NF-κB Signaling in Tumor Pathways Focusing on Breast and Ovarian Cancer
Monika Devanaboyina1, Jasskiran Kaur1, Emma Whiteley1, Leslie Lin1, Katelyn Einloth1, Susan Morand1, Laura Stanbery2, Danae Hamouda1 and 
John Nemunaitis2*- 1Department of Medicine, University of Toledo College of Medicine and Life Sciences, Toledo, OH, United States
- 2Gradalis, Inc., Carrollton, TX, United States
Immune disorders and cancer share a common pathway involving NF-κb signaling. Through involvement with GM-CSF, NF-κB can contribute to proliferation and activation of T- and B- cells as well as immune cell migration to sites of inflammation. In breast cancer, this signaling pathway has been linked to resistance with endocrine and chemotherapies. Similarly, in ovarian cancer, NF-κB influences angiogenesis and inflammation pathways. Further, BRCA1 signaling common to both breast and ovarian cancer also has the capability to induce NF-κB activity. Immunotherapy involving NF-κB can also be implemented to combat chemoresistance. The complex signaling pathways of NF-κB can be harnessed for developing cancer therapeutics to promote immunotherapy for improving patient outcomes.
Introduction
Nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells (NF-κB) comprises a group of transcription factors which play an important role in mediating inflammatory signaling pathways. As NF-κB signaling dysregulation is correlated with immune disorders and cancer, the pathway is vital to tumorigenesis, oncologic development and developing therapeutics [1, 2].
NF-κB signaling includes the canonical and non-canonical pathways. The canonical pathway is dependent on Nuclear factor kappa beta Essential Modulator (NEMO or IKKγ) activation and subsequent kinase complexes such as inhibitory kappa beta kinase alpha and beta (IKKα and IKKβ). NEMO’s ubiquitin domain can recruit IKK for degradation which decreases inhibition of NF-κB to participate in inflammatory signaling. Activation of the canonical pathway occurs through cytokines, specifically tumor necrosis factor (TNF) and IL (Interleukin)-1, pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs), and other immune signals. Canonical pathway activation leads to RelA and RelB transcription factor activation.
The non-canonical pathway is NEMO independent and plays a significant role in activating TNF receptors including CD40, LTßR, RANK, and TNFR2. NF-κB-inducing-kinase (NIK) is the major inducer in non-canonical signaling. This pathway is correlated with development of the lymphoid system through B cell survival and maturation along with dendritic cell activation [2].
In addition, NF-κB has shown the capability to affect cell survival and proliferation which could affect the tumor microenvironment and pathogenesis. Increased expression of NF-κB and associated signaling molecules is associated with poor prognosis in many cancer types, such as bladder and non-small cell lung cancer [3, 4]. Recent literature has shown that increased expression of NF-κB may contribute to ovarian cancer [1].
NF-κB Role in GM-CSF Pathway
Granulocyte monocyte colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) has the capability to activate NF-κB [5, 6]. This activation of NF-κB occurs through the canonical pathway which also induces the formation p52 and RelB heterodimers [7]. NF-κB is bound by the inhibitor of kappa B (IκB) complex in the inactive state. As IκB is phosphorylated, NF-κB is released and may translocate to the nucleus to induce transcription of immune and inflammatory cytokines [8]. The ɑ- and β-chains of GM-CSF receptor interact with IκB kinase beta (IκKβ), a component of IκB kinase complex, which normally inhibits NF-κB. With GM-CSF, the GM-CSF receptor-ɑ chain activates IκKβ which ubiquitinates and inactivates IκB, releasing NF-κB [7, 9]. Further analysis illustrated other possible mechanisms including TNF receptor-associated factor 6 (TRAF6) mediation in GM-CSF activation of NF-κB. TRAF6 directly activates IκK leading to the disinhibition of IκB and activation of NF-κB [7].
NF-κB can activate multiple downstream signaling pathways, including the proliferation, differentiation, and activation of T- and B-cells [10]. NF-κB regulates transcription of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as TNF-α, increasing the role of NF-κB in inflammation [11]. In this sense, GM-CSF’s role with NF-κB increases the functional activity of effector lymphocytes, while also increasing pro-inflammatory cytokines. NF-κB also interacts with vascular endothelial cells to improve immune cell migration via enhanced expression of adhesion molecules on leukocytes and endothelial cells, to allow circulating leukocytes to enter the site of inflammation [12]. GM-CSF has also been shown to stimulate anti-tumor immune responses through dendritic cell activation and T-lymphocyte activity [6]. This review article more comprehensively details the role of NF-κB signaling in breast and ovarian cancer to highlight possible upcoming therapeutic approaches.
Role of NF-κB in Breast Cancer
Breast cancer is the fourth leading cause of cancer death in the United States and it is predicted that in 2019, there were approximately 268,600 cases of invasive breast cancer [13]. Breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease stratified by hormone receptor and human epidermal growth factor (ErbB2/(Her2/neu)) receptor status. Tumors negative for both hormone and epidermal growth factor receptors are called triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) and are common in women with a BRCA1 mutation [14, 15].
While these tumor types are distinct, constitutive activation of NF-κB is a frequent characteristic found in most breast cancer tumors as well as other cancer types. In breast cancer specifically, NF-κB is present at higher levels in grade III tumors at 86.9% and only 37.5% in grade I tumors (p = 0.002) [16]. NF-κB plays an essential role in normal mammary gland development mediated by receptor activator of NF-κB ligand (RANKL), its receptor RANKL, and the decoy receptor osteoprotegerin (OPG). RANKL activates NF-κB, inducing cellular proliferation by targeting cyclin D1 as illustrated in Figure 1 [17] while also while also protecting cells from apoptosis, and assisting with tumor cell renewal (Suarez 2010, Wang 2015). In fact, A study by Kiechl et al, concluded serum levels of RANKL/OPG are potential predictors of predisposition and prognosis of breast cancer specially in post-menopausal women (Kiechl, 2017).
FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1. Role of NF-κB pathway in breast cancer.
Survival is also mediated by NF-κB through increased inhibitors of apoptosis (IAPs) and Bcl-xL in breast cancer cells [18]. Inactivation of NF-KB via downregulation of Transglutaminase 2 (TGase2), a cross linking enzyme, leads to apoptosis of drug resistant cancer cells. Furthermore, TGase 2 gene silencing led to decreased expression of survival factors such as Bcl-xL and Bcl2 [19-21]. Additionally, previous evidence has illustrated NF-κB activation and its role in driving breast cancer development and progression via its role in cancer stem cells (CSC), epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT) and resistance to endocrine and chemotherapies.
Cancer stem cells (CSC) play an imperative role in tumor initiation and act to drive tumorigenesis and treatment resistance. CSCs express epithelial-specific antigen (ESA) and CD44. In one study, suppression of NF-κB led to dramatically decreased proportions of CD44-positive cells in Her2 dependent tumors. Her2, overexpressed in one-third of all breast cancers, has also been shown to control the CSC population. Specifically, Her2 can activate NF-κB through the canonical pathway. NF-κB was shown to influence tumor initiation, cell proliferation and recruitment of tumor associated macrophages (TAMs) in a HER2 mouse model after selective suppression of NF-κB [18].
Metastasis is largely driven in solid tumors by the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) [22]. Previous research has established the role of NF-κB in the induction and maintenance of EMT, an imperative process for breast cancer progression [23, 24]. Several mechanisms by which NF-κB influences EMT include NF-κB/p65 as a transcriptional regulator of EMT transcriptions factors such as SLUG, SIP1, and TWIST1 as well as through NF-κB dependent expression of ZEB-1/ZFHX1A and ZEB-2/ZFHX1B/Smad-interacting protein [25]. Dysregulation of the RANKL/RANK/OPG system and its relationship to metastatic bone disease has been previously documented (Infante, 2019). Treatments such as denosumab, a human monoclonal antibody, which inhibits RANKL, is currently used [26, 27]. RANKL/RANK system induced EMT has been linked to upregulation of Snail and TWIST1 and downregulation of E-cadherin [28]. In addition, TWIST1 was observed in bone marrow of breast cancer patients and its expression correlated with occurrence of metastasis [29].
Furthermore, inhibition of NF-κB/p65 with dehydroxymethylepoxyquinomicin (DHMEQ) decreased migration and invasion in human breast cancer cell lines, MDA-MB-231 and HCC-1954 [30]. Another study also validated these results as DHMEQ inhibited 3D invasion of breast carcinoma cells through inhibition of matrix metalloproteinase (MMP), a peptidase important for extracellular matrix degradation in the tumor microenvironment, along with inhibition of IL-6 [31].
Previous studies have associated NF-κB activation in estrogen receptor positive (ER+) tumors and is associated with resistance to endocrine and chemotherapies [32, 33]. Approximately 80% of breast cancer are ER+ and bind estrogen to stimulate cancer cell growth. Typically, drugs such as tamoxifen and aromatase inhibitors, which inhibit estrogen receptors or lower estrogen levels, respectively, are used to treat ER + breast cancer. However, disease recurrence and resistance to treatment is common [34]. A cohort study in Indonesia, examined NFKB expression, ER status and HER2 status as potential predictors of response to a chemotherapy regimen of cyclophosphamide-doxorubicin-5FU (CAF). Patients with negative NFKB expression were 10-times more likely to be responsive to chemotherapy compared to those with positive NFKB expression [35]. Potential mechanisms for resistance are discussed below. The various implications of NF-κB in the context of breast cancer make it an important therapeutic target.
Role of NF-κB in Ovarian Cancer
Constitutive activation of NF-κB has also been linked to the development of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). Activation of the canonical NF-κB pathway can be triggered by an inflammatory stimulus after which cytokines such as TNFα, interleukin-1α/β bind to their receptors [36–38]. Binding of cytokines to their receptors leads to subsequent phosphorylation of NF-κB, which enables dimerization and translocation of RelA and p50 into the nucleus for initiation of downstream gene transcription involved with proliferation, invasion, adhesion, and angiogenesis [39-41]. Heterodimer p50 and c-Rel can also enter the nucleus to induce antiapoptotic gene transcription and regulate genes involved in cell cycle checkpoint inhibition [42, 43]. As a result, EOCs associated with NF-κB signaling tend to have a poor prognosis due to increased gene expression that are advantageous for malignant progression [44].
Interaction between NF-κB and estrogen has also been suggested to contribute to the pathogenesis of EOC. Estradiol regulates NF-κB by degrading inhibitor of nuclear factor κB (IkB) and preventing phosphorylation of IkB proteins by IkB kinase (IKK) complex [45]. The phosphorylation and subsequent degradation of IkB proteins ultimately leads to release of heterodimers capable of mediating gene transcription within the nucleus. Overexpression of estrogen receptor (ER) can also suppress NF-κB activity by blocking DNA-binding by NF-κB, inhibit gene transcription by binding to DNA-bound NF-κB, and decrease IL-6 production, another inflammatory mediator of NF-κB signaling [46, 47]. Despite this, constitutively active NF-κB signaling in gonadal cell tumors has been found to repress ER-mediated transactivation even in the presence of estradiol binding [48].
Most cases of ovarian cancer, however, occur further upstream via hyperactivation of the phosphoinositol 3 kinase/protein kinase B/mammalian target of rapamycin (PI3K/AKT/mTOR) pathway as shown in Figure 2. Overexpression of this pathway drives downstream activation of NF-κB which induces proliferation, angiogenesis, and expression of antiapoptotic genes responsible for the survival and aggressiveness of EOCs [49]. Triggered by the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines, activation of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway is followed by phosphorylation of PI3K regulatory subunit p85, which subsequently increases the catalytic activity of PI3K-110α. PI3K-110α then phosphorylates downstream NF-κB subunit p65RelA, thus allowing NF-κB translocation into the nucleus [50, 51]. Moreover, NF-κB has binding sites in the promoter region of PIK3CA, an oncogene that encodes for PI3K-110α [52]. Therefore, reciprocal activation results in high expression levels of p65RelA that is associated with increased chemoresistance and poor outcomes in patients with EOC [53].
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2. Role of NF-κB in PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway in ovarian cancer tumorigenesis.
PI3K can also phosphorylate AKT which subsequently activates the IKK complex to phosphorylate p65RelA, which allows for nuclear translocation. For AKT to induce NF-κB activity via activation of IKK, however, requires assistance from downstream mTOR-associated protein Raptor which interacts with and stimulates IKK [54]. Otherwise, AKT can directly phosphorylate and activate the p65RelA subunit without IKK activity [55]. The downstream pathway of NF-κB increases the gene RelA and co-expression of RelB. This leads to the increase of the gene p65, enhancing spheroid growth in ovarian cancer cells [56]. Preclinical models have shown decreased RelB expression with doxycycline treatment in ovarian cancer cells in addition to significantly decreased spheroid formation, possibly due to increased c-myc-cyclins D1 and E [1, 56]. The absence of RelB also decreased ovarian cancer tumor metastasis to abdominal organs [56]. Another marker for tumorigenicity in ovarian cancer includes aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH). ALDH can be inhibited by silencing RelB, which indicates the significance of NF-κB activity in ovarian cancer. Decreasing ALDH with siRNA further decreased tumor formation and increased sensitization to treatment with carboplatin [56].
NF-κB can additionally mediate selective gene activation via regulation of Smad intermediaries of transforming growth factor-β (TGFβ) signaling. Smad proteins are a family of signal transducers that function as transcriptional regulators for TGFβ signaling, which is essential in the regulation of proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis of cells. Co-expression and interaction between NF-κB subunits p52 or p65 with Smad3 or Smad4 not only enhance TGFβ transactivation activity, but also strongly increase basal transcription of target genes [57]. In turn, increased TGFβ activity can further induce NF-κB transcriptional activity. Smad7 activity, which normally inhibits TGFβ, is suppressed by p65 expression even without a consensus NF-κB binding site [58]. This results in dysregulation of TGFβ signaling that is essential to tissue maintenance and development and can ultimately lead to uncontrolled tumor growth and cell invasion.
Other mediators downstream of NF-κB include VEGF and IL-8 which play an important role in angiogenesis and tumor development[1]. In ovarian cancer, Cytokines IL-6 and IL-8 are activated by NF-κB andpromote tumor growthvia immunosuppression. Inhibition of NF-κB leads to decreased levels of IL-6 and IL-8 in ovarian cancer cells indicating the direct correlation between NF-κB and ovarian cancer progression[59].
Along with downstream regulators, NF-κB influences upstream cellular signaling molecules. Upstream regulation of NF-κB is mediated through epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), a tyrosine kinase receptor that is increased in 70% of ovarian cancers. EGFR regulates cell growth on the epithelial surface of ovaries and development of ovarian follicles. Through NF-κB, EGFR upregulates proinflammatory markers, IL-6 and plasminogen activation inhibitor (PAI-1), leading to increased proliferation in ovarian cancer cells.Co-expression of IL-6 and PAI-1 in epithelial ovarian cells was significantly associated with advanced-stage EOC and decreased survival [60]. Silencing EGFR not only decreased NF-κB activity but also decreased IL-6 and PAI-1 activity[60].
Another upstream mediator in the NF-κB pathway involves tripartite motif (TRIM) genes with oncogenic capabilities. TRIM genes are responsible for encoding proteins in cell growth, development, and differentiation. Compared to normal tissue, there is increased TRIM52 expression in ovarian cancer cells after the phosphorylation of IKKB and p65 with NF-κB activation. Absence of TRIM52 resulted in decreased ovarian cancer growth and increased apoptosis through decreasing levels of NF-κB [61].
Understanding the mechanisms of the NF-κB pathway could lead to identification of key molecules or enzymes for targeted therapy in ovarian cancer. For example, anti-EGFR compounds and ALDH inhibitors in the NF-κB pathway have been utilized as therapeutic measures in ovarian cancer [56, 60]. Furthermore, polyphenols and curcumin have shown anti-cancer and anti-inflammatory effects through the regulation of NF-κB with miRNA expression [62, 63]. Weldolactone was found to also suppress NF-κB activity in ovarian cancer cell lines and decrease proliferative activity [64]. The development of targeted therapeutics combining NF-κB and anti-estrogen therapy should be further investigated to improve ovarian cancer outcomes.
Chemotherapy Resistance in Breast and Ovarian
A major setback in the treatment of breast and ovarian cancers is resistance to chemotherapy. Resistance can occur intrinsically or can be acquired over time. The cell membrane plays an important role through absorption of chemotherapy and efflux mechanisms such as P-glycoprotein, along with enzymes inside the cell that can alter metabolism [65]. Previous studies have shown that breast cancer resistance could be affected by growth factor signaling mechanisms. Alterations in the PI3K/AKT/mTOR and RAS/MAPK/ERK signaling pathways have been related to resistance with endocrine therapy like tamoxifen [66]. NF-κB plays a key role in the PI3K pathway and similar effects could be noted with NF-κB.
Although chemoresistance may be multifactorial, activation of NF-κB is one mechanism linked to such resistance. Common chemotherapies, such as anthracyclines, including doxorubicin are shown to activate NF-κB and its pro-survival downstream targets which contribute to chemoresistance. The mechanisms by which doxorubicin activates NF-κB remain unclear, however previously studied mechanisms include activation via the IKK complex, PI3K dependent pathway, and c-Abl kinase activity in breast cancer cells [67, 68]. Microtubule disrupting chemotherapies, including taxanes, platinum agents, and vinca alkaloids have also been shown to activate NF-κB [18, 69].
A study using NF-κ B/p65 nuclear translocation staining as a measure of NF-κB activation found that nuclear immunohistochemical staining was significantly correlated with resistance to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients [70]. Additionally, NF-κB activation was increased in patients after chemotherapy, suggesting that NF-κB is inducible by chemotherapy. Increased NF-κB activity, measured by NF-κ B/p65, was seen in ovarian cancer cell lines with resistance to the chemotherapy agents such as platinum, paclitaxel, and erlotinib [1].
BRCA Signaling
Breast cancer susceptibility genes 1 or 2 mutations (BRCA1/2) are linked with hereditary breast and ovarian cancers (HBOC), 5%–10% of breast cancers and 10%–15% of ovarian cancers possess a BRCA1/2 mutation [71]. The estimated lifetime risk of developing breast cancer is 40%–80% in patients carrying either BRCA1/2 mutation. The estimated lifetime risk of developing ovarian cancer is 25%–65% and 15%–20% in patients with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations, respectively [72]. BRCA1 is a multifunctional protein with important roles in cell-cycle control, ubiquitination, transcriptional regulation, DNA damage repair [73, 74].
Although less common, NF-κB activation can also occur by DNA damage. Mutations in the BRCA1 tumor suppressor gene are often found in EOCs. BRCA1-null mutations in ovarian cancer cells induce NF-κB signaling, which causes enhanced transcriptional activation of target genes that promote increased autophagy, glycolysis, and oxidative stress in the stroma [75]. The increased levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS)can then further upregulate NF-κB [76]. When BRCA1-null ovarian cancer cells were rescued with the wild-type, BRCA1 overexpression successfully blocked NF-κB activation and decreased oxidative stress within the microenvironment [75]. These findings demonstrate the important regulatory role BRCA1 plays in NF-κB activation. Therefore, mutation of BRCA1 can lead to pathway dysregulation further downstream and repression of BRCA1-induced apoptosis, further making chemotherapy treatment of EOCs challenging [77].
BRCA1 was found to bind the p65/RelA subunit of NF-κB to stimulate tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) and interleukin-1 (IL-1) [78]. A study by Buckley et al. discovered consistent NF-κB hyperactivity associated with BRCA1 dysfunction as a consequence of increased reactive oxygen species (ROS). Higher NF-κB activity was found in BRCA1-mutant and BRCA1-low cells compared to their isogenic matched BRCA1 reconstituted controls. ShRNA mediated BRCA1 knockdown in a normal breast cell line also led to increased NF-κB activity. Further investigation into how BRCA1 function leads to basal NF-κB hyperactivity was performed using a series of inhibitors to pathways known to be regulated by BRCA1 activity. These pathways include: Notch, DNA Damage Response (ATM and PARP inhibitors), and ROS. Of interest, inhibition of ROS resulted in loss of increased NF-κB activity seen in BRCA1 dysfunction. ROS levels were significantly higher in cells lacking functional BRCA1. To determine whether the same biology can be observed in breast cancer cells, a cell line-derived gene list of target genes upregulated by NF-κB with dysfunctional BRCA1 was created. The list was refined to contain genes with the most significant fold changes. The gene list was used to interrogate TNBC microarray dataset enriched for BRCA1 mutations to identify a subgroup of breast cancers labeled as BRCA1(-)/NF-κB(+) (“NF-κB on”). The remaining tumors were labeled as non-BRCA1(-)/NF-κB(+) (“NF-κB off”). Of the 42 genes identified and refined using ElasticNet computational analysis, 39 were upregulated in the “NF-κB on” subgroup. To investigate the clinical significance of the “NF-κB on” and “NF-κB off” subgroups, ElasticNet derived 42 gene signatures which were applied to 4 additional TNBC datasets. This application showed the “NF-κB on” subgroup has significantly better relapse free survival in the publicly available GSE58812 (HR = 0.2886, 0.1179–0.7065 95% CI, p = 0.0065), GSE21653 (HR = 0.1956, 0.04632–0.8263 95% CI, p = 0.0264), and GSE2034 (HR = 0.4412, 0.1929–1.009 95% CI, p = 0.0525) datasets. The “NF-κB on” subgroup expressed higher levels of genes associated with high ROS levels, which is consistent with the in-vitro studies discussed above [73].
Denosumab, a monoclonal antibody inhibitor for RANKL and NF-κB signaling, has been FDA approved for the treatment of breast cancer with bone metastases [79] (Table 1). In a stage 3 study named D-CARE, denosumab was given as an adjuvant to chemotherapy for stage II or II breast cancer over a span of 5 years. Although preclinical studies did show that bone metastases were decreased in patients with denosumab, this study did not show any evidence for improvement in outcomes in the addition of denosumab [80]. Additionally, another study also observed the effects of denosumab in hormone receptor positive breast cancer patients. Disease-free survival for 3,425 patients was determined for both adjuvant denosumab and placebo groups. At 5 years, the disease-free survival rate was significantly higher with denosumab at 89.2% (95% CI 87.6–90.8) and placebo at 87·3% (85.7–89.0) (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.69–0.98, Cox p = 0.0260). This study illustrates the beneficial effect of denosumab in combination with aromatase inhibitor therapy [81].
TABLE 1
TABLE 1. Summary of the discussed FDA-approved cancer drugs that inhibit NF-κB signaling and their mechanism of action.
Other mechanisms of NF-κB inhibition include acetylation which has been targeted in the treatment of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL). Vorinostat and Romidepsin are acetylation inhibitors that downregulate activity of NF-κB in CTCL and are FDA-approved agents for the treatment of CTCL [18, 82, 83]. Other FDA approved agents that modulate NF-κB for multiple myeloma include proteasome inhibitors, Bortezomib and Carfilzomib. Proteasome inhibitors prevent the degradation of IκBα which then prevents activation of NF-κB, inhibiting tumorigenic activity [84]. Preclinical studies also led to further investigation of bortezomib in breast cancer patients. In a phase II clinic study of twelve patients with metastatic breast cancer treated with bortezomib as a single agent, no objective clinical responses were noted. There was, however, a significant reduction in IL-6 levels from an average level of 44.1 ± 12.7 units to 14.9 ± 5.5 units (p = 0.04). Decreased levels of IL-6 have corresponded with apoptosis, longer survival rates and reduced inflammation. This mechanism of NF-κB inhibition can be harnessed in the treatment of breast cancer alongside antitumor agents [85]. Further investigation of NF-κB could provide evidence of interaction with immune system activity of T-cells.
NF-κB Immunotherapy
As discussed previously, NF-κB can have potent effects in signaling pathways involving the immune system, including GM-CSF. In previous studies, GM-CSF has been shown to mediate immune cytokines and upregulate the immune response against tumors with dendritic cell activation and T-lymphocyte activation [6]. One example of GM-CSF employment in cancer therapeutics includes Vigil, an autologous tumor cell vaccine transfected ex vivo with GM-CSF DNA and bifunctional short hairpin RNA against furin. Furin knockdown is known to suppress TGFβ1 and TGFβ2 [86]. Previous literature has shown the safety and efficacy of Vigil in various solid tumors [87–92]. In a phase IIb trial stage III/IV high grade serous, endometroid, or clear cell ovarian cancer, patients were observed to have an improved recurrence free survival compared to placebo, although not significant (11.5 vs. 8.4 months HR 0.69 CI 0.44–1.07 p = 0.078). More interestingly, Vigil is the first immunotherapy to show efficacy in the BRCA wild type population as the preplanned subgroup analysis results were statistically significant when compared to placebo (HR 0.51 CI 0.30–0.88 p = 0.02) [93]. Normal BRCA1 expression would also promote NF-κB expression at baseline [71, 73]. Vigil could block the immunosuppressive effects of TGFβ transcription and further inhibit proliferative NF-κB signaling and selectively increasing GM-CSF expression to enhance the anti-tumor effects [57, 94].
Within recent years, it has been discovered that NF-κB plays a role in the expression of genes known to assist in the evasion of immune responses and promotion of tumor survival, including through PD-L1 transcription and post-translational expression [95]. Inflammatory cytokines, such as IFN- γ, IL-17, and TNF-α, are able to activate NF-κB-dependent pathways leading to PD-L1 upregulation, which in turn blocks immune checkpoint [96–99]. These effects on PD-L1 expression have been described in a variety of cancers and through a wide variety of mechanisms. For example, one study found that LPS, a pathogen-associated molecular pattern (PAMP), increases NF-κB activation, which results in PD-L1 upregulation in gastric cancer cells. This same study indicated that NF-κB regulates PD-L1 gene transcription through p65-binding to the PD-L1 promoter to increase gene expression [98]. Another study found that in melanoma cells, IFN- γ induces translocation of NF-κB, inducing PD-L1 promoter activity and expression [100]. In ovarian cancer cells, the proto-oncogene Bcl3 enables NF-κB p65 acetylation and p300-dependent recruitment to the PD-L1 promoter resulting in increased PD-L1 gene transcription [101]. Finally, Mucin1 (MUC1), an oncoprotein expressed in carcinomas of epithelial origin [102], activates pathways that lead to nuclear translocation of NF-κB and directly bind to NF-κB to drive transcription of PD-L1 in TNBC [103]. Other cancers, including prostate cancer, colon cancer, and non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC), have also demonstrated how NF-κB -induced expression of PD-L1 may be an attractive target in cancer therapeutics [96, 104].
Conversely, the inhibition of NF-κB activity is associated with suppression of PD-L1 gene expression. inhibition of NF-κB in nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells was found to decrease expression of PD-L1 in a dose-dependent manner [105]. Additionally, CDK 4/6 phosphorylation of RB allows RB to interact with NF-κB p65, inhibiting NF-κB activity and suppressing PD-L1 gene expression. This RB-mediated suppression of PD-L1 gene expression is inhibited following radiation, resulting in the upregulation of PD-L1 transcription and expression [106, 107]. The clear relationship between NF-κB and PD-L1 expression in cancers has prompted the idea that perhaps siRNA-mediated NF-κB silencing or pharmacological inhibitors of NF-κB could be used as potential therapeutics [108]. Furthermore, there may be a targetable interaction between EGFR and NF-κB signaling that may result in decreased PD-L1 expression, though previous studies have shown conflicting data. EGFR appears to be involved in the regulation of post-translational PD-L1 expression, and EGFR stimulation was shown to stabilize PD-L1 in breast cancer cells via glycosylation. Without this glycosylation, PD-L1 is instead phosphorylated by glycogen synthase kinase 3-β, leading to its ubiquitination and degradation [109]. In breast cancer, TNF-α induces activation of p65, which binds to the COPS5 gene promoter leading to enhanced transcription of CSN5 and de-ubiquitination activity. CSN5 binds to PD-L1, causing the removal of PD-L1-bound ubiquitin which prevents degradation and promotes stability [110]. Similar patterns have been noted in nasopharyngeal carcinoma and colorectal cancer [111, 112]. CDK phosphorylation and EGFR signaling manipulation may provide two potential methods of inhibiting NF-κB and PD-L1 expression.
Recent advances in immunotherapy have shown benefit in breast and ovarian cancer patients. NF-κB involvement in the tumor microenvironment has been thoroughly studied in preclinical models, and clinical studies are ongoing to explore NF-κB in immunotherapy. A recent phase 1B/2 trial in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) studied the effects of nivolumab, an anti-PD-1 inhibitor, combined with denosumab, a monoclonal antibody inhibiting receptor activator of NF-κB ligand (RANKL).
Although results are pending, the study could provide sufficient reasoning for involvement of NF-κB with immunotherapy [113]. In addition, an observational study reported outcomes after the use of immunotherapy with ipilimumab, pembrolizumab or nivolumab, combined with denosumab in melanoma and NSCLC patients. Longer exposure time to combination therapy showed improved survival in NSCLC (p < 0.001) [114]. Prospective studies should be conducted based on these preliminary results showing the capability of NF-κB inhibition to improve patient responses to immunotherapy. Another upcoming study will examine denosumab in ovarian cancer patients with BRCA1 mutation, using immunohistochemistry of patient samples measuring Ki67 as a proliferation index to compare proliferation in denosumab vs. control groups [115]. Moreover, these results could be applied in breast and ovarian cancer and further research in clinical trials could be warranted.
Discussion
NF-κB signaling plays an important role in cancer initiation, progression, and metastasis. In breast cancer, RANKL activates NF-κB, inducing cellular proliferation by targeting cyclin D1 gene [17]. Survival is also mediated by NF-κB through increased inhibitors of apoptosis (IAPs) and Bcl-xL. As for ovarian cancer, NF-κB activation of the oncogene PI3K-110α which can then increase p65RelA that is associated with increased chemoresistance and poor outcomes in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer [52, 53]. Many other immune signaling pathways, including EGFR, have also been shown to be mediated through NF-κB as discussed in this paper. Furthermore, breast and ovarian cancer can be found at higher rates in patients with BRCA1 mutations that are also affected by NF-κB signaling [71, 72]. This reasoning warrants investigation into immunotherapy, such as Vigil and PD-L1 inhibition, that can inhibit the effects of NF-κB found in chemoresistance associated with breast and ovarian cancer. NF-κB mediated inhibition should continue to be studied with an emphasis on recent immunotherapy which would lead to improvements in cancer therapeutics.
Author Contributions
MD was involved in supervision, conception, writing-original draft and writing-review and editing. JK, EW, LL, KE, and SM were involved in manuscript investigation, writing-original draft, writing- review and editing. LS contributed to supervision, conception and writing-review and editing. DH was involved in writing-review and editing of the manuscript. JN was responsible for manuscript conception, supervision as well as writing-review and editing.
Conflict of Interest
Authors LS and JN were employed by the company Gradalis, Inc.
The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
1. Harrington, BS, and Annunziata, CM. NF-κB Signaling in Ovarian Cancer. Cancers (Basel) (2019) 11(8):1182. doi:10.3390/cancers11081182
2. Mitchell, S, Vargas, J, and Hoffmann, A. Signaling via the NFκB System. WIREs Syst Biol Med (2016) 8(3):227–41. doi:10.1002/wsbm.1331
3. Mitrakas, L, Gravas, S, Papandreou, C, Koukoulis, G, Karasavvidou, F, Dimakopoulos, G, et al. Primary High-Grade Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer: High NFκB Expression in Tumor Specimens Distinguishes Patients Who Are at Risk for Disease Progression. Pathol Oncol Res (2019) 25(1):225–31. doi:10.1007/s12253-017-0340-1
4. Zhang, Z, Ma, J, Li, N, Sun, N, and Wang, C. Expression of Nuclear Factor-Κb and its Clinical Significance in Nonsmall-Cell Lung Cancer. Ann Thorac Surg (2006) 82(1):243–8. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.01.049
5. Lawrence, T. The Nuclear Factor NF- B Pathway in Inflammation. Cold Spring Harbor Perspect Biol (2009) 1(6):a001651. doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a001651
6. Morand S, DM, Fung, C, Royfman, R, and Filipiak, L. Anti-Cancer Immune Response and Therapeutic Application. J Vaccin Vaccination (2020) 12(1).
7. Meads, MB, Li, ZW, and Dalton, WS. A Novel TNF Receptor-Associated Factor 6 Binding Domain Mediates NF-Kappa B Signaling by the Common Cytokine Receptor Beta Subunit. J Immunol (2010) 185(3):1606–15. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.0902026
8. Israël, A. The IKK Complex, a Central Regulator of NF- B Activation. Cold Spring Harbor Perspect Biol (2010) 2(3):a000158. doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a000158
9. Ebner, K, Bandion, A, Binder, BR, de Martin, R, and Schmid, JA. GMCSF Activates NF-Κb via Direct Interaction of the GMCSF Receptor with IκB Kinase β. Blood (2003) 102(1):192–9. doi:10.1182/blood-2002-12-3753
10. Gerondakis, S, and Siebenlist, U. Roles of the NF- B Pathway in Lymphocyte Development and Function. Cold Spring Harbor Perspect Biol (2010) 2(5):a000182. doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a000182
11. Hayden, MS, and Ghosh, S. NF-κB in Immunobiology. Cell Res (2011) 21(2):223–44. doi:10.1038/cr.2011.13
12. Eck, SL, Perkins, ND, Carr, DP, and Nabel, GJ. Inhibition of Phorbol Ester-Induced Cellular Adhesion by Competitive Binding of NF-Kappa B In Vivo. Mol Cel Biol (1993) 13(10):6530–6. doi:10.1128/mcb.13.10.6530-6536.1993
13. DeSantis, CE, Ma, J, Gaudet, MM, Newman, LA, Miller, KD, Goding Sauer, A, et al. Breast Cancer Statistics, 2019. CA: A Cancer J Clinicians (2019) 69(6):438–51. doi:10.3322/caac.21583
14. Petrucelli, N, Daly, MB, and Pal, T. BRCA1- and BRCA2-Associated Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer. In: Adam, MP, editor. GeneReviews(®). SeattleSeattle (WA): University of Washington (1993).
15. Jhan, JR, and Andrechek, ER. Triple-negative Breast Cancer and the Potential for Targeted Therapy. Pharmacogenomics (2017) 18(17):1595–609. doi:10.2217/pgs-2017-0117
16. Sarkar, DK, Jana, D, Patil, PS, Chaudhari, KS, Chattopadhyay, BK, Chikkala, BR, et al. Role of NF-Κb as a Prognostic Marker in Breast Cancer : A Pilot Study in Indian Patients. Indian J Surg Oncol (2013) 4(3):242–7. doi:10.1007/s13193-013-0234-y
17. Srivastava, S, Matsuda, M, Hou, Z, Bailey, JP, Kitazawa, R, Herbst, MP, et al. Receptor Activator of NF-Κb Ligand Induction via Jak2 and Stat5a in Mammary Epithelial Cells. J Biol Chem (2003) 278(46):46171–8. doi:10.1074/jbc.m308545200
18. Wang, W, Nag, SA, and Zhang, R. Targeting the NFκB Signaling Pathways for Breast Cancer Prevention and Therapy. Curr Med Chem (2015) 22(2):264–89. doi:10.2174/0929867321666141106124315
19. Kiechl, S, Schramek, D, Widschwendter, M, Fourkala, EO, Zaikin, A, Jones, A, et al. Aberrant Regulation of RANKL/OPG in Women at High Risk of Developing Breast Cancer. Oncotarget (2017) 8(3):3811–25. doi:10.18632/oncotarget.14013
20. Kim, DS, Park, KS, and Kim, SY. Silencing of TGase 2 Sensitizes Breast Cancer Cells to Apoptosis by Regulation of Survival Factors. Front Biosci (Landmark Ed (2009) 14(7):2514–21. doi:10.2741/3394
21. Agnihotri, N, Kumar, S, and Mehta, K. Tissue Transglutaminase as a central Mediator in Inflammation-Induced Progression of Breast Cancer. Breast Cancer Res (2013) 15(1):202. doi:10.1186/bcr3371
22. Heerboth, S, Housman, G, Leary, M, Longacre, M, Byler, S, Lapinska, K, et al. EMT and Tumor Metastasis. Clin Translational Med (2015) 4:6. doi:10.1186/s40169-015-0048-3
23. Felipe Lima, J, Nofech-Mozes, S, Bayani, J, and Bartlett, J. EMT in Breast Carcinoma-A Review. J Clin Med (2016) 5(7):65. doi:10.3390/jcm5070065
24. Gooding, AJ, and Schiemann, WP. Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition Programs and Cancer Stem Cell Phenotypes: Mediators of Breast Cancer Therapy Resistance. Mol Cancer Res (2020) 18(9):1257–70. doi:10.1158/1541-7786.mcr-20-0067
25. Wang, Y, and Zhou, BP. Epithelial-mesenchymal Transition in Breast Cancer Progression and Metastasis. Chin J Cancer (2011) 30(9):603–11. doi:10.5732/cjc.011.10226
26. Infante, M, Fabi, A, Cognetti, F, Gorini, S, Caprio, M, and Fabbri, A. RANKL/RANK/OPG System beyond Bone Remodeling: Involvement in Breast Cancer and Clinical Perspectives. J Exp Clin Cancer Res (2019) 38(1):12. doi:10.1186/s13046-018-1001-2
27. Lipton, A, and Goessl, C. Clinical Development of Anti-RANKL Therapies for Treatment and Prevention of Bone Metastasis. Bone (2011) 48(1):96–9. doi:10.1016/j.bone.2010.10.161
28. Tsubaki, M, Komai, M, Fujimoto, S, Itoh, T, Imano, M, Sakamoto, K, et al. Activation of NF-Κb by the RANKL/RANK System Up-Regulates Snail and Twist Expressions and Induces Epithelial-To-Mesenchymal Transition in Mammary Tumor Cell Lines. J Exp Clin Cancer Res (2013) 32:62. doi:10.1186/1756-9966-32-62
29. Watson, MA, Ylagan, LR, Trinkaus, KM, Gillanders, WE, Naughton, MJ, Weilbaecher, KN, et al. Isolation and Molecular Profiling of Bone Marrow Micrometastases Identifies TWIST1 as a Marker of Early Tumor Relapse in Breast Cancer Patients. Clin Cancer Res (2007) 13(17):5001–9. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-07-0024
30. Pires, BRB, Mencalha, AL, Ferreira, GM, de Souza, WF, Morgado-Diaz, JA, Maia, AM, et al. NF-kappaB Is Involved in the Regulation of EMT Genes in Breast Cancer Cells. PLoS One (2017) 12(1):e0169622. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0169622
31. Ukaji, T, Lin, Y, Okada, S, and Umezawa, K. Inhibition of MMP-2-Mediated Cellular Invasion by NF-Κb Inhibitor DHMEQ in 3D Culture of Breast Carcinoma MDA-MB-231 Cells: A Model for Early Phase of Metastasis. Biochem Biophysical Res Commun (2017) 485(1):76–81. doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2017.02.022
32. Khongthong, P, Roseweir, AK, and Edwards, J. The NF-KB Pathway and Endocrine Therapy Resistance in Breast Cancer. Endocrine-Related Cancer (2019) 26(6):R369–R380. doi:10.1530/erc-19-0087
33. Sas, L, Lardon, F, Vermeulen, PB, Hauspy, J, Van Dam, P, Pauwels, P, et al. The Interaction between ER and NFκB in Resistance to Endocrine Therapy. Breast Cancer Res (2012) 14(4):212. doi:10.1186/bcr3196
34. Frasor, J, El-Shennawy, L, Stender, JD, and Kastrati, I. NFκB Affects Estrogen Receptor Expression and Activity in Breast Cancer through Multiple Mechanisms. Mol Cell Endocrinol (2015) 418(3):235–9. doi:10.1016/j.mce.2014.09.013
35. Indra, , , Manginstar, C, Islam, AA, Sampepajung, D, Hamdani, W, Bukhari, A, et al. The Relationship between NFKB, HER2, ER Expression and Anthracycline -based Neoadjuvan Chemotherapy Response in Local Advanced Stadium Breast Cancer: A Cohort Study in Eastern Indonesia. Ann Med Surg (2021) 63:102164. doi:10.1016/j.amsu.2021.02.010
36. Sakumoto, R, and Okuda, K. Possible Actions of Tumor Necrosis Factor-.ALPHA. In Ovarian Function. J Reprod Development (2004) 50(1):39–46. doi:10.1262/jrd.50.39
37. Fujii, A, Harada, T, Yamauchi, N, Iwabe, T, Nishi, Y, Yanase, T, et al. Interleukin-8 Gene and Protein Expression Are Up-Regulated by Interleukin-1β in normal Human Ovarian Cells and a Granulosa Tumor Cell Line. Fertil Sterility (2003) 79(1):151–7. doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(02)04408-4
38. Son, DS, and Roby, KF. Interleukin-1α-Induced Chemokines in Mouse Granulosa Cells: Impact on Keratinocyte Chemoattractant Chemokine, a CXC Subfamily. Mol Endocrinol (2006) 20(11):2999–3013. doi:10.1210/me.2006-0001
39. Basseres, DS, and Baldwin, AS. Nuclear Factor-Κb and Inhibitor of κB Kinase Pathways in Oncogenic Initiation and Progression. Oncogene (2006) 25(51):6817–30. doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1209942
40. Deregowski, V, Delhalle, S, Benoit, V, Bours, V, and Merville, MP. Identification of Cytokine-Induced Nuclear Factor-kappaB Target Genes in Ovarian and Breast Cancer Cells. Biochem Pharmacol (2002) 64(5-6):873–81. doi:10.1016/s0006-2952(02)01151-6
41. Karin, M. NF-κB and Cancer: Mechanisms and Targets. Mol Carcinog (2006) 45(6):355–61. doi:10.1002/mc.20217
42. Hunter, JE, Leslie, J, and Perkins, ND. c-Rel and its many Roles in Cancer: an Old story with New Twists. Br J Cancer (2016) 114(1):1–6. doi:10.1038/bjc.2015.410
43. Sun, SC. The Noncanonical NF-Κb Pathway. Immunological Rev (2012) 246(1):125–40. doi:10.1111/j.1600-065x.2011.01088.x
44. Hernandez, L, Hsu, SC, Davidson, B, Birrer, MJ, Kohn, EC, and Annunziata, CM. Activation of NF-Κb Signaling by Inhibitor of NF-Κb Kinase β Increases Aggressiveness of Ovarian Cancer. Cancer Res (2010) 70(10):4005–14. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-09-3912
45. Stice, JP, and Knowlton, AA. Estrogen, NFκB, and the Heat Shock Response. Mol Med (2008) 14(7-8):517–27. doi:10.2119/2008-00026.stice
46. Kalaitzidis, D, and Gilmore, TD. Transcription Factor Cross-Talk: the Estrogen Receptor and NF-Κb. Trends Endocrinol Metab (2005) 16(2):46–52. doi:10.1016/j.tem.2005.01.004
47. Kurebayashi, S, Miyashita, Y, Hirose, T, Kasayama, S, Akira, S, and Kishimoto, T. Characterization of Mechanisms of Interleukin-6 Gene Repression by Estrogen Receptor. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol (1997) 60(1-2):11–7. doi:10.1016/s0960-0760(96)00175-6
48. Chu, S, Nishi, Y, Yanase, T, Nawata, H, and Fuller, PJ. Transrepression of Estrogen Receptor β Signaling by Nuclear Factor-Κb in Ovarian Granulosa Cells. Mol Endocrinol (2004) 18(8):1919–28. doi:10.1210/me.2004-0021
49. Guo, RX, Qiao, YH, Zhou, Y, Li, LX, Shi, HR, and Chen, KS. Increased Staining for Phosphorylated AKT and Nuclear Factor-Κb P65 and Their Relationship with Prognosis in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer. Pathol Int (2008) 58(12):749–56. doi:10.1111/j.1440-1827.2008.02306.x
50. Sizemore, N, Leung, S, and Stark, GR. Activation of Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase in Response to Interleukin-1 Leads to Phosphorylation and Activation of the NF-Κb p65/RelA Subunit. Mol Cel Biol (1999) 19(7):4798–805. doi:10.1128/mcb.19.7.4798
51. Reddy, SA, Huang, JH, and Liao, WSL. Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase in Interleukin 1 Signaling. J Biol Chem (1997) 272(46):29167–73. doi:10.1074/jbc.272.46.29167
52. Yang, N, Huang, J, Greshock, J, Liang, S, Barchetti, A, Hasegawa, K, et al. Transcriptional Regulation of PIK3CA Oncogene by NF-Κb in Ovarian Cancer Microenvironment. PLoS One (2008) 3(3):e1758. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0001758
53. Kleinberg, L, Dong, HP, Holth, A, Risberg, B, Trope', CG, Nesland, JM, et al. Cleaved Caspase-3 and Nuclear Factor-Κb P65 Are Prognostic Factors in Metastatic Serous Ovarian Carcinoma. Hum Pathol (2009) 40(6):795–806. doi:10.1016/j.humpath.2008.10.019
54. Dan, HC, Cooper, MJ, Cogswell, PC, Duncan, JA, Ting, JPY, and Baldwin, AS. Akt-dependent Regulation of NF-Κb Is Controlled by mTOR and Raptor in Association with IKK. Genes Dev (2008) 22(11):1490–500. doi:10.1101/gad.1662308
55. Madrid, LV, Mayo, MW, Reuther, JY, and Baldwin, AS. Akt Stimulates the Transactivation Potential of the RelA/p65 Subunit of NF-Κb through Utilization of the IκB Kinase and Activation of the Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase P38. J Biol Chem (2001) 276(22):18934–40. doi:10.1074/jbc.m101103200
56. House, CD, Jordan, E, Hernandez, L, Ozaki, M, James, JM, Kim, M, et al. NFκB Promotes Ovarian Tumorigenesis via Classical Pathways that Support Proliferative Cancer Cells and Alternative Pathways that Support ALDH+ Cancer Stem–like Cells. Cancer Res (2017) 77(24):6927–40. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-17-0366
57. Lopez-Rovira, T, Chalaux, E, Rosa, JL, Bartrons, R, and Ventura, F. Interaction and Functional Cooperation of NF-Kappa B with Smads. Transcriptional Regulation of the junB Promoter. J Biol Chem (2000) 275(37):28937–46. doi:10.1074/jbc.M909923199
58. Nagarajan, RP, Chen, F, Li, W, Vig, E, Harrington, MA, Nakshatri, H, et al. Repression of Transforming-Growth-Factor-β-Mediated Transcription by Nuclear Factor κB. Biochem J (2000) 348:591–6. doi:10.1042/bj3480591
59. Nishio, H, Yaguchi, T, Sugiyama, J, Sumimoto, H, Umezawa, K, Iwata, T, et al. Immunosuppression through Constitutively Activated NF-Κb Signalling in Human Ovarian Cancer and its Reversal by an NF-Κb Inhibitor. Br J Cancer (2014) 110(12):2965–74. doi:10.1038/bjc.2014.251
60. Alberti, C, Pinciroli, P, Valeri, B, Ferri, R, Ditto, A, Umezawa, K, et al. Ligand-dependent EGFR Activation Induces the Co-expression of IL-6 and PAI-1 via the NFkB Pathway in Advanced-Stage Epithelial Ovarian Cancer. Oncogene (2012) 31(37):4139–49. doi:10.1038/onc.2011.572
61. Yang, W, Liu, L, Li, C, Luo, N, Chen, R, Li, L, et al. TRIM52 Plays an Oncogenic Role in Ovarian Cancer Associated with NF-kB Pathway. Cell Death Dis (2018) 9(9):908. doi:10.1038/s41419-018-0881-6
62. Rajagopal, C, Lankadasari, MB, Aranjani, JM, and Harikumar, K. Targeting Oncogenic Transcription Factors by Polyphenols: A Novel Approach for Cancer Therapy. Pharmacol Res (2018) 130:273–91. doi:10.1016/j.phrs.2017.12.034
63. Mirzaei, H, Masoudifar, A, Sahebkar, A, Zare, N, Sadri Nahand, J, Rashidi, B, et al. MicroRNA: A Novel Target of Curcumin in Cancer Therapy. J Cel Physiol (2018) 233(4):3004–15. doi:10.1002/jcp.26055
64. Sarwar, S, Amed, T, Qazi, NG, Yu, JQ, and Huq, F. Prospects of Wedelolactone as a Chemotherapeutic Agent in Gynecological Cancers; Clue from its In-Vitro and In-Silico Investigation. Curr Comput Aided Drug Des (2020) 16:365–75. doi:10.2174/1573409915666191015113134
65. Ji, X, Lu, Y, Tian, H, Meng, X, Wei, M, and Cho, WC. Chemoresistance Mechanisms of Breast Cancer and Their Countermeasures. Biomed Pharmacother (2019) 114:108800. doi:10.1016/j.biopha.2019.108800
66. Levin, ER. Extranuclear Estrogen Receptor's Roles in Physiology: Lessons from Mouse Models. Am J Physiology-Endocrinology Metab (2014) 307(2):E133–40. doi:10.1152/ajpendo.00626.2013
67. Tergaonkar, V, Bottero, V, Ikawa, M, Li, Q, and Verma, IM. IκB Kinase-independent IκBα Degradation Pathway: Functional NF-Κb Activity and Implications for Cancer Therapy. Mol Cel Biol (2003) 23(22):8070–83. doi:10.1128/mcb.23.22.8070-8083.2003
68. Li, F, and Sethi, G. Targeting Transcription Factor NF-Κb to Overcome Chemoresistance and Radioresistance in Cancer Therapy. Biochim Biophys Acta (Bba) - Rev Cancer (2010) 1805(2):167–80. doi:10.1016/j.bbcan.2010.01.002
69. Beinke, S, and Ley, SC. Functions of NF-Κb1 and NF-Κb2 in Immune Cell Biology. Biochem J (2004) 382(2):393–409. doi:10.1042/bj20040544
70. Montagut, C, Tusquets, I, Ferrer, B, Corominas, JM, Bellosillo, B, Campas, C, et al. Activation of Nuclear Factor-Kappa B Is Linked to Resistance to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer Patients. Endocr Relat Cancer (2006) 13(2):607–16. doi:10.1677/erc.1.01171
71. Valencia, OM, Samuel, SE, Viscusi, RK, Riall, TS, Neumayer, LA, and Aziz, H. The Role of Genetic Testing in Patients with Breast Cancer: A Review. JAMA Surg (2017) 152(6):589–94. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2017.0552
72. Pruthi, S, Gostout, BS, and Lindor, NM. Identification and Management of Women with BRCA Mutations or Hereditary Predisposition for Breast and Ovarian Cancer. Mayo Clinic Proc (2010) 85(12):1111–20. doi:10.4065/mcp.2010.0414
73. Buckley, NE, Haddock, P, Mullan, P, Irwin, G, Kennedy, R, Parkes, E, et al. A BRCA1 Deficient, NFκB Driven Immune Signal Predicts Good Outcome in Triple Negative Breast Cancer. Oncotarget (2016) 7(15). doi:10.18632/oncotarget.7865
74. Sau, A, Lau, R, Cabrita, M, Nolan, E, Crooks, P, Visvader, J, et al. Persistent Activation of NF-Κb in BRCA1-Deficient Mammary Progenitors Drives Aberrant Proliferation and Accumulation of DNA Damage. Cell Stem Cell (2016) 19(1):52–65. doi:10.1016/j.stem.2016.05.003
75. Martinez-Outschoorn, UE, Balliet, RM, Lin, Z, Whitaker-Menezes, D, Howell, A, Sotgia, F, et al. Hereditary Ovarian Cancer and Two-Compartment Tumor Metabolism: Epithelial Loss of BRCA1 Induces Hydrogen Peroxide Production, Driving Oxidative Stress and NFkappaB Activation in the Tumor Stroma. Cell Cycle (2012) 11(22):4152–66. doi:10.4161/cc.22226
76. Bubici, C, Papa, S, Dean, K, and Franzoso, G. Mutual Cross-Talk between Reactive Oxygen Species and Nuclear Factor-Kappa B: Molecular Basis and Biological Significance. Oncogene (2006) 25(51):6731–48. doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1209936
77. Harte, MT, Gorski, JJ, Savage, KI, Purcell, JW, Barros, EM, Burn, PM, et al. NF-κB Is a Critical Mediator of BRCA1-Induced Chemoresistance. Oncogene (2014) 33(6):713–23. doi:10.1038/onc.2013.10
78. Yi, YW, Kang, HJ, and Bae, I. BRCA1 and Oxidative Stress. Cancers (2014) 6:771–95. doi:10.3390/cancers6020771
79. Casas, A, Llombart, A, and Martin, M. Denosumab for the Treatment of Bone Metastases in Advanced Breast Cancer. The Breast (2013) 22(5):585–92. doi:10.1016/j.breast.2013.05.007
80. Coleman, R, Finkelstein, DM, Barrios, C, Martin, M, Iwata, H, Hegg, R, et al. Adjuvant Denosumab in Early Breast Cancer (D-CARE): an International, Multicentre, Randomised, Controlled, Phase 3 Trial. Lancet Oncol (2020) 21(1):60–72. doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(19)30687-4
81. Gnant, M, Pfeiler, G, Steger, GG, Egle, D, Greil, R, Fitzal, F, et al. Adjuvant Denosumab in Postmenopausal Patients with Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer (ABCSG-18): Disease-free Survival Results from a Randomised, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase 3 Trial. Lancet Oncol (2019) 20(3):339–51. doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(18)30862-3
82. Tiffon, C, Adams, J, van der Fits, L, Wen, S, Townsend, P, Ganesan, A, et al. The Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors Vorinostat and Romidepsin Downmodulate IL-10 Expression in Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma Cells. Br J Pharmacol (2011) 162(7):1590–602. doi:10.1111/j.1476-5381.2010.01188.x
83. Domingo-Domenech, J, Pippa, R, Tapia, M, Gascon, P, Bachs, O, and Bosch, M. Inactivation of NF-Κb by Proteasome Inhibition Contributes to Increased Apoptosis Induced by Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors in Human Breast Cancer Cells. Breast Cancer Res Treat (2008) 112(1):53–62. doi:10.1007/s10549-007-9837-8
84. Turner, JG, Kashyap, T, Dawson, JL, Gomez, J, Bauer, AA, Grant, S, et al. XPO1 Inhibitor Combination Therapy with Bortezomib or Carfilzomib Induces Nuclear Localization of IκBα and Overcomes Acquired Proteasome Inhibitor Resistance in Human Multiple Myeloma. Oncotarget (2016) 7(48):78896–909. doi:10.18632/oncotarget.12969
85. Yang, CH, Gonzalez-Angulo, A, Reuben, J, Booser, D, Pusztai, L, Krishnamurthy, S, et al. Bortezomib (VELCADE) in Metastatic Breast Cancer: Pharmacodynamics, Biological Effects, and Prediction of Clinical Benefits. Ann Oncol (2006) 17(5):813–7. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdj131
86. Nemunaitis, J, Barve, M, Orr, D, Kuhn, J, Magee, M, Lamont, J, et al. Summary of Bi-shRNAfurin/GM-CSF Augmented Autologous Tumor Cell Immunotherapy (FANG™) in Advanced Cancer of the Liver. Oncology (2014) 87(1):21–9. doi:10.1159/000360993
87. Barve, M, Kuhn, J, Lamont, J, Beitsch, P, Manning, L, O. Pappen, B, et al. Follow-up of Bi-shRNA Furin/GM-CSF Engineered Autologous Tumor Cell (EATC) Immunotherapy Vigil∗ in Patients with Advanced Melanoma. Biomed Genet Genomics (2016) 1(4). doi:10.15761/bgg.1000116
88. Ghisoli, M, Barve, M, Mennel, R, Lenarsky, C, Horvath, S, Wallraven, G, et al. Three-year Follow up of GMCSF/bi-shRNA(furin) DNA-Transfected Autologous Tumor Immunotherapy (Vigil) in Metastatic Advanced Ewing's Sarcoma. Mol Ther (2016) 24(8):1478–83. doi:10.1038/mt.2016.86
89. Ghisoli, M, Barve, M, Schneider, R, Mennel, R, Lenarsky, C, Wallraven, G, et al. Pilot Trial of FANG Immunotherapy in Ewing's Sarcoma. Mol Ther (2015) 23(6):1103–9. doi:10.1038/mt.2015.43
90. Oh, J, Barve, M, Senzer, N, Aaron, P, Manning, L, Wallraven, G, et al. Long-term Follow-Up of Phase 2A Trial Results Involving Advanced Ovarian Cancer Patients Treated with Vigil∗ in Frontline Maintenance. Gynecol Oncol Rep (2020) 34:100648. doi:10.1016/j.gore.2020.100648
91. Senzer, N, Barve, M, Kuhn, J, Melnyk, A, Beitsch, P, Lazar, M, et al. Phase I Trial of "Bi-shRNAi(furin)/GMCSF DNA/autologous Tumor Cell" Vaccine (FANG) in Advanced Cancer. Mol Ther (2012) 20(3):679–86. doi:10.1038/mt.2011.269
92. Senzer, N, Barve, M, Kuhn, J, Melnyk, A, Rao, D, Pappen, B, et al. Long Term Follow up: Phase I Trial of “Bi-shRNA Furin/GMCSF DNA/Autologous Tumor Cell” Immunotherapy (FANG™) in Advanced Cancer. J Vaccin Vaccination (2013) 4(8):209.
93. Rocconi, RP, Grosen, EA, Ghamande, SA, Chan, JK, Barve, MA, Oh, J, et al. Gemogenovatucel-T (Vigil) Immunotherapy as Maintenance in Frontline Stage III/IV Ovarian Cancer (VITAL): a Randomised, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase 2b Trial. Lancet Oncol (2020) 21(12):1661–72. doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(20)30533-7
94. Oh, J, Barve, M, Matthews, CM, Koon, EC, Heffernan, TP, Fine, B, et al. Phase II Study of Vigil® DNA Engineered Immunotherapy as Maintenance in Advanced Stage Ovarian Cancer. Gynecol Oncol (2016) 143(3):504–10. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.09.018
95. Grinberg-Bleyer, Y, Oh, H, Desrichard, A, Bhatt, DM, Caron, R, Chan, TA, et al. NF-κB C-Rel Is Crucial for the Regulatory T Cell Immune Checkpoint in Cancer. Cell (2017) 170(6):1096–108 e13. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2017.08.004
96. Wang, X, Yang, L, Huang, F, Zhang, Q, Liu, S, Ma, L, et al. Inflammatory Cytokines IL-17 and TNF-Alpha Up-Regulate PD-L1 Expression in Human Prostate and colon Cancer Cells. Immunol Lett (2017) 184:7–14. doi:10.1016/j.imlet.2017.02.006
97. Garcia-Diaz, A, Shin, DS, Moreno, BH, Saco, J, Escuin-Ordinas, H, Rodriguez, GA, et al. Interferon Receptor Signaling Pathways Regulating PD-L1 and PD-L2 Expression. Cel Rep (2017) 19(6):1189–201. doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2017.04.031
98. Li, N, Wang, J, Zhang, N, Zhuang, M, Zong, Z, Zou, J, et al. Cross-talk between TNF-Alpha and IFN-Gamma Signaling in Induction of B7-H1 Expression in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cells. Cancer Immunol Immunother (2018) 67(2):271–83. doi:10.1007/s00262-017-2086-8
99. Imai, D, Yoshizumi, T, Okano, S, Itoh, S, Ikegami, T, Harada, N, et al. IFN-Gamma Promotes Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition and the Expression of PD-L1 in Pancreatic Cancer. J Surg Res (2019) 240:115–23. doi:10.1016/j.jss.2019.02.038
100. Lee, SK, Seo, S, Kim, B, Kim, C, Lee, J, Kang, J, et al. IFN-Gamma Regulates the Expression of B7-H1 in Dermal Fibroblast Cells. J Dermatol Sci (2005) 40(2):95–103. doi:10.1016/j.jdermsci.2005.06.008
101. Zou, Y, Uddin, MM, Padmanabhan, S, Zhu, Y, Bu, P, Vancura, A, et al. The Proto-Oncogene Bcl3 Induces Immune Checkpoint PD-L1 Expression, Mediating Proliferation of Ovarian Cancer Cells. J Biol Chem (2018) 293(40):15483–96. doi:10.1074/jbc.ra118.004084
102. Farahmand, L, Merikhian, P, Jalili, N, Darvishi, B, and Majidzadeh-A, K. Significant Role of MUC1 in Development of Resistance to Currently Existing Anti-cancer Therapeutic Agents. Curr Cancer Drug Targets (2018) 18(8):737–48. doi:10.2174/1568009617666170623113520
103. Maeda, T, Hiraki, M, Jin, C, Rajabi, H, Tagde, A, Alam, M, et al. MUC1-C Induces PD-L1 and Immune Evasion in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. Cancer Res (2018) 78(1):205–15. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-17-1636
104. Asgarova, A, Asgarov, K, Godet, Y, Peixoto, P, Nadaradjane, A, Boyer-Guittaut, M, et al. PD-L1 Expression Is Regulated by Both DNA Methylation and NF-kB during EMT Signaling in Non-small Cell Lung Carcinoma. Oncoimmunology (2018) 7(5):e1423170. doi:10.1080/2162402x.2017.1423170
105. Fang, W, Zhang, J, Hong, S, Zhan, J, Chen, N, Qin, T, et al. EBV-Driven LMP1 and IFN-Gamma Up-Regulate PD-L1 in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: Implications for Oncotargeted Therapy. Oncotarget (2014) 5(23):12189–202. doi:10.18632/oncotarget.2608
106. Permata, TBM, Hagiwara, Y, Sato, H, Yasuhara, T, Oike, T, Gondhowiardjo, S, et al. Base Excision Repair Regulates PD-L1 Expression in Cancer Cells. Oncogene (2019) 38(23):4452–66. doi:10.1038/s41388-019-0733-6
107. Sato, H, Niimi, A, Yasuhara, T, Permata, TBM, Hagiwara, Y, Isono, M, et al. DNA Double-Strand Break Repair Pathway Regulates PD-L1 Expression in Cancer Cells. Nat Commun (2017) 8(1):1751. doi:10.1038/s41467-017-01883-9
108. Gowrishankar, K, Gunatilake, D, Gallagher, SJ, Tiffen, J, Rizos, H, and Hersey, P. Inducible but Not Constitutive Expression of PD-L1 in Human Melanoma Cells Is Dependent on Activation of NF-Κb. PLoS One (2015) 10(4):e0123410. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0123410
109. Li, CW, Lim, SO, Xia, W, Lee, HH, Chan, LC, Kuo, CW, et al. Glycosylation and Stabilization of Programmed Death Ligand-1 Suppresses T-Cell Activity. Nat Commun (2016) 7:12632. doi:10.1038/ncomms12632
110. Lim, SO, Li, CW, Xia, W, Cha, JH, Chan, LC, Wu, Y, et al. Deubiquitination and Stabilization of PD-L1 by CSN5. Cancer Cell (2016) 30(6):925–39. doi:10.1016/j.ccell.2016.10.010
111. Pan, Y, Wang, S, Su, B, Zhou, F, Zhang, R, Xu, T, et al. Stat3 Contributes to Cancer Progression by Regulating Jab1/Csn5 Expression. Oncogene (2017) 36(8):1069–79. doi:10.1038/onc.2016.271
112. Liu, C, Yao, Z, Wang, J, Zhang, W, Yang, Y, Zhang, Y, et al. Macrophage-derived CCL5 Facilitates Immune Escape of Colorectal Cancer Cells via the p65/STAT3-CSN5-PD-L1 Pathway. Cell Death Differ (2020) 27(6):1765–81. doi:10.1038/s41418-019-0460-0
113. Ahern, E, Cubitt, A, Ballard, E, Teng, MWL, Dougall, WC, Smyth, MJ, et al. Pharmacodynamics of Pre-operative PD1 Checkpoint Blockade and Receptor Activator of NFkB Ligand (RANKL) Inhibition in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC): Study Protocol for a Multicentre, Open-Label, Phase 1B/2, Translational Trial (POPCORN). Trials (2019) 20(1):753. doi:10.1186/s13063-019-3951-x
114. Liede, A, Hernandez, RK, Wade, SW, Bo, R, Nussbaum, NC, Ahern, E, et al. An Observational Study of Concomitant Immunotherapies and Denosumab in Patients with Advanced Melanoma or Lung Cancer. Oncoimmunology (2018) 7(12):e1480301. doi:10.1080/2162402x.2018.1480301
Keywords: ovarian cancer, breast cancer, NFκB, immunotherapy, tumor signaling, inflammatory signaling
Citation: Devanaboyina M, Kaur J, Whiteley E, Lin L, Einloth K, Morand S, Stanbery L, Hamouda D and Nemunaitis J (2022) NF-κB Signaling in Tumor Pathways Focusing on Breast and Ovarian Cancer. Oncol. Rev. 16:10568. doi: 10.3389/or.2022.10568
Received: 13 April 2022; Accepted: 02 August 2022;
Published: 03 October 2022.
Edited by:
Camillo Porta, University of Bari Aldo Moro, ItalyReviewed by:
Carlo Ganini, University of Pavia, ItalyCamillo Porta, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Italy
Copyright © 2022 Devanaboyina, Kaur, Whiteley, Lin, Einloth, Morand, Stanbery, Hamouda and Nemunaitis. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: John Nemunaitis, johnnemunaitis@gmail.com
