Transpl IntTransplant InternationalTranspl Int1432-2277Frontiers Media S.A.1095510.3389/ti.2023.10955Health ArchiveReviewTolerance Induction in Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation—A Brief Review of Preclinical ModelsHuelsboemer et al.Tolerance Induction in VCA—A Brief Review of Preclinical ModelsHuelsboemerLioba12*†Kauke-NavarroMartin1†ReuterStefan3StoegnerViola A.14FeldmannJan2HirschTobias56KueckelhausMaximilian56‡DermietzelAlexander56‡1Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States2Institute of Musculoskeletal Medicine, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany3Division of General Internal Medicine, Nephrology and Rheumatology, Department of Medicine D, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany4Department of Plastic, Aesthetic, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hanover, Germany5Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, Institute of Musculoskeletal Medicine, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany6Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Hand Surgery, Fachklinik Hornheide, Münster, Germany*Correspondence: Lioba Huelsboemer, lioba@huelsboemer.de
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
Pre-clinical studies are an obligatory tool to develop and translate novel therapeutic strategies into clinical practice. Acute and chronic rejection mediated by the recipient’s immune system remains an important limiting factor for the (long-term) survival of vascularized composite allografts (VCA). Furthermore, high intensity immunosuppressive (IS) protocols are needed to mitigate the immediate and long-term effects of rejection. These IS regiments can have significant side-effects such as predisposing transplant recipients to infections, organ dysfunction and malignancies. To overcome these problems, tolerance induction has been proposed as one strategy to reduce the intensity of IS protocols and to thereby mitigate long-term effects of allograft rejection. In this review article, we provide an overview about animal models and strategies that have been used to induce tolerance. The induction of donor-specific tolerance was achieved in preclinical animal models and clinical translation may help improve short and long-term outcomes in VCAs in the future.
To date, about 150 vascularized composite allotransplants (VCAs) including over 40 face and 120 extremity transplantations, have been performed worldwide. Approximately 40 VCA programs across five continents have been established to date, and more VCA centers are anticipated to be established in the future (1,2).
In the field of reconstructive surgery, the geometric uniqueness and often resulting functional deficit of a composite tissue defect are major challenges. Vascularized composite allotransplantation (e.g., facial VCA) has revolutionized restoration of form and function of the most complex defects. For example, facial transplantation can now be offered to selected patients at experienced centers with reproducible results (3-5). However, acute and chronic rejection as well as the resulting need for life-long multidrug immunosuppression (IS) limit the more widespread use of this revolutionary biotechnology.
Side-effects related to these IS protocols (e.g., increased susceptibility to infection, malignancy, and organ dysfunction) continue to adversely affect the risk-benefit ratio transplants, particularly in case of VCA which is not a lifesaving but rather a life-giving procedure.
In this context, tolerance induction, the long-term immunosuppression-free graft acceptance without clinical or histological evidence of rejection, has become the topic of many preclinical and clinical research endeavors. The strategy of tolerance induction is often viewed as the holy grail of achieving improved transplant outcomes for example by preventing or slowing the development of chronic rejection, which is still an important long-term cause of graft loss in solid organ transplantation and presumably also in VCA (6,7).
Given the inherent complexity and diversity of VCA procedures, different animal models have been established and evaluated, while additional models are being developed to help answer specific VCA related immunological questions. We present a brief review of the most commonly used preclinical approaches of tolerance induction in the field of VCA.
Tolerance Induction in VCA
Tolerance induction strategies can be broadly categorized into cell- and pharmaceutical based strategies. The goal is to achieve graft acceptance and minimize the need for less specific and highly toxic systemic immunosuppression such as tacrolimus and MMF. The interest in cell-based strategies has been increasing over the past 10 years. Cell-based strategies include the use of stem (e.g.,: bone marrow transplant-derived, mesenchymal stem cells) and/or immune cells (e.g.,: dendritic cells, T reg cells) plus usually a co-administration of a drug therapy regimen (8). Figure 1 illustrates standard tolerance induction strategies that have been used in preclinical models of VCA. The goal of stem cell-based therapies is the establishment of mixed chimerism which was described in detail in 1988 by Sykes and Sachs as a phenomenon of host and donor bone marrow-derived cell coexistance (9). For example, mixed chimerism can be induced by transfer of donor hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) from bone marrow or cytokine-mobilized peripheral stem cells. Typically, the recipient is conditioned in order to control alloreactivity and generate space for donor HSCs engraftment. The co-existence of donor and recipients HSC is thought to promote donor-specific tolerance while maintaining immunocompetence (10,11).
Figure shows cell-based tolerance induction approaches in VCA. Bone marrow transplantation with donor-derived stem cells can induce mixed chimerism and thereby induce tolerance (A), vascularized bone marrow as continuous source for donor derived hematopoietic cells might be able to help minimize immunosuppressants (B) and mesenchymal stem cells extracted from adipose tissue (C) are already tested in VCA to induce tolerance through mixed chimerism and direct effects on the graft. The extraction of Treg cells (D), modification into CAR-Tcells using CRISPR/C9 and infusion into humans is tested in clinical trials with SOT so far and seems to be a promising approach to induce tolerance in VCA. CAR-Tcells can recognize MHC-I on donor cells and block their interaction with the recipient´s immune system to prevent rejection (Figure created with BioRender.com).
Mixed chimerism alone was shown to not consistently achieve tolerance induction and thus Leonard et al. described different approaches achieving mixed chimerism combined with adjuvant cellular therapies leading to tolerance induction in pigs (3,10). The longest tolerance induction through establishment of mixed chimerism was demonstrated in a pig model by Leonard et al. (12,13) in 2015 (14) after performing VCA in stable mixed chimerism or concurrent with induction of mixed chimerism following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Both groups showed no signs of rejection up to 504 days after transplantation.
To achieve a continuous supply of donor derived bone marrow elements, Barth et al. further analyzed the role of vascularized bone in a heterotopic partial face transplantat model in NHPs (15). VCA containing vascularized bone not only led to prolonged, but rejection free graft survival (430 days) compared to VCA without vascularized bone (7 days). Schneeberger et al. developed the “Pittsburg Protocol” as an approach in humans following upper-extremity transplantation. Bone marrow cell-based treatment allowed a maintenance low-dose immunosuppression protocol compared to conventional protocols (16). However, long-term results have not been published and further studies are needed to evaluate the safety and reliability of this approach.
Conditioning of the recipient entails toxic side effects, thus approaches of bone marrow infusion-mediated immunomodulation without the necessity of conditioning are studied at the time (17). In this context other immune cells have been studied. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are multipotent stem cells that can differentiate into mesenchymal cell lineages. MSCs are derived from the bone marrow but can also be extracted from for example adipose tissue (= adipose derived MSCs) and have shown promising immunomodulatory effects by regulation of T-cell proliferation and inhibition of dendritic cell differentiation as they interact with the innate and adaptive immune system (18). Not only can MSCs induce mixed chimerism in the recipient, but they can also modulate cytokine expression in VCAs and hereby may be able to prolong graft survival(19). Promising results have been shown in small and large animal models, and clinical trials using mesenchymal stem cells have been established in solid organ transplants with promising results (8).
Ongoing clinical trials in humans evaluate the potential of dendritic cells as major regulator of the human immune system. An injection of immature dendritic cells was shown to have an immunosuppressant effect and to achieve inhibition of memory T cells (20). Another promising approach is the use regulatory T-cells. Tregs help maintain and regulate self-tolerance, antimicrobial resistance, tumor immunity and transplant rejection. Tregs exert their immunosuppressive effects via cell-to-cell interaction with target immune cells, via removal of IL-2 (potent factor in T cell survival and growth), via anti-inflammatory molecules (TGF-beta) or through costimulatory pathways such as binding to cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4. Nevertheless, irregularity in Tregs can lead to autoimmune disorders, reduced disease tolerance or higher risk for cancer(21). Recent studies have investigated the potential therapeutic value of genetically modified patient-derived Tregs, such as antigen-specific Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR)-Tregs, targeting for example MHC-class I expressed by donor cells. Tregs can be isolated from patient´s blood samples, cultured and expanded to produce for example CAR-Treg cells. Those conditioned T cells can be infused into the patient. Clinical trials did show the safety, efficacy, and proof of concept of Treg therapy in kidney and liver transplantation (22). The engineering of Tcells (e.g.: CAR-Tregs) might be a promising supplementary treatment of rejection in the future. CAR-T cells are typically designed to recognize donor MHC molecules, thus localizing to donor tissues and exerting their regulatory effects in a precise and targeted manner (21).
Pharmaceutical therapy regimens are the current gold standard in VCA and are mostly modifications of regimens that have already been established in SOT (23). Usually, an induction therapy (e.g.,: Anti-Thymoglobulin, Alemtuzumab) is administered first and a maintenance immunosuppressive regimen (Tacrolimus, Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF), Prednisone) is given (8). Anti-Thymocyte globulin (ATG) is used as induction agent in most cases and leads to decreased T-cell mediated rejection (10). The maintaining therapy of the calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) Tacrolimus, Corticosteroids (Prednisone) and MMF (inhibits proliferation of lymphocytes) often involves side effects such as myopathy, diabetes mellitus, impaired kidney function, abdominal pain or diarrhea. Aside from the standard immunosuppressive regiments, other pharmaceutical approaches have been tested, for example tolerance inducing medications.
Cell mediated graft rejection in VCA is fueled by the CD28 and CD80/86 co-stimulatory pathway of T-cells (Figure 2). Preventing or interfering with co-stimulation of T cells is an approach for improved allograft survival and a more specific pharmaceutical approach that may cause less severe side effects compared to the conventional approaches (11). CD28 surface T-cell receptors communicate with antigen-presenting cells through CD80 and CD86 ligands and evokes both T-cell proliferation and pro-inflammatory pathways. Drugs like Belatacept or Abatacept are already established anti-rejection medications used in humans to interfere with co-stimulatory pathways. Both inhibit the costimulatory pathway through CTLA4-Ig or CD 125 (Fusion protein of cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 Immunoglobulin and IgG1 Fc) by inhibiting the linking of CD28 (T-cell surface) and CD80/86 (APC surface) (15,17). Belatacept can serve as replacement for CNI after kidney transplantation as side effects appear to be less than with CNI. Belatacept is already in clinical application following hand and/or face transplantation along with low dose of CNI/MMF/prednisone. Subsidiary, topical administration of immunosuppression might also reduce the systematically dosage of immunosuppressants. Tacrolimus and steroids are available as creams or mouthwashes as “transplant-targeted therapy” and show promising results in first approaches (8).
Left (A) demonstrates physiologic naïve T-cell activation. Antigen presenting cells (APC) interact with the CD28 surface receptor of naïve T-cells with their ligands CD80/86 while the antigen is presented to the T-cell. This interaction will promote T-cell proliferation and activation of cellular inflammatory pathways. (B) With the use of Belatacept (second-generation CTLA4-Ig) the costimulatory interaction between APC and T-cell can be altered. Belatacept blocks the interaction of CD28 with CD80/86 by binding to CD80/86. This interaction limits the activation of T-cells and was shown to reduce alloreactivity and thereby prolong allograft survival (Figure created with BioRender.com).
Large Versus Small Animal Model
Rodent models are of great value especially in VCA research and are most popular for preclinical studies as they allow precise genetic breeding, are easy to reproduce and handle, produce low costs in housing and breeding and enable therefore larger study groups. The majority of the described animal models in this article used rat models and most commonly the hindlimb model was used. Mice allow more precise genetic manipulation which makes analysis of immunological mechanisms easier when compared to other small animal models. However, disadvantages of rat and mice models are related to their smaller size in terms of anatomic structures and the lack of similarity to the human immune system. Furthermore, the results of rodent models have often failed to be successfully transferred to large animal models or human trials (8). In addition, their short lifespan can make it difficult to truly assess long-term graft survival. Most importantly, the development of a naive immune system in largely germ-free laboratory environments and the lack of class II antigen expression on rodent vascular endothelium suggests a fundamentally different immune system than that of humans (11, 24-27).
Large animals are suited as preclinical models as they allow evaluation of a hypothesis in a complex system that has strong similarities to humans in terms of anatomical structures, size, and immune responses, making data potentially more reliable for translation to humans (28). Swine models also allow genetic manipulation to control for example the degree of MHC mismatch in transplantation and share great similarity with humans in structure, cellular and antigenic attributes in skin (8). NHP models are also of great value as they are even more similar in human anatomy than pigs and showed similar transplant rejection to humans. Hand transplantation is feasible and did show good motor function in NHPs (29). Disadvantages are cost and for example with primates’ ethical concerns, slower reproductive cycles. Especially the skin of humans and pigs show a great similarity which is even more important with skin being a crucial part of VCA and complicating factor on the way to long-term graft survival and tolerance induction. Having a great similarity with pig skin makes pig animal model most valuable for research. Finally, the high costs of livestock breeding and research in large animals, the ethical status in NHP models on the one hand and the simplicity of reproducibility, handling of rodents and low costs on the other hand may explain why most research groups are using rodents.
Mouse Models
Costimulatory Blockade (CoB) takes advantage of the mechanism that naïve helper and cytotoxic Tcells must be activated through different pathways to become effector T-cells that can ultimately promote graft rejection. Antibodies, antigens, and immunosuppressive drugs (e.g.: Belatacept) can inhibit T-cell costimulatory pathways and, combined with adjuvant strategies such as total body irradiation (TBI) or stem cell transplantation, may induce mixed chimerism and thereby induce graft tolerance in VCA (10). Tolerance induction in all mice models described here (Table 1) was achieved via drug-based strategies utilizing costimulatory blockade in combination with adjuvant stem cell and/or TBI therapy regimen. Tolerance has been successfully induced up to 120–210 days in all mouse models described in this article. Five out of six models used an osteomyocutaneous hindlimb allograft transplant model while one used a full-thickness skin graft model without inclusion of bone or muscles. Lin et al. (2016) and Anggelia et al. (2021) showed successful induction of donor-specific tolerance (survival >120 days) by application of CoB (anti-CD154, CTLA4-Ig) with a short treatment of rapamycin (30,31). Both studies achieved graft survival up to 120 days. Lin et al. (2021) added high-dose bone marrow transplantation cells to the regimen of CoB (anti-CD154, CTLA4-Ig) and rapamycin and induced tolerance by mixed chimerism for >120 days in vascular bone marrow transplantation (32). Oh et al. (2020) combined the CoB (anti-CD154, CTLA4-Ig) with TBI and demonstrated tolerance induction and a depletion of alloreactive T cells for >210 days. Depletion of alloreactive T cells appears to be a promising mechanism for long-term graft feasibility and a key to long-term viability in this approach (33). Lin et al. (2013) used a different approach in vitro; the group used a donor antigen-specific CD4−CD8− double negative Treg-based therapy plus anti-lymphocyte serum (ALS) plus rapamycin plus Il-2/Fc fusion proteins and showed tolerance induction in VCA but interestingly not in full thickness grafts (34). Davis et al. (2014) applied adipose-derived stromal cells (ASC) with non-myeloablative low-dose busulfan plus anti-CD4/CD8 and induced tolerance for >180 days as well as mixed macrochimerism (35). The longest graft survival plus depletion of alloreactive Tcells for over 210 days could be shown via CoB plus TBI 1 day before surgery by Oh et al (2020). This approach is furthermore relinquishing immunosuppressants which could be a promising in terms of that patients are mostly young and healthy when receiving VCA and therefore suffer a lot from long-term toxic side effects.
VCA models with detailed therapy regimen in Mice, all models developed tolerance induction.
Mouse: VCA model
Donor
Recipient
Therapy regimen
Days of survival
Results
Ref
Osteomyocutaneous VCA or full thickness skin (FTS) transplantation fully MHC mismatched
DBA/2
C57BL/6
Skin grafting each n = 3: I = ALS & Rapa (n = 3), II = ALS, Rapa & DN, IV = ALS, Rapa, IL-2 & DN
10–180
Antigen-induced CD4 derived DN Tregs and a short course of anti-lymphocyte serum, rapamycin and IL-2/Fc fusion protein results in tolerance in VCA but not FTS allografts
(34)
VCA each n = 5: I = untreated, II = Rapa, III = Rapa & IL-2, IV = Rapa & DN, V= Rapa, IL-2 & DN, VI = ALS, Rapa & IL-2, VII = ALS, Rapa, IL-2 & DN
Osteomyocutaneous allografts (OMC)
Balb/c (H2d)
C57BL/6 (H2b)
I = without Treg depletion (n = 15), all other groups received anti-CD154, CTLA4-Ig & Rapa: II = POD 0 (n = 7), III = POD 30 (n = 7), IV = POD 90 (n = 7)
50–180
80% of VCA receipients with CoB & Rapa developed tolerance, 20% showed signs of rejection
(31)
Full-thickness trunk skin grafts
Balb/c
C57BL/6
I = untreated control (n = 10), II = conditioning therapy only (n = 10), III = conditioned with skin transplantation received ASCs (n = 6), IV = conditioned with skin transplantation received ASCs & BMCs (n = 12) Conditioning: anti-CD4 & anti CD8 monoclonal Anti bodies and non-myeloablative low dose busulfan
17–58
BMCs &ASCs results in skin allograft survival and mixed donor-recipient macrochimerism
(35)
Osteomyocutaneous allografts (alloOMCs) or myocutaneous allografts (alloMC)
Balb/c (H2d)
C57BL/6 (H2b)
I = alloMC with 1.5 × 10^8 CBMT (n = 6), II = alloMC with 3 × 10^7 CBMT (n = 6), alloOMC with VBMT (n = 6), IV = syngeneic group OMC without treatment (n = 4), V = alloMC without CBMT (n = 6) All groups received a costimulated blockage: anti-CD154 & CTLA4Ig plus Rapa short-term
62–120
VBMT with CoB & Rapa led to prolonged graft survival (>120 days), high CBMT also led to prolonged graft survival
(32)
Orthotopic hindlimb transplantation and full thickness skin trans-plantation (third party) fully MHC mismatched
Balb/C (H2d) FVB/N (H2q)
C57BL/6 (H2b)
I = untreated (n = 5), II = CTLA4-Ig (n = 4), III = CTLA4-Ig & hamster anti-mouse CD154 mAB (n = 8), IV = TBI 1 day before surgery, CTLA4-Ig & hamster anti-mouse CD154 mAB (n = 6)
8–210
CoB treatment plus TBI 1 day before Surgery increased graft survival (82 days) and showed T cell depletion
(33)
Osteomyocutaneous allografts (alloOMCs) or myocutaneous allografts (alloMC)
Balb/c (H2d)
C57BL/6 (H2b)
I = syngeneic controll (n = 2), II = alloOMC untretead
12–120
Combined CoB and Rapa (Group VI) led to long-term allograft survival (>120 days, 12 out of 15 animals) and same treatment in alloMC (Group III) without vascularized BM showed reduced allograft survival (53 days + - 11.6)
(30)
(n = 5), II = alloMC with anti-CD154, CTLA4Ig & RPM
(n = 6), IV = alloMC with antiCD154, CTLA4Ig (n = 6),
V = alloOMC with Rapa (n = 6), VI = alloOMC with anti
CD154, CTLA4Ig & Rapa (n = 15)
DN, double negative Treg based therapy; ALS, anti-lymphocyte serum; Rapa, rapamycin; ASCs, adipose-derived stromal/stem cells; VBMT, Vascularized bone marrow transplantation; CBMT, conventional bone marrow transplantation; CoB, Costimulated Blockade; BMCs, bone marrow cells.
Rat Models
Tolerance induction was achieved in five out of eight described rat models (Table 2), and stem cells were used in most approaches to obtain longer-term graft survival. In total, four studies used a hindlimb, two a skin flap, one abdominal wall with/without hindlimb and one group an osseomusculuocutanous sternum with/without thymus model. Ramirez et al. (2013) showed a successfully induced tolerance and peripheral chimerism using a regimen of cyclosporine A (CsA), ALS, and adipocyte-derived stem cells (36). Jindal et al. (2015) used human IL-2 fusion protein and combined this regimen with ALS plus CsA (37). This regimen showed the longest graft survival with >150 days plus tolerance induction but no mixed chimerism were analyzed.
VCA models with detailed therapy regimen in Rats.
Rat: VCA model
Donor
Recipient
Therapy regimen
Days os survival
Results
Ref
Hindlimb, orthotopic
BN, RT1u
LEW, TR1l
Five groups received different circles of treatment n = 4 ALS, n = 5 CsA, n = 4 CsA + human (h) IL-2/Fc, n = 6 ALS + CsA, n = 5 ALS + CsA + hIL-2/Fc
8–150
hIL-2/Fc in combination with ALS + CsA enables long-term graft survival and induction of tolerance, furthermore hIL-2/Fc leads to increased Treg proliferation & function but no chimerism were analyzed
(37)
Groin flap fully MHC mismatched
ACI, RT1a for flap LEW for BMC
LEW, RT1I rec. flap
N = 8 each: I & II: VCA from ACI donors preconditioned at 24 & 72 hrs, prior to VCA transplant, supported with a 7-day IS protocol of s.c. CsA & i.p. anti-ab-TCR monoclonal antibody, III & IV: VCA from ACI donors precond. at 24 & 72 h, prior to transplantation (no IS). V: VCA from noncond. ACI donor under a 7-day IS of CsA & anti-ab-TCR. VI: VCA from noncond. ACI donor, no IS
8–98
The regimen BMC prior 24 h plus anti-ab-TCR/CsA shows the longest graft survival (80+-18 days) and tolerance induction with mixed chimerism
(41)
ACI received BMC
Osseomusculocutaneous sternum (OMCS, n = 5) or osseomusculocutaneous sternum and thymus (OMCST, n = 5) heterotopic allotransplantation
LEW BN, RT1l
LEW, RT1l
CsA monotherapy (16 mg/kg) tapered to 2 mg/kg and maintained for the duration of the study
150
Study confirms correlation between thymus transplantation and donor-specific chimerism. No signs of rejection in any of the transplants during the 150 days posttransplant (Banff grade 0) but also no tolerance induction
(43)
Heterotopic hindlimb fully MHC mismatched
BN, RT1An
LEW, RT1Al
I = syngeneic control (n = 4); II-VI (each n = 6) = allogeneic VCA with II = no treatment, III = ALG &CsA, IV = ALG, CsA & ADSC, V = ALG, CsA & TBI, VI = ALG, CsA, ADSC & TBI
10–150
150 days of survival in 4 out of 6 rats in group IV & VI, both received infusion of ADSC, tolerance induction was achieved here but no mixed chimerism were analyzed
(39)
Full-thickness hemiabdominal wall (HAW) or hindlimb osteomyocutaneous (HLOMC) or combined HAW/HLOMC flap fully MHC mismatched
BN, RT1An
LEW, RT1Al
I&II = syngeneic controls; III-V = no IS (III = HAW n = 6, IV = HAW/HLOMC n = 4, V=HLOMC n = 4); VI-VIII ALS, CsA & ADSC (VI = HAW n = 8, VII = HAW/HLOMV n = 7, VIII = HLOMC n = 8)
11–150
150 days of survival only in syngeneic control groups; longest survival in group VIII (HLOMC) with 57 +- 21 days, also showed significantly higher peripheral
(36)
Chimerism as well as tolerance induction
Groin flap fully MHC mismatched
ACI RT1A
LEW, RT1Al
n = 6 each group: I = untreated, II = 7 days anti-ab-TCR/CsA, III = DRCC, IV = DRCC plus 7 days anti-ab-TCR monoclonal antibody & CsA
8–125
Longest survival in group IV with 125 days after single application of DRCC plus IS regimen for 7 days. DRCC therapy induces tolerance induction plus peripheral blood chimerism in the VCA recipients
(40)
Inferior epigastric flap
BN, RT1An
LEW, RT1Al
n = 15 each group: I=VCA, II = VCA & hASCs/GFP, III = VCA & hASCs/CCR7
8–17
Targeted migration of hASCs/CCRP7 infusion to secondary lymphoid organs potently prolong the mean survival time of VCA flaps, no chimerism/tolerance was established
(42)
Hindlimb
BN, RT1An
LEW, RT1Al
I = control (n = 5), II = 1 × 10^6 BM-MSCs (n = 6), III = 5 × 10^6 BM MSCs (n = 7),IV = 1 × 10^6 AD-MSCs (n = 8), V = 5 × 10^6 AD-MSCs (n = 9) all recipients: rabbit antirat lymphocyte serum 4 days before & 1 day after surgery, daily Tacrolimus 0–21 days after surgery, single-shot MSC IV on day 1 after surgery
47–120
all cell-treated groups showed prolonged survival, 47% of the MSC-treated exhibited long-term survival of the allograft and tolerance induction (>120 days). Peripheral blood chimerism were only transient
Plock et al. (2015) changed the regimen to only a short course of FK-506 plus either adipose- or bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells and induced tolerance as well as long-term graft survival and transient mixed chimerism (>120 days) (38). Cheng et al. (2013) used adipocyte-derived stem cells, CsA and ALS. Tolerance induction and long-term graft survival could be achieved up to 150 days but no mixed chimerism were analyzed (39). A single donor-recipient chimeric cells (DRCC) therapy by ex vivo cell fusion (of bone marrow cells) was applied by Cwykiel et al. (2021) in combination with CsA and antibody therapy and resulted in graft survival of >79 days, tolerance induction plus peripheral chimerism (40). In 2016, Sieminow et al. showed establishment of mixed chimerism by preconditioning recipient bone marrow cells (BMC) followed by anti-α-β-T cell receptor (TCR) monoclonal antibody plus CsA for 7 days post-transplant and achieved a median graft survival of 90 days plus tolerance induction (41). Ma et al. (2019) demonstrated a potential attenuation of rejection by infusion of human adipose-derived stem cells (hASC) plus chemokine receptor 7 (CCR7). CCR7 was able to guide hASC to secondary lymphoid organs to have immunomodulatory effects on Tcells. Chimerism or tolerance induction have not been established (42). Zor et al. (2020) analyzed the role of a simultaneous thymus transplantation. Chimerism were detectable >150 days posttransplant under continuous CsA therapy in an osseomusculoutaneous sternum and thymus allotransplantation, but without induction of tolerance (43). The longest survival with simultaneously induction of tolerance here was shown by Cheng et al. (2013) with a regimen of adipose-derived stem cells, CsA and ALS with or without TBI. Unfortunately, the establishment of mixed chimerism has not been analyzed. Most approaches here show that using stem cell therapies can induce tolerance and graft survival.
Swine Models
In swine (Table 3), tolerance induction was attempted by establishing mixed chimerism with and without co-stimulatory blockage. One group used a full-skin flap, the second group used an osteomyocutaneos flap. Leonard et al. (2014) successfully induced tolerance in their large animal model. The recipient was preconditioned by T-cell depletion plus TBI, followed by hematopoietic cell transplantation. VCA was either performed into stable mixed chimerism or after establishing of mixed chimerism 85–105 days later. After transplantation, a 45-day course of CsA was given. No signs of rejection were seen between 115–504 days posttransplant (14). Lellouch et al. (2022) showed tolerance induction by mixed chimerism across MHC class-I-mismatch up to 400 days posttransplant. Treatment was TBI and thymic irradiation 2 days before surgery. Bone marrow transplantation was performed on the day of surgery, followed by co-stimulatory blockade (CTLA4-Ig + FK405) for 30 days and treatment of anti-IL6R monoclonal antibody (mAb) plus methylprednisolone (44). Both approaches show promising results in terms of long-term graft survival, similarity to the human immune system and absence of long-term immunosuppression and serve as proof of concept in a preclinical large animal model.
VCA models with detailed therapy regimen in Swine, both induced tolerance.
Swine: VCA model
Donor
Recipient
Therapy regimen
Days of survival
Results
Ref
Fasciocutaneous flap (MGH miniature swine)
SLAacPAA+
SLAadPAA-
T cell depletion with CD3-immunotoxin,
115–504
Both VCAs (transplanted into stable chimerism n = 4 and transplanted at time of hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) n = 2) showed no signs of rejection following withdrawl of immunosuppression and stable mixed chimerism
(14)
100 cGy TBI prior to HCT, 45-day course of CsA
Osteomyocutaneous flap matched for class II SLA, mismatched for class I SLA (MGH miniature swine)
PAA+
PAA-
300cGy total body irradiation +700cGy thymic irradiation, following bone marrow transplantation, co-stimulated blockade using CTLA4-Ig + FK506
400
3 out of 5 animals achieved long-term survival without Immunosuppression, 2 recipients developed idiopathic pneumonia-like syndrome (euthanized 36–39
(44)
POD), tolerance induction and mixed chimerism was achieved
CsA, Cyclosporine A.
NHP Model
As described above, to have a continuous source for donor stem cells, vascularized bone marrow transplantation might be an approach to induce tolerance through establishment of mixed chimerism (continuous source of donor-derived hematopoietic stem cells). This approach was tested by Barth et al. (Table 4) as he further analyzed the role of vascularized bone marrow transplantation (VBM) in a VCA model with a heterotopic partial face transplantation in NHPs. VCA containing vascularized bone not only led to prolonged, but also rejection free graft survival (430 days) compared to VCA without vascularized bone (7 days). However, withdrawal of immunosuppressants led to graft loss and tolerance induction was not achieved but VBM enabled a low dose maintenance immunosuppressants regimen and sporadic macrochimerism were detected (15). Although this approach was unable to achieve tolerance induction through mixed chimerism, these results serve as proof of concept. However, stable macro or micro chimerism has not been documented in human VCA. Further studies are necessary, for example on how to enhance the ability of vascularized bone marrow to induce chimerism, e.g., via Treg modulative strategies to increase acceptance of donor derived hematopoietic stem cells (21).
VCA model with detailed therapy regimen in Non-Human Primate (NHP); vascularized bone marrow (VBM), bone marrow cells (BMC) infusion.
NHP: VCA model
Donor
Recipient
Therapy regimen
Days of survival
Results
Ref
Heterotopic partial face transplantation with (n = 4)/without vascularized bone (n = 3) (mandible segment)
Cynomolgus macaques
Tacrolimus IV/IM plus MMF OV/orally and all daily
7–430
VCA with vascularized bone led to prolonged rejection-free graft survival and showed sporadic macrochimerism; no tolerance induction as graft was rejected after withdrawal but low dose maintenance of immunosuppression could be achieved
(15)
MHC class I-mismatched
Conclusion
Both small and large animal models are relevant for preclinical VCA research. Small animal models are advantageous because of low costs in breeding and housing and especially mice are well suited for analysis of immunological mechanisms. Large animal models offer greater similarity to human immune system and human anatomy, but models tend to be more complex and cost intensive. Tolerance induction in preclinical models was achieved using both cellular based and pharmaceutical based strategies. Clinical translation of such strategies to human trials has yet to be done successfully, however, the induction of donor-specific tolerance may ultimately help improve the risk benefit ratio of VCA transplantation.
Author Contributions
LH and MK-N contributed to conducting and writing this review as shared first co-authors. VS and JF contributed in data analysis and literature research. MK-N, AD, SR, MK and TH contributed in research design and input on the manuscript. MK and AD supervised the manuscript process as shared last authors. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Conflict of Interest
LH is a recipient of a scholarship (Walter-Benjamin) from the German Research Foundation (DFG).
The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
ReferencesThuongMPetruzzoPLandinLMahilloBKaySTestelinSVascularized Composite Allotransplantation - a Council of Europe Position Paper. (2019) 32(3):233–40. 10.1111/tri.13370TchiloembaBKaukeMHaugVAbdulrazzakOSafiAFKollarBLong-term Outcomes after Facial Allotransplantation: Systematic Review of the Literature. (2020) 105(8):1869–80. 10.1097/TP.0000000000003513KaukeMSafiAFZhegibeAHaugVKollarBNelmsLMucosa and Rejection in Facial Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation: A Systematic Review. (2020) 104(12):2616–24. 10.1097/TP.0000000000003171KaukeMPanayiACSafiAFHaugVPerryBKollarBFull Facial Retransplantation in a Female Patient—Technical, Immunologic, and Clinical Considerations. (2021) 21(10):3472–80. 10.1111/ajt.16696KaukeMPanayiACTchiloembaBDiehmYFHaugVKollarBFace Transplantation in a Black Patient — Racial Considerations and Early Outcomes. (2021) 384(11):1075–6. 10.1056/NEJMc2033961LeonardDACetruloCLMcGroutherDASachsDH. Induction of Tolerance of Vascularized Composite Allografts. (2013) 95(3):403–9. 10.1097/TP.0b013e31826d886dRavindraKv.XuHBozulicLDSongDDIldstadST. The Need for Inducing Tolerance in Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation. (2012) 2012:438078–11. 10.1155/2012/438078KaukeMSafiAFPanayiACPalmerWJHaugVKollarBA Systematic Review of Immunomodulatory Strategies Used in Skin-Containing Preclinical Vascularized Composite Allotransplant Models. (2022) 75(2):586–604. 10.1016/j.bjps.2021.11.003SykesMSachsDH. Mixed Allogeneic Chimerism as an Approach to Transplantation Tolerance. (1988) 9(1):23–7. 10.1016/0167-5699(88)91352-7GiannisDMorisDCendalesLC. Costimulation Blockade in Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation. (2020) 11:544186. 10.3389/fimmu.2020.544186PilatNSayeghMHWekerleT. Costimulatory Pathways in Transplantation. (2011) 23(4):293–303. 10.1016/j.smim.2011.04.002LeonardDAMcGroutherDAKurtzJMCetruloCL. Tolerance Induction Strategies in Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation: Mixed Chimerism and Novel Developments. (2012) 2012:863264–8. 10.1155/2012/863264SachsDHKawaiTSykesM. Induction of Tolerance through Mixed Chimerism. (2014) 4(1):a015529. 10.1101/cshperspect.a015529LeonardDAKurtzJMMallardCAlbrittonADuRan-StRuuckRFarkashEAVascularized Composite Allograft Tolerance across MHC Barriers in a Large Animal Model. (2014) 14(2):343–55. 10.1111/ajt.12560BarthRNRodriguezEDMundingerGSNamAJHaJSHui-ChouHVascularized Bone Marrow-Based Immunosuppression Inhibits Rejection of Vascularized Composite Allografts in Nonhuman Primates. (2011) 11(7):1407–16. 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2011.03551.xSchneebergerSGorantlaVSBrandacherGZeeviADemetrisAJLunzJGUpper-Extremity Transplantation Using a Cell-Based Protocol to Minimize Immunosuppression. (2013) 257(2):345–51. 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31826d90bbJohnstoneBHMessnerFBrandacherGWoodsEJ. A Large-Scale Bank of Organ Donor Bone Marrow and Matched Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Promoting Immunomodulation and Transplant Tolerance. (2021) 12:622604. 10.3389/fimmu.2021.622604KuoY-RChenC-CGotoSLinP-YWeiF-CChenC-L. Mesenchymal Stem Cells as Immunomodulators in a Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation. (2012) 2012:854846–8. 10.1155/2012/854846HeyesRIarocciATchoukalovaYLottDG. Immunomodulatory Role of Mesenchymal Stem Cell Therapy in Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation. (2016) 2016:6951693–10. 10.1155/2016/6951693VyasKMohanAMorrisonSTranDMardiniS. Cell-Based Therapies in Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation. (2018) 34(08):642–50. 10.1055/s-0038-1661336Kauke-NavarroMKnoedlerSPanayiACKnoedlerLNoelOFPomahacB. Regulatory T Cells: Liquid and Living Precision Medicine for the Future of VCA. (2023) 107(1):86–97. 10.1097/TP.0000000000004342QuGChenJLiYYuanYLiangRLiB. Current Status and Perspectives of Regulatory T Cell-Based Therapy. (2022) 49(7):599–611. 10.1016/j.jgg.2022.05.005Schutte-NutgenKTholkingGSuwelackBReuterS. Tacrolimus - Pharmacokinetic Considerations for Clinicians. (2018) 19(4):342–50. 10.2174/1389200219666180101104159PageEKDarWAKnechtleSJ. Tolerogenic Therapies in Transplantation. (2012) 3:198. 10.3389/fimmu.2012.00198MathesDWNolandMGravesSSchlenkerRMiwongtumTStorbR. A Preclinical Canine Model for Composite Tissue Transplantation. (2010) 26(3):201–7. 10.1055/s-0030-1247717PoberJSMerolaJLiuRManesTD. Antigen Presentation by Vascular Cells. (2017) 8:1907. 10.3389/fimmu.2017.01907ThelemannCHallerSBlyszczukPKaniaGRosaMErikssonUAbsence of Nonhematopoietic MHC Class II Expression Protects Mice from Experimental Autoimmune Myocarditis. (2016) 46(3):656–64. 10.1002/eji.201545945ShengwuZQingfengLHaoJBanichJKaidingFBensonCDeveloping a Canine Model of Composite Facial/Scalp Allograft Transplantation. (2007) 59(2):185–94. 10.1097/SAP.0b013e31802c79a5BrandacherGGrahammerJSucherRLeeW-PA. Animal Models for Basic and Translational Research in Reconstructive Transplantation. (2012) 96(1):39–50. 10.1002/bdrc.21002LinCHWangYLAnggeliaMRChuangWYChengHYMaoQCombined Anti-CD154/CTLA4Ig Costimulation Blockade-Based Therapy Induces Donor-specific Tolerance to Vascularized Osteomyocutaneous Allografts. (2016) 16(7):2030–41. 10.1111/ajt.13694AnggeliaMRChengHYChuangWYHsiehYHWangAYLLinCHUnraveling the Crucial Roles of FoxP3+ Regulatory T Cells in Vascularized Composite Allograft Tolerance Induction and Maintenance. (2021) 105(6):1238–49. 10.1097/TP.0000000000003509LinC-HAnggeliaMRChengHYWangAYLChuangWYLinCHThe Intragraft Vascularized Bone Marrow Component Plays a Critical Role in Tolerance Induction after Reconstructive Transplantation. (2021) 18(2):363–73. 10.1038/s41423-019-0325-yOhBCFurtmullerGJFryerMLGuoYMessnerFKrapfJVascularized Composite Allotransplantation Combined with Costimulation Blockade Induces Mixed Chimerism and Reveals Intrinsic Tolerogenic Potential. (2020) 5(7):e128560. 10.1172/jci.insight.128560LinCHZhangWNgTWZhangDJiangJPulikkottilBVascularized Osteomyocutaneous Allografts Are Permissive to Tolerance by Induction-Based Immunomodulatory Therapy. (2013) 13(8):2161–8. 10.1111/ajt.12275DavisTAAnamKLazdunYGimbleJMElsterEA. Adipose-derived Stromal Cells Promote Allograft Tolerance Induction. (2014) 3(12):1444–50. 10.5966/sctm.2014-0131RamirezAEChengHYLaoWWWangYLWenCJWallaceCGA Novel Rat Full-Thickness Hemi-Abdominal wall/hindlimb Osteomyocutaneous Combined Flap: Influence of Allograft Mass and Vascularized Bone Marrow Content on Vascularized Composite Allograft Survival. (2014) 27(9):977–86. 10.1111/tri.12364JindalRUnadkatJZhangWZhangDNgTWWangYSpontaneous Resolution of Acute Rejection and Tolerance Induction with IL-2 Fusion Protein in Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation. (2015) 15(5):1231–40. 10.1111/ajt.13118PlockJASchniderJTZhangWSchweizerRTsujiWKosterevaNAdipose- and Bone Marrow–Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells Prolong Graft Survival in Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation. (2015) 99(9):1765–73. 10.1097/TP.0000000000000731ChengH-YGhetuNHuangWCWangYLWallaceCGWenCJSyngeneic Adipose-Derived Stem Cells with Short-Term Immunosuppression Induce Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation Tolerance in Rats. (2014) 16(3):369–80. 10.1016/j.jcyt.2013.06.020CwykielJJundzillAKlimczakAMadajka-NiemeyerMSiemionowM. Donor Recipient Chimeric Cells Induce Chimerism and Extend Survival of Vascularized Composite Allografts. (2021) 69(1):13. 10.1007/s00005-021-00614-9SiemionowMRampazzoAGharbBBCwykielJKlimczakAMadajkaMThe Reversed Paradigm of Chimerism Induction: Donor Conditioning with Recipient-Derived Bone Marrow Cells as a Novel Approach for Tolerance Induction in Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation. (2016) 36(8):676–83. 10.1002/micr.30041MaTLuanSTaoRLuDGuoLLiuJTargeted Migration of Human Adipose-Derived Stem Cells to Secondary Lymphoid Organs Enhances Their Immunomodulatory Effect and Prolongs the Survival of Allografted Vascularized Composites. (2019) 37(12):1581–94. 10.1002/stem.3078ZorFBozkurtMCwykielJKaragozHKulahciYUygurSThe Effect of Thymus Transplantation on Donor‐specific Chimerism in the Rat Model of Composite Osseomusculocutaneous Sternum, Ribs, Thymus, Pectoralis Muscles, and Skin Allotransplantation. (2020) 40(5):576–84. 10.1002/micr.30555LellouchAGAndrewsARSavianeGNgZYScholIMGoutardMTolerance of a Vascularized Composite Allograft Achieved in MHC Class-I-Mismatch Swine via Mixed Chimerism. (2022) 13:829406. 10.3389/fimmu.2022.829406