AUTHOR=Ndong Abdourahmane , Diallo Adja Coumba , Falola Adebayo , Ndiaye Mamadou Arame , Faye Magatte , Faye Pape Mamadou , Niasse Abdou , Fall Sidy Mouhamed Abdoulaye , Cissé Mamadou , Diop Papa Saloum , Konaté Ibrahima 

TITLE=Choice of Surgical Technique in Groin Hernia Surgery Among Residents in Senegal: Experience and Influencing Factors

JOURNAL=Journal of Abdominal Wall Surgery

VOLUME=Volume 4 - 2025

YEAR=2025

URL=https://www.frontierspartnerships.org/journals/journal-of-abdominal-wall-surgery/articles/10.3389/jaws.2025.14076

DOI=10.3389/jaws.2025.14076

ISSN=2813-2092

ABSTRACT=IntroductionGroin hernia repair is a common surgical procedure globally, with several techniques developed to minimize complications, pain, and recurrence. In Senegal, despite advancements, the adoption of minimally invasive techniques remains limited. This study evaluates the factors influencing surgical technique choice among surgical residents in Senegal.MethodsWe conducted a national cross-sectional survey from July 1 to July 15, 2024. The survey targeted surgical residents in Senegal specializing in general surgery and urology, utilizing contact information from resident associations. A structured questionnaire covered demographic data, knowledge and experience with hernia repair techniques, and factors influencing technique choice. Statistical analysis was performed using R software, with descriptive statistics summarizing the data.ResultsA total of 74 residents participated, with an average age of 31.3 ± 3.5 years. The Bassini repair was the most commonly known (100%), witnessed (97.3%), and performed technique (94.2%) among residents, followed by the Lichtenstein technique. Minimally invasive techniques, such as TAPP and TEP, were less familiar and rarely performed. Factors influencing technique choice included training (90.5%), ease of performance (63.5%), time required (58.1%), and cost (51.4%).ConclusionThis study highlights a preference for open hernia repair techniques among residents in Senegal, particularly the Bassini and Lichtenstein techniques, due to cost-effectiveness and accessibility. Limited training and resources constrain the adoption of minimally invasive techniques, underscoring the need for enhanced access to resources and training to align with global standards.