDF, ADF, ADL, CF, CEL, HCEL, ADL/NC, and RB, annotated with different letters denoting statistical significance.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<p>Carbon content (C, % DM) was lower in radish compared to safflower and white mustard, and also differed between RadA and RadB (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1A</xref>). Nitrogen content (N, % DM) did not vary among crop species but was higher in RadB than in RadA (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1B</xref>). Ash content (% DM) was highest in radish for both harvests; however, later harvest increased Ash in both radish and safflower (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1C</xref>).</p>
<p>Carbohydrates (CH, % DM) in biomass A showed a decreasing trend from radish (highest) to white mustard (lowest), whereas in biomass B radish and white mustard were comparable, and both SafB and WmuB increased with ripening time (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1D</xref>). Fat (% DM) content showed the strongest contrast between harvest stages in white mustard, with the lowest values in WmuA and the highest in WmuB (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1E</xref>).</p>
<p>Neutral detergent fibre (NDF) and acid detergent fibre (ADF, % DM) decreased in radish and safflower biomass B compared to biomass A. In contrast, WmuB had significantly higher NDF, ADF, and acid detergent lignin (ADL, % DM) than the other crops at the later harvest (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figures 1F&#x2013;H</xref>). ADL in biomass A was highest in SafA but declined in SafB, while RadB and WmuB were higher than RadA and WmuA (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1H</xref>).</p>
<p>Similar to NDF, ADF, and ADL, crude fibre (CF) and cellulose (CEL, % DM) values were highest in WmuB (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figures 1I,J</xref>). In biomass A, CEL was reduced in SafA. For safflower, CF and CEL decreased from SafA to SafB, while hemicellulose (HCEL, % DM) showed the opposite trend: highest in SafA but reduced in SafB compared to the other crops (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1K</xref>).</p>
<p>The ratio of ADL to nitrogenous compounds (ADL_NC), an indicator of digestibility, closely followed ADL patterns. Values increased from biomass A to biomass B in radish and white mustard, but decreased in safflower (SafB &#x3c; SafA; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1L</xref>).</p>
<p>Residual biomass (RB, % DM) was significantly higher in SafA than in the other two crops, indicating slower decomposition of safflower. However, RB values were comparable across crops in biomass B (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1M</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-2">
<title>Soil properties</title>
<p>Soil pH did not differ among variants with various incorporated crops, neither in earlier (biomass A) or later maturity stage (biomass B). However, biomass B amendments generally lowered pH compared with unamended soil (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2C</xref>). In particular, RadB- and WmuB-amended soils had lower pH than RadA and WmuA, respectively (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2A</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F2" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 2</label>
<caption>
<p>Soil pH at the end of trial. Displayed are means (n &#x3d; 3) &#xb1; standard error of mean (SEM; error bars); chart <bold>(A)</bold> - lowercase letters expressed differences among variants (crop type) within a group of variants with equal type of biomass [either <bold>(A,B)</bold>]; charts <bold>(B,C)</bold> - lowercase letters express differences among variants with an equal crop (differing in the date of harvest), uppercase letters express differences among variants discriminated according to the crop type; results based on Tukey&#x2019;s HSD post-hoc test calculated at a significance level p &#x2264; 0.05. Rad &#x3d; radish; Saf &#x3d; safflower, Wmu &#x3d; white mustard.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="sjss-16-16036-g002.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Bar graph with three panels labeled A, B, and C shows pH values for different biomass samples. Panel A compares Biomass A and B across Rad, Saf, and Wmu; panels B and C show individual biomasses with treatments, featuring small standard errors and statistical groupings labeled a and b.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<p>Soil contents of oxidizable organic carbon (Cox), total carbon (TC), total nitrogen (TN), and their ratio (Cox/TN) were unchanged across crops within both maturity stages (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figures 3A&#x2013;I</xref>). By contrast, total phosphorus (P) and potassium (K) increased in soils amended with biomass A, showing a trend from lower values in RadA to higher values in WmuA, all exceeding the unamended control (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figures 4B,H</xref>). Biomass B amendments also elevated P, K, and Mg contents relative to the control, except for P in SafB and Mg in RadB (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figures 4C,F,I</xref>). Within each maturity stage, Mg did not differ among crops (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4D</xref>). P and K were highest in WmuA soils, while P was highest in WmuB soils, compared with RadA (P, K) and SafB (P) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figures 4A,G</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F3" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 3</label>
<caption>
<p>Soil oxidizable carbon (Cox - charts <bold>(A-C)</bold>), total nitrogen (TN - charts <bold>(D-F)</bold>), and Cox_N (charts <bold>(G-I)</bold>) at the end of trial. Displayed are means (n &#x3d; 3) &#xb1; standard error of mean (SEM; error bars); charts <bold>(A,D,G)</bold> - lowercase letters expressed differences among variants (crop type) within a group of variants with equal type of biomass [either <bold>(A,B)</bold>]; charts <bold>(B,C,E,F,H,I)</bold> - lowercase letters express differences among variants with an equal crop (differing in the date of harvest), uppercase letters express differences among variants discriminated according to the crop type; results based on Tukey&#x2019;s HSD post-hoc test calculated at a significance level p &#x2264; 0.05. Rad &#x3d; radish; Saf &#x3d; safflower, Wmu &#x3d; white mustard.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="sjss-16-16036-g003.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Grouped bar chart panels labeled A to I display Cox percentage, TN percentage, and Cox/N ratios for different biomass treatments: Rad, Saf, Wmu, and Control, with statistical notation &#x201C;a&#x201D; indicating no significant differences between groups. Each panel compares two biomasses (A in blue, B in green), except panels B, C, E, F, H, and I, which show only biomass A or B in blue. Error bars are included on all bars. All results show similar values among treatments, as denoted by consistent statistical annotations.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<fig id="F4" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 4</label>
<caption>
<p>Soil total phosphorus (P - charts <bold>(A-C)</bold>), magnesium (Mg - charts <bold>(D-F)</bold>), and potassium (K - charts <bold>(G-I)</bold>) at the end of trial. Displayed are means (n &#x3d; 3) &#xb1; standard error of mean (SEM; error bars); charts <bold>(A,D,G)</bold> - lowercase letters expressed differences among variants (crop type) within a group of variants with equal type of biomass [either <bold>(A,B)</bold>]; charts <bold>(B,C,E,F,H,I)</bold> - lowercase letters express differences among variants with an equal crop (differing in the date of harvest), uppercase letters express differences among variants discriminated according to the crop type; results based on Tukey&#x2019;s HSD post-hoc test calculated at a significance level p &#x2264; 0.05. Rad &#x3d; radish; Saf &#x3d; safflower, Wmu &#x3d; white mustard.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="sjss-16-16036-g004.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Nine-panel grouped bar graph set showing phosphorus, magnesium, and potassium levels in plant biomass types A and B under Rad, Saf, and Wmu treatments, and in biomass A and B under Cont, Rad, Saf, and Wmu controls. Error bars indicate variation; letters above bars denote statistical groupings. Panels show higher nutrient concentrations in Wmu for most measures. Data visualization is intended to compare nutrient accumulation across biomass types and treatments.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<p>Enzyme activities responded variably to biomass incorporation. &#x3b2;-glucosidase (GLU) activity increased in RadA- and SafA-amended soils compared with the control (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure 5B</xref>), but showed no differences among crop treatments within each maturity stage (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure 5A</xref>). Phosphatase (Phos) activity was higher in RadA and SafB than in the control (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figures 5E,F</xref>). Across maturity stages, biomass A amendments generally enhanced GLU (all crops) and Phos (radish and white mustard) compared to biomass B (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure 5A</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F5" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 5</label>
<caption>
<p>Soil enzymes mineralizing carbon and phosphorus at the end of trial. Displayed are means (n &#x3d; 3) &#xb1; standard error of mean (SEM; error bars) of &#x3b2;-glucosidase (GLU - charts <bold>(A-C)</bold>) and phosphatase (Phos - charts <bold>(D-F)</bold>); charts <bold>(A,D)</bold> - lowercase letters expressed differences among variants (crop type) within a group of variants with equal type of biomass [either <bold>(A,B)</bold>]; charts <bold>(B,C,E,F)</bold> - lowercase letters express differences among variants with an equal crop (differing in the date of harvest), uppercase letters express differences among variants discriminated according to the crop type; results based on Tukey&#x2019;s HSD post-hoc test calculated at a significance level p &#x2264; 0.05. Rad &#x3d; radish; Saf &#x3d; safflower, Wmu &#x3d; white mustard.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="sjss-16-16036-g005.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Six grouped bar and column charts labeled A through F show GLU and Phos enzyme activities comparing Biomass A and B types under different treatments: Rad, Saf, Wmu, and Cont. Panels A and D display side-by-side bars for Biomass A (blue) and B (green) for GLU and Phos, respectively, with statistical groupings indicated by lowercase letters above bars. Panels B and C (GLU) and E and F (Phos) show only Biomass A and B separately across treatments. Error bars are shown and y-axes are nmol per gram per minute.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<p>Urease (Ure) activity increased in SafA but decreased in RadB compared with the control (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figures 6B,C</xref>). Differences among crops were also evident: WmuA and RadB had lower Ure activity than the other two crops at the same maturity stage (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figure 6A</xref>). N-acetyl-&#x3b2;-D-glucosaminidase (NAG) and arylsulfatase (ARS) increased in RadA relative to the control (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figures 6E,H</xref>). Biomass B amendments further raised NAG in WmuB and ARS in RadB and SafB (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figures 6F,I</xref>). Among crop comparisons, WmuA decreased ARS relative to RadA, whereas WmuB increased NAG compared to RadB and SafB (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figures 6D,G</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F6" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 6</label>
<caption>
<p>Soil enzymes mineralizing nitrogen and sulphur at the end of trial. Displayed are means (n &#x3d; 3) &#xb1; standard error of mean (SEM; error bars) of urease (Ure - charts <bold>(A-C)</bold>), N-acetyl-&#x03B2;-D-glucosaminidase (NAG - charts <bold>(D-F)</bold>), and arylsulfatase (ARS - charts <bold>(G-I)</bold>) charts <bold>(A,D,G)</bold> - lowercase letters expressed differences among variants (crop type) within a group of variants with equal type of biomass [either <bold>(A,B)</bold>]; charts <bold>(B,C,E,F,H,I)</bold> - lowercase letters express differences among variants with an equal crop (differing in the date of harvest), uppercase letters express differences among variants discriminated according to the crop type; results based on Tukey&#x2019;s HSD post-hoc test calculated at a significance level p &#x2264; 0.05. Rad &#x3d; radish; Saf &#x3d; safflower, Wmu &#x3d; white mustard.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="sjss-16-16036-g006.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Nine-panel bar graph depicting enzyme activity (urease, N-acetylglucosaminidase, arylsulfatase) by biomass type (A and B) across three treatments (Rad, Saf, Wmu) and controls, with statistical group letters above bars and error bars indicating variability in each panel.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<p>Enzymatic stoichiometry also shifted with crop type and maturity. The soil carbon acquisition ratio (Cacq.) and vector length (C limitation index) remained unchanged with biomass A but increased under RadB compared with other crops (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">Figures 7C,I</xref>). Within biomass A, WmuA showed higher Cacq. and vector length than SafA, while RadB had the highest values among biomass B treatments (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">Figures 7A,G</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F7" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 7</label>
<caption>
<p>Soil indicators of nutrient acquisition and limitation at the end of trial. Displayed are means (n &#x3d; 3) &#xb1; standard error of mean (SEM; error bars) of carbon acquisition (Cacq. - charts <bold>(A-C)</bold>) and limitation (Vector - charts <bold>(G-I)</bold>), and nitrogen acquisition (Nacq. - charts <bold>(D-F)</bold>) and limitation (Angle - charts <bold>(J-L)</bold>); charts <bold>(A,D,G)</bold> - lowercase letters expressed differences among variants (crop type) within a group of variants with equal type of biomass [either <bold>(A,B)</bold>]; charts <bold>(B,C,E,F,H,I)</bold> - lowercase letters express differences among variants with an equal crop (differing in the date of harvest), uppercase letters express differences among variants discriminated according to the crop type; results based on Tukey&#x2019;s HSD post-hoc test calculated at a significance level p &#x2264; 0.05. Rad &#x3d; radish; Saf &#x3d; safflower, Wmu &#x3d; white mustard.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="sjss-16-16036-g007.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Grouped bar and column charts labeled A to L show statistical comparisons for parameters Cacq., Nacq., Vector, and Angle across four treatments: Cont, Rad, Saf, and Wmu. Separate charts compare Biomass A (blue bars) and Biomass B (green bars), with letters above bars denoting statistically significant differences. Each chart uses consistent y-axes for quantitative comparisons. Panel arrangements are three columns by four rows, with parameter names and units labeled on axes. Error bars are visible on each bar.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<p>Nitrogen acquisition ratio (Nacq.) and vector angle (N limitation index) showed opposite patterns. RadB decreased Nacq. but increased vector angle relative to the control (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">Figures 7F,L</xref>). Within biomass A, WmuA had lower Nacq. and higher angle than SafA. Conversely, WmuB had the highest Nacq. and lowest angle among biomass B treatments. Across crops, Nacq. declined while vector angle increased with longer maturation (biomass A vs. B; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">Figures 7D,J</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-3">
<title>The relations among plant and soil properties</title>
<p>Pearson&#x2019;s correlation analysis (<xref ref-type="sec" rid="s11">Supplementary Figure S2A</xref> revealed several significant relationships. Plant C content correlated negatively with Ash content (p &#x2264; 0.001, r &#x3d; &#x2212;0.89) and with the soil Vector index (p &#x2264; 0.01, r &#x3d; &#x2212;0.65), but positively with soil urease (Ure) activity and N acquisition ratio (Nacq.) (p &#x2264; 0.001, r &#x3d; 0.74 and 0.71, respectively). Conversely, Ash content correlated negatively with Ure and Nacq. (p &#x2264; 0.001, r &#x3d; &#x2212;0.80 and &#x2212;0.73). Acid detergent fibre (ADF) correlated positively with Nacq. (p &#x2264; 0.01, r &#x3d; 0.63), while neutral detergent fibre (NDF) and residual biomass (RB) correlated positively with soil pH (p &#x2264; 0.01, r &#x3d; 0.61; p &#x2264; 0.001, r &#x3d; 0.72). Acid detergent lignin (ADL) correlated negatively with &#x3b2;-glucosidase (GLU; p &#x2264; 0.01, r &#x3d; &#x2212;0.60). Residual biomass correlated positively with hemicellulose (HCEL; p &#x2264; 0.001, r &#x3d; 0.83). Among soil parameters, phosphatase (Phos) correlated negatively with P, K, and Mg contents (p &#x2264; 0.01, r &#x3d; &#x2212;0.65, &#x2212;0.70, &#x2212;0.73).</p>
<p>When analysed separately for biomass A (<xref ref-type="sec" rid="s11">Supplementary Figure S2B</xref>), RB correlated positively with NDF, HCEL, and ADL (p &#x2264; 0.001, r &#x3d; 0.87, 0.93, 0.85), and negatively with ADF, cellulose (CEL), and Ash (p &#x2264; 0.001, r &#x3d; &#x2212;0.81, &#x2212;0.88, &#x2212;0.95).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="discussion" id="s4">
<title>Discussion</title>
<sec id="s4-1">
<title>Crop-specific quality and maturity stage impacts plant biomass properties</title>
<p>The results of residual biomass quantification, soil trait and plant quality determination indicated that both crop choice and, more decisively, harvest timing are critical determinants of biomass quality and subsequent soil responses. Early-harvested biomass provides more labile substrates that promote larger decomposition, whereas later-harvested biomass, particularly of white mustard, is more resistant and may contribute to long-term soil organic matter stabilization. Specifically, residual biomass (RB; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1M</xref>) indicated more extensive biodegradation of all crops (77%&#x2013;87% mass loss), except safflower biomass A (SafA), which decomposed less (62% loss). This lower degradability of SafA was associated with higher NDF, ADL, hemicellulose, and ADL:NC ratios, and reduced cellulose and Ash. High lignin content (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Jensen et al., 2005</xref>), hemicellulose (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Henriksen and Breland, 1999</xref>), and elevated ADL:nitrogen ratios (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B59">Moore et al., 1999</xref>) are generally linked with structural stability and decomposition resistance. Conversely, high protein, fat, and soluble carbohydrates support easier degradation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Heal et al., 1997</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Aditya and Wolfram, 2020</xref>).</p>
<p>Interestingly, the most degraded biomasses such as RadA and WmuB did not show higher nitrogenous compound contents, challenging the assumption that N-rich biomass always decomposes easily. Instead, both were rich in fat, fibre, and cellulose. Although these parameters cause moderately recalcitrant decay (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Henriksen and Breland, 1999</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B86">Zoghlami and Pa&#xeb;s, 2019</xref>), cruciferous crops (radish, white mustard) tended to degrade more easily, consistent with previous observations (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">Kucerik et al., 2024</xref>). By contrast, safflower decomposed less easily, despite relatively low ADL and fibre fractions in SafB, highlighting inconsistency with previous reports of safflower green manure contributing substantially to soil C (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">Kucerik et al., 2024</xref>).</p>
<p>As aforementioned, decomposition was shaped by both crop type and maturity stage (two-way ANOVA, <xref ref-type="sec" rid="s11">Supplementary Table S1</xref>). In some traits (e.g., fat, NDF, hemicellulose), harvest stage had a stronger effect than crop identity. Correlation analysis confirmed that RB was positively associated with hemicellulose and NDF, and negatively with lignin, cellulose, and Ash (<xref ref-type="sec" rid="s11">Supplementary Figure S2</xref>). This suggests that decomposition depends not only on the abundance of resistant polymers, but also on the specific balance between moderately degradable (cellulose, hemicellulose) and resistant (lignin, Ash) compounds.</p>
<p>These results indicate a fundamental difference between crucifers and safflower: cruciferous residues appear more degradable despite moderately recalcitrant fibre fractions, possibly due to their biochemical composition (e.g., glucosinolates and associated breakdown products), while safflower shows unexpectedly slow decomposition even at lower ADL contents. Such a decoupling between bulk ADL and decay rate is consistent with evidence that lignin chemistry and phenolic cross-linking (e.g., ferulate-mediated linkages) can physically and chemically protect labile carbohydrates, thereby constraining decomposition independent of ADL concentration (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Hatfield et al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B74">Talbot et al., 2012</xref>).</p>
<p>Therefore, the results imply that cruciferous crops appear more degradable, making them better suited for short-term nutrient release, while safflower may stabilize soil C. A combination of cruciferous residues with safflower could therefore balance rapid nutrient turnover with longer-term carbon sequestration, a strategy that could be agronomically exploited for soil fertility management.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4-2">
<title>Impact on soil pH</title>
<p>Previous studies often report that green manuring raises soil pH (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B81">Xu W. et al., 2023</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B77">Wang et al., 2024</xref>). In this experiment, crop type did not significantly affect pH, but biomass B amendments slightly decreased pH compared to the control. This acidifying effect was linked to altered Mg:K ratios: unamended soil had Mg:K &#x2248; 2.4, while biomass B-amended soils ranged from 1.4 to 1.8. Such shifts in cation ratios can influence soil buffering capacity and mineral availability (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Jalali, 2008</xref>).</p>
<p>Although the magnitude of pH change was small, it appeared that even minor acidification may accumulate under repeated applications of green manures, especially when combined with shifts in Mg:K balance. This could alter root nutrient uptake and rhizosphere buffering, implying that crop maturity selection could serve as a management tool to fine-tune soil reaction for target crops.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4-3">
<title>Impacts on soil carbon, mineral content and transformation</title>
<p>Stoichiometric indicators revealed that radish at later harvest (RadB) intensified microbial C limitation (higher C acquisition and vector length) but reduced N acquisition, accompanied by greater N limitation (higher vector angle). In contrast, white mustard at later harvest (WmuB) promoted microbial N acquisition and alleviated N limitation. These findings suggest that the maturity stage of incorporated biomass is a decisive factor also in regulating soil nutrient availability and microbial resource allocation. Early incorporation enhances labile nutrient cycling, while later incorporation, particularly of white mustard, supports more balanced nutrient acquisition and may favour longer-term soil fertility.</p>
<p>In general, green manures are linked to higher soil C (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B62">Patra et al., 2023</xref>), however, in this study, no significant changes in oxidizable C were detected. Radish (lower plant C) degraded faster, whereas safflower (higher plant C) decomposed slowly, reducing its contribution to soil C enrichment. This illustrates a trade-off: C-rich biomass may not enrich soil if its decomposition is too slow to release labile substrates (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B75">Tamura et al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Gleixner et al., 2001</xref>). In general, the length of the experiment was too short to consider markable changes in total C contents that would be likely observed in similar medium- to long-termed trial.</p>
<p>Enzyme responses supported this view. &#x3b2;-glucosidase (GLU) activity was unchanged under biomass B but increased under RadA and SafA, coinciding with higher cellulose &#x2b; hemicellulose contents and carbohydrate levels. Higher hemicellulose:ADL ratios in early harvests (A) compared to later harvests (B) likely explained these effects (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B53">Liu et al., 2025</xref>). Thus, enzyme activity was driven more by substrate quality than crop type alone.</p>
<p>C acquisition (Cacq.) and microbial C limitation (Vector length) responded only to biomass B, and most strongly in RadB. This biomass had high HCEL:ADL and Ash but low plant C and C:N, promoting greater microbial demand and C turnover. In contrast, soil P, K, and Mg generally increased with biomass amendments, consistent with other reports for P (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B84">Zhang et al., 2023</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Kataria et al., 2024</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">Khan et al., 2025</xref>), potassium and magnesium (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B72">Solangi et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">Kucerik et al., 2024</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B55">Ma et al., 2021</xref>).</p>
<p>Interestingly, higher phosphatase activity (Phos) occurred in RadA and SafB, both associated with lower soil P content. This suggests microbial upregulation of P-mining under limitation, corroborated by higher vector angles (&#x3e;45&#xb0;) aligning with the notion about mutual relation between reduced availability of P and induced Phos (functioning also vice-versa (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Bargaz et al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Janes-Bassett et al., 2022</xref>)).</p>
<p>Altogether, these results show that the maturity stage determines whether soil C inputs stimulate microbial activity (labile C cycling, possible priming of SOM) or contribute to persistent organic matter pools (slow decomposition, reduced turnover). The consistent link between stoichiometric indices and enzyme assays highlights that integrating these approaches is essential to reveal &#x201c;hidden&#x201d; nutrient limitations and microbial allocation trade-offs.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4-4">
<title>Impacts on soil enzymes and related elements</title>
<p>Correlation analysis confirmed strong links between plant biomass traits and soil enzyme dynamics. High C content in plant material was associated with increased urease activity and microbial N acquisition, while high Ash content showed the opposite trend, indicating that mineral-rich biomass may partially suppress N cycling. Fibre quality traits also played a key role: hemicellulose and lignin were strongly associated with residual biomass, suggesting that structural compounds drive decomposition resistance, while lignin negatively correlated with &#x3b2;-glucosidase, reflecting reduced microbial C acquisition from recalcitrant residues. Among soil properties, higher P, K, and Mg contents were linked with lower phosphatase activity, implying nutrient feedback regulation.</p>
<p>Contrary to some studies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54">Lyu et al., 2023</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B78">Wang et al., 2025</xref>), biomass incorporation did not significantly change soil TN or C:N ratios in this study. However, enzyme activities indicated shifts in N cycling. Urease activity increased under SafA, while WmuA and RadB showed reduced values compared to other treatments. This suggests that safflower may sustain N mineralization despite its slower decomposition.</p>
<p>N-acetyl-&#x3b2;-D-glucosaminidase (NAG), linked to fungal chitin turnover, increased in RadA and WmuB relative to the control. Crucifer biomass maturity negatively affected NAG, as seen in lower activity under SafB versus SafA, aligning with reports that later maturity reduces protein degradation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">Kohn and Allen, 1995</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">Kejun et al., 2011</xref>). Arylsulfatase (ARS) also increased with biomass amendments, consistent with earlier findings (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B76">Tejada et al., 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Elfstrand et al., 2007</xref>). However, WmuA showed the lowest ARS, despite white mustard being rich in S-containing glucosinolates (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Cou&#xeb;del et al., 2018b</xref>). This discrepancy likely reflects that glucosinolate degradation is mediated by enzymes like myrosinase (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Al-Turki and Dick, 2003</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Huber et al., 1983</xref>) rather than ARS.</p>
<p>Taken together, these enzyme responses indicate that microbial N and S cycling can shift without parallel changes in bulk TN, highlighting the importance of process-level indicators. While safflower decomposes slowly, it still supports steady N turnover through urease activity. Crucifer residues, in contrast, showed maturity-dependent differences in protein- and chitin-degrading pathways, with direct implications for the timing of incorporation to optimize N release. Moreover, the interaction between glucosinolate-rich residues and sulfur enzymes suggests that biochemical specificity of plant metabolites must be considered when predicting S dynamics under green manuring.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="conclusion" id="s5">
<title>Conclusion</title>
<p>The results suggest that although residue quality indicators such as lignin, cellulose, and C:N ratio are commonly used to predict decomposition rates, they do not always capture the variability associated with different crop types and maturity stages. For cruciferous residues, larger degradation has often been reported despite moderately recalcitrant fibre fractions, suggesting that secondary metabolites such as glucosinolates may play a role in enhancing microbial breakdown. In contrast, oilseed crops such as safflower have been described as more resistant due to structural complexity and phenolic cross-linking in their cell walls, which can decouple decomposition rates from bulk lignin content. Our findings reinforce and expand upon these observations, showing that safflower residues decomposed less extensively than cruciferous biomass even at lower ADL contents, highlighting the importance of polymer interactions and cell wall architecture beyond simple lignin abundance. Moreover, by comparing early- and late-harvested biomass, this study provides novel evidence that maturity stage can override crop identity in shaping residue quality and subsequent soil responses, an aspect largely overlooked in previous green manure studies. This highlights the need to integrate biochemical residue traits with stoichiometric and enzymatic assays to better predict residue&#x2013;soil interactions and their implications for nutrient cycling and soil carbon dynamics.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec sec-type="data-availability" id="s6">
<title>Data availability statement</title>
<p>The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="author-contributions" id="s7">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>Conceptualization, JH, MB, and AK; Methodology, MB, AK, JS, and OM; Software, TB and JH; Validation, JK, AK, and MB; Formal analysis, JH, JK, and MB; Investigation, JH, AK, JK, MB, AM, and MN; Resources AK, TB, JS, and OM; Data curation, OM, JS, and TB; Writing &#x2013; original draft preparation JH, JK, and MB; Writing &#x2013; review and editing, JK, MB, TB, JH, AK, MN, and AM; Visualization, JH and TB; Supervision, MB, JK, AK, MN, and AM; Project administration, AK, JH, and MB; Funding acquisition, AK, JH, and MB. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="COI-statement" id="s9">
<title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>Authors AK and JS were employed by Agricultural Research, Ltd. Author JH was employed by Agrovyzkum Rapotin, Ltd.</p>
<p>The remaining author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="ai-statement" id="s10">
<title>Generative AI statement</title>
<p>The author(s) declared that generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.</p>
<p>Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="supplementary-material" id="s11">
<title>Supplementary material</title>
<p>The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.frontierspartnerships.org/articles/10.3389/sjss.2026.16036/full#supplementary-material">https://www.frontierspartnerships.org/articles/10.3389/sjss.2026.16036/full&#x23;supplementary-material</ext-link>
</p>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Supplementaryfile1.docx" id="SM1" mimetype="application/docx" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"/>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Adetunji</surname>
<given-names>A. T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ncube</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mulidzi</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lewu</surname>
<given-names>F. B.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Management impact and benefit of cover crops on soil quality: a review</article-title>. <source>Soil Tillage Res.</source> <volume>204</volume>, <fpage>104717</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.still.2020.104717</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Aditya</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wolfram</surname>
<given-names>Y. M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Chemical compounds and decomposition process from four species leaf litter as a source of organic matter soil in anggori education forest, Manokwari</article-title>. <source>J. Sylva Indonesiana</source> <volume>3</volume>, <fpage>60</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>67</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.32734/jsi.v3i02.2848</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Al-Turki</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dick</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>Myrosinase Activity in Soil</article-title>. <source>Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. - SSSAJ</source> <volume>67</volume>, <fpage>139</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>145</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2136/sssaj2003.1390</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<mixed-citation publication-type="book">
<collab>ANKOM</collab> (<year>2006</year>). <source>ANKOM technology</source>.</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Antosh</surname>
<given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liebig</surname>
<given-names>M. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Archer</surname>
<given-names>D. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Luciano</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Cover crop interseeding effects on aboveground biomass and corn grain yield in western North Dakota</article-title>. <source>Crop, Forage and Turfgrass Manag.</source> <volume>8</volume>, <fpage>e20148</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/cft2.20148</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<mixed-citation publication-type="book">
<collab>AOAC</collab> (<year>2023</year>). <source>Association of official analytical chemists</source>. <publisher-name>Oxford University Press</publisher-name>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/9780197610145.003.2944</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bargaz</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Faghire</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Abdi</surname>
<given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Farissi</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sifi</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Drevon</surname>
<given-names>J.-J.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Low soil phosphorus availability increases acid phosphatases activities and affects P partitioning in nodules, seeds and rhizosphere of Phaseolus vulgaris</article-title>. <source>Agriculture</source> <volume>2</volume>, <fpage>139</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>153</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/agriculture2020139</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bogu&#x17e;as</surname>
<given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Miku&#x10d;ionien&#x117;</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>&#x160;lepetien&#x117;</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sinkevi&#x10d;ien&#x117;</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Feiza</surname>
<given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Steponavi&#x10d;ien&#x117;</surname>
<given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Long-term effect of tillage systems, straw and green manure combinations on soil organic matter</article-title>. <source>Zemdirbyste-Agriculture</source> <volume>102</volume>, <fpage>243</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>250</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.13080/z-a.2015.102.031</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Cou&#xeb;del</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Alletto</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Justes</surname>
<given-names>&#xc9;.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018a</year>). <article-title>Crucifer-legume cover crop mixtures provide effective sulphate catch crop and sulphur green manure services</article-title>. <source>Plant Soil</source> <volume>426</volume>, <fpage>61</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>76</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11104-018-3615-8</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Cou&#xeb;del</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Alletto</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kirkegaard</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Justes</surname>
<given-names>&#xc9;.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018b</year>). <article-title>Crucifer glucosinolate production in legume-crucifer cover crop mixtures</article-title>. <source>Eur. J. Agron.</source> <volume>96</volume>, <fpage>22</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>33</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.eja.2018.02.007</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Cui</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xu</surname>
<given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ai</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liang</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Enzymatic stoichiometry reveals phosphorus limitation-induced changes in the soil bacterial communities and element cycling: evidence from a long-term field experiment</article-title>. <source>Geoderma</source> <volume>426</volume>, <fpage>116124</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.geoderma.2022.116124</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Doi</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ranamukhaarachchi</surname>
<given-names>S. L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Soil dehydrogenase in a land degradation-rehabilitation gradient: observations from a savanna site with a wet/dry seasonal cycle</article-title>. <source>Rev. Biol. Trop.</source> <volume>57</volume>, <fpage>223</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>234</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.15517/rbt.v57i1-2.11317</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19637703</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Dong</surname>
<given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hu</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Qi</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hao</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Effects of green-manure and tillage management on soil microbial community composition, nutrients and tree growth in a walnut orchard</article-title>. <source>Sci. Rep.</source> <volume>11</volume>, <fpage>16882</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41598-021-96472-8</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34413432</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>dos Santos Cordeiro</surname>
<given-names>C. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Echer</surname>
<given-names>F. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Araujo</surname>
<given-names>F. F.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Cover crops impact crops yields by improving microbiological activity and fertility in sandy soil</article-title>. <source>J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr.</source> <volume>21</volume>, <fpage>1968</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1977</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s42729-021-00494-0</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Elfstrand</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>B&#xe5;th</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>M&#xe5;rtensson</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Influence of various forms of green manure amendment on soil microbial community composition, enzyme activity and nutrient levels in leek</article-title>. <source>Appl. Soil Ecol.</source> <volume>36</volume>, <fpage>70</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>82</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.apsoil.2006.11.001</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<mixed-citation publication-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Faraway</surname>
<given-names>R. J. J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <source>Linear models with R</source>. <publisher-loc>Boca Raton, FL, USA</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Chapman and Hall/CRC Press</publisher-name>.</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<mixed-citation publication-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Feng</surname>
<given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <source>Plant-derived macromolecules in the soil</source>. <fpage>79</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>115</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/9781119480419.ch4</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Feng</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sekaran</surname>
<given-names>U.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kumar</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>On-farm assessment of cover cropping effects on soil C and N pools, enzyme activities, and microbial community structure</article-title>. <source>J. Agric. Sci.</source> <volume>159</volume>, <fpage>216</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>226</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1017/s002185962100040x</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Fr&#xf8;seth</surname>
<given-names>R. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bakken</surname>
<given-names>A. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bleken</surname>
<given-names>M. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Riley</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pommeresche</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Thorup-Kristensen</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Effects of green manure herbage management and its digestate from biogas production on barley yield, N recovery, soil structure and earthworm populations</article-title>. <source>Eur. J. Agron.</source> <volume>52</volume>, <fpage>90</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>102</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.eja.2013.10.006</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Garcia-Franco</surname>
<given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Albaladejo</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Almagro</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mart&#xed;nez-Mena</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Beneficial effects of reduced tillage and green manure on soil aggregation and stabilization of organic carbon in a mediterranean agroecosystem</article-title>. <source>Soil Tillage Res.</source> <volume>153</volume>, <fpage>66</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>75</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.still.2015.05.010</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Garc&#x131;&#x301;a-Ayuso</surname>
<given-names>L. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Luque de Castro</surname>
<given-names>M. D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1999</year>). <article-title>A multivariate study of the performance of a microwave-assisted soxhlet extractor for olive seeds</article-title>. <source>Anal. Chim. Acta</source> <volume>382</volume>, <fpage>309</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>316</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/s0003-2670(98)00795-8</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Gautam</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shriwastav</surname>
<given-names>C. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lamichhane</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Baral</surname>
<given-names>B. R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>The residual effect of pre-rice green manuring on a succeeding wheat crop (Triticum aestivum L.) in the rice-wheat cropping system in Banke, Nepal</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Agron.</source> <volume>2021</volume>, <fpage>10</fpage>, <lpage>4142743</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1155/2021/4142743</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<mixed-citation publication-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Gleixner</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Czimczik</surname>
<given-names>C. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kramer</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>L&#xfc;hker</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schmidt</surname>
<given-names>M. W. I.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2001</year>). in <source>Global biogeochemical cycles in the climate system</source>. Editors <person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname>Schulze</surname>
<given-names>E.-D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Heimann</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Harrison</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Holland</surname>
<given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lloyd</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Prentice</surname>
<given-names>I. C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<publisher-loc>San Diego</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Academic Press</publisher-name>), <fpage>201</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>215</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/B978-012631260-7/50017-0</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Gunnarsson</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Marstorp</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dahlin</surname>
<given-names>A. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Witter</surname>
<given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Influence of non-cellulose structural carbohydrate composition on plant material decomposition in soil</article-title>. <source>Biol. Fertil. Soils</source> <volume>45</volume>, <fpage>27</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>36</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00374-008-0303-5</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hadas</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kautsky</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Goek</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Erman Kara</surname>
<given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>Rates of decomposition of plant residues and available nitrogen in soil, related to residue composition through simulation of carbon and nitrogen turnover</article-title>. <source>Soil Biol. Biochem.</source> <volume>36</volume>, <fpage>255</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>266</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.soilbio.2003.09.012</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hatfield</surname>
<given-names>R. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rancour</surname>
<given-names>D. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Marita</surname>
<given-names>J. M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Grass cell walls: a story of cross-linking</article-title>. <source>Front. Plant Sci.</source> <fpage>7</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2016.02056</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28149301</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Heal</surname>
<given-names>O. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Anderson</surname>
<given-names>J. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Swift</surname>
<given-names>M. J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1997</year>). &#x201c;<article-title>Plant litter quality and decomposition: an historical overview</article-title>,&#x201d; in <source>Driven by Nature: Plant Litter Quality and Decomposition</source>. <person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname>Cadisch</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Giller</surname>
<given-names>K. E.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<publisher-loc>Wallingford</publisher-loc>; <publisher-name>CAB International</publisher-name>), <fpage>3</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>30</lpage>.</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Henriksen</surname>
<given-names>T. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Breland</surname>
<given-names>T. A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1999</year>). <article-title>Evaluation of criteria for describing crop residue degradability in a model of carbon and nitrogen turnover in soil</article-title>. <source>Soil Biol. Biochem.</source> <volume>31</volume>, <fpage>1135</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1149</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/s0038-0717(99)00031-0</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<mixed-citation publication-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hinkle</surname>
<given-names>D. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wiersma</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jurs</surname>
<given-names>S. G.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <source>Applied statistics for the behavioral sciences</source>. <edition>5th ed</edition>. <publisher-loc>Boston, Mass.</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Houghton Mifflin</publisher-name>.</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hu</surname>
<given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhao</surname>
<given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ning</surname>
<given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liang</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cao</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Winter green manure decreases subsoil nitrate accumulation and increases n use efficiencies of maize production in North China Plain</article-title>. <source>Plants-Basel</source> <volume>12</volume> (<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>311</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/plants12020311</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">36679024</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Huber</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kranz</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kreibich</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Beining</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kr&#xfc;ger</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Weissbach</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1983</year>). <article-title>Microbiological degradation of glucosinolates in defatted rapeseed meal</article-title>. <source>Food/Nahr.</source> <volume>27</volume>, <fpage>257</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>263</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/food.19830270319</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">6684210</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B32">
<mixed-citation publication-type="book">
<collab>ISO_10390</collab> (<year>2005</year>). <source>International Organization for Standardization</source>. Geneva, Switzerland.</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B33">
<mixed-citation publication-type="book">
<collab>ISO_13878</collab> (<year>1998</year>). <source>International Organization for Standardization</source>. Geneva, Switzerland.</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B34">
<mixed-citation publication-type="book">
<collab>ISO_13906</collab> (<year>2008</year>). <source>International Organization for Standardization</source>. Geneva, Switzerland.</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B35">
<mixed-citation publication-type="book">
<collab>ISO_14235</collab> (<year>1998</year>). <source>International Organization for Standardization</source>. Geneva, Switzerland.</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B36">
<mixed-citation publication-type="book">
<collab>ISO_20130</collab> (<year>2018</year>). <source>International Organization for Standardization</source>. Geneva, Switzerland.</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B37">
<mixed-citation publication-type="book">
<collab>ISO_6865</collab> (<year>2000</year>). <source>International Organization for Standardization</source>. Geneva, Switzerland.</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B38">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Jalali</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Effect of sodium and magnesium on kinetics of potassium release in some calcareous soils of Western Iran</article-title>. <source>Geoderma</source> <volume>145</volume>, <fpage>207</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>215</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.geoderma.2008.03.005</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B39">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Janes-Bassett</surname>
<given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Blackwell</surname>
<given-names>M. S. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Blair</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Davies</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Haygarth</surname>
<given-names>P. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mezeli</surname>
<given-names>M. M.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>A meta-analysis of phosphatase activity in agricultural settings in response to phosphorus deficiency</article-title>. <source>Soil Biol. Biochem.</source> <volume>165</volume>, <fpage>108537</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.soilbio.2021.108537</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B40">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Jenkinson</surname>
<given-names>D. S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1965</year>). <article-title>Studies on the decomposition of plant material in soil. i.t: losses of carbon from <sup>14</sup> c labelled ryegrass incubated with soil in the field</article-title>. <source>J. Soil Sci.</source> <volume>16</volume>, <fpage>104</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>115</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2389.1965.tb01424.x</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B41">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Jensen</surname>
<given-names>L. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Salo</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Palmason</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Breland</surname>
<given-names>T. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Henriksen</surname>
<given-names>T. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Stenberg</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Influence of biochemical quality on C and N mineralisation from a broad variety of plant materials in soil</article-title>. <source>Plant Soil</source> <volume>273</volume>, <fpage>307</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>326</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11104-004-8128-y</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B42">
<mixed-citation publication-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kassambara</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mundt</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <source>CRAN.R-project</source>.</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B43">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kataria</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Singh</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Singh</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mavi</surname>
<given-names>M. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sillanp&#xe4;&#xe4;</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Al-Farraj</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Residual phosphorus availability after soil application of different organic waste in varying soil P status soils</article-title>. <source>Heliyon</source> <volume>10</volume>, <fpage>e25732</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25732</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">38601584</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B44">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kejun</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Juntao</surname>
<given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ying</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zongwen</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lin</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cong</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Accelerating the degradation of green plant waste with chemical decomposition agents</article-title>. <source>J. Environ. Manag.</source> <volume>92</volume>, <fpage>2708</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2713</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.06.011</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21763065</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B45">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Khan</surname>
<given-names>A. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Azeem</surname>
<given-names>I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hui</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yuan</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shah</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2025</year>). <article-title>Non-leguminous green manures improve labile phosphorus availability and crop yield in agroecosystems: a global meta-analysis</article-title>. <source>Soil Tillage Res.</source> <volume>248</volume>, <fpage>106430</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.still.2024.106430</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B46">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kohn</surname>
<given-names>R. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Allen</surname>
<given-names>M. S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1995</year>). <article-title>Effect of plant maturity and preservation method on <italic>in vitro</italic> protein degradation of forages</article-title>. <source>J. Dairy Sci.</source> <volume>78</volume>, <fpage>1544</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1551</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(95)76776-5</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">7593847</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B47">
<mixed-citation publication-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Komsta</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Novomestky</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <source>CRAN.R-project</source>.</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B48">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kucerik</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Brtnicky</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mustafa</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hammerschmiedt</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kintl</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sobotkova</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Utilization of diversified cover crops as green manure-enhanced soil organic carbon, nutrient transformation, microbial activity, and maize growth</article-title>. <source>Agronomy-Basel</source> <volume>14</volume>, <fpage>2001</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/agronomy14092001</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B49">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>L&#xea;</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Josse</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Husson</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>FactoMineR: An R package for multivariate analysis</article-title>. <source>J. Stat. Softw.</source> <volume>25</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>18</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18637/jss.v025.i01</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B50">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jia</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname>
<given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Deng</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lu</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Adaptive evaluation for agricultural sustainability of different fertilizer management options for a green manure-maize rotation system: impacts on crop yield, soil biochemical properties and organic carbon fractions</article-title>. <source>Sci. Total Environ.</source> <volume>908</volume>, <fpage>168170</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.168170</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">37924887</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B51">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>J. X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Peng</surname>
<given-names>S. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Faivre-Vuillin</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xu</surname>
<given-names>Z. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>D. Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhou</surname>
<given-names>G. Y.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Erigeron annuus (L.) Pers., as a green manure for ameliorating soil exposed to acid rain in Southern China</article-title>. <source>J. Soils Sediments</source> <volume>8</volume>, <fpage>452</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>460</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11368-008-0041-1</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B52">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ku</surname>
<given-names>Y. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Contador</surname>
<given-names>C. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lam</surname>
<given-names>H. M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>The impacts of domestication and agricultural practices on Legume nutrient acquisition through symbiosis with Rhizobia and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi</article-title>. <source>Front. Genet.</source> <volume>11</volume>, <fpage>583954</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fgene.2020.583954</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33193716</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B53">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tang</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tou</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wanek</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kuzyakov</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2025</year>). <article-title>Opposite roles of plant quality and soil exoenzymes in regulation of litter carbon transfer to fungal and bacterial necromass</article-title>. <source>Soil Biol. Biochem.</source> <volume>210</volume>, <fpage>109940</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.soilbio.2025.109940</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B54">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lyu</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shang</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname>
<given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Drive soil nitrogen transformation and improve crop nitrogen absorption and utilization - a review of green manure applications</article-title>. <source>Front. Plant Sci.</source> <volume>14</volume>, <fpage>1305600</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2023.1305600</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">38239220</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B55">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ma</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yin</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ju</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Deng</surname>
<given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Meta-analysis of green manure effects on soil properties and crop yield in northern China</article-title>. <source>Field crop. Res.</source> <volume>266</volume>, <fpage>108146</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fcr.2021.108146</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B56">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ma</surname>
<given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liang</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fu</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ma</surname>
<given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chang</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Long-term green manuring increases soil carbon sequestration <italic>via</italic> decreasing qCO2 caused by lower microbial phosphorus limitation in a dry land field</article-title>. <source>Agric. Ecosyst. and Environ.</source> <volume>374</volume>, <fpage>109142</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.agee.2024.109142</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B57">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Marrubini</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Papetti</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Genorini</surname>
<given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ulrici</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Determination of the sugar content in commercial plant milks by near infrared spectroscopy and luff-schoorl total glucose titration</article-title>. <source>Food Anal. Methods</source> <volume>10</volume>, <fpage>1556</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1567</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s12161-016-0713-1</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B58">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Mehlich</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Mehlich 3 soil test extractant: a modification of mehlich 2 extractant</article-title>. <source>Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Analysis</source> <volume>15</volume> (<issue>12</issue>), <fpage>1409</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1416</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/00103628409367568</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B59">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Moore</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Trofymow</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Taylor</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Prescott</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Camir&#xe9;</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Duschene</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>1999</year>). <article-title>Litter decomposition rates in Canadian forests</article-title>. <source>Glob. Change Biol.</source> <volume>5</volume>, <fpage>75</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>82</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1046/j.1365-2486.1998.00224.x</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B60">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Moorhead</surname>
<given-names>D. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sinsabaugh</surname>
<given-names>R. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hill</surname>
<given-names>B. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Weintraub</surname>
<given-names>M. N.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Vector analysis of ecoenzyme activities reveal constraints on coupled C, N and P dynamics</article-title>. <source>Soil Biol. Biochem.</source> <volume>93</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>7</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.10.019</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B61">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Muhammad</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Khan</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Khan</surname>
<given-names>M. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Anjum</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Alizai</surname>
<given-names>N. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kamran</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Green manuring for increasing nitrogen use efficiency and growth performance of wheat</article-title>. <source>J. Appl. Res. Plant Sci.</source> <volume>3</volume>, <fpage>177</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>186</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.38211/joarps.2022.3.1.22</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B62">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Patra</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Singh</surname>
<given-names>R. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kundu</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kumar</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Malkani</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Singh</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Millet production in india: challenges and opportunities</article-title>.</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B63">
<mixed-citation publication-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Pek&#xe1;r</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Brabec</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <source>Modern analysis of biological data. Generalized linear models in R</source> <publisher-loc>Brno, Czech Republic</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Masaryk University Press</publisher-name>.</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B64">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Piotrowska-Dlugosz</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wilczewski</surname>
<given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Influence of field pea (<italic>Pisum sativum</italic>L.) as catch crop cultivated for green manure on soil phosphorus and P-cycling enzyme activity</article-title>. <source>Arch. Agron. Soil Sci.</source> <volume>66</volume>, <fpage>1570</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1582</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/03650340.2020.1715950</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B65">
<mixed-citation publication-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Pomeranz</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Meloan</surname>
<given-names>C. E.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1994</year>). <source>Food analysis</source>, <fpage>625</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>677</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/978-1-4615-6998-5_36</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B66">
<mixed-citation publication-type="book">
<collab>R_Core_Team</collab> (<year>2023</year>). <source>R Foundation for Statistical Computing</source>. Vienna, Austria.</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B67">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ranaivoson</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Falconnier</surname>
<given-names>G. N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Affholder</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Leroux</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Autfray</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Muller</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Can green manure contribute to sustainable intensification of rainfed rice production in Madagascar?</article-title> <source>Field crop. Res.</source> <volume>289</volume>, <fpage>108711</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fcr.2022.108711</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B68">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Rinne</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jaakkola</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Huhtanen</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1997</year>). <article-title>Grass maturity effects on cattle fed silage-based diets. 1. Organic matter digestion, rumen fermentation and nitrogen utilization</article-title>. <source>Animal Feed Sci. Technol.</source> <volume>67</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>17</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/s0377-8401(96)01141-8</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B69">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Sandhu</surname>
<given-names>O. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jat</surname>
<given-names>M. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gupta</surname>
<given-names>R. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Thind</surname>
<given-names>H. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sidhu</surname>
<given-names>H. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Singh</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Influence of residue type and method of placement on dynamics of decomposition and nitrogen release in maize-wheat-mungbean cropping on permanent raised beds: a litterbag study</article-title>. <source>Sustainability</source> <volume>14</volume>, <fpage>864</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/su14020864</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B70">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Sharma</surname>
<given-names>A. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ghosh</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cycl</surname>
<given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2000</year>). <article-title>Effect of green manuring with Sesbania aculeata and nitrogen fertilization on the performance of direct-seeded flood-prone lowland rice</article-title>. <source>Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosyst.</source> <volume>57</volume> (<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>141</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>153</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1023/a:1009863100224</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B71">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Singh</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Devi</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>P</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bahadur</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kumar</surname>
<given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Devi</surname>
<given-names>O.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <source>Int. J. Environ. Clim. Change</source> <volume>13</volume>, <fpage>39</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>45</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.9734/IJECC/2023/v13i113142</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B72">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Solangi</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bai</surname>
<given-names>J. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gao</surname>
<given-names>S. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhou</surname>
<given-names>G. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cao</surname>
<given-names>W. D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Improved accumulation capabilities of phosphorus and potassium in green manures and its relationship with soil properties and enzymatic activities</article-title>. <source>Agronomy-Basel</source> <volume>9</volume> (<issue>11</issue>), <fpage>708</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/agronomy9110708</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B73">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Su</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhao</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname>
<given-names>Y. a.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname>
<given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Green manure return strategies to improve soil properties and Spring maize productivity under nitrogen reduction in the North China Plain</article-title>. <source>Agronomy-Basel</source> <volume>12</volume>, <fpage>2734</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/agronomy12112734</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B74">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Talbot</surname>
<given-names>J. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yelle</surname>
<given-names>D. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nowick</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Treseder</surname>
<given-names>K. K.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Litter decay rates are determined by lignin chemistry</article-title>. <source>Biogeochemistry</source> <volume>108</volume>, <fpage>279</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>295</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10533-011-9599-6</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B75">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Tamura</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Suseela</surname>
<given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Simpson</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Powell</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tharayil</surname>
<given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Plant litter chemistry alters the content and composition of organic carbon associated with soil mineral and aggregate fractions in invaded ecosystems</article-title>. <source>Glob. Change Biology</source> <volume>23</volume>, <fpage>4002</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>4018</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/gcb.13751</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28480539</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B76">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Tejada</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gonzalez</surname>
<given-names>J. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Garcia-Martinez</surname>
<given-names>A. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Parrado</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Effects of different green manures on soil biological properties and maize yield</article-title>. <source>Bioresour. Technology</source> <volume>99</volume>, <fpage>1758</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1767</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.biortech.2007.03.052</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17512725</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B77">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhong</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xue</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Systematic analysis of the effects of different green manure crop rotations on soil nutrient dynamics and bacterial community structure in the Taihu Lake Region, Jiangsu</article-title>. <source>Agriculture</source> <volume>14</volume>, <fpage>1017</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/agriculture14071017</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B78">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hu</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yin</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fan</surname>
<given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fan</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2025</year>). <article-title>Optimal green manure application reduces nitrogen losses, enhances wheat grain yield, and improves nitrogen use efficiency</article-title>. <source>J. Integr. Agric.</source> <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jia.2025.04.001</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B79">
<mixed-citation publication-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wickham</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <source>Springer-Verlag</source>.</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B80">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Xie</surname>
<given-names>Z. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shah</surname>
<given-names>F. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhou</surname>
<given-names>C. H.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Combining rice straw biochar with leguminous cover crop as green manure and mineral fertilizer enhances soil microbial biomass and rice yield in South China</article-title>. <source>Front. Plant Sci.</source> <volume>13</volume>, <fpage>778738</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2022.778738</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">35548318</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B81">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Xu</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname>
<given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jiang</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yu</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2023a</year>). <article-title>Improving soil pH, nutrient concentrations, and enzyme activities by green manure returning in young and mature rubber plantation on Hainan island, China</article-title>. <source>Plant Soil</source> <volume>495</volume>, <fpage>341</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>358</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11104-023-06327-6</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B82">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Xu</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Si</surname>
<given-names>L. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cao</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2023b</year>). <article-title>Various green manure-fertilizer combinations affect the soil microbial community and function in immature red soil</article-title>. <source>Front. Microbiol.</source> <volume>14</volume>, <fpage>1255056</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2023.1255056</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">38163071</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B83">
<mixed-citation publication-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zar</surname>
<given-names>J. H.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1984</year>). <source>Biostatistical analysis</source>. <edition>2nd ed</edition>. <publisher-loc>Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, USA</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Prentice-Hall, Inc</publisher-name>.</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B84">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nie</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cao</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gao</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lu</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liao</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Long-term green manuring to substitute partial chemical fertilizer simultaneously improving crop productivity and soil quality in a double-rice cropping system</article-title>. <source>Eur. J. Agron.</source> <volume>142</volume>, <fpage>126641</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.eja.2022.126641</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B85">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>He</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wei</surname>
<given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gao</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2025</year>). <article-title>Integrating green manure and fertilizer reduction strategies to enhance soil carbon sequestration and crop yield: evidence from a two-season pot experiment</article-title>. <source>Front. Sustain. Food Syst.</source> <volume>8</volume>, <fpage>1514409</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fsufs.2024.1514409</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B86">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zoghlami</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pa&#xeb;s</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Lignocellulosic biomass: understanding recalcitrance and predicting hydrolysis</article-title>. <source>Front. Chem.</source> <volume>7</volume>, <fpage>874</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fchem.2019.00874</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31921787</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
<fn-group>
<fn fn-type="custom" custom-type="edited-by">
<p>
<bold>Edited by:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/93060/overview">Jose Navarro Pedre&#xf1;o</ext-link>, Miguel Hern&#xe1;ndez University of Elche, Spain</p>
</fn>
</fn-group>
<sec id="s12">
<title>Glossary</title>
<def-list>
<def-item>
<term id="G1-sjss.2026.16036">
<bold>ADF</bold>
</term>
<def>
<p>acid detergent fiber</p>
</def>
</def-item>
<def-item>
<term id="G2-sjss.2026.16036">
<bold>ADL</bold>
</term>
<def>
<p>acid detergent lignin</p>
</def>
</def-item>
<def-item>
<term id="G3-sjss.2026.16036">
<bold>ADL_NC</bold>
</term>
<def>
<p>ratio of ADL to plant nitrous compounds</p>
</def>
</def-item>
<def-item>
<term id="G4-sjss.2026.16036">
<bold>ARS</bold>
</term>
<def>
<p>soil arylsulfatase</p>
</def>
</def-item>
<def-item>
<term id="G5-sjss.2026.16036">
<bold>C</bold>
</term>
<def>
<p>plant carbon content</p>
</def>
</def-item>
<def-item>
<term id="G6-sjss.2026.16036">
<bold>Cacq</bold>
</term>
<def>
<p>soil carbon acquisition ratio</p>
</def>
</def-item>
<def-item>
<term id="G7-sjss.2026.16036">
<bold>CEL</bold>
</term>
<def>
<p>cellulose</p>
</def>
</def-item>
<def-item>
<term id="G8-sjss.2026.16036">
<bold>CF</bold>
</term>
<def>
<p>crude fiber</p>
</def>
</def-item>
<def-item>
<term id="G9-sjss.2026.16036">
<bold>CH</bold>
</term>
<def>
<p>content of carbohydrates</p>
</def>
</def-item>
<def-item>
<term id="G10-sjss.2026.16036">
<bold>Cox_N</bold>
</term>
<def>
<p>ratio of soil oxidizable carbon to total nitrogen</p>
</def>
</def-item>
<def-item>
<term id="G11-sjss.2026.16036">
<bold>DM</bold>
</term>
<def>
<p>dry matter</p>
</def>
</def-item>
<def-item>
<term id="G12-sjss.2026.16036">
<bold>GLU</bold>
</term>
<def>
<p>soil &#x3b2;-glucosidase</p>
</def>
</def-item>
<def-item>
<term id="G13-sjss.2026.16036">
<bold>HCEL</bold>
</term>
<def>
<p>hemicellulose</p>
</def>
</def-item>
<def-item>
<term id="G14-sjss.2026.16036">
<bold>K</bold>
</term>
<def>
<p>soil potassium</p>
</def>
</def-item>
<def-item>
<term id="G15-sjss.2026.16036">
<bold>Mg</bold>
</term>
<def>
<p>soil magnesium</p>
</def>
</def-item>
<def-item>
<term id="G16-sjss.2026.16036">
<bold>NAG</bold>
</term>
<def>
<p>soil N-acetyl-&#x3b2;-D-glucosaminidase</p>
</def>
</def-item>
<def-item>
<term id="G17-sjss.2026.16036">
<bold>Nacq</bold>
</term>
<def>
<p>soil nitrogen acquisition ratio</p>
</def>
</def-item>
<def-item>
<term id="G18-sjss.2026.16036">
<bold>NC</bold>
</term>
<def>
<p>plant nitrous compounds</p>
</def>
</def-item>
<def-item>
<term id="G19-sjss.2026.16036">
<bold>p</bold>
</term>
<def>
<p>p-value of statistical significance</p>
</def>
</def-item>
<def-item>
<term id="G20-sjss.2026.16036">
<bold>P</bold>
</term>
<def>
<p>total soil phosphorus</p>
</def>
</def-item>
<def-item>
<term id="G21-sjss.2026.16036">
<bold>PCA</bold>
</term>
<def>
<p>Principal component analysis</p>
</def>
</def-item>
<def-item>
<term id="G22-sjss.2026.16036">
<bold>pH</bold>
</term>
<def>
<p>soil pH</p>
</def>
</def-item>
<def-item>
<term id="G23-sjss.2026.16036">
<bold>Phos</bold>
</term>
<def>
<p>soil phosphatase</p>
</def>
</def-item>
<def-item>
<term id="G24-sjss.2026.16036">
<bold>PNP</bold>
</term>
<def>
<p>p-nitrophenol</p>
</def>
</def-item>
<def-item>
<term id="G25-sjss.2026.16036">
<bold>r</bold>
</term>
<def>
<p>correlation coefficient</p>
</def>
</def-item>
<def-item>
<term id="G26-sjss.2026.16036">
<bold>Rad</bold>
</term>
<def>
<p>radish</p>
</def>
</def-item>
<def-item>
<term id="G27-sjss.2026.16036">
<bold>RB</bold>
</term>
<def>
<p>residual biomass</p>
</def>
</def-item>
<def-item>
<term id="G28-sjss.2026.16036">
<bold>Saf</bold>
</term>
<def>
<p>safflower</p>
</def>
</def-item>
<def-item>
<term id="G29-sjss.2026.16036">
<bold>TC</bold>
</term>
<def>
<p>soil total carbon content</p>
</def>
</def-item>
<def-item>
<term id="G30-sjss.2026.16036">
<bold>TN</bold>
</term>
<def>
<p>soil total nitrogen content</p>
</def>
</def-item>
<def-item>
<term id="G31-sjss.2026.16036">
<bold>Ure</bold>
</term>
<def>
<p>soil urease</p>
</def>
</def-item>
<def-item>
<term id="G32-sjss.2026.16036">
<bold>Wmu</bold>
</term>
<def>
<p>white mustard</p>
</def>
</def-item>
</def-list>
</sec>
</back>
</article>